Jake Lehmann’s dad Darren is the reason he won’t be selected

David Lord Columnist

By David Lord, David Lord is a Roar Expert

Tagged:
 , , ,

57 Have your say

    In a perfect world, the very talented Jake Lehmann will be presented with his first baggy green at the Gabba for the first Ashes Test against England.

    But it’s an imperfect world, so through no fault of his own the 25-year-old is on a hiding to nothing, to make the 12-man squad.

    All because he’s the son of Australian head coach Darren Lehmann,

    If he’s selected nepotism will be the call from the cynics, even though Darren leaves the selection room when his son’s future is discussed.

    If he misses out, the other group of cynics will accuse the selectors of avoiding perceptions of favouritism.

    Either way Jake Lehmann is the pawn, and he doesn’t deserve that.

    In 29 Sheffield Shield games for South Australia he’s cracked six tons and nine half-centuries for a career average of 44, the best of all contenders for the number six batting spot.

    He debuted against the Vics at Adelaide in March 2015 with 54 off 105 with seven fours, with 39 in the second dig off 102 with six fours in an innings loss.

    In only his third game in 2015, Lehmann posted his career best 205 in Hobart, and in his last game 103 and 93 against the Vics at the MCG with South Australia is trouble in both digs.

    At 3-18 in the first, Lehmann and skipper Travis Head combined for a 164-run fourth wicket stand, and in the second at 3-59 Lehmann and Callum Ferguson parted company after a 212-run fourth wicket stand.

    By any standards, Jake Lehmann has done more than enough to deserve selection for the Gabba.

    Again through no fault of his own, he can’t escape the fact he’s the coach’s son.

    Jake Lehmann scores a century

    (AAP Image/George Salpigtidis)

    His 11 squad mates will never discuss any of Darren Lehmann’s decisions as either a coach or a national selector in front of him, and Darren will have to be guarded in what he says to his son about the other members of the squad.

    The cop out would be for one of them to miss out, but both deserve to be there.

    And there’s no magic wand to be waved to solve the problem.

    It’s to be hoped all parties are sensible enough to bury any negatives, and simply look at all the positives.

    And there are plenty of those.

    Jake’s inclusion would give the Australian XI six left-handed batsmen, with four in the top six – openers David Warner and Matt Renshaw, plus first drop Usman Khawaja and Lehmann.

    Pacemen Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood round out the half dozen lefties.

    That’s a big advantage for the Australians who perform far better on home tracks than they do overseas, with the one exception being skipper Steve Smith.

    His career average is 59.66 with 68.65 at home, and 53.95 overseas – mighty impressive across the board.

    But the rest of the top five have stark differences.

    Warner’s career average is 47.94, with 59.21 at home, and 38.25 overseas.

    His opening partner Renshaw’s career average is 36.64 with 63.00 at home, and just 25.67 overseas.

    Khawaja’s career average is 45.47 made up of 63.73 at home, and just 27.21 overseas.

    But the widest margin belongs to Peter Handscomb with a career average of 53.07 including a Bradmanesque 99.75 at home, and 34.40 overseas.

    But what about the Ashes chances?

    The Australian attack is in fine form, especially Starc with his record-setting hat-trick in each innings against at Hurstville last week.

    Pat Cummins and Hazlewood will share the pace duties, with Starc leaving offie Nathan Lyon to complete a four-man attack.

    The only spot left is the keeper which should see Peter Nevill recalled as the most reliable gloveman in the country, the most vital criteria of all.

    Let’s get rid of the ‘keeper must bat’ selection folly, it’s highly unlikely another Adam Gilchrist will surface in the foreseeable future – and there are certainly none available now.

    So the only spot up for grabs is number six in the batting line-up.

    For mine, despite the side issues, Jake Lehmann is the most deserving.

    David Lord
    David Lord

    David Lord was deeply involved in two of the biggest sporting stories - World Series Cricket in 1977 and professional rugby in 1983. After managing Jeff Thomson and Viv Richards during WSC, in 1983 David signed 208 of the best rugby players from Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and France to play an international pro circuit. The concept didn't get off the ground, but it did force the IRB to get cracking and bring in the World Rugby Cup, now one of the world's great sporting spectacles

    Have Your Say



    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (57)

    • November 9th 2017 @ 6:48am
      Steve said | November 9th 2017 @ 6:48am | ! Report

      He’ll get his chance, Australia is actually spoilt for options at number 6 its just that its the ashes that makes it worrisome.

    • November 9th 2017 @ 6:57am
      GM said | November 9th 2017 @ 6:57am | ! Report

      He won’t get picked ‘cos of his mo … and oh, ‘cos all he’s done is make runs in one match. Let’s see a solid *season* out of him, before he’s on the selectors radar

      • November 9th 2017 @ 7:39am
        Basil said | November 9th 2017 @ 7:39am | ! Report

        2000 odd runs in 29 games at an average of 44 suggests he’s putting together a decent body of work, and not just one good game.
        I can’t help but feel that if he were selected he’d had deserved it more than Maddinson did last year.

        • Roar Guru

          November 9th 2017 @ 8:54am
          The Bush said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:54am | ! Report

          At least five batsmen in Australia deserved selection ahead of Maddison last year, one of which is in his own team (Patterson).

        • Roar Guru

          November 9th 2017 @ 9:44am
          JamesH said | November 9th 2017 @ 9:44am | ! Report

          There are a dozen or more current batsmen who would deserve it more than Maddinson did last year, including a few (Klinger, White, Cowan) who have been dropped from their State teams.

      • Roar Guru

        November 9th 2017 @ 8:53am
        The Bush said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:53am | ! Report

        Is this said in jest?

        He has had two “solid” seasons in a row now (one of them you’d have to call good even).

      • November 9th 2017 @ 10:44am
        Ouch said | November 9th 2017 @ 10:44am | ! Report

        He’s had 2 solid seasons already. Played 29 matches.

    • Roar Rookie

      November 9th 2017 @ 7:22am
      Don said | November 9th 2017 @ 7:22am | ! Report

      I’d say that Boof leaving the room when Jake’s name comes up will make little difference.

      Steve Smith seems to be largely getting the sides he wants and if Smith has flagged Jake as someone he wants then it will happen sooner rather than later.

      Also, there is the other theory that the selectors will pick Jake Lehmann regardless of whether Boof is in the room or not because his form demands it.
      However, Boof does seem to be loyal to older guys looking at their second or third chance so maybe the selectors will follow suit?

      If he was named Jake Marsh he’s be in like Flynn.

      • Roar Guru

        November 9th 2017 @ 9:44am
        JamesH said | November 9th 2017 @ 9:44am | ! Report

        Or Mitchell Lehmann.

    • November 9th 2017 @ 7:23am
      Targa said | November 9th 2017 @ 7:23am | ! Report

      How is his 1st class average of 44 better than Hilton Cartright’s average of 47?

      • Roar Rookie

        November 9th 2017 @ 7:28am
        Don said | November 9th 2017 @ 7:28am | ! Report

        Yep.
        But current form means alot and Cartright got a pair in his last match whereas Jake Lehmann scored plenty.

      • Roar Guru

        November 9th 2017 @ 7:30am
        Michael Keeffe said | November 9th 2017 @ 7:30am | ! Report

        C’mon Targa don’t you know better than to question the logic of a David Lord article?

      • Roar Guru

        November 9th 2017 @ 8:10am
        Chris Kettlewell said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:10am | ! Report

        I was thinking exactly the same thing.

      • November 9th 2017 @ 8:39am
        jameswm said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:39am | ! Report

        Ha, was about to write the same thing Targa.

        Lehmann certainly has to be in the conversation.

        When are they picking the side? After the next Shield round?

        Poor old Cartwright – could he have picked a worse time in his career for a pair?

        • November 9th 2017 @ 9:12am
          spruce moose said | November 9th 2017 @ 9:12am | ! Report

          Or, hopefully the selectors will not fall into the trap of judging someone’s form by one match and just write the pair off as something that happens to any cricketer at any time.

    • November 9th 2017 @ 8:39am
      Curious George said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:39am | ! Report

      Wont stop Maxwell getting automatically picked

      Man I wish Wade’s dad was the national coach, then he would be no chance of playing in the Ashes (the selectors will pick him and he will cost us dearly; dropping cook and root repeatedly and doing nothing with the bat)

      • Roar Guru

        November 9th 2017 @ 9:46am
        JamesH said | November 9th 2017 @ 9:46am | ! Report

        If Scott Wade was a selector, Matty Wade would have played 80 tests by now.

    • Roar Guru

      November 9th 2017 @ 8:52am
      The Bush said | November 9th 2017 @ 8:52am | ! Report

      Jake’s inclusion would give the Australian XI six left-handed batsmen, with four in the top six – openers David Warner and Matt Renshaw, plus first drop Usman Khawaja and Lehmann.

      Pacemen Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood round out the half dozen lefties.

      That’s a big advantage for the Australians who perform far better on home tracks than they do overseas, with the one exception being skipper Steve Smith.

      I don’t understand this section. How is having more left handers a big advantage at home? Is this a reference to the struggles of some of the left handers on spinning wickets in Asia?

      • November 9th 2017 @ 9:11am
        G Knight said | November 9th 2017 @ 9:11am | ! Report

        Agreed, don’t see at all how the two are connected

    Explore:
    , , ,