Join The Roar
Become a member to join in Australia's biggest sporting debate, submit articles, receive updates straight to your inbox and keep up with your favourite teams and authors.
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
By joining The Roar you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions
Login and get Roaring
Oops! You must provide an email address to create a Roar account
When using Facebook to create or log in to an account, you need to grant The Roar permission to see your email address
The Wallabies have lost a second Test in a row as their Spring Tour turns sour, a 32-15 defeat at the hands of England making it eight in a row against former coach Eddie Jones.
If you stayed up late, or got up early, to watch the effort from Twickenham, then what better way to vent than by giving each of the Wallabies’ 23 a score for their performance.
If you’re after a rough guide as to what each number means, here’s what we usually go by:
1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May
GodJohn Eales have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a match of such importance.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good.
7. Pretty good, actually.
8. Very good.
9. Excellent.
10. Extraordinary. Calling them man of the match would be an insult.
Does Kurtley Beale get a pass mark for an error-riddled night? Did James O’Connor’s penalty success overshadow the rest of his match? And did Ollie Hoskins do enough in his brief run on debut to get a ranking? These are all questions you’ll have to answer yourselves.
Ready to go? Head to the form below, make your calls and don’t forget to hit submit!