The Wallabies forwards make amends, but we need consistency

By The Doc / Roar Guru

The Wallabies forwards have been consistently inconsistent for a long time now. A miserable showing against the All Blacks in Bledisloe 1 was quickly followed up by a much-improved performance in New Zealand.

It was then a case of one step forward, two steps back against South Africa as the lineout broke down and their consistent lack of support to protect the ball at the breakdown lead to several turnovers and lack of quality ball to the backline.

Against Argentina, the Wallabies’ forward pack improved again, mostly rectifying the issues of the previous week.

It was a slightly odd first half. They were a little off the money at times and poor ruck defence ultimately cost them a try – albeit a controversial one in some people’s eyes. But in other ways, this was their most complete performance yet.

The scrums were the highlight – it has been a long time since we saw the Wallabies scrum genuinely dominate an opponent. The Argentinian scrum has been poor for some time, but so has ours.

The Wallabies did not lose the ball against the feed (winning ten from ten scrums) and rather than having to scramble and survive as we so often are forced to do, the ball was stable, allowing time to pick and choose the side to move the ball.

The highlight, of course, was a series of scrums at the 68th minute. The Argentine loosehead was unable to stay up and was ultimately penalised with a yellow card. The job of the loosehead is to scrum up, angle in and attack the chest of the tighthead – the loosehead could hardly stay up let alone put any pressure on the opposing tighthead.

Credit to Sekope Kepu who gave the opposing replacement prop no chance to put any pressure on the Wallabies’ scrum. The sending off led to a weakened opposition and another dominant scrum led directly to Will Genia finding space and heading straight over the try line.

The lineouts were a massive problem last week. There is nothing more demoralising than kicking a penalty to touch, planning a set piece and then losing the lineout. South Africa have big jumpers up front and made it hard for Tatafu Polota-Nau.

Polota-Nau is a good ball runner, brutal in defence, excellent in his support play for fellow runners and anchors the scrum, but his lineout throwing is inconsistent. He and the forwards managed to fix the issues of last week, leading to a much-improved effort. All bar one of his throws hit the mark and the accuracy meant Australia got onto the front foot off the back of good lineout ball.

However, the lineout defence could be better as Argentina made some good gains off several rolling mauls. The Wallabies need to be better prepared for this tactic as it was not exactly subtle – seeing the No.6 line up next to the line instead of the No.9 telegraphs the Argentines’ intentions.

Yet the Wallabies failed to counter this with good metres being made on two occasions (refer screenshot below). Rather than contest the lineout, perhaps it is wiser to just attack the catcher once he lands.

The breakdown was certainly the biggest concern coming into the match and this was a mixed performance. In attack, there were several occasions in the first half where the support did a poor job of cleaning out.

At 36:33, both Ned Hanigan and Kepu fail to secure the ball and ‘cockroll’ the No.6 off the ball. It is very difficult to shift the best flankers once they are in the jackal position so either get there early or you have to be strong enough to roll them off the ball by turning them. Unfortunately, Hanigan and Kepu managed to achieve neither.

The second half was a different story – the forwards ran together, with the runner well supported by a forward attached to him or right next to him. As a result, the ball coming out was more secure and cleaner allowing the Wallabies backs to get on the front foot.

Several times, a forward would join the runner and provide an extra push to get them over the gainline – Polota-Nau may not get the metres run next to his name but his extra shove was vital in the lead-up to Australia scoring a try early in the second half.

The ruck defence was also a major issue last weekend with South Africa making plenty of metres straight over the ruck. This was better this week but again an error in the first half led to the first try – the shot below at 21:34 shows Adam Coleman playing ‘post’ but he and Scott Sio got their spacing wrong, creating a big gap that the Argentines exploited.

A big highlight was the quality and ambition of the forwards to pass the ball out of the 1-3-3-1 formation. They mostly made good decisions – passing when they had to and taking it into contact when there was nothing on.

All the forwards showed good hands and while a couple of balls went to ground the ambition is there and it is important to keep trying these things in the heat of battle to perfect their execution. Even Rob Simmons got on the action with a beautiful offload playing a big hand in a second-half try.

Just a brief comment on restarts which is almost becoming another set piece – the Wallabies were not really put under any pressure when receiving kick-offs as the Argentines kicked deep and Sean McMahon et al held onto numerous catches.

It was pleasing to see the blockers get in front of the receiver – a shot from this restart shows several blockers protecting the space in front of Henry Speight.

Off our restarts, Bernard Foley’s drop-kicks appear to be improving. There was a combination of flatter trajectories just past the ten-metre line and on another day much more could have been made of these kicks. Credit to the Pumas here for several excellent almost Aussie rules-like catches that defused potentially awkward situations.

I usually stay away from commenting on the backs but I wanted to make brief mention of our oft-maligned fly-half. Foley cops a lot of criticism and at times deservedly so but he had a solid game on Saturday. His exit kicking was better and far superior to Kurtley Beale’s and he had a good night converting penalties – kicking seven from seven (six conversions and penalty goal).

Foley threatened the line with an occasional run to keep the defence honest and his passing was excellent. He doesn’t tend to pass the ball long but his short and medium passing and offloading were brilliant.

He made one error in a failed grubber kick that was cleaned up by Israel Folau but followed it up with a nice grubber kick to Speight on the wing. Defensively he made eight tackles and missed three (stats as per ESPN) – so all in all a decent night out and Foley will hopefully keep the criticism at bay for another week.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-09-22T16:50:16+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Fair call Baz. It is crucial for the forwards to get on the front foot for 10 to do his best work. Completely agree with your comments on the backrow. Perhaps he is keen on getting more games into hanigan in preparation for 2019 but cannot see how he is our starting 6. Agree with Fardy but he is now 32, playing in Leinster and so unavailable and so we need to use someone else eg timani, demsey or keep getting games into hannigan

AUTHOR

2017-09-22T16:46:12+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Hi Gepetto, you Could read it either way - ill leave it up to you. I havent been a huge of Simmons for his lack of physicality but i think his recent work has been much better.

AUTHOR

2017-09-22T16:44:07+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Great comment OB. Duly noted - we are in some ways saying similar things but the LH work the lift the chest of the TH - your way works and ala Joe Moody - subtle angle can achieve it too

AUTHOR

2017-09-22T16:41:40+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Thanks for the comment Curl!

AUTHOR

2017-09-22T16:41:21+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Thanks Nick! Trying to learn from the best.

2017-09-22T07:42:06+00:00

Phantom

Roar Rookie


There would be quite a queue of kiwis ahead of foley at 10 behind any ab pack. He would look ok but would struggle to make the grade as a top class kiwi #10.

2017-09-22T01:25:54+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


Sorry TM - I thought Old Bugger was an Auck - in my defense he was talking the same sort of nonsense you lot do. He must be close though - prob Harbour - its all the same place according to Sir JK and I believe him.

2017-09-21T21:56:22+00:00

taylorman

Guest


hey hey no need to get personal, the 80s is over!

2017-09-21T20:15:07+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


Ha ha - good one - not run into a screed yet - run up a few scree slides though. Point is fella - you coming up with all that theory stuff is like saying 'and the halfback stands at the center of the tunnel and puts the ball in straight'. In the book yes - in the game no. If you're coaching by the book - fine but you'll be the only one and your front row will get drilled by teams who's coaches focus on what actually happens. And don't you worry about Canterbury, son - we will right the wrongs - there's a few games but only one trophy so tha'ts where we are looking.

2017-09-21T12:30:12+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


You wouldn't know a screed if it hit you on the head when you join a scrum. Like all good trainee coaches, you'd do wonders with assisting your own RnB scrum, if that's what you predict. You stick with your angle sets and let a scrum do the job its meant to do - win the ball rather than twist the scrum, with angles. And btw, who cares about Auckland......If I was you, I'd be more worried about how your red and black side buckled last weekend, against the Lions. Were you their trainee-coach??

2017-09-21T09:55:26+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


Oh yeah - and Auckland are showing the backbone of a Jellyfish.

2017-09-21T08:32:26+00:00

Baz

Guest


Foley is a decent 10. Not the best full stop, but the best we have at the moment. Put him behind an All Black pack and it would be interesting to see what he could do. If the forwards are going forward he looks ok. Having KB along side also provides a really good decoy for both he and Genia. Agreed the forwards are looking better with Moore gone but the back row is not getting it done at the breakdown. Hanigan is just not heavy or strong enough at present. He is a player of the future but should not be starting. Fardy should be 6 and bring Hanigan on late in the game. The combination of both Hanigan and Hooper ensures who ever we play get fast ball from the break down. ABs thrive on fast ball.

2017-09-21T07:29:16+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


That may be the technical blather that the trainee coaches get told - but trust me - in practise the tight head sets the angle and what he does depends on what the plan is. I could write screeds here in reply but you'll either accept what I say or you won't so I'll not bother - if you are coaching though I recommend you tell the tight head what I'm saying rather than repeating your wee novel.

2017-09-20T22:44:04+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Sorry, but that's not right. The angle, is set by the bind which prevents props, from lining up straight. That's why the bind was amended in the laws from under the armpits, to a long bind down the torso. Except, the binds today start down the torso and end up, under the armpits. The change is an attempt to prevent angling in by the props and if refereed properly, it would provide a more improved and stable scrum set, for the challenge. The TH is the anchor of the scrum - but, that won't happen if, your body angle is inwards because the weight transfer, will be ineffective. A proper transfer of weight occurs when all the parts/players are aiming in the same straight forward direction from No8 thru' the second row thru the front row. if any one of those parts/players is off-line and angled, the collective transfer, will be compromised and ineffective. Do it properly and your front row won't be bodies, positions and intangibles. It will be the front line of a formidable weapon when it is collectively engaged, as a single tangible entity. Like any mechanism, the entity is only as good as its weakest link hence the continuous scrum practice to ensure, the weak link is no longer, an intangible.

2017-09-20T22:32:23+00:00

Gepetto

Guest


"Even Rob Simmons got on [sic] the action with a beautiful offload playing a big hand in a second-half try." Nice sledge of Simmo. Reminds me of Marto's calling of Quade Cooper's plays. You are not in good company.

2017-09-20T21:32:12+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


Angle is set by the tighthead - when the loose head does it on his own its really obvious and you'll get yr penalty. The entire front row thing is bodies and positions and intangibles - thats why you can get hammered at one scrum and then smash them the next. As you can't see whats going on you do a lot of it by feel and instinct which means smart old nasty's can set wee traps for you. Its a great game within a game and just a shame that it does not translate to the spectators. As an aside rumour is Coleman to Ireland - Aus need that like a hole in the head.

2017-09-19T23:42:51+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Doc You said "The job of the loosehead is to scrum up, angle in and attack the chest of the tighthead – the loosehead could hardly stay up let alone put any pressure on the opposing tighthead." I have to disagree with your "angle-in and attack the chest" perspective because having the outside shoulder, any LH prop who angles inwards to attack his opposing TH's chest, will inevitably drive that opposition TH prop, onto his own hooker. The job of the LH prop is to stay straight and keep the TH prop's shoulders, as high as possible from the ground, to diminish any opportunity of the opposition scrum from gaining any traction and moving forward. The TH prop has the job of being the anchor of the scrum, by keeping a straight back with his shoulders virtually parallel to his hip bone to allow the weight traction, to be transferred from the boiler-house onto the front row and either gain traction to move forward or, force the opposing front row to go down, in the scrum. If the loose-head does his job, the TH will be prevented from anchoring because his shoulders are too high and the weight transfer goes in an upward direction rather than, a straight forward direction. In the AB v Pumas game, Moody consistently "popped" his opposing TH prop by keeping his shoulders high and preventing him from gaining any traction authority, being transferred from, his own boiler-room second row. In either case, a penalty should ensure. But, what do I know.....I was an HB and the closest I came to the front row, was when I fed the scrum.

2017-09-19T22:55:24+00:00

Curl

Guest


Nice to have someone unpacking the the big end of the game. Thanks, keep it up, I might understand whats going on in about a thousand years. Seriously, thanks.

2017-09-19T19:09:37+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Good one Doc!

Read more at The Roar