Tim Cahill's heroic moment sullied by alleged cash-grab celebration

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

It wasn’t something you would have immediately noticed, caught up as so many of us were in breathless whooping and chest thumping in the aftermath of Tim Cahill’s winning goal against Syria on Tuesday.

But, FIFA is now reportedly investigating Cahill and whether he did use his winning goal celebration as a platform to further the commercial agenda of a company he is an ambassador for.

TripADeal, a travel company that sells holiday packages, posted an image on their Instagram of Cahill miming the letter T, mid-jog, following the wonderful winning header that clinched progression for the Socceroos. “The TripADeal ‘T’”, according to the post, on show for everyone to see. “Did you catch it?”, they asked. Well, I’ve certainly caught something, because I’m suddenly feeling a little ill.

Perhaps this is just an opportunistic bit of social media bandwagoning; Cahill might have been making the gesture for some other reason, and TripADeal are just taking advantage of it, trying to craft a tongue-in-cheek viral tidbit.

But then, in the image, you can see that Tim Cahill’s official Instagram account has replied to the post, with some jovial emoji spam, a smiley face, the 100 symbol, a jet taking off.

Needless to say, a large portion of the football-loving public are feeling less than pleased about it.

As far as sponsorship opportunities go, Cahill is the most sought-after footballer in the country, a bonafide national hero whose longevity and quality at national level is unrivalled by any other Socceroo.

He is an incredibly eloquent, confident speaker; Cahill’s post-match interviews always flow nicely, with no verbal stumbling, and broadcast the impression of an athlete very much at home under the spotlight – he might take some time to train up Aaron Mooy on some of these on-camera skills.

He’s never been embroiled in an off-the-field scandal, or been responsible for some abject on-the-field moment.

It’s no surprise he’s attracting so many sponsorship offers, and no one should begrudge any athlete – a temporal professional fighting to make as much money before their body gives out – from trying to maximise their earnings.

But at what point does the seeping presence of corporate sponsors become intolerable?

There are strict rules about who can have their corporate emblems plastered over sportspeople, and most of the rules restricting players from attaching their own personal sponsors to their clothes or bodies are made specifically with the protection of their other sponsors in mind.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Nicklas Bendtner was fined £80,000 in 2012 when, having scored for Denmark, he lifted up his shirt to expose the name of a betting agency printed on the band of his underpants.

Whether or not Cahill’s alleged stunt should draw an equivalent punishment, or whether the national team sponsors have legal reason to be perturbed is a question for the relevant lawyers and administrators.

What I would like to stand behind, though, is the idea that certain sporting moments should be kept unsullied by the poisonous tendrils of capitalist opportunism.

The entire Socceroos supporter base was glued to the screens, nails gnawed down to pulpy stumps, waiting for that moment.

It’s hard to tell on the game telecast when exactly the gesture occurred; Cahill was mobbed by his teammates – a few seconds after he held his arms out, imitating an aeroplane, perhaps? Hmmm – and the broadcast cut to replays of the goal before the T gesture happened.

Photographers did capture the moment.

Even if this was a case of blatant commercialism it isn’t something to get too outraged about; there are certainly more serious issues to protest in world football.

But it has raised eyebrows and overshadowed what might end up being a historic moment in Australia’s World Cup journey.

Gareth Bale trademarked his highly irritating celebratory heart gesture in 2013, not that we’ve seen much of it since then.

Multiple high-profile players have debuted personal logos over the past few years; it seems this is the future we’re heading towards.

It may not be long before we see players en masse forego celebrating with their teammates, in favour of performing sponsored celebrations conceived and paid for by companies.

Even the glorious aftermath of goals, something that should be reserved entirely for basking in the golden light of sporting triumph, for hugging strangers and roaring in victory, is not safe from commercial dilution.

TripADeal’s Cahill post has since been deleted, presumably after the social media reaction.

This all seems a little moot when the team in question are forever referred to as the Caltex Socceroos.

We watched him ascend to a new level of belovedness on Tuesday; and even if it was part of an advertising campaign he’s still our greatest player.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-15T08:34:35+00:00

holly

Guest


Move along. Nothing to see here.

2017-10-14T00:33:16+00:00

Mike

Guest


"T" for Tim. Get over it.

2017-10-13T15:00:33+00:00

ph1lstar

Guest


Tim Cahill is the Socceroos lol oh that's right he's not really Australian he's brown.

2017-10-13T13:14:32+00:00

Beny Iniesta

Guest


Who cares? Doesn't contravene the rule as I read it. So I say again. Who cares?

2017-10-13T10:31:31+00:00

Peter

Guest


Evan massive fake outrage from you so you can get lots of clicks. If you want to get your knickers in a knot about rampant capitalism, take aim at the raging corruption within FIFA, which in my view has no moral authority to investigate anybody for anything.

2017-10-13T08:29:08+00:00

marron

Guest


The difference here is Cahill has an arrangement with tripa whatever already. They tweeted the picture - which they really had to know about to find seeing as it didnt hit the broadcast, cahill has been tweeting at them. Pretty clear it's all a stunt. Yeah its all commercialised and so what. Personally I'd like my socceroos to be excited and relieved to be scraping through,,not excited to be able to spruik their latest cash cow.

2017-10-13T08:12:53+00:00

Gavin R

Guest


I wouldn't be surprised to see him banned if they can prove a payment

2017-10-13T07:55:58+00:00

marron

Guest


The first thought he had when scoring this crucial goal was his brand and sponsorship obligations. Doesn't surprise me in the least.

2017-10-13T06:21:44+00:00

League table speaks

Guest


lol what is it with communists in the aussie sports media this one is in the left column (paid?) with gambling ads all over the site .... moaning about "the poisonous tendrils of capitalist opportunism" if you're going to lay it on that thick, at least do it well ... :)

2017-10-13T05:30:51+00:00

IrelandsCall

Roar Rookie


LOL

2017-10-13T05:12:47+00:00

Schuey

Guest


Snowflakes need to toughen up. Its a non story.

2017-10-13T04:59:13+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Some players make a gesture with their arms as if they're rocking baby to sleep to celebrate the birth of their child ... UNACCEPTABLE = ambush marketing for obstetricians &/or baby products.. Some players put the ball under their shirt to celebrate their partner's pregnancy ... UNACCEPTABLE = ambush marketing for maternity wear.

2017-10-13T04:40:24+00:00

Josh Barton

Roar Pro


That heart shape might be an endorsement of the heart foundation. Unacceptable. Any player who makes a heart shape with their hands should be banned for life, their club or country barred from competition for 2 years, and be forced to spend a day grocery shopping with David Gallop as punishment.

2017-10-13T04:28:35+00:00

Fadida

Guest


Agree. Talk about a non story

2017-10-13T04:18:32+00:00

Torchbearer

Guest


I thought it was T for Tim...like Mo Farah does....

2017-10-13T04:09:26+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Hardly the same. Bendtner had "Paddy Power" printed on the waistband of his underwear. Tim made a T-sign with his arms. Some players make a heart shape with their fingers.

2017-10-13T03:55:18+00:00

SM

Guest


Nicklas Bendtner did something similar after scoring against Portugal at Euro 2012 if I remember correctly. Pretty sure he was fined and banned. Rules are rules unfortunately. As stupid as some of them may be.

2017-10-13T03:48:45+00:00

RBBAnonymous

Guest


Look it's a little tacky but so what, he isn't doing anyone any harm. Just let it go.

2017-10-13T03:38:43+00:00

Josh Barton

Roar Pro


When the "advertising" is so subtle, that to pretty much everyone the symbol is meaningless, there has to be some leniency, unless it can be proven - and even then who really cares anyway. Whats the stop Jetstar from putting up a photo a player running with their arms outstretched and putting a caption that the player was being one of their planes?

2017-10-13T03:36:00+00:00

Redondo

Guest


Spot on Ben. If Cahill was advertising Tripadeal then the FFA will be in a real bind. Like it or not, the sport relies heavily on its official sponsors and if the FFA can't protect the sponsors' investments then the sponsors will walk away. I can just imagine the outrage if the AFL logo floated across the tv screen during an A-League ad.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar