Were the NRL’s $350,000 concussion fines fair?

Allistar Twigg Roar Rookie

By Allistar Twigg, Allistar Twigg is a Roar Rookie


4 Have your say

    The NRL recently imposed significant fines on three separate NRL clubs who, it said, had breached the game’s head injury rules in Round 3.

    The clubs and their penalties were:

    • Gold Coast Titans – $150,000 ($100,000 suspended) for incidents involving Kane Elgey and Ryan Simpkins
    • St George Illawarra Dragons – $100,000 ($50,000 suspended) for an incident involving Josh Dugan
    • Newcastle Knights – $100,000 ($50,000 suspended) for an incident involving Brendan Elliot.

    Under the NRL’s concussion guidelines, the burden of diagnosing concussion and treating players is placed squarely on the clubs. That was the basis for the imposition of these fines.

    Reviewing the Elliot and Dugan incidents online, it is clear that there was significant head trauma in each case.

    Elliot’s head was caught by a swinging arm from the tackler and fans in the stand on that side saw it and reacted loudly. Elliot did not get up after the tackle, the slow-motion replays showed significant force applied to his head, and he did not protect himself as he fell.

    But Elliot was not subjected to a head injury assessment (HIA) and wasn’t removed from the field. How did the Knights miss what everyone else saw?

    Similarly, Dugan was felled by a teammate’s accidental elbow. Replays showed that his head suffered the application of significant force, that he also failed to protect himself as he fell, and then lay prostrate and inert for a couple of seconds before apparently rousing himself.

    According to the club, “At no stage did he present any symptoms relating to concussion”, so he wasn’t subjected to an HIA and wasn’t removed from the field.

    Those at home saw both of these incidents, replayed in HD slow-mo. People at the ground saw them on the big screen. How were these players allowed to stay on? Everybody seemed to know except those responsible for implementing the concussion guidelines.

    When the NRL strengthened its concussion policy in April 2015, it said that “players must not return to the field if they exhibit any of the following signs… [including] falling to the ground without taking protective action”.

    So who is really responsible here? Where does the rubber hit the road when the head is subjected to trauma?

    Josh Dugan NRL rugby league concussion

    AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts

    Concussion assessment
    The job of first assessor usually falls to a team’s trainer. The trainer’s first job is to attend to any immediate first aid needs, and then to observe for signs of concussion in a player: things like loss of consciousness, falling without taking protective action, seizure or tonic posturing, balance disturbance.

    According to NRL CEO Todd Greenberg, “if players exhibit these signs it is compulsory that they are removed from the field and do not return.”

    Next the trainer/first assessor (if s/he is aware of a head knock) will also check for memory impairment by asking questions like:

    • What ground are we at today?
    • Which half is it now?
    • Who scored last?
    • Did your team win the last game?

    Inappropriate responses necessitate immediate removal from the field of play.

    But trainers in NRL premiership games are under unspoken pressure to get the game back underway again and are usually dependent on player feedback to enable them to make a critical decision.

    The NRL is also presently trialling a system which allows a team doctor to listen, via a wireless earpiece connected to the trainer, to hear the trainer talk to a player who may be injured or concussed.

    The team doctor also has access to TV replays (separate to what’s being broadcast or on the ground’s big screen) and the ability to replay an incident on the sideline to see if a player is injured or concussed.

    How do the trainer and doctor know there’s been a head knock?
    This really is a key issue and is vital to the NRL’s and club’s duties of care.

    Who lets the trainer and the team doctor know that there’s been a potential concussion occurrence that they need to look at? If the incidents for which the clubs got fined are anything to go by, it would seem nobody.

    The trainer is probably the busiest person on the ground. Always running around, on and off the field, attending to players when they get knocked around – and, being a collision sport, rugby league players do suffer a lot of knocks. The trainer also seems to be continually getting instructions from others. They don’t have time to look at the big screen, the trainer usually doesn’t hear the roar of the crowd. The trainer is focused on what they are doing.

    Likewise, the team doctor is also very busy during a game. He or she is not kicking back up in the hospitality suites enjoying a cold chardonnay and one of those tiny smoked salmon sandwiches. The team doctor’s attention is focused on the many and varied jobs associated with keeping the team’s 17 players on the field for the duration of the match.

    Indeed, when the NRL first gave the Titans notice to show cause why they shouldn’t be fined $150,000, they talked about fighting the fine – arguably with good reason. When Elgey went down, they argued that, by the time the trainer attended to him, he was not showing any symptoms of concussion. Further, they said, the team doctor was not able to review the incident because he was already busy performing an HIA in the dressing rooms on another player.

    So how do the trainer and doctor get to know that there has been a potential concussion incident? It’s not the referees’ or touch judges’ job to tell them. There’s no communication lines from the television commentators to the trainer and doctor, although the commentators usually have a lot to say about it. Nor is there any real instant connection from coach to trainer or doctor.

    And even if there were a way to communicate the possibility of head trauma to trainer and doctor, given their on-going responsibilities during the game, there’s no guarantee of immediate decision-making by either.

    Usually, the trainer doesn’t have time to look up at the big screen and wait for a replay to be shown. And the doctor may be incommunicado in the sheds stitching someone up or attending to some other urgent problem.

    So what we have here is a communication problem.

    It’s not at all unlikely that all the world may know about a possible concussion except for the two people who are required to make the critical decisions.

    This needs to be addressed. It is unfair of the NRL to simply load up the clubs and trainers and doctors with responsibilities and not address the gaps in the system.

    What needs to change?
    Both the NRL and the clubs need to cooperate to satisfy their respective duties of care to the players.

    First, someone in the NRL Bunker with immediate access to video replay technology needs to be delegated the responsibility of observing for head knocks. The Bunker delegate should be someone with some medical training – perhaps a sports doctor. But really, you don’t need to be a brain surgeon to see when a player has suffered a potential concussion.

    Secondly, once an actual or possible head knock is observed by the Bunker delegate – at any time, even if it is significantly after it has occurred – this delegate is to immediately notify a nominated sideline game day official (NRL, not a club official – there are good reasons why club staff should not have their mobiles with them).

    It is imperative that the delegate have immediate communication with this sideline official, who needs an access-all-areas pass.

    Finally, once notified by the delegate, this sideline official has the job of immediately finding and personally notifying the relevant team doctor of the possible concussion. I say the team doctor because, by the time the message is conveyed, it is probably time for the team doctor to act.

    It may be a little clunky, but it may save teams another $350,000. And it also just may save a player from serious damage.

    Allistar Twigg heads the Snedden Hall & Gallop Sports Law team. He provides advice on legal, administration and governance issues which are uniquely sporting related.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (4)

    • Roar Guru

      May 15th 2017 @ 11:00am
      Magnus M. Østergaard said | May 15th 2017 @ 11:00am | ! Report

      Nice overall analysis Allistar, however I am completely fine with the current system. With the fines the clubs have cleaned up their act and often check even in the littlest of cases. For example yesterday one of the Saifiti twins copped a high tackle and while the penalty was given and the team took the kick for the sideline you could see the trainer run through the 4 questions which he obviously answered fine. Play wasnt slowed down and there were no issues.

      • May 15th 2017 @ 2:33pm
        kk said | May 15th 2017 @ 2:33pm | ! Report

        Agreed 100%, VH

    • May 15th 2017 @ 6:07pm
      Zedman said | May 15th 2017 @ 6:07pm | ! Report

      Could be wrong but i thought a replay of the incident that caused the HIA is available to the doctor assessing.

    • Roar Rookie

      May 19th 2017 @ 10:33am
      Allistar Twigg said | May 19th 2017 @ 10:33am | ! Report

      Hi Zedman, that is true — once the doctor knows a head knock has occurred, they have access to their own video replay technology on the sideline to enable review and assessment of the incident. But the point of the article is that there is no certainty that the trainer and/or the doctor will actually find out about possible head knocks before the match is over, and that this is a gap in the concussion protocols which has consequences for the duties of care which the NRL and the clubs owe to the players. At the moment, the concussion guidelines don’t provide for and don’t make it anyone’s responsibility to let the first assessor (the trainer) and the second assessor (the club doctor) know of a head knock. The NRL and clubs should move to close this gap.

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.