All Blacks playing by the same rules

By Rugby Fan / Roar Guru

It’s still an open question whether the All Blacks are showing chinks in their armour after defeats to three different teams over the last two seasons.

However, there might be one development in rugby which could now be working against them: the attitude of referees.

New Zealand lost to the British Lions after Sonny Bill Williams drew a red card. It was a game New Zealand could still have won even with 14 men, so the blame isn’t entirely his – but his dismissal is the main reason.

Reports noted afterwards that Williams was the first All Black to be sent off since Colin Meads in 1967. That seems like a long period of continued self-discipline on the field, but what if it has also reflected the reluctance of referees to sanction All Blacks?

And what if that attitude might be changing?

I would argue that the New Zealand, by virtue of being consistently the best team, earned themselves a champion’s benefit of the doubt. It’s a quirk of officiating which runs throughout the game.

Only last year, Dean Ryan of lowly-ranked Worcester claimed a confidential referees report showed officials in the English Premiership frequently favoured top-ranked teams.

The way the laws are going currently, though, superior teams can no longer expect that kind of bonus from officials. Increasingly, incidents are being judged on the outcome, rather than intent.

This is important for New Zealand rugby. After the 2007 World Cup quarter-final loss to France, some Kiwi supporters said their team vowed to “take the referee out of the equation”. The idea is to stay disciplined, and score so heavily, that the vagaries of officiating would be negated.

Two World Cups out of two is a good haul since the 2007 failure, so something clearly went right.

But times change.

In rugby today, an increasing number of on-field sanctions result from actions which would once have just been called accidents. No matter how disciplined you aim to be, if you hit someone the wrong way, then you’ll be leaving the field.

You often hear officials saying “I have no choice” when brandishing a yellow or red card, passing the buck to the laws. That means referees are no longer subconsciously awed by the consequences of penalizing a better team.

Many former players bemoan the sanctions being awarded. It’s common to hear pundits say “What else could he have done?” when a defender ends up with his arm around someone’s neck. It may not seem in the spirit of rugby, but the new laws are more about future litigation.

World Rugby doesn’t want anyone claiming later that they have ignored obvious risks. Referees know this, so they don’t want to be lenient on issues of dangerous play.

I think that might put New Zealand back in the pack from an officiating perspective. I’m not arguing here that New Zealand infringes more than any other team, simply that they do so at comparable rates as other major sides, and that hasn’t always been fully reflected.

That fifty year period with no-one sent off? We know that at least some other All Blacks should have been red carded during that time. Not just occasions when we, as one-eyed supporters of our own team, think a New Zealand player crossed the line.

Look at when a player has been cited after the match and banned. Andrew Hore in 2012 against Wales is an obvious example, and I don’t think any New Zealand supporter would take issue with that one.

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Under current laws, Hore would have been sent off at the time, because his offence was easy to see on replay. In 2012, the TMO had no scope to interfere, so his punishment came afterwards.

Past judgements show New Zealand deserved more on-field red card punishments. They also show the opposition got too many. Simon Shaw, Bismark du Plessis and Damian de Allende all received on-field red cards In Test matches against New Zealand which were later negated. Hard to think another top team has received that kind of largesse.

Jerome Kaino was also penalised during that Lions series. With some suggesting that Sonny Bill Williams should be put out to grass, perhaps the answer is for the All Blacks to drop these older players.

However, Beauden Barrett drew a yellow card against the Lions too, which was his fourth by then. It’s not just old lags who don’t know where the line is.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-11-27T03:19:02+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


Report on Stuff says NZ received more cards in 2017 than any other team aside from Argentina https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/99278416/all-blacks-see-plenty-of-yellow-and-a-bit-of-red-in-2017

AUTHOR

2017-11-19T15:34:53+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


Paul Cully writing today: "Referees are no longer afraid to go to the pocket against the All Blacks " http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/england-get-three-winning-tickets-in-twickenham-lottery-20171118-gzo9ca.html That's what I said here.

AUTHOR

2017-11-06T02:36:21+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


I hope I was clear that I was saying that, Jacko. I didn't, however, say that post-match All Black red cards would conclusively have led to wins for the opposition if the sanctions had taken place during the match.instead. The All Blacks have been that good. Similarly teams who have seen red cards against New Zealand, only to see then rescinded on appeal, wouldn't necessarily have won with 15 men on the pitch. In both cases, all you can safely say is that the opposition would have had a better chance.

2017-11-05T18:20:24+00:00

MIB2

Roar Rookie


There are 4 refs that miss every forward pass

2017-11-05T18:10:19+00:00

MIB2

Roar Rookie


You also need a home town ref.

2017-11-05T18:05:54+00:00

MIB2

Roar Rookie


When Barnes is reffing the abs usually get the wrong end of the penalty count.

2017-11-05T18:01:15+00:00

MIB2

Roar Rookie


I guess he penalises both teams using the same set of rules. The French refs in particular usely referee one team more than the other.

2017-11-05T07:45:32+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Haha we are all the judge's of fact and Law Piru but the ref gets to make the only decision that counts

2017-11-05T07:37:24+00:00

Jacko

Guest


2017-11-05T07:31:28+00:00

Jacko

Guest


There is another 10 sentences infering the ABs are treated different to other teams. Not that you are saying that tho eh RF

2017-11-05T04:47:16+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


And on another side we have those that make boorish generalisations.

2017-11-05T02:50:02+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


There was no knock on or forward pass...why?...because there is no clear and obvious evidence that either happened. But if you do have evidence then hold onto it ...it will no doubt give you comfort.

2017-11-05T02:36:11+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


You mean like the one he awarded to Retallick in Dunedin then had it over turned?

AUTHOR

2017-11-04T01:09:32+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


I can't think of any team which wouldn't find it a challenge with a man sent off, Especially for most of the match. My point here is that the All Blacks usually don't face this challenge. SBW being the first sent off in 50 years - the first in the professional era - shows this clearly. Other teams have had players sent off in key matches, and it's becoming more common. We can agree on some reasons why that has been the state of play - New Zealand teams are usually more skillful, disciplined, and show great rugby awareness . We can also disagree on others - few here agree with my contention that the number of All Blacks receiving post-match red card sanctions means some on-field officials have, mostly subconsciously, taken the easy route and passed the buck. The All Blacks are also exceptional at dealing with any challenges posed by law changes, ensuring that they take whatever steps they can to minimize running foul of officials. Under the current law environment, the All Blacks can't mitigate the risks in the way they have before, and as referees get used to brandishing more red cards at all levels of the sport, any reluctance some might have felt at making a game-changing decision in a big match will become weaker.

2017-11-03T22:32:07+00:00

Jacko

Guest


But Rugby Fan couldnt every side find it hard to win after being on the end of "such a decision"????

2017-11-03T21:49:34+00:00

Muzzo

Guest


Ah yes piru, I don't think they would let Lima ride his bike around the rugby paddock!! Strange that!!lol.

AUTHOR

2017-11-03T12:59:58+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


You are right, of course. There will always be decisions which baffle. Most officials might see an incident one way, but the only decision which matters is the man on the field. Another referee might even have made more of other incidents in that match .

2017-11-03T12:35:22+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


'Only a few years ago, many referees would have been nervous about making a decision with large repercussions. Not any more.' Given that the TMO appeared to be trying to talk the ref out of sending SBW off, I'm not sure it's as clear cut as that yet.

2017-11-03T12:30:19+00:00

Steve Wright

Guest


Yup - just another pseudo intellectual speculating his backside off.

AUTHOR

2017-11-03T12:25:48+00:00

Rugby Fan

Roar Guru


Do you think an All Black player will receive an on-field red-card in a Test match some time over the next two years (up to the end of the 2019 World Cup)? I think there's a good chance someone will. And it could cost New Zealand a test match. If it happens at the World Cup, it could disrupt their tournament, I happen to think there's an even higher chance that England will see another red card over that period too. Quite simply, under current laws, it could happen to any team. What makes it a different proposition for New Zealand is that the team is used to coming up with strategies which counter the changing moods of the sport. The fact that players can get sent from the field for what is essentially an accident is not something you can control. On top of that, you have a panel of international referees under instructions to issue red cards where appropriate. Alain Rolland had no qualms about ruining the match as a spectacle when he sent off Sam Warburton, and that's how he wants everyone to operate. New Zealand face England next year in a highly anticipated encounter, if a player from either side makes the kind of tackle SBW executed when he hit Watson, the he'll be sent off. Only a few years ago, many referees would have been nervous about making a decision with large repercussions. Not any more.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar