Live scores
Live Commentary
Stormers : 25
Reds : 19
| Fulltime

How the Wallabies went from Bledisloe blunder to flying form

Scott Allen Columnist

By Scott Allen, Scott Allen is a Roar Expert

 , ,

32 Have your say

    With the Wallabies unbeaten in seven matches, Bledisloe 1 in early August seems like a distant memory.

    The team’s defensive performance in the first 50 minutes of that match was diabolical as they allowed the All Blacks to score eight tries and build a 54-6 lead before the Wallabies scored some consolation points.

    I watched that match in a hotel in Ireland with players and coaches from all around the world who were participating in the Women’s World Cup. Fortunately the New Zealanders were staying at another hotel so we only had to put up with one lone Kiwi in the room, but that was enough as we copped a serious ribbing during the annihilation!

    The criticism most people had for the Wallabies’ performance focused on their defence. There was a lot of talk about the complicated system Nathan Grey had implemented with lots of players switching positions dependent on field position and the type of set piece the opposition were starting from.

    After the match, Brumbies assistant coach Laurie Fisher tweeted:

    Michael Cheika agreed that the defence wasn’t good enough saying: “It was pretty plain to see that our defence wasn’t good enough, at all. The adherence to the way we want to defend and the tackling in itself, it’s got to be better.”

    Both Cheika and Stephen Larkham made comments during the week after the match saying the team would stick with Grey’s defensive system.

    “We’ve been building towards that game for a fair while and we’ll make sure that we don’t change too many things this week, particularly with the travel over to New Zealand,” Larkham said.

    “We’ve got a relatively young combination out on the field, guys who are getting a handle on this system.”

    In Bledisloe 2, the Wallabies conceded another five tries but since that match they have conceded just 16 tries in seven Tests. No team has managed to score more than three tries on them in a match. So how have they turned their defence around?

    In Bledisloe 1, here’s an example of how they were defending from a five-man lineout. Bernard Foley is in the tracks at the front of the lineout, Michael Hooper at receiver, Will Genia back in the defensive line but ready to drop in behind to act as cover, there are two forwards out in the line and Kurtley Beale and Israel Folau are in the backfield.

    The positioning in that example is not that different to what most teams do from a five-man lineout with two players in the backfield and a back in the tracks.

    It’s very rare that you don’t see No.15 in the backfield and most teams have their No.7 in the receiver position with two forwards out in the line. It’s also common to see the open side winger (No.14 in this example) on the end of the line.

    So, the only real difference is where the Wallabies have No.11 and 12 positioned. Most teams will have their blind side winger (No.11 in this example) in the backfield and their No.12 in the front line.

    The Wallabies use this structure to get Beale in position to launch a counterattack if the opposition kicks. Yes, there’s no doubt that the structure has the added benefit of getting Foley and Beale out of the front line in defence, which preserves them a little more but the main thrust behind this is to get their best two attacking players, in Beale and Folau, in the backfield ready to launch a counter-attack.

    It’s the same strategy Ewen McKenzie used so well with Quade Cooper at the Reds in 2010 and 2011. Of course, most people at the time claimed the structure was mainly about hiding Cooper in defence rather than understanding what it was really used for.

    Let’s look at another example from Bledisloe 3 last month with the Kiwis having a five-man lineout just inside their half. A similar field position to the example above.

    This time the Wallabies used a more traditional structure with Tatafu Polota-Nau in the tracks and Genia at receiver.

    Does this mean the Wallabies have abandoned the defensive structures they used in Bledisloe 1?

    Let’s look at examples from full lineouts in those two matches. In Bledisloe 1, the Wallabies used Foley in the tracks and Genia at receiver.

    In Bledisloe 3, we saw Tatafu Polota-Nau in the tracks and Genia at receiver.

    Now to examples from the match on the weekend against Wales.

    From a six-man lineout we saw Foley in the tracks and Genia at receiver with Polota-Nau and Hooper out in the defensive line, which is very similar to the first example from Bledisloe 1. You’ll notice that for this match there was another change with Reece Hodge in the backfield and Beale on the end of the line.

    In this example, Foley is in the tracks but Hooper is in the receiver position.

    In this one, Hooper is back out in the defensive line with Foley in the tracks and Genia at receiver. Again Hodge is in the backfield with Beale on the end of the line.

    As you can see, the changing defensive structures we saw in Bledisloe 1 are still being used. In fact, there appear to be more variations dependent on the number of players in the lineout and field position.

    Obviously players have become more familiar with the structures as the season has progressed but when you look closely at Bledisloe 1, it wasn’t the changing structures that caused most of the issues ā€“ it was poor decision making and execution by individuals.

    In this first example, Samu Kerevi is certainly too slow to fold around the corner and get into the line. But despite this the Wallabies had numbers in place to deal with what was coming at them. It was Folau’s mistake turning in and getting beaten on the outside that was the issue here.

    Folau should never have been thinking about the inside players ā€“ he had to stay on his man outside.

    This was on the second phase after a lineout but it wasn’t poor structure that caused the problem, it was a simple one-on-one miss by Sean McMahon and then Beale didn’t take anyone in the backfield.

    In this example it was poor communication that resulted in Beale thinking he needed to jamb in, when he needed to stay out.

    Allan Alaalatoa had to keep moving around and let Beale know he’d take the inside man so Beale could stay out.

    And finally, it looked like there was no communication between Foley, Kerevi and Henry Speight here.

    Eliminating basic mistakes, like those highlighted, has transformed the Wallabies’ performances. The improvement since that dreadful loss in Bledisloe 1 in communication, individual technique and decision making has been really good.

    After Bledisloe 1, Michael Lynagh said: “I can’t overestimate how angry I am at seeing an Australian team who have skills that are non-existent. Passing and catching and making tackles and trusting the bloke beside you are pretty basic, even at schoolboy level.”

    He’d probably feel a lot better about the Wallabies now and Eddie Jones was correct this week to praise the contribution Mick Byrne has made to the Wallabies ā€“ he was brought in to improve individual skills and it looks like he’s well on top of it.

    Let’s hope it continues because England will be a real challenge this weekend.

    Scott Allen
    Scott Allen

    Scott has been a rugby contributor with The Roar since 2013. After taking some time out to pursue other roles in the game, including coaching Premier Grade with University of Queensland and the Wallaroos at the recent World Cup, he?s returned to give us his insights. You can follow him on Twitter @ScottA_ to hear more from him.

    This video is trending right now! Submit your videos for the chance to win a share of $10,000!

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (32)

    • Roar Guru

      November 18th 2017 @ 6:25am
      Harry Jones said | November 18th 2017 @ 6:25am | ! Report

      Very interesting. Looking at where 11 and 12 are on that LO set up to free KB to trigger–excellent and I’ll be looking at that this weekend, if the camera producers will let us.

      Thanks for the excellent work.

    • November 18th 2017 @ 6:26am
      Mike said | November 18th 2017 @ 6:26am | ! Report

      Good onya Scott. Would be great to see you helping out on the coaches box. I was one of those yelling for Grey’s head at the time. Happy to have been proven wrong and surprised it was just a few minor tweaks needed to a sound strategy. Somehow don’t think Cheik can outsmart the wily EJ- well not yet anyway

    • November 18th 2017 @ 7:36am
      Cam Mason said | November 18th 2017 @ 7:36am | ! Report

      Thanks Scott, your articles are always insightful and a pleasure to read.

    • November 18th 2017 @ 8:19am
      waxhead said | November 18th 2017 @ 8:19am | ! Report

      Very good Scott – thanks for the tutorial šŸ™‚

    • November 18th 2017 @ 8:38am
      Worlds Biggest said | November 18th 2017 @ 8:38am | ! Report

      Cheers Scott, whilst the defence has improved since Bledisloe 1, there is still a fair bit to go imo. The red zone defence against the Boks away was sloppy allowing a couple of relatively soft tries whilst they got exposed a bit too much out wide last week. They will need to put in a huge defensive shift against England to stay in the game.

    • November 18th 2017 @ 8:52am
      HarryT said | November 18th 2017 @ 8:52am | ! Report

      Thanks Scott, very interesting analysis.

      In the first video sequence you claim that Kerevi is too slow, but in my mind I see it as a lack of urgency he has when defending. In this instance, Speight has to stop, turn and then sprint in cover, whereas Kerevi just needs to speed up in cover. Speight overtakes Kerevi and arrives a fraction of a second too late to take the AB winger over the side line so I assume that a try probably would have been saved had Kerevi sprinted flat out when he was leading the cover.

      • November 18th 2017 @ 9:23am
        Farmer said | November 18th 2017 @ 9:23am | ! Report

        In the first example where Falou was beaten on the outside it was really a 4 on 2. Sure Kerevi should have been quicker to react but Genia should have realized the numbers and pushed out a little which would have kept Folau out a bit as well. All this should have been communicated between them as it unfolded

      • Columnist

        November 18th 2017 @ 9:43am
        Scott Allen said | November 18th 2017 @ 9:43am | ! Report

        Yes, he wasn’t moving urgently – lazy or lacking awareness? Could be a bit of both.

        • November 18th 2017 @ 10:30am
          Luke Ringland said | November 18th 2017 @ 10:30am | ! Report

          I think it was just a flat out poor decision from Cheika to play Kerevi considering what little amount of rugby he’d played, who the opposition were, and the fact we had Kuridrani available, easily our best defensive 13.

          Kerevi’s mind was not up for it.

          My rugby “career” was dominated by knee injuries, and so I was always making comebacks. No matter how much training I did, the first few games were so hard they made me question whether I was right to even be trying to play again. It was the classic sense of my body not being “hard” enough for the collisions, and obviously the lungs burn like crazy. But as much as anything, everything just seemed to move so fast, and this was low grade amateur! A few weeks later would go by and I’d feel more at home. And so my point is that Kerevi may not have been lazy, or lacking awareness, just slow in the mind from a lack of games. People talk about the step up from Super Rugby to tests, and this was the ABs….

          I’m really looking forward to them doing away with the June internationals and having a uninterrupted international season. A few warm up games and then an uninterrupted schedule before we meet the ABs will really improve our chances of winning back the Bledisloe.

        • November 18th 2017 @ 11:31am
          Fionn said | November 18th 2017 @ 11:31am | ! Report

          I don’t think he was fit enough, Scott. He had had almost no matches for months preceding that match and then he is playing against the All Blacks who were on fire in that half.

          Whether it was mental or physical or both he wasn’t ready.

    , ,