The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

VOTE: Wallabies DIY player ratings vs England

18th November, 2017
Advertisement
Michael Hooper of Australia attempts to break through during the Old Mutual Wealth Series match between England and Australia at Twickenham Stadium on November 18, 2017 in London, England. (Photo by Laurence Griffiths/Getty Images)
18th November, 2017
16
1057 Reads

The Wallabies have copped a 24-point loss against Eddie Jones’ England, and it’s safe to say that result was much less than Australian fans hoped for going into the match.

That said, it was largely a competitive performance until England ran away with the match in the latter stages, and many will say that the scoreboard didn’t truly reflect the game.

Is that true? One way to answer the question would be to look at the individual performances of the players, rather than the overall result for the team.

And for that reason we’re opening up our DIY Player Ratings to you, Roarers. Have a vote and let us know what you thought of each player’s performance.

If you’ve not done our DIY player ratings before, it’s a simple enough process. Hit up the form below and rate each player from 1 to 10 based on their performance. We’ll keep track of the results and publish our findings tomorrow.

You’re free to rate players as you like with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest – or toss an NA on any player not worth rating – but if you’re looking for a bit more detail than that, our handy little guide might help you make your judgments…

1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May God have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a squad of such depth.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good.
7. Pretty good, actually.
8. Very good.
9. Excellent.
10. Might as well have been John Eales.

Advertisement
close