The pink ball is creating problems and something needs to change

Anindya Dutta Roar Guru

By Anindya Dutta, Anindya Dutta is a Roar Guru

 , ,

9 Have your say

    Imagine this. It is the second of December, 2017. You walk in to bat at the Adelaide Oval with your team score at 0 for 1 and Alastair Cook back in the pavilion.

    With more than 1000 runs in county cricket this season and an unexpected recall for the Ashes down under, the team is looking for you to dig them out of this hole.

    You take guard and face up to a rampaging Pat Cummins running in at full steam. You are calm and confident. His arm goes up at the delivery stride and you know it’s going to be on your stumps on a good length. You don’t care if it’s at 140k or 150k, you know you have it covered.

    As the ball leaves his hand, you lose it completely. All you see is a flash of dark grey in the darkness behind the arm and then hear the clutter of your stumps behind you.

    You are Gary Ballance. You are colour blind. And the pink ball has got you. Again.

    In early 2014 when the pink ball was first being tested in the Sheffield Shield, the first questions had been raised about its effect on colour blind cricketers.

    At the time, the response of the Cricket Australia spokesperson had been: “The advice we’ve received to date is that there isn’t any reason why a player with normal colour blindness would have any more difficulty seeing a pink ball compared to a red ball given its lighter colour and higher luminosity.”

    Since then we have come a long way as far as the use of the pink ball is concerned.

    Australia played New Zealand in the first ever Day/Night Test match in November 2015. The following season in November 2016, Australia hosted South Africa at Adelaide. This summer, England played the West Indies and come December, the first Day/Night Ashes Test using the pink ball will be contested at Adelaide.

    Day-night Test cricket Adelaide Oval Australia New Zealand

    (AP Photo/Rick Rycroft)

    So far, the experiment that was primarily aimed at attracting bigger crowds to Test cricket by timing the matches such that fans could attend after work, seems to be working. More teams are getting involved, the fans are coming to watch, the ball is continuously evolving, the sponsors are happy.

    But what about the players themselves?

    When the red ball against the white sight screen in full daylight was replaced by the white ball against the black, with the cricket played partly in the sun and partly in the dark, everyone adapted well. When T20 was invented and played completely under lights, not an eyebrow was raised. But when it came to the pink ball, not everything has been as straightforward.

    In November 2014, Australian opening batsman Chris Rogers was forced to pull out of a Shield match between his home state Victoria and Tasmania because he was colour blind and could not see the pink ball.

    He also had intermittent issues with the red ball against non-conducive backgrounds, but that had not prevented him from averaging over 42 from 25 Test matches, with most his Tests played between the age of 35 and 38.

    For those of us with ‘normal’ vision, it is interesting to hear Rogers’ perspective: “As someone who is colour-deficient (I’ve learnt to stop saying colour blind), I knew the pink ball would not be ideal. It’s not a colour I tend to pick up that well. If I see someone wearing a pink shirt I’ll remember the next day what was on the shirt but won’t be able to describe its colour. It feels as if there’s a loose connection in your brain.”

    Rogers goes on to describe his experience when he was asked to lead an MCC XI in an exhibition pink ball match at Abu Dhabi.

    “The moment I realised just how much of a problem the pink ball would be for me came when I was in the nets facing Mohammad Nabi, who earlier this year was in the World Cup as captain of Afghanistan. We trained at dusk. Nabi was bowling his off-spin to me and I just could not see it. I was just way too early on it and I kept chipping the ball about two or three metres up in the air and having it landing a metre in front of me. I was just completely misreading it. It was bizarre.”

    Rogers continued to say, “I was even worse in the match. I won the toss and was out in the second over. In the second I got to 18 but fell to a tall Notts paceman named Luke Fletcher, whose release point was about level with the top of the sightscreen. He bowled me a full toss and I simply did not see it. It hit me on the shin in front of middle stump.”

    “Most people see the pink ball as a light colour,” he said, “but I later found out that colour-deficient people see the pink ball – I hope I’ve explained this correctly – as a dark colour. That’s when the administrators realised they couldn’t use a black sightscreen because for colour-deficient people it’d just be a dark ball on a dark sightscreen.”

    Chris Rogers of Australia

    (AAP Image/Dean Lewins)

    So what is it about colour blindness that creates this problem with sighting the pink ball?

    The mildest type of colourblindness is Deuteranopia, which takes out most shades of red and pink and turns them into a green. A red dress, provided that its light, will turn into a sort of dull shade of army green. Greens are also darker and duller, turning to light greys and brownish-green camouflage colours.

    Protanopia is more severe. Instead of turning red to green, it shuts some shades of red off completely, making them appear black or grey. The darker shades of red are grey-black, and even the lightest shades of pink change to army green or darker.

    Chris Rogers has the latter, which explains his complete inability to see the ball, but he is far from being the only one. His colleague from Victoria and Australia’s current wicketkeeper, Matthew Wade is also colour blind and struggles with the pink ball. But he has coped with it a bit better because he has a milder form of the deficiency and has been able to adapt.

    In 2016, Wade was selected for Australia’s Day/Night Test against South Africa. Wade said before the match “I played pink ball at Adelaide Oval last year in a Shield game, so it’ll be interesting to see what it does in the Test arena. You’ve just got to get used to it. I think it’s trying to get it out of your mind. I can see the colour of the ball, I pick it up. It’s just at times it takes a little bit longer to work out the depth of where it’s coming.”

    Wade clearly adapted well. In that match, he had to his credit six catches and a stumping. Not bad for a bloke who can’t identify the colour of the ball.

    But then Wade has two factors in his favour – he has a milder form of the deficiency, and being a wicketkeeper, he has a bit longer to sight the ball than a batsman with the same disability. It is not possible to judge from his score of 4, whether Wade had difficulty while batting in Australia’s first innings in that Test, but one suspects it was not as easy for him to face up to Vernon Philander and Kagiso Rabada as it would be for his colleagues without the same condition.

    Gary Ballance has a condition that is closer to Rogers’ than to Wade’s i.e. he struggles to see the ball at all, where the pink ball often appears the same colour as the pitch.

    As captain of Yorkshire, Ballance was keen to play Surrey in the County Championship match this year. The problem? It was a day/night encounter to be played with a pink ball. Before the match, speaking to reporters, he said: “It’s not ideal, the last time I played with it, I struggled to see it. I’m going to have a few net sessions with it and if I can’t see it, I can’t see it. There’s nothing I can do. If you can’t see the ball, you can’t play cricket.”

    Fortunately, a brilliant 180 not out from Kumar Sangakkara and bad weather ensured that Ballance was not required to bat. At Adelaide, he will be.

    Matthew Wade

    (AFP / Glyn Kirk)

    The questions about pink ball cricket are going beyond the cricket pitch

    Colour Blind Awareness has written to the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) demanding it review the use of the ball which it says is very difficult to spot for people with the condition. It has warned that the ECB could be even failing colour blind cricketers under equality employment legislation because the visual impairment is seen as a disability.

    “In the UK there are approximately three million people with colour blindness,” the letter says, adding that that equates to possibly one colour blind cricketer in each team, 1,125 spectators at England versus West Indies Test at Edgbaston, and thousands watching that match alone on television around the world.

    This makes it a broader issue. Not only do players on the field have an issue, which could make a wider adaptation of the pink ball a career-ending move for some, but spectators report they can’t spot the ball, which could potentially be a bigger problem for the sport.

    What is the future of Pink Ball Cricket at Test level?

    While it is true that the latest innovation comes with its challenges, there is no doubting the fact that it is a move in the right direction. The world has evolved such that cricket today needs to compete for audiences with all the other entertainment. Hence, the possibility of drawing in crowds after working hours is something that Test cricket can only ignore at its own peril.

    Day-night Tests with the pink ball is here to stay. What that means, however, is that the responsibility for ensuring that the game can be played by everyone with the requisite talent and watched by everyone with a keen interest to do so rests with the ICC and the various boards.

    One in every twelve Caucasian men and one in every ten Indian origin men are colour blind. In the UK, Australia and New Zealand, in purely statistical terms, its likely that one player in the national team and at least 4000 spectators per Test match (assuming 100,000 come to see the match over the five days) will not be able to see the pink ball.

    In India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, assuming similar spectator numbers, 5000 audience members will be frustrated by their inability to follow the game as they normally would, and at least one player each on the subcontinent teams will be unable to see the pink ball.

    The only way to overcome this is to continue to innovate and ensure that the technology applied to the ball, the surroundings, and indeed the telecast of the matches makes playing and watching this version of the game a level playing field for all.

    There have been upsets aplenty in the World Cup so far, so be sure to check out our expert tips and predictions for South Korea vs Sweden, Belgium vs Panama and England vs Tunisia and get the good oil on who to tip tonight.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (9)

    • October 8th 2017 @ 11:13am
      Liam said | October 8th 2017 @ 11:13am | ! Report


      I’m really not sure here. On one hand, a prejudice against a player is definitely a bad thing. On the other, I’m 5’4″, so a career in basketball is probably beyond me.

      • Roar Guru

        October 8th 2017 @ 10:50pm
        Anindya Dutta said | October 8th 2017 @ 10:50pm | ! Report

        Yes Liam, but here we are talking about the careers of people who are possibly a foot and a half taller than you and already basketball players, whose career is suddenly ended (I am being dramatic here) by changing the colour of the basket and the board behind it so he can no longer see the basket when he shoots. How about that?

        • October 10th 2017 @ 8:54am
          Liam said | October 10th 2017 @ 8:54am | ! Report

          I can absolutely see what you’re saying, I’m just not so certain about where the problem is. It feels like there could be an issue, but if the solution is to scrap pink ball tests – what other colours can a) hold their shine, or b) last the durations necessary for test cricket – then I’m not sure that an allowance should be made.

          And with my original example, if I’d spent years perfecting my shooting, my basketball skills, only to have failed to make it further due to being at the forefront of a new trend of tall people being better at it, then that’s a consequence of my physical attributes potentially limiting my sporting output.

          At some point, language gets us all into trouble, and I’m trying to avoid coming across as uncaring for those with colour blindness, but ultimately it comes down to this; I am not an expert, either in cricket or in optometry, and there are reasons why those in both industries were consulted to get their opinion and settled on the pink ball.

          • Roar Guru

            October 10th 2017 @ 10:39am
            Anindya Dutta said | October 10th 2017 @ 10:39am | ! Report

            Liam – I get it and not for a moment am I suggesting that we don’t progress to D/N Tests and play with the pink ball. The article is more to bring to the fore an oft ignored aspects and see if technology or change in parameters (sightscreens, Seam on the ball, whatever) can be improved to make it easier for players and spectators with this condition to play and watch this game.

    • Roar Guru

      October 10th 2017 @ 12:55pm
      Paul D said | October 10th 2017 @ 12:55pm | ! Report

      Sorry Anindya, you’re wrong here. There will be a brief transition period of about a decade where people who are colourblind struggle, and then what will happen is that people who are colourblind won’t be coming through the ranks because they’ll have been weeded out at junior levels.

      Just the way it is. As others will no doubt tell you, plenty of people are prevented from chasing their dreams in all fields of endeavour by their physical limitations. There’s nothing sacred about being colour blind.

      • Roar Guru

        October 10th 2017 @ 10:36pm
        Anindya Dutta said | October 10th 2017 @ 10:36pm | ! Report

        It could well be the case Paul. I am not disputing the final outcome just hoping there can be a way to level the playing field. If we don’t recognise the issues there will never be a way to overcome them. As opinion Writers and columnists I believe we need to continue pointing out areas which can be improved. This is one.

        • Roar Guru

          October 11th 2017 @ 12:16am
          Paul D said | October 11th 2017 @ 12:16am | ! Report

          The only way this gets fixed is if they can get a white ball to survive 80 overs. Which apparently they cannot.

          Either that, or they use white balls and reduce the number of overs between taking the new ball, to say, 60. Which, if the ball deteriorates quicker, will be like 80 anyway.

          That’s the only two practical ways I see of solving an issue affecting people who are colourblind. They’re never going to be able to see a pink ball no matter what they do. Can’t use yellow because it won’t work under lights on TV. Maybe bright orange? I don’t know.

          What will most likely happen is they’ll just stick to using pink balls in perpetuity and the future Chris Rogers of the world won’t even know they could have been test cricketers because they’ll have given it away at 22 and gone off to be an accountant

    • December 6th 2017 @ 9:12am
      Tom said | December 6th 2017 @ 9:12am | ! Report

      Dear Paul and Liam

      I found this article after wanting to send something to my friends who couldn’t grasp the fact I could never see the ball in the Adelaide test.

      There are decisions that are made out of practicality and those that are arbitrary. For example though the height of a basket is set at 10 feet because of an arbitrary decision right at the invention of the sport, being tall would still be an advantage in the game even if the hoop were lowered, shorter people needing to jump vs taller people being able to place it in the basket etc.

      However when it comes to choosing the colour of something this can have a discriminatory effect against people when there is no real need, this doesn’t just extend to the pink ball here it is also kits in football or what a referee is wearing.

      These are colours that have been picked and there is known information about which colours the three types of colour deficeint people struggle with it isn’t really much to ask to not discriminate against us. I will never be a test cricketer playing day night matches but I still enjoy the game. The pink ball renders a form of it unwatchable when the exercise is to increase viewing figures in test matches is just plain silly. If (approximately) 8% of your male viewers can’t watch the game the intent of increasing viewers has instantly set you back.

      There are things we are already unable to do but having a fudge between red ball and white ball cricket = pink ball taking away from a pleasure that is already sadly in decline is a needless way to further damage a wonderful sport.

      • Roar Guru

        December 6th 2017 @ 10:36am
        Paul D said | December 6th 2017 @ 10:36am | ! Report

        I think you’re overreacting. You can still watch every ball of every other cricket match played this summer.

        The decision to choose pink was not arbitrary – it was borne out of absolute practicality as well. See my replies above regarding colours of ball.

        Honestly I think complaining about not being able to see a cricket ball on your big TV in just one of 60 odd games of televised cricket this summer is a bit of a first world problem

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    , ,