Formula One’s most compelling reason for more teams

Michael Lamonato Columnist

By Michael Lamonato, Michael Lamonato is a Roar Expert


2 Have your say

    Mercedes have once again dominated the F1 field. (Image supplied by AMG Petronas Motorsport).

    Related coverage

    It is rare that the Formula One regulatory or financial landscape remains static, but the turn of the next decade marks a significant milestone even for this sport.

    The 2020–21 window could represent one of the sport’s most important overhauls in years, with ordinarily intermittent posturing about aerodynamics, power units and money all coming to a head at the turn of the next decade.

    First this is the 2020 expiry of most of the sport’s much maligned commercial treaties. With the new commercial rights holder in place and agitating for change, this will form the backdrop for the upcoming three to four years.

    But alongside that are proposed changes to Formula One’s power unit philosophy, with simpler power plants billed to bring costs down and entice new engine builders into the sport in an effort to diversify performance and break the power base of the sport’s big manufacturers.

    Further, updates to the technical regulations cannot be ruled out in the short to medium term despite 2017’s wholesale changes – Ross Brawn has made no secret of his desire to tweak the rules to allow smaller teams to become more competitive.

    In summary, almost everything is on the table post-2020, which is no bad thing – these changes create an opportunity for the commercial, technical and engine regulations to align in order to foster new teams entering Formula One.

    In 2017 just ten teams compete for the world championship, but the sporting regulations allow 26 cars to enter each season.

    The addition of three teams would bring more than just colour; the three additional seats would be invaluable for the health of the currently almost stagnant driver pool.

    In truth the problem is the sport’s ten teams – all bar Haas’ longstanding competitors in the championship – have arrived at such comfortable levels competence that none are filling the traditional Formula One role of the plucky, risk-taking midfielder.

    Force India, perhaps the last such team to play this part, is attempting an unlikely assault on third in the championship. Williams believes it can rebound to occupy that same position, as it has done for the past three years. Renault bought Lotus and is climbing only upwards. Haas remains committed to its current drivers in these formative years of its existence.

    Only Toro Rosso and Sauber remain unaccounted for, but with Toro Rosso beholden to the Red Bull Junior Team and Sauber on the verge of becoming something of a de facto Ferrari proving ground, the route to Formula One remains stubbornly closed to anyone not both affiliated with an Formula One team and arriving at precisely the right moment.

    The post-Hungarian Grand Prix in-season test, featuring a number of junior Formula One hopefuls, only emphasised the sport’s lack of opportunity. With the exception Charles Leclerc, Formula Two’s runaway championship leader, none appeared close to an Formula One drive.

    Lando Norris is highly rated by McLaren, but the team is committed to keeping Fernando Alonso, and if Stoffel Vandoorne begins delivering on his junior-level promise, Norris will struggle to find a full-time way into Woking.

    Oliver Rowland, currently second in the F2 championship, tested along with Nicholas Latifi for Renault, but Robert Kubica is arguably ranked ahead of both in the race to replace Jolyon Palmer.

    Force India gave track time to European F3’s Nikita Mazepin and DTM’s Luca Auer, but with higher-placed seats unavailable for current drivers Sergio Perez and Esteban Ocon, neither junior will find Formula One accessible in the short term.

    Mercedes is backing GP3 leader George Russell, considered by many to be Britain’s next Formula One hope, but with Mercedes struggling just to keep Pascal Wehrlein in Formula One, the Briton’s route to Formula One remains unclear.

    Even the Red Bull Junior Team, which typically runs Toro Rosso’s driver roster with ferocious ruthlessness, seems unwilling to replace Daniil Kvyat with 2016’s GP2 champion Pierre Gasly, as elaborated here last month.

    But the lack of depth in the Formula One driver pool was evident even earlier this season, when Felipe Massa ended his brief retirement to replace the Mercedes-bound Valtteri Bottas at Williams. Moreover, he’s likely to remain there – or, for an outside chance, be replaced by Paul di Resta – because there are no adequately experienced drivers to take his place.

    Formula One is crying out for the reinstatement of a traditional, independent midfield willing to take a risk on a young driver’s career. Without it all but the few drivers who capture the attention of the big teams with the resources to induct them into junior programmes risk missing out on a Formula One opportunity – and Formula One misses out on a whole generation of new sporting stories.

    For this reason Formula One must prioritise filling the empty three places on the grid for the sake of the show – and for the benefit of the drivers.

    Michael Lamonato
    Michael Lamonato

    Michael is one-third of F1 podcast Box of Neutrals, as heard weekly on ABC Grandstand Digital nationwide. Though he's been part of the F1's travelling press room since 2012, people seem more interested in the time he was sick in a kart ? but don't ask about that, follow him on Twitter instead @MichaelLamonato.

    This video is trending right now! Submit your videos for the chance to win a share of $10,000!

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (2)

    • August 8th 2017 @ 6:12pm
      Simoc said | August 8th 2017 @ 6:12pm | ! Report

      I’m liking the direction of the new F1 owners so far. I would like to see a horse racing money type set-up where they all race for money at each Grand Prix and the likes of Ferrari get no guarantees for turning up at the race. Every country that can put up an F1 standard track and the prize money to run a Grand Prix gets one. They could race 35 times plus if the interest is there. The hosts may choose to pay some teams like Ferrari to turn up.

      We need to get over the noise (lack of) and make the racing a lot closer. I reckon electric cars will do that with-in a decade. Currently, Hamilton has had it too easy since joining Mercedes and still managed to lose to Rosberg last year.

      The current model has done very well for a few, and the challenge is to grow the sport to a wider audience.

    • Roar Rookie

      August 9th 2017 @ 2:11pm
      Jamie Mills said | August 9th 2017 @ 2:11pm | ! Report

      I must sound like a broken record by now, but nice article Michael, I again agree with all your points and am enjoying reading your pieces each week.

      The almost stagnant talent pool is certainly a concern in F1 at the moment. It would be great to see more young guns coming through, as well as capable drivers, like Di Resta, given more of a chance. Independent midfield teams that, as you said, wouldn’t be afraid to gamble a little more, would be huge in terms of making that a reality.

      Aside from actually increasing the car count, which would obviously be the best case scenario, if the new regulations attracted more engine suppliers, such as Cosworth for example, I believe this could definitely improve the situation too.

      As you touched on, lower-tier teams seem to be persuaded into hosting their engine suppliers’ young drivers as part of engine supply deals these days, besides Toro Rosso who obviously foster Red Bull drivers anyway, so if a team such as Sauber or Force India was to be supplied by Cosworth, surely that would open doors and get the pool flowing a little better.

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.