Intervention spares Ferrari’s blushes at Shanghai

Bayden Westerweller Roar Guru

By Bayden Westerweller, Bayden Westerweller is a Roar Guru

Tagged:
 ,

3 Have your say

    No sooner than the tune had switched to Ferrari becoming the hunted did the Maranello outfit regress to its former state of strategic indecision, and the irony is that a safety car potentially erased its blunders at Shanghai on Sunday.

    That Sebastian Vettel was subsequently spun by Max Verstappen is irrelevant, for Ferrari’s primary opponent, Mercedes, saw another victory unrealised when this weekend had the potential to place the German manufacturer back in the contest, having appeared bereft for answers following qualifying.

    Third to Kimi Raikkonen and ultimately eighth to Vettel was the reality, as opposed to sixth for the Finn and second for the former – as they had been running prior to the safety car, which sounds like a better deal, though it will be delighted that Bottas, with Lewis Hamilton not figuring in contention at any stage, was forced to settle for, or perhaps crudely, again accepted second.

    One driver who certainly benefitted from its appearance was Raikkonen, who for the umpteenth occasion in recent memory, was sacrificed to enhance Vettel’s prospects, having fallen victim to the German’s aggressive tactics off the grid into T1.

    He slipped to fourth and was held out until his compatriot, having undercut Vettel thanks to a shrewd early stop and blistering out lap, passed him on lap 27, ceding position to Hamilton and Ricciardo in the process.

    Yet, the 2007 world champion could have achieved even greater than the bottom step on the podium had he switched to the soft compound as the safety car was deployed, unable to pass Bottas despite sticking on his tail in the closing laps.

    Where the Red Bulls gained in deficit nullification from the intervention – triggered by friendly fire from its’ sister outfit, Toro Rosso, was duplicated by a second double stacking switch to softs with twenty-five laps remaining, followed by three precious laps at a crawl to conserve rubber for an all-out tilt to the flag.

    On the restart, Verstappen over executed a move on Hamilton, which dropped the Dutchman behind Ricciardo. A few laps later, having climbed back to fourth, he over executed, again, this time colliding with Vettel, from which the German emerged second best, tacitly remarking “I don’t need to say anything here”, placing an exclamation mark on a scrappy Sunday when a third victory from three starts would have amounted to going in for the kill at this early stage of the season.

    It goes without saying that on paper, Raikkonen has appeared to be the cleaner of the two Ferraris over the opening three events, only for inopportune nature to take its course and deny the Finn on each occasion, which has been a recurring theme – particularly over the past twelve months, thus it was ironic yet appropriate that he was the Prancing Horse’s breadwinner on Sunday.

    Ferrari's Kimi Raikkonen (Photo: Ferrari Scuderia)

    (Photo: Ferrari Scuderia)

    For Mercedes, it seemed to have cracked the code to its indifferent form, only for Bottas to again display that he isn’t desperate enough to get his elbows out with a victory on the line. Meanwhile, Hamilton has been operating on seven cylinders – or five in the modern F1 parlance, as though the wind has been blown out of his sails since having first snatched from his grasp at Melbourne.

    All of which equated to a relative stalemate, as Red Bull – Formula One’s pied piper, finger trouble with wunderkind Verstappen, engine failures and the rest, saw an opening and went with it.

    Displaying on the seldom occasion in recent years when it has its ducks in a row, there’s little to stop its charge, and boasting Daniel Ricciardo – who wants it badly enough, and whose teammate continues to try too hard, “sometimes you have just got to lick the stamp and send it.”

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (3)

    • April 17th 2018 @ 2:49pm
      Dexter The Hamster said | April 17th 2018 @ 2:49pm | ! Report

      Bayden, you really have to feel for Kimi don’t you? It was bad enough that Bottas jumped Vettel in the pit strategy, but to then try to sacrifice Kimi to undo their poor work really takes the cake. I like Ferrari and want to see them do well, they are part of F1 in a massive way, but at the moment they are making It very hard to support them.

      • Roar Guru

        April 17th 2018 @ 9:11pm
        Jawad Yaqub said | April 17th 2018 @ 9:11pm | ! Report

        Exactly. At 38-years old and near the end of his career, I’m sure Kimi Räikkönen wouldn’t be getting out of bed each day to play the sacrificial lamb to Ferrari. Bayden and I constantly deliberate, whether Kimi will ever win or ‘be allowed’ to win a race in F1 before he decides to hang up the helmet. That being said, you wonder who’ll take his place at Ferrari when he does inevitably retire and whether they’ll be consigned to the role of dummy.

      • Roar Guru

        April 18th 2018 @ 8:15pm
        Bayden Westerweller said | April 18th 2018 @ 8:15pm | ! Report

        He seems to serve one purpose, and regardless of how competitive he is, there doesn’t appear to be any appetite to give him a legitimate run at victories. It’s nothing new from Ferrari and really does make it difficult to support much of the time, though any breakthrough where the Finn circumvents pit wall and other sorcery will be very sweet.

    Have Your Say



    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Explore:
    ,