The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

The absurd England-Belgium situation

Eden Hazard in Belgium colours. (AP Photo/Amel Emric)
Roar Guru
27th June, 2018
18

How exactly does one go about throwing a World Cup match?

In a tournament where the previous finalists Germany and Argentina are going through titanic battles just to escape their groups, and Spain, Portugal and Brazil have all had their hairy moments, it seems an indulgence for both England and Belgium to be able to toss aside their last group match against each other.

Not only that, but reports that Belgium could rest as many as ten players (an entire team minus one) indicate that they clearly want to finish second in their group.

Yes, it’s conspiracy theory time, but I’m more laughing about it than brooding.

This decade, major tournaments have curiously developed massively unbalanced knockout rounds. Holland squeezed through two lightweight halves of the draw in the previous two World Cups.

The classic example, however, comes from merely two years ago, when Portugal on their way to Euro 2016 glory played one opponent out of six who had reached the previous World Cup, while Spain lost to Italy who lost to Germany who lost to France on the other side.

Argentina and Germany’s struggles have likely placed the classical names all on one half of the draw, opening a deep Russia 2018 experience for two of Switzerland, Mexico, Colombia, Senegal, Japan, Denmark, Croatia and so on. And… Belgium? England?

Belgium-England had originally promised to be the second-best match of the first round. Instead, while Portugal-Iran, Argentina-Nigeria, Mexico-Sweden, Brazil-Serbia and Senegal-Colombia all throw down in desperate final confrontations, Belgium-England now promises something else entirely.

Belgium's Eden Hazard controls the ball during the World Cup Group H qualifying soccer match between Bosnia and Belgium at the Grbavica stadium in Sarajevo, Bosnia.

Eden Hazard in Belgium colours. (AP Photo/Amel Emric)

Advertisement
Advertisement

Something never seen before in World Cup history? A tied situation means that a draw between the two will involve a tie-breaker of fair play points. That is – the lesser number of team yellow and red cards wins the group.

While unfortunately-timed yellow cards can cost teams tournaments, if Belgium’s subs can all stomach the yellow load and quietly go back to the bench the rest of the tournament, it could be mission accomplished.

And who can blame them? If Belgium find themselves on a path with one of only Croatia and Spain between them and a World Cup final, I could almost back them to win it all. If they conversely finish first, their path would likely involve Colombia, a quarter-final against Germany or Brazil and another huge semi-final struggle.

This is not unknown in World Cup history. West Germany in 1954 beat Hungary 3-2 after their B team had lost to them 3-8.

I expect England to ‘naively’ play to win and to indeed win, as a young team like them wants momentum, and I don’t see Gareth Southgate as the type to play games.

Gareth Southgate

Gareth Southgate, Manager of England (Photo by Nathan Stirk/Getty Images)

Given Belgium’s dreadful fragility against anyone ‘up for it’ on the day, however, they would be playing a dangerous game with their always shaky morale. They were classical flat-track bullies in being outfought and defeated by Italy and Wales in Euro 2016 – the gifted Belgians losing to the two teams willing to scrap.

I imagine everyone on the field will try their best. It’s the World Cup! Professionals, heck anyone, lives for these moments. But B teams are B teams.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It’s an open World Cup. Everyone except Croatia, Uruguay, Belgium and England has had their struggles. It will be an even more open World Cup when France, Portugal, Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil, Germany and Belgium all knock each other out.

Or not. Insert wink emoji here.