West Coast’s day of reckoning is rapidly approaching – and the Eagles know it

By Ryan Buckland / Expert

The Eagles are built to win more than they lose right now. They are winning more than they are losing – just. It is four minutes to midnight, and West Coast have to win more, and lose less, before it is too late.

West Coast’s comfortable, contending reality was shaken at around 8:15pm on August 19, 2016. Nic Naitanui, the league’s most unique and dominant ruckman, and one of the single most influential players in the competition, landed awkwardly but innocuously on his left knee in a marking contest on the Subiaco Oval turf.

He knew, the crowd knew, the competition knew. Everything changed.

For a player who had been relentlessly criticised as a one-dimensional non-factor for so much of his career, the tide of acknowledgement and respect had finally come all the way in. With it, and with their own freshly minted Alastair Clarkson Coaching Academy graduate Adam Simpson, West Coast graduated from interesting possibility to regular contender.

The tide went out just as quickly. Opting for a traditional knee reconstruction, Naitanui has been touted as a probable 2017 starter for much of the year. A journey to a specialist in the United States, spun as a sign of the extents the Eagles were prepared to go to in order to bring back their superstar, looms as a white flag.

West Coast are a flawed football team. They have been caught flat footed by the league’s pace and space revolution. 2017 is littered with the carcasses of teams that held on a little too long; the Eagles are not there yet, but a growing litany of signs suggest it is one fork in their aspirational road.

AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts

Beware the blue pill
We’ve covered this ground a lot in recent years, but when it comes to West Coast’s prospects it pays to repeat: North Melbourne made a series of defensible moves which resulted in their list falling into disrepair.

The Roos were a good team, full of good to very good players that played football at a good to very good level. After doubling down on their good-to-very-good-ness in 2015 and 2016, North hit the halfway point of last season like a pigeon hitting a plain glass window. It did not end well.

They were forced to awkwardly jettison four celebrated veterans, delist some other players, and pivot to youth. Plenty of teams have done this, but the Roos are doing so from a position of relative weakness – they have no superstar youngster or youngsters in waiting, their middle age players look a lot like 20 possession jobbers, the top end of their list is devoid of experience.

North Melbourne’s rebuild job will be multi-year in nature, and particularly challenging given the head start many other teams built over the past three years.

Closer to home for West Coast is Fremantle, who made it to the last game of the season once in a run of five finals appearances between 2010 and 2015 (which included three straight top-four, 16-win seasons). The Dockers also got old in critical places, and are now on a significant youth movement – which they bizarrely decided to rotate to after consecutive pastings in the first three rounds of this season – that already looks to be paying reasonable dividends.

Football history shows that which takes a long time to can be torn down in six months or less. It pays to be alert to team demographics, as the Sydney Swans – who rebuilt their second-oldest, third-most-experienced 2012 list in three years while still contending – show. Don’t choose the blue pill.

West Coast are moving precariously close to the precipice many have tipped over before them.

As ESPN’s Matt Cowgill showed last month, West Coast’s best 22 demographics are skewing old – like, really old. At the time, the Eagles had filled just 20 per cent of available playing spots with players aged 24 or younger, which is less than half the AFL average (43.8 per cent).

The Eagles don’t skew ancient, but have transparently committed to a core of players that is ageing together. More broadly, West Coast has the oldest list in the competition, with an average age of 25 years flat on their full list, and 24.7 when the rookie list is taken into account.

Those numbers were boosted by the Eagles’ signing 34-year-olds Sam Mitchell and Drew Petrie in the off season, who instantly became the two oldest players on the list.

This is fine, for now, if West Coast are winning. The last part of that equation has become more challenging of late.

AAP Image/Julian Smith

The West is too slow
Since making the 2015 grand final, on the back of a tactical defensive innovation which I call the man-zone defence (others call it the Weagles Web, which is a tyre fire of a moniker), big things have been expected of West Coast.

Coach Adam Simpson had his charges playing a Hawthorn-like skill-based style, with tweaks associated with having a generational ruckman in Naitanui and a group of defenders that are highly capable marks. The Eagles played quickly, using long kicks and bursts from stoppages to move the ball into their half of the ground and lock it in with pressure; when they didn’t have the ball they were able to set up their trapping zone quickly to cut off opposition attacks.

Now, everyone worth their salt plays a trapping zone on defence. And the dominant attacking strategy of the competition is built on ground pace rather than kicking. This is a uniquely damaging cocktail for the West Coast Eagles – diminishing their advantage on defence, making it more difficult for them to attack with kicking, and scrambling their ability to stop offensive transition from the opposition.

All told, the Eagles are an average football team in 2017. Their scoring has dropped from 99.1 points per game last year (an Offensive Efficiency Rating of +11.7 – really good) to 89.2 points per game this year (OER of -1.2 – meh), ranked ninth in the competition.

Defensively, the drop-off has been more stark, with West Coast’s points per game conceded rising from 76.3 (a +14.1 Defensive Efficiency Rating, ranked fifth) to 87.0 (+3.6 on DER, ranked eighth). In net margin terms, it is a drop off of more than 20 points – the third-largest fall in the competition, behind Sydney (-28.9) and Hawthorn (-31.4).

Their 8-6 record overstates their abilities by about half a win. West Coast has also been involved in seven close games – a league high – and have won three of them. As an aside that 3-4 record in close games is likely to explain the difference between the Eagles’ Pythagorean wins and actual wins.

What’s changed? The ground game, an area of football the Eagles haven’t been renowned for in their current list build.

Last season, West Coast’s games had an average of 206 adjusted contested possessions (contested possessions less contested marks and free kicks – a proxy measure for ground ball gets and contested knock ons) per game, and the Eagles tended to lose the battle by 1.3. This season, that’s increased to 229 per game, and West Coast have lost the count by 12.6 – the worst mark in the league.

It gets worse: the Eagles have a disastrous -22.5 differential in losses.

There are no two ways about it: the Eagles get shredded on the deck.

Make of that what you will. They’re ‘soft’. They ‘don’t work hard enough’. They’re ‘flat-track bullies’.

I interpret it mostly as a lack of pace, as well as a diminished ability to both attack and defend from stoppages.

It means the Eagles aren’t able to generate the kinds of scoring opportunities they had done in recent times. West Coast’s league-leading inside 50 differential of +11.5 from their 2015 grand final year fell to +4.3 in 2016 and just +1.1 in 2017. The quality of those entries has fallen away too – for instance, the Eagles are getting just 11.8 marks inside 50 per game this season, down from 13.8 in 2016. Similarly, shot quality indicators (scores per inside 50 and share of scores that are goals) are down on their recent peak.

Naitanui’s absence is clearly at play, as is Scott Lycett’s absence. The fact that West Coast’s ruckman recycle gambit hasn’t blown up in their face is something of a minor miracle.

Still, the Eagles have done from one of the most dominant ruck units to one of the meekest. Fascinatingly, the Eagles have essentially fluctuated around a clearance differential of zero per game for the past three years (+0.9 in 2015, -1.2 in 2016 and -1.9 in 2017). One assumes advanced statistics would show the Eagles perform better on an output metric – like scores for and against from clearances – with their first choice pairing compared to without him.

This is not the only factor; Matt Priddis’ decline from sentient clearance machine to 31-year-old with plenty of miles on the clock is a relative hindrance (albeit he remains a very good player). West Coast’s depth midfielders – Mark Hutchings, Chris Masten, Jack Redden – don’t provide much above average. Sam Mitchell does his best work when he’s a disposal outside of the maelstrom rather than dishing the dimes.

West Coast have always had issues against teams that hit them between the eyes. Their loss to the Western Bulldogs in last year’s elimination final bought two years’ worth of issues to the surface; this year, even middling pressure teams have given the Eagles trouble.

They have laid 1.33 tackles per minute of opposition possession this season, ranked 12th and the lowest mark of any current top eight team except Greater Western Sydney.

[latest_videos_strip category=”afl” name=”AFL”]

Saving one bird with two stones
Getting old and moving nowhere fast – not an ideal way to be discussing a pre-season contender with eight rounds to go.

There has been a noticeable shift in West Coast’s tactical hierarchy in recent weeks. The Eagles are more content to push the pace of the game, and are less worried about executing the perfect structural plays that we have come to know them for.

That clip was the culmination of a minute-long transition play which began with a kick out to the exact spot Jetta has the ball. Elliot Yeo took a strong contested mark and the Eagles looked to break away quickly; being that they were playing the Dogs, that was impossible.

West Coast instead slowed the pace of the game down, kicked backwards, shifted the Dogs’ zone and tried again. The result speaks for itself. The Eagles have been trying to play this precision football for most of the year.

In recent weeks, it has become the exception rather than the rule. West Coast are attempting to lift the pace of the game, running the wings and flanks and worrying less about stopping play. The Eagles have recorded their three lowest field mark totals for the season in their past three games; the average of 65 in that stretch about 25 lower than their average from Round 1 through Round 11.

They had a near-death experience in Round 12, falling out of the eight for the first time since Round 3, 2015. Coincidentally – or not – that flirtation with finals irrelevance came after season-ending injuries to key defenders Mitch Brown and Eric McKenzie (which necessitated the development of the man-zone scheme), and a seemingly serious elbow injury to key forward Josh Kennedy. That was supposed to be the death knell for West Coast then, too. As then, it may have spurred coach Adam Simpson on to a shift in playing style.

Kennedy is injured again now, a calf injury that sounded suspiciously like an Achilles tendon injury at the time and turns out to be a combination of the two keeping him out since Round 10. He is on a long but mostly short-term West Coast injury list, which includes veterans Sam Butler, Mark LeCras, Priddis and captain Shannon Hurn.

All have missed various chunks of time, as have 2015-16 regulars Hutchings, Masten, Sharrod Wellingham, Josh Hill, and Jamie Cripps. Recent trade-ins Lewis Jetta and Jack Redden have also struggled to stay in the team consistently, albeit Jetta has played some of his best football as an Eagle in the past six weeks.

In their stead, West Coast have relied upon last year’s exchange period acquisitions: Mitchell, Vardy, and Drew Petrie, who looks far from the moribund mummy he impersonated in his final season at North Melbourne. But critically, the Eagles have turned to their youth.

Dom Sheed, the 2015 Rising Star runner-up, has played 11 games this season after missing much of 2016 with a hip complaint. Liam Duggan looked assured at AFL level after flashing some brilliant ground ball and kicking abilities in 2015 and 2016. Tom Barrass, an experiment at the end of last year, has emerged as a ready-made and reliable key defender in spite of what history says about the development trajectory of young key position players.

Injuries and form lapses have opened up opportunities for other younger players: Jackson Nelson (eight games), Kurt Murtimer (four), Malcolm Karpany and Tom Cole (three each). The quartet are in their 21 and younger season, and represent the future. All have shown glimpses of potential, albeit in relatively minor roles – bar Nelson, who has played patches as West Coast’s primary rebounding defender.

Cole and Karpany travelled east in what became West Coast’s youngest line up of the year to date. It may have been forced due to injury, but, equally, I suspect it is recognition that the team of year’s passed needed a shake up. Whether that is recognition that this year is now beyond West Coast’s grasp is an open question – particularly given the increasingly unlikely return of Naitanui to senior football in 2017.

This week, the West Australian reported that as many as seven of West Coast’s injured players could come in to their winning Round 15 line up. That quantum would be a mistake. The Eagles know what they have with Will Schofield, Josh Hill, Mark LeCras and dare I say it Matt Priddis. It’s time to give the new guard a run at making it work.

West Coast’s fixture is amenable to this selection policy. After hosting Port Adelaide this weekend, the Eagles have a four-week stretch of middling-to-poor teams: Collingwood (away, at Etihad Stadium), Brisbane (home), St Kilda (away) and Carlton (home).

Their final two rounds project as tougher: a near-full strength (whatever that means this year) GWS away and the Adelaide Crows at home. There is enough latitude in the next month to suck it and see.

It will create a decision gate on a number of West Coast’s veterans: Butler, LeCras and Wellingham (who while only 29 has a chequered, mostly self-inflicted injury history) remain unsigned beyond this season. The status of Josh Hill is unclear – the notoriously cagey Eagles did not provide a contract date for Hill upon his re-signing in 2015. Drew Petrie and Sam Mitchell’s decisions also loom large, albeit the former is almost certainly not in West Coast’s long term plans.

Can the Eagles continue to push games into their younger players, modify their tactics, and contend in 2017? That may be a bridge too far. But by recognising the need to continuously work at the state of their list, while being aware of the realities of the situation they find themselves in, the Eagles have an opportunity to avoid the pitfalls of ageing teams who’ve come before them.

West Coast’s day of reckoning is rapidly approaching. Fortunately, they know it.

The Crowd Says:

2017-07-08T11:57:01+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


999 Brad Hardie rumours come to nothing...and he has started many thousands of them. 6PR moved Hardie out of his position into occasional weekend holiday cover for good reason. His opinions are always a mile off the mark.

2017-07-08T04:10:16+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


Sure you listened to 6pr and brad being quite vocal that freo is chasing Mitch.

2017-07-08T00:28:22+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


Freo needs no one? This is the club that threw massive dollars at Travis Cloke once. Every team in the afl can always improve their list.

2017-07-07T13:28:53+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Ballas has been very productive in both games this season (he actually kicks goals). More so than McGovern today. Mitch does have a consistency problem and a massive fitness issue. Balic is playing his first game after missing 5 games caring for his mother. You don't bring him back without any footy. Is Jon really suggesting Langdon should come straight back after injury after criticising Freo for bringing Sandi and Ballas straight back? Not at all sure he knows what he is arguing.

2017-07-07T13:22:59+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Do you really think that broken ribs is "breaking down"? Sandi has played 250 games after being a rookie. That is a wonderfully resilient player. Are you aware how many games your new messiah, Mitch McGovern, has missed?

2017-07-07T13:01:28+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


You don't know Freo players, though. If you ever look at Freo's squad, you'd get it. Just because Mitch plays well doesn't mean he is better than Freo's players. It just means he played well. I'm not sure, however, that 18 possessions and no score at all suggests he played well, especially in such a one sided win.

2017-07-07T12:47:03+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


FREO DON - Your quote''Mitch McGovern may not get regular footy at Freo'' makes you look rather silly watching him play friday night

2017-07-07T10:16:03+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


These boys (Pearce and Apeness) have shown great ability. Everybody that follows footy knows how many games they have played. That makes no point. When they are fit, they will play again and are better than McGovern. Remember, Mitch is not Jeremy and Mitch has also missed much with injury this season. Why is his injury record more acceptable? I mention The Freo big-bodied utilities because Mitch is a big bodied utility...except all the Freo boys mentioned are better. Would I take Mitch? Yep. Do we need Mitch? nope. Mitch may not get regular footy at Freo. Freo needs no one. All we need is fitness. Freo just needs to improve yearly through the draft. Our young squad has probably the most potent potential in the league.

2017-07-07T07:43:03+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


Nat Fyfe is playing great footy and showing great leadership but is long way off his 2015 Form (broken leg) That is my point A Pearce M Apeness and H Bennell Future is unknown Current History is not Good That it why you should not be going forward with old injury prone men like Sandilands and Ballantyne

2017-07-07T07:13:02+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


Don -You come up with some interesting stuff at times but that is absolute Rubbish but you rightly have a opinion! Apeness has played just 7 games in 4 years unfortunately has had multiple injuries he is not proven even at WAFL level that he will become a good AFL Player, Alex Pearce 21 games in 3 Years has shown he could hold down a key roll in defence But the poor kid has broken his leg not Once but Twice ,,,,You like me would know players with this injury Rarely are they the same again You are putting to a high a expectation on these two Kids

2017-07-07T06:27:43+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


Naming a load of established midfield talent makes no sense. Pearce and apeness are injured and no guarantees to be reliable goal kickers. Other ones aren't established on a team supposedly rebuilding so they must gave some question marks about them. But cmon don saying freo couldn't use a young 191cm forward with good hands and great goal kicking is ah pretty ridiculous. If freo don't grab him would love to welcome him to west coast.

2017-07-07T06:17:42+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


Alright Don to target Mitch McGovern would be foolish because Fremantle's fwd line is functional...

2017-07-07T04:30:51+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Exactly...so explain why Freo needs McGovern. We have Fyfe, Mundy, Blakely, Bennell, Balic, Alex Pearce, Michael Apeness...all better than Mitch McGovern. Add Hughes, Ryan, Nyhuis...all big bodied, fast and skilled.

2017-07-07T02:36:43+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


Right about size matti ,,, Bulldogs premiers good example The forwards spend just as much time in the backline these days

2017-07-07T02:19:53+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


Jon - from what I can tell your issue is the selection when fit of ballantyne & sandilands as best 18 players nothing more, your points about McGovern are spot on and no one on freos list has shown the consistency he has at Adelaide. The size issue means zero! Remember how sheedy would send fletcher to Phil matera as he was best guy for job or how in 2013 freo fwd line was based around 1 tall(pav) and 2 smalls(Walters & ballantyne). McGovern is great on the lead and in the pack and has the sure hands his brothers got.

2017-07-07T01:35:42+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


Very Sad,,,Suban and especially Ballantyne playing at the expense of Langdon and Balic who are playing at Peel on Saturday

2017-07-07T01:21:26+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


I did say 4 weeks ago that Sandi will break down again,,,,,Ballantyne WILL break down Again ! Sandi 9 games in 2 Years! Next year maybe 4-5 Hoping the big fella might do the right thing and give it away make room on the list for a young bloke,,Keep the money and be the ruck coach

2017-07-07T00:56:45+00:00

Jon boy

Guest


Point1-M,McGovern is BETTER than anyone we have got now,,,,,Point 2 Is the best that is Possibly Available Point 3 Probably the only one that might like to play For Freo,,,,,, Point 4 - History tells you that NO ONE Apart from Ex W,A boys are interested in playing for Freo

2017-07-06T23:11:12+00:00

Mattician6x6

Guest


If we apply that thinking Josh Gibson, Adam Hunter, Antoni Grover, ablett snr even Robbie Haddril should never been a chance to play a key position.

2017-07-06T15:05:16+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


This is footy. Crozier will not be CHF. Don't you realise that a journalist places the list? Ballantyne will be in a pocket. Cox will be CHF. A very good chance for Logue to play FF. I expect Kersten to not make the 22. By the way, you don't think Mitch McGovern is a key forward do you? Jeremy is but Mitch is shorter than Mundy and barely taller than Blakely. He is almost as light as Crozier.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar