Lions series reflections: The day of the Faz

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

At the Allianz stadium in North London, home of European champion club Saracens, the core of the faithful have a unique way of assisting attempts on goal by their own kickers.

They close their eyes, extend their arms in mock supplication and look to inspire with ‘spirit fingers’ tingling towards the ball.

Typically, their head-wear of preference is the fez.

It is doubtful whether this concentration of psychic energy has ever really helped Owen Farrell boot a goal over the back dot. But the influence of Saracens as a club on Owen’s father, the British and Irish Lions defensive mastermind Andy Farrell, is much less open to speculation.

It is where ‘Big Faz’ first cut his teeth as both a rugby union player and coach. After a long and distinguished career in league, during which he became the youngest-ever Great Britain captain and twice won the coveted Man of Steel award as the outstanding player in the UK, he finally crossed the border between the codes in his thirties.

His best years as a player were well behind him, but his frustrations only fed his desire to succeed as a coach. Midway through his spell as defence coach of England in the Stuart Lancaster era (2011-2015) he was shrewdly enlisted as Lions defence coach by Warren Gatland for the tour of Australia.

The Lions won that series and they only conceded four tries over the three Tests in the process of doing it. Wind the clock on another four years, and Faz has managed to pull off the same trick in a much sterner rugby environment Down Under.

New Zealand 2016 (v.all) v.Ireland (2016) v.Lions (2017)
Tries scored (average per game) 5.71 3.5 1.67
Points scored (average per game) 40 25 22

Of the four games (out of 14) in 2016, in which the All Blacks were held to scoring less than 30 points, two of those occurred against Ireland with Farrell as their defence coach.

Against Ireland, New Zealand managed 61 per cent of their average try- and points-scoring expectation over the whole of the year.

With better quality personnel to work with, Farrell went one step further with the 2017 Lions. They allowed seven tries in their six Saturday matches in New Zealand, and only conceded five tries in the three Tests.

New Zealand’s five tries represented less than one-third of their total against the last Gatland-managed team to visit New Zealand, Wales in June 2016. Then, the All Blacks had scored 16 tries in three games against the Welsh rush defence coached by Shaun Edwards.

It is not as if Farrell’s defence was not under any pressure. With New Zealand enjoying 58 per cent territory and 60 per cent possession over the three games and emerging from the overall penalty count five to the good, the All Blacks had most of the ball they wanted in the right attacking positions on the field.

It is no exaggeration to say that the coach who made all the difference to the performance of the 2017 Lions was Farrell. He is the outstanding defensive planner and coach in world rugby. Without him, the Lions would not have come near to drawing the series, and the seeds of Gatland’s excellent tour management skills would have fallen on stony ground.

The restarts from the final Test at Eden Park provide some excellent examples of how Farrell’s defence never allowed the All Blacks to enjoy an undisputed advantage from the ball they won back from kicks or turnovers.

New Zealand have always been world leaders at creating unstructured attacking opportunities from kick-offs, and the way in which they went about their business at Eden Park made for fascinating viewing.

The first All Blacks’ restart occurred in the 21st minute of the first half:

There are threats spread wide to both sides of the kick-off in the first frame at 20:44. The 6’5” frame of full-back Jordie Barrett has been added to the tight forwards on the left, while #8 Kieran Read is split out towards the near-side touch-line alongside Israel Dagg to provide options on the other side.

This formation has already forced the Lions into some uncomfortable defensive adjustments. Two the Lions best aerial athletes (Liam Williams and right wing Anthony Watson) have been drawn across to the (New Zealand) right to cover the threat of Read and Dagg, which means that all of the Lions back three are effectively defending on one side of the field.

The kick-off is short left, with Jordie Barrett cleverly inserting himself into the space between Maro Itoje and his intended rear lifter (Tadhg Furlong) to win the ball back. It was one of two occasions where the All Blacks used Barrett’s height to repossess ball straight from the KO during the game.

As soon as the ball is spun out to the All Blacks’ right, a situation of real danger has been created for the Lions at the first breakdown (20:54). Watson has been absorbed in the tackle, Daly is in line close to the ruck and Liam Williams has dropped back into the left half of the backfield.

This leaves #12 Owen Farrell out on his own near the right-hand touch, contemplating the tackle he might have to make on Julian Savea, if ‘The Bus’ should receive the ball in space. When Savea does get the ball directly from a Beauden Barrett cross-kick on the next play, all Farrell can do is watch in admiration as Savea races away down the left side-line.

It is here that the quality of the Lions scramble defence asserts itself. The line has been broken, but none of Farrell, #1 Mako Vunipola or #9 Murray (coming from the far side of the field) have given up on the play. By the time Savea has ploughed Liam Williams out of the way, Farrell is back in position to make a tackle while Vunipola and Murray are saturating the inside support lanes so there can be no killing offload (21:07).

This was a recurring theme throughout the game:

In the first sequence, as Beauden Barrett is tackled by Williams after making the intercept near the New Zealand goal-line, the All Black support (with Laumape and Savea closest to the ball) is in prime position to continue the movement and score:

But by the time Laumape has been run down by Jonathan Davies, Anthony Watson has overhauled Savea (after spotting him a five-metre start) and is blocking the critical support channel

The Lions’ ability to scramble and own the support channels was one of their many defensive virtues. They made concrete and sensible adjustments as the ‘chess game’ from Kiwi restarts developed in the course of the match:

After the initial disaster in the 21st minute, the Lions have adapted, with Daly moving back to the left and Antony Watson now positioned at fullback on the right-hand side of midfield as Liam Williams catches the KO under pressure from Kieran Read.

The contest between Read and Williams under All Black kick-offs was one of the most compelling of the micro-dramas threading the game. Williams wins this one, and at the beginning of the second half, he earns a penalty after Read is hauled back for obstruction when the KO fails to go ten metres (see the highlight reel at 40:02). Elliott Daly kicked the goal from fully 55 metres out to get the Lions back in the match.

The dénouement to that drama had the grandest of implications for the result of the series as a whole. With the scores locked at 15-15 and less than three minutes to play, New Zealand again kicked off with the intention of giving Read an aerial one-on-one with Williams:

We were well aware of Kieran Read’s tendencies in these situations in the England camp as long ago as 2012. He tends to ‘sail’ into the receiver at the very end of his reach, and this can mean a heavy contact with the opponent in the air:

(England-New Zealand 2012, @33:25 on the clock.)

In this example, Read is over-extended and sails into Joe Launchbury as he goes up for the ball. Launchbury ends up on his back with the wind knocked out of him. Referee George Clancy gives England a penalty, explaining that Read was “in the air way too early” and that the contact is dangerous, while the two (New Zealand) commentators assess it as a fair contest for the ball.

A similar scenario arose on Saturday evening. Read contests the ball at the very outermost limit of his reach and the impact of the challenge knocks Williams all the way back from the ‘L’ in Life to the ‘n’ in Standard. The challenge has at best to be at the edge of legality, but in this instance referee Romain Poite allowed it (even after review).

It also has a critical spin-off effect, by propelling Williams back behind the point of the catch so that it appears (but only appears) that Ken Owens has caught the ball in front of him. In fact, the ball has gone backwards off Williams, and it first makes contact with Owens between the ‘r’ and ‘d’ of Standard – which in turn renders the whole argument about whether he is offside moot. Play should have been allowed to continue, at least once Poite had decided not to penalise Kieran Read for a ‘charging foul’.

Summary:
If a drawn series can truly belong to anyone, it has to belong to Andy Farrell, who had the outstanding coaching impact of anyone on the two rival teams throughout. Saturday at Eden Park was indeed the ‘Day of the Faz’.

Farrell has done what very few believed was possible – to restrict a try-happy New Zealand side to under two tries per game in a three-match series. It was his defence which kept the Lions in the hunt when all the key stats (territory, possession and penalty count) went against them.

I am happy that the outcome of the series was not decided by a refereeing technicality (and an incorrect one at that). I have not always been enamoured of Poite’s style of refereeing, with its brutal punishment of technical offences at the scrum, but at Eden Park he went against type, awarding four penalties in twenty scrums and only 14 penalties in total.

At the same time, he followed the example of Nigel Owens (in general) and Craig Joubert (at the 2011 World Cup final) in staying out of the way at the critical time of the game, awarding just three penalties (one kickable to each side) in the final quarter.

It was not a series that deserved to be resolved by technical penalty. The five-to-four try count over the three games is probably a fair reflection of the All Blacks’ slight superiority, but tactically they never confounded the Lions beyond repair, and they never broke their spirit. A draw was an honourable result.

The Faz had an awful lot to do with that.

The Crowd Says:

2017-07-19T11:47:54+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Nicholas...It is very hard to determine if that ball went forward,backwards or sideways from the pics available,however if it did go backwards, I doubt it has done so anywhere near the extent that you seem to think it has. You have used some rather makeshift methods to make your point I feel. The use of a parallel line isn't necessarily a good idea either for the reasons given by 'ethan' in his posts. Anyways...if one draws the lines as you suggested, then Owens appears to catch the ball ahead of the point where it touched Williams. In the second shot a parallel line appears to cut some way ahead of the EY sign - which I might add is a moving sign.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T17:40:13+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It's possible Doc - I think the difficulty would lie in getting the two refs to interpret situations (like the breakdown) in the same way. There would be bound to be an overlap somewhere and potentially could be confusing for the players. But with the speed of the game now it may become necessary!

2017-07-15T15:21:09+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


What do u think about adding in a 2nd on field referee? It is hard enough for the 1 Ref to watch the breakdown and the offside line. Perhaps a second ref would help police the offside line. another example of its use would be for one ref to watch 1 side of scrum. No question the rules need to be simplified and I am loathe to launch into the refs when it is so tough for them. Many other sports have added on the second on field ref eg. League and AFL (4 refs) - and I would say mostly successfully

2017-07-15T13:51:36+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


This the point, though, Coconut. Your comment that there was a tackle in this series similar to the BoD one explains why everyone outside NZ see Kiwis and their approach to things as being 'different'. There wasn't a tackle in this series remotely in the same ballpark as the BoD one. The reason why that incident continues to run and run is partly because it was so bad but mostly because the Kiwi reaction from day 1 was to pretend nothing had happened, come out with ludicrous statements that belied the obvious facts, and blame the victim. I don't think any other country's fans would have behaved the same way in the same circumstances.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T12:34:27+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I noticed the Lions halfbacks (not just Murray) have a habit of rolling the ball out the back of the ruck so it’s essentially clear That's exactly right Jerry - and refs have protected them in the NH until the moment they lift the ball off the deck, even when it's well behind the rear foot... Worked quite well up here, as it has added more definition to situations where you can, and cannot play the #9.

2017-07-15T12:17:30+00:00

Jerry

Guest


That's the case in the SH too, but I noticed the Lions halfbacks (not just Murray) have a habit of rolling the ball out the back of the ruck so it's essentially clear (sometimes it was comical as it was a couple of feet behind anyone in the ruck). If they do that, they shouldn't be protected, surely.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T11:59:30+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yes I know this has been a real concern in NZ schools too... with the physical development of boys of Polynesian origin tending to be quicker and earlier than Caucasians. I don't think you can go far wrong by giving that solid grounding in RL tackle technique, it will stand him in good stead and give him a chance to enjoy the game when he's up against bigger opponents!

2017-07-15T11:18:22+00:00

Fin

Guest


Hi Nick, In keeping with this week's topic of defence, there is a lot of concern in the high school competitions in Brisbane and Sydney about the physical mismatches that exist between players. In the quest to win the big competitions the schools are offering scholarships to players (often of Pacific Islander origins) who are at times far more physically developed than their peers. Parents have become so concerned about the risk of serious injury that some of them have pulled their son's out of rugby altogether and directed them to play other sports. My son is only 6 years old and is learning to play the game at the local rugby union club but from next year I am going to enrol him into the local rugby league program. I want him to learn how to tackle and defend so that when he is older and comes across these big boys in rugby he will be able to handle the collision situation with confidence knowing that he has been taught good technique, which will also reduce his chances of injury. Rugby League teach their boys good tackle technique from a young age. Farrell, Muggleton, Shaun Edwards, Les Kiss, Peter Ryan at the Brumbies - these guys are all rugby league players coaching defence in rugby. On a seperate matter, it was an enjoyable afternoon of club rugby in the suburbs today. Radike Samo, Will Genia, and Anthony Herbert were all at the game I was at and enjoying watching the footy. Club rugby is really positive ATM Nick.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T10:37:59+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


That site is a gold mine Doc - enjoy!

2017-07-15T09:22:32+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Brilliant as always Nick. Thank you for your outstanding contributions during the series. And just found 'the rugby site' a few days ago - loads of great analysis pieces on there

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T07:09:55+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No I’m saying he became suddenly inconsistent to the level of incompetence. For me it’s better to be wrong than incompetent, at least you’ve made a decision. Try telling Craig Joubert that after the Scotland-Australia WC quarter final T-man! Despite making the "right" decision by your standard (i.e. in real time without referral) Joubert was told he had made the wrong decision by his own governing body and thrown under the media bus. It became a pitiless witch-hunt which cost Joubert any further appointments during that World Cup. The old Scotland captain Gavin Hastings said, "He should be sent home tomorrow, he should be punished and he should not be allowed to make an international rugby commitment again." So are you saying that Poite should have volunteered for the same treatment?

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T06:55:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I agree Fin - these sort of incidents have a habit of happening in those circumstances. Craig Joubert got hung out to dry for making the "wrong" decision but he used the right process - with no TMO consultation. Romain Poite has been hung out to dry for making the "right" one, but via the wrong process. Poite prob had this in mind when he made the decision to make the referral - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12R5jGbU8NY . The only consistent factor is that refs get hung out to dry whatever they do, and whatever the due process.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T06:48:02+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No they would simply have been much more competitive in the final, that's all.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T06:46:13+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I'm saying it's happened an awful lot lately - the availability of the TMO has complicated the process for refs : see the link in my reply to T-man.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T06:44:10+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I’m blaming the Ref for changing his approach for one decision that he didn’t apply to others simply because of the enormity of the situation. But this has happened quite a lot lately with refs - especially in situations where tries have been awarded (wrongly) Videos are shown on the big screen sometime before the conversion is taken so that the entire audience can see the error, and the ref reverses his decision. It's why kickers have been hurrying the conversion! One example of many here... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-3240584/Nikola-Matawalu-s-denied-try-shows-video-referees-used-England-edged-Fiji-Rugby-World-Cup-opener-Sir-Clive-Woodward.html The balance between using the TMO and not, and exactly when a decision is final has not yet been established.

AUTHOR

2017-07-15T06:30:22+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


At this point in time, Paul Gustard is the premier defensive coach in the NH. Jones and Gustard have taken England to where they should have been under Lancaster and Farrell. It would certainly have been interesting to see what would have happened if Jones and Gustard had been put in place back in 2011... I suspect it would have been the wrong time for both. But there is no way that Paul Gustard is the best defensive coach in the UK, sorry - he's lucky to be learning with England at a time when Jones is in charge of a very settled side.

2017-07-15T03:21:13+00:00

Fin

Guest


Maybe some of the players mistakes were on par with the refereeing errors. When you are the team creating more of the opportunities and you don't capitalise on it by putting the opposition away it's hard to blame anyone but yourselves if the result doesn't go your way. The AB's would know that. The result of this match should never have come down to relying on that final decision because it should have been all over by half time. It's a bit like the Wallabies vs Scotland game in the WC where the wallabies were scoring tries at will, yet because they were unable to put the game out of reach through their own unnecessary errors they found themselves relying on a controversial penalty at the end to win it.

2017-07-14T22:33:52+00:00

John

Guest


Obviously England would have won U20 comp if all there players were there Talk about Bias

2017-07-14T21:22:10+00:00

taylorman

Guest


No I'm saying he became suddenly inconsistent to the level of incompetence. For me it's better to be wrong than incompetent, at least you've made a decision. Imagine the discussion between Poite, TMO and Garces immediately after the match. TMO: "what happened? We agreed it was a penalty, your initial decision was penalty, we checked the foul play off the replay, why the scrum?" Poite: "Oh, on the way back to the mark My mate Garces said to me perhaps you should change it to a scrum due to accidental offside". TMO: "Oh really?, didn't think to check that with me, just kinda went with it where you yourself had just straight armed the same play?..okey dokey then...I think I'll drink over there with the ball boys". Or something like that.

2017-07-14T21:13:07+00:00

Darwin Stubbie

Guest


It's not actually my opinion - that's taken from those with far more knowledge in these areas ... So are you saying that's incorrect and he followed correct procedure ? ...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar