Comparing Gold Coast with University doesn’t make for good reading for Suns fans

Paul P. Mark Roar Rookie

By Paul P. Mark, Paul P. Mark is a Roar Rookie


6 Have your say

    So we are now seven seasons into the existence of the Gold Coast Suns. This means we can compare the team’s performance thus far with that of the defunct Melbourne University Football club who spent seven seasons in the big league from 1908 to 1914.

    It must be said that the Suns have been a huge disappointment to date – in fact, that would be a mammoth understatement. As can be seen in the table, the Suns have only performed about five per cent better than University did in their seven seasons, and yet their respective circumstances couldn’t be further apart.

    Key to University’s rapid decline after 1911 was the fact the club chose to remain strictly amateur while rival clubs had already begun issuing match payments to many of their players.

    There is no doubt that University fielded many genuinely good footballers but, by all accounts, it seems University’s players and officials were primarily focused on their studies and/or careers.

    This shouldn’t come as much of a surprise given the club was comprised current and former students of Melbourne University.

    Let’s contrast this to the enormous salary cap afforded to clubs these days, along with the plethora of high draft picks that were handed to the Suns on a platter by the AFL in 2011. But yet, in seven seasons, they have performed only marginally better than a bunch of genuine amateurs to whom footy was not much more than a weekend hobby.

    Gary Ablett Gold Coast Suns AFL 2016

    (AAP Image/Julian Smith)

    In fact, even University’s away record is superior to that of the Gold Coast. On the flip side, at least Gold Coast’s home record is significantly better than University’s, but this would be mostly due to the fact that the Suns get a home-state advantage in every home match they play – with the exception of matches played against the Brisbane Lions. Even then, they technically still have a home city advantage (similar to Geelong at Kardinia Park versus Melbourne-based clubs).

    Now, don’t get me wrong, I really like the idea of having an AFL club based on the Gold Coast. While I certainly don’t believe a second Brisbane-based club would be viable, I think with Gold Coast being a distinct, and somewhat glitzy, city about an hour’s drive south of Brisbane, it really does have potential to become the talk of the town in a very lucrative marketplace. But something has gone terribly wrong.

    So why have the Gold Coast started so poorly? A lot of the blame has to fall on the first two coaches, but for different reasons.

    They started out far too young and inexperienced
    I don’t think there was much wrong with inaugural coach Guy McKenna’s game plan or match-day tactics, but the list he assembled, or helped to assemble, was simply too young. Sure, you have to have a long-term view when harvesting young talent, but they went in drastically on the young side.

    Jaeger O'Meara Gold Coast Suns AFL 2014

    (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

    In their first ever match on April second, 2011 at the Gabba against Carlton, they went in with 12 AFL debutants and were duly flogged to the tune of 119 points by a fairly ordinary Blues line-up. In regards to list management, did Gold Coast really need to field a team of which more than half the players had never played any AFL game?

    Things got particularly embarrassing (for both the Suns and the AFL) in Round 6 at Etihad Stadium when Essendon led by a record 93 points at quarter time. Thankfully for the Suns, the Bombers may have empathetically taken their foot off the gas by adding just 103 more points to their tally across the remaining three quarters, eventually winning the match by 139 points (197 to 58)

    As a saving grace, Gold Coast did manage to scrounge out three wins for the season, including an interstate victory against Port Adelaide at Football Park in Round 5. Three wins, 19 losses, and a woeful percentage of just 56.3 as a result of being on the receiving end of many a frightful flogging.

    It just didn’t need to start this way. An additional recruitment of just three or four more reasonably experienced (50-100 game) players would, most likely, have made a big difference to their results in their formative years.

    The appointment of Rodney Eade as coach failed miserably
    Taking the reigns in 2015, Rodney Eade was supposed to be the experienced coach that Gold Coast needed to finally guide such a talented playing group into a successful period. By this time, the players had also gained significant experience on the AFL stage – talent plus experience usually equals success. But things went even further downhill.

    In his three seasons as coach, The Suns finished 16th, 15th, and 15th. Eade was abruptly sacked towards the end of 2017.

    Rodney Eade Gold Coast Suns AFL 2017

    (AAP Image/Tracey Nearmy)

    To be fair, Eade’s playing group was decimated by injuries during a large part of his tenure, and any coach would have struggled under such circumstances. Still, one got the feeling his game plan never quite brought out the best in the players.

    So where to from here for the Suns?

    The appointment of Stuart Dew as head coach for 2018 may be just what the Suns need. A fresh look, fresh game plan, fresh feel.

    Ablett may be gone, but the bulk of that initial talent is still there. Let’s see if Dew can be the one to finally get the best out of this enviable list of players. What do you think, Roarers? Is it time for the Suns to rise?

    Getting hassled by a parent or partner about spending too much time playing video games? Now, you can tell them the story of how some ordinary gamers scored $225k for just seven weeks of work.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (6)

    • March 26th 2018 @ 8:55am
      Aligee said | March 26th 2018 @ 8:55am | ! Report

      One of the very big reasons for Universities demise was WWI and the amount of players who signed on, which ultimately decimated the club – when do you think WW3 will happen ?.

    • March 26th 2018 @ 9:54am
      Qlder said | March 26th 2018 @ 9:54am | ! Report

      OK, Paul, as a GCSuns supporter and member (yes, we exist) I’ve got to add a couple of things here.
      First, credit for getting two things right (at least): the injury record has been appalling. Little things like having O’Meara on the list for two years in which he didn’t play a game; Ablett’s struggles with his shoulder (thanks Collingwood) and then his hamstrings; Jack Martin’s first season over 10 minutes into Round 1… I could go on. And the two coaches so far missed the mark in differing ways. In retrospect, Eade’s appointment was not good, despite the injury issues he had to deal with.
      A couple of things people ‘outside’ don’t get about expansion teams is that the club starts with no 100 year culture. That takes some time to develop. Like 100 years or so; so when the team is criticised for a lack of culture, they have to be cut some slack (Paul, you did not hit that empty bucket, thank you). Secondly, when expansion teams succeed, they are dissed by other supporters because the AFL”gives them everything; blah blah, blah” but when they struggle it’s “pack them up; a waste of time and money” etc.
      So, with that off my chest, let’s look at how some other expansion teams have performed. I am deliberately going to cherry-pick my stats here, but let me point out that established clubs Footscray, North Melbourne and Hawthorn all joined the VFL in 1925. Footscray took 13 years to make the finals in a 12-team one-city competition. North took 20 years, and Hawthorn just 32 years to make the finals (you could make the case that they have gone OK since then).
      So, if you want to bring up University, what about Richmond who joined at the same time? Well, it took the Tigers 8 years to do it in 1916 when only FOUR teams played in the VFL due to WW1. The following year when there were 6 teams, Richmond went straight back to the bottom.

    • Roar Rookie

      March 26th 2018 @ 3:55pm
      Paul P. Mark said | March 26th 2018 @ 3:55pm | ! Report

      Good points Qlder, very good points I must admit. I do think the Suns are great for the competition as opposed to GWS, whom I believe are destined to fail almost as soon as they end up on he lower rungs of the ladder after this run of relative success – but I will “expand” on that in another article soon.

      Stewy Dew might be a great coach too. I want the Suns to succeed.

      • March 26th 2018 @ 4:53pm
        Aligee said | March 26th 2018 @ 4:53pm | ! Report

        Hawthorn also took about 50 years before they won a game at Collingwood home ground (then) Vic Park.

    • March 26th 2018 @ 5:13pm
      Aligee said | March 26th 2018 @ 5:13pm | ! Report

      Interesting ……

      Also this was about 4/5 years ago, plenty of growth since then, just as a comparison, each WAFL club has about 5k of juniors per zone, there is 9 WAFL clubs and Perth has a population of 2million, the GC has a population of about 500,000 (?)

    • Roar Pro

      March 27th 2018 @ 4:23pm
      Doran Smith said | March 27th 2018 @ 4:23pm | ! Report

      I wouldn’t write the Suns off yet, they won on the weekend and Stuart Dew is an astute Coach.

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.