The Kangaroos winning the RLWC is a foregone conclusion

By Daniel Szabo / Roar Guru

I must preface this piece by saying that I for one am extremely excited for the upcoming Rugby League World Cup.

I am not a hater. I love international rugby league, and as a Sydneysider, I think it’s a disgrace that the only two games in my city are Australia vs Lebanon and England vs Lebanon.

I think Jason Taumalolo and Andy Fifita jumping ship to Tonga is fantastic. I love the new eligibility laws (as a short-term fix, I think loosening them now will allow them to be strengthened in the future without the standard of competition decreasing – that’s a discussion for another day) and I think there will be many awesome games and incredible moments.

But let’s not kid ourselves here by pretending that anyone but the Kangaroos will win this thing.

For days on this site I’ve been reading articles and comments from international league lovers like myself, full of that pre-tournament optimism about the other teams.

Common sentiments include “I wouldn’t be surprised to see England win”, and “The Kiwis will shock many at this World Cup”.

I even read this gem. “France could give Australia a real run for their money”.

France? Give me a break.

Allow me to spell it out for everyone. Any team that is not made up entirely of players with NRL and/or Super League experience is no chance. Not “next to no chance”. I mean literally.

No. Chance.

So with that in mind we can rule out USA, Ireland, Wales, Scotland, Lebanon, Papua New Guinea, France and Italy.

With all due respect to these nations, none of them would beat the Newcastle Knights if they had a player sent off in the first minute of the game.

These nations will not beat any of the other nations. They will only beat each other.

So what about the others? Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, and the Big 3. To have six squads in the RLWC made up entirely of players with NRL/Super League experience is amazing. I never thought I’d see that.

(NRL Photos/Grant Trouville)

But it’s one thing to have a team made up of players who have played first grade. It’s something else completely to have a team made up entirely of current, elite first graders like Australia has.

I believe that Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, New Zealand and England will be competitive against each other, and while New Zealand and England would obviously be favourites, it wouldn’t shock me at all to see any one of these nations beat each other.

This is not just due to the increased strength of Samoa, Tonga and Fiji, but also the fact that New Zealand are a lot weaker than usual, while England are about the same as they usually are.

This is why I say that even New Zealand can’t beat Australia. Johnson is in a massive form slump. RTS hasn’t been great either. They have no Taumalolo, no Bromwich, no Proctor. That for me equals no hope.

Samoa, Tonga and Fiji? They all have world-beaters in their team. The likes of Vunivalu, Fifita, Taumalolo and Papalii are all NRL superstars. These teams have many elite players, but none of them play in the spine which is why they will not challenge the Kangaroos.

As for England? As a St George Illawarra fan I say discount the Bennett Factor at your own risk. They have some elite NRL players like Big Sam, Graham, Widdop and Josh Hodgson. But Australia has 24 elite NRL players!

(AFP PHOTO / GLYN KIRK)

The Super League guys in the England team would all probably make it in the NRL. But I think very few would be genuine superstars.

The Super League is a vastly inferior competition to the NRL. Many experts say it’s only slightly above the level of the Queensland Cup. I don’t believe that a squad of players from an inferior competition will be up to the task against the best of the best.

The reason why Australia are so good is their spine. Smith, Cronk and Slater will pick apart teams who show any weakness. If they can do it against NSW, who have relatively few weaknesses, they will not struggle at all against teams made up of a mixture of superstars, first graders, and fringe first graders.

Finally, I hope everyone enjoys the RLWC for what it is – an exhibition of rugby league talent from all over the world. As a contest for first place, it is lacking a fair bit. But the contest for second I believe will be absolutely enthralling, as will the contests for first place in groups C and D.

We will see free-flowing, passionate rugby league that we arguably don’t see enough of in the NRL, and the simple fact that there will be rugby league until the start of December is awesome! But rather than pretending that this is something that it’s not, let’s just enjoy it for what it is.

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-25T21:41:16+00:00

Chook

Guest


Well we can dream that those effin Bs get torn a new one but I personally don't see it

2017-10-23T08:07:33+00:00

republican

Guest


......typical Australian arrogance. 'Pride goeth before a fall'. England V NZ final, mark my words...........

2017-10-20T06:13:57+00:00

Sport lover

Guest


Brilliant riposte. The reason not to watch is the brilliance in each team. Going well.

2017-10-19T23:33:52+00:00

Sport lover

Guest


Union is going well in Australia. Totally irrelevant. The RLWC will be great. Enjoy trol ls...

2017-10-19T23:29:05+00:00

Sport lover

Guest


All codes, all codes, all codes. ? How is the AFL World Cup going in its preparations?

2017-10-18T23:52:56+00:00

Rob9

Guest


Put whatever sort of spin on it you want. That’s only a 19% success rate the Kiwis have against the Kangaroos which is an accurate reflection of the gulf that exists between the 2.

2017-10-18T22:42:03+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


And look at the ones they won.

2017-10-18T04:16:51+00:00

Rob9

Guest


I was looking from 2004. In that time there has been 37 tests between the Kiwis and Kangaroos. NZ won 7 of them.

2017-10-18T03:51:48+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


"Looking at fixtures throughout the last decade or so, we’re playing the Kiwis on average 3 times a year. Some times up to 4 times. How many times should we be playing against them?" And during that decade they won about half the international tournaments on offer and became world number one.

2017-10-18T03:47:18+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Thank You David Brown. Woods is like the Emperor's New Clothes. Lazy commentators just troll his name out as a starting prop certainty - and out he trundles. He is a third man flop in tackles, does not bend the line at all. The only thing he has is a nifty offload. Napa or Wallace from the SOO wining Qld side would be a better choice. I can't believe Mal Meninga goes along with it. I guess there are a lot of politics in selections.

2017-10-18T03:46:02+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


I don't believe in fun.

2017-10-18T03:44:03+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


You mean top line players can't make mistakes? Yeesh, guv. Which points?

2017-10-18T03:28:15+00:00

terry tavita

Roar Rookie


there are some promising young players coming into the wallabies..i mlike that lukhan tui fella..and the hooker uelese..koroibete is not too shabby either..

2017-10-18T03:26:07+00:00

Rob9

Guest


I had a very similar upbringing on rugby as you. The game turned pro when I was in Year 7 and I started at the tin stand on the outer at Ballymore before ‘graduating’ to the hill at the other end. Super Rugby was a great vehicle to transition the game into professionalism in Australia, but with our cluttered sporting landscape and a lack of foresight on the part of the ARU, the game has stalled. In my 30 odd years of following the code, it has never been in worse health than it is now. That said, our dire position isn’t one that’s replicated around the world. Rugby might be on struggle street in Australia but it goes ahead in leaps and bounds in many other places.

2017-10-18T03:05:46+00:00

zenn

Guest


Surely it's a bit early to write of Burkina Faso's chances of winning the RLWC.

2017-10-18T01:05:00+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Rugby in Australia is a game for a certain elite. It's the people's game in NZ and they play like their lives depended on it. For some reason the international refs allow the ABs to get away with flagrant flaunting of the rules. I played Rugby as a kid and loved it, and loved going to Ballymore to watch the Queensland side. I use to love going down to my club and watching all the grades play. It is run by top-heavy, businessmen - I don't watch it at all anymore. The ABs are welcome to as many "trophies" as they can grab.

2017-10-18T00:03:44+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Just bloggers having a bit of fun.........

2017-10-17T23:59:21+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Good job. So basically Australia could field around 5 competitive 17s. BTW - I think Dylan Walker is injured. Walker suffered a horrific ankle dislocation and break when representing the PM’s XIII in Papua New Guinea. I also think Moylan is injured as he didn't play in any of the final matches for the Panthers.

2017-10-17T23:46:53+00:00

Raugeee

Guest


Johnson had a shocker in this years Anzac match. Amazingly NZ were still in it at 24 -12 in the second half. Kangaroos had a goal line drop out. Johnson positions himself under it and then ..... drops it cold. End of Match. Anyway, what about the other points I made in my post?

2017-10-17T23:14:29+00:00

Rob9

Guest


Looking at fixtures throughout the last decade or so, we’re playing the Kiwis on average 3 times a year. Some times up to 4 times. How many times should we be playing against them?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar