So because he would get destroyed by the best of the best – is he not legitimate?

Hey Scott, I was curious to hear how you thought the Basketbrawl incident was covered by Australian journalists? Maybe even in contrast to the way it was covered internationally? This is for a school assignment so it would really help if I heard your opinion on it.

ahhhhhhhh. You sir are correct! My Apologies.

Firstly thanks for replying man

1. Theres a difference between saying someone is one of the best players and should deserve 1st team all honours. I think every fan in the world thinks that. But where the difference lies is that I take it one more step further and say that he is the number one best player in basketball. Most people wouldnt because he hasnt even been to a conference finals. See the best player in the league does not move around like the MVP. It usually stays consistent for eras unless injuries/ absences (JORDAN IN 94-96) or there are just two near equally great players (Duncan + KOBE). Its less contingent on who had the best regular season and more who is just the best player. Because how you play in Playoffs matters heaps. Sometimes the best player in basketball doesnt win the championship – Luka because of his supporting cast compared to contenders falls under this exception

2. Ignore skip Bayless… DONE. Hasnt been relevant since Bron and now from what Ive heard his tryna evolve his career by hating Luka…………

3. With Morris vs Smith. I’ll agree Smith is on the better contract. And he is really good. In fact TBH, this debate made me double think my opinion on him. But im still taking Morris because his ceiling is and has been better. His last game he had 24 5/6 from 3. In game 7 he had 23, 7/9. I don’t think Finney could do that in games like this. I also do believe that scoring matters alot for clippers who are always unsure where the points will come from. However most of Morris games his just less than average, cus he is a perfect example of fate or feast. I still thinking having a on n off player like that is more valuable and better than what Finney provides. Also I agree with your point about his Knicks tale and empty stats etc. But I think same could be said for Finney with the lack of supporting players in Dallas.

And you cant use his efficiency as a your numb 1 point cus even Kelly Olynic is ballin in Housten efficiently. The truth is Dallas don’t have a great role players so Finney even looks better than he is. His 3pt shooting numbers spiked when Luka became a star and dragged defenders to him. Thats opportunity for Smith.

4. I think you mis interpreted my Jordan Point. Of course you can win a chip with one all star, look at all of MJS sixx rings. Also Im glad you mentioned Jordan Rules cus the book got delivered yesterday. But I do understand the concept. No doubt Pistons won cus of their D. But what I was saying was: Jordan didn’t have an All Star for the last game of the series and he lost. In fact he had worse than a all star, more of a YMCA scrub. (1-10, 2 points, 2 TO, 4 R, 2 Ass). Every year you give the GOAT a all star, provided he has enough time to play in the season, it was a wrap! Also the Bulls went 55-27 (3rd seed) while Pistons went 59-23 (1st). Not that big of a gap.

But Jordan was clearly the best player in the league even though he lost in game 7 to a team that won the chip without entering finals. So we should think Luka is the best player because he single handedly took a championship contending team to the Finals.

Alright soo many things to unpack here so please reply to this:

Firstly im not gonna lie, I wrote this in 45 Minutes because I just felt like it, so I didn’t use as much sophisticated evidence as I could of. NOT A COP OUT – I still think LUKA is the BEST player in the league – just why I even admit my evidence was lacking a little

OK 1. Everybody says you need a championship to be the best player. Theres a reason KD left OKC for Warriors. Look at Skip Bayless (the numb 1 bball media guy in 2011) roasting bron. In fact this stigma has largely led to the player mobility era of superstars joining eachother

2. I wasn’t using that as an argument, I was trying to explain that in certain times, the best player in the league (MJ) does not need a lot playoff success when their team is bad

3. Yes BAD! Bro I watch NBA every day, maybe 30 dallas games just this season. Finney is good, but im taking Marcus Morris instead of him. Not just for name recognition. Oh and clearly FINNEY IS EXCELENT for his contract and should be resigned. Morris has just done more on bad teams and good teams that Finney has ever. Facts. Do you think he would of been the second best player on the on 2020 Knicks? Sure he think his better than he is but he defs is better than smith.

3. That Jordan point: Every single season Jordan had JUST ONE ALL STAR Teammate, it was a wrap, they won the championship. They lost game 7 because MJ didnt have an all star teammate that game. Not that pippen wasnt great. But he wasnt before then.

Look maybe im being harsh with that word ‘garbage’ but at end of the day he was not an all star. And marucs morris had a much better 3pt percentage on more attempts in the reg season.

It is undeniable that his contact extension was a large factor in their downfall. He was not the same player when he got that contract. I would say Ewing over Walt Frazier as the greatest Knick. Frazier (6x All-NBA 7x ALL STAR 2x CHAMP) over Ewing (7x All-NBA 6 x ALL STAR 2 finals losses).

Both Knick figure heads won championships in lack luster time periods for talent. The early 70s, the league was half on cocain, they beat a too-old Jerry West/ Wilt lakers team twice.

Then Ewing went up against a Dominant Rockets Team and lost then got injured in 99 in the ECF- His team wins and lose in 5 against the Spurs. in 95 there was no MJ and in 99 it was just a weak era of ball. Lakers weren’t there yet and the Jazz were old. Again NO MJ.

Man can’t tell you how much that means to me! Thanks so much. Heres a little bit of info/ analysis on Bills Career and what made him stand out. It is a long read though…

In 1969, William John Simmins III was born in Malborough Massachusetts, an important detail for his rise to fame.

Four years later, Bill’s father was wavering between a new motorcycle and single season ticket for the Celtics. After Bill’s mother, Jan Corbo, shut down the idea of a motorcycle, Bill and his father had something new they could do together, unbeknownst to both that it would become the central theme of their life long relationship. Their fates were ultimately sealed the following year when the family would move to Chestnut Hill, only 15 minutes away from the arena. Bill went to every home game with his dad, and even revealed in his book, ‘The Book Of Basketball’, that as a kid, he wanted to be called ‘Jabaal-Abdul Simmons’, and that he wanted to be African American because all of his idols were.

This kind of speaks to who is Simmons is at his core, his problematic without being outright abhorently so. His forthright at the cost of being labeled ignorant, for which he is not. Simmons praised past black players for their success and social progress in the face of racial injustice, in a time where it wasn’t always the ordinary thing to do. Hopefully when I’m done you will have a more precise analysis on who Bill Simmons is and his impact in sports journalism.

After growing up obsessed with Sports Illustrated plus non-sports related literature like the Hardy Boys or any works of Steven King, Simmons would get a job at the Boston Globe. Furtuniate for him it was a historically lucky time with so many greats working at one place like Bob Ryan who covered basketball, Ray Fitzgerald who was a famous news columnist and Jackie MacMullen who Simmons is still friends with to this day. Although in such a tight place, Simmons was never given the freedom he needed to write lengthy pieces. He cared so little he used to write his friends’ names in the box scores of local games and trades without ever being caught.

After some soul searching while mostly bartending, Simmons left for the online publication, ‘Digital City’. Inspired by another writer’s gimmick named the Boston Movie Guy, Bill got to start his own column named, the Boston Sports Guy. This was his time to find his own voice. But what would start off as something interesting would take on something much more. His brash writing style mixed with his Boston-inability to censor himself defined his personality as a writer, and took him to ESPN where he would write such pieces as the ‘Ewimg Theory’. In this column, Simmons elaborates on a theory where a sports team has a sudden run of wins after one of their best players is relegated to the bench.

After citing 15 brief but elaborate examples of the theory in action, Simmons would apply the theory to romance and then even relate it to his favourite TV show. “Beverly Hills 90210,” writing quote, “After petulant star Shannen Doherty leaves the show, the producers import Tiffani Amber-Theissen as the resident vixen during the watershed “Dylan’s drinking again” season — maybe the greatest upgrade in TV history”

He could marry his unique brand of unfiltered opinion and homerism, his encyclopedic knowledge of sports, and command of pop culture to form sports theories and perspectives that no one else could. He was the guy who was saying what no one else could, because they either didn’t have the unique perspective and mix of ‘I don’t care’ attitude or were too busy trying to be what sportswriters “should” be. It was fun. And while an individual article was mostly meaningless, on a whole it started asking the question “does sports actually mean anything on a real scale?” (BS Reader, 2019).It was a new style of writing that only Bill could do.

Simmons adapted to ESPN by now appealing to a national crowd, removing much of his old Boston niche comments and topics, but what always remained consistent was that his voice was as much the story as the actual story he was covering. Simmons dealt with critics for writing about sports without having a press pass, and for writing about picking his nose but as Simmons said in a Q and A at Sail University quote, ‘“All of the stuff I was writing about was the stuff people wanted to read… I was writing about fantasy football and wrestling paperviews and stuff that David Halberstam was not covering… and that was the biggest reason I think it started to do well”
One of my personal favourites from his ESPN days was his humorous yet affecting play-by-play of a lifelong Boston Red Sox fan watching his team win the World Series. The column made both the Big Lead’s and the Rolling Stone’s lists unsurprisingly as he perfectly spells out the jubilation of a long-suffering sports fan upon discovering that his or her team has gone all the way describing quote,

“Outsiders made up fake curses, called us losers, pointed to a legacy of failure, questioned our sanity. We kept hoping. We kept the faith. We kept passing this team down from generation to generation, hoping it would be worth it. And it was. The last 11 days were the greatest sports ride of our lives: Eight games, eight wins, one championship, a boatload of memories. We crawled through 500 yards of (expletive)-smelling foulness and came out smelling like roses on the other side. (that’s a shawshank reference)

Anyway, I have very few rules in life, but this is one: Any time the Red Sox can win the World Series on the same night of a lunar eclipse, I have to keep a running diary. I’m not doing this for you. I’m doing it for me. I want to read it in 50 years, show my kids, frame this baby and stick it on a wall. Here’s how Dad was feeling on the night the Red Sox won the championship. I like that idea. “

The “fan’s perspective” is best captured in Simmons’ frequent “running diaries” of major sporting events, where he writes hundreds of time-stamped entries throughout the event and posts them as a column, talking about what he is eating, which channels he switches to during commercials, when he hits the bathroom, what his wife and dogs are doing in the living room, and so forth.

For what made Simmons great – his intention to resonate with readers like a real fan and less of a distanced journalist, this is right on the money. While fans did write columns and while journalists may have mentioned pop culture references, Simmons pioneered a style of writing for peers and fans that no one had seen before.

Simmons is the most visible representative of a huge contemporary shift in sports journalism, which is increasingly leaving behind the traditional, serious-minded “reporterly” mode associated with print media and turning toward the growing influence of a free-form aesthetic, derived from the writing style of non-professional bloggers. This style treats sports as a component of pop culture, rather than a sanctified space apart from it.

After befriending a up and coming comedian in the works of having his very own show with ABC, named Jimmy Kimmel, Bill would go on to write for the show. He would also do more behind the scenes work at ESPN like creating and producing ESPN’s 30 for 30. But in 2011, Simmons was the editor and chief of a ESPN owned website named Grantland.

Grantland was the personification of Bill’s striving for greatness. It wasn’t the same lighthearted rambling like with his old ESPN coloumns. It wasn’t just a bigger platform for Bill’s message. It was him striving to do something never done before, while giving him the checkbook to surround himself with a supporting cast to do it. It married an era of burgeoning statistics and sports writing–where hot takes were ruthlessly destroyed, and better ones were introduced. It was bar room theories, weaponized with statistics.

In his piece, The Consequences of Caring, Simmons writes tenderly and philosophically on the inevitable moments of disappointment that come with being a sports fan. He takes his young daughter, a fledgling Los Angeles Kings fan, to see the team lose a gut-wrenching Stanley Cup game and then juxtaposes her crushing sadness with his own after seeing LeBron James and the Miami Heat demolish his beloved Celtics in Game 6 of the 2012 Eastern Conference finals.

Saying quote, “And just like that, she started crying. I remained sympathetic while being secretly delighted, like she had passed some sort of “Fledgling Sports Fan” hurdle or something. On the way home, I discreetly snapped an iPhone picture of her post-cry for a keepsake — you know, “Here’s the first time sports ever made my daughter cry” — only she caught me taking it, flipped out like a Real World roommate and scratched my right arm so hard that it bled. She didn’t talk to me for two hours. And that’s when I knew my daughter liked sports”.

This is still a continuation of Bill’s fresh style that made him so popular a decade prior. But to compare him to an athlete, this was the peak of writing career. It was his crowning achievement. The site demonstrated that a mix of sports, pop culture, blogging, longform writing, video and podcasting can survive and thrive in the social media era. It’s a platform that suits the sensibilities of sports consumers who didn’t grow up relying solely on the newspaper for their daily sports knowledge.

However, his everyman pose grew from an affectation to an insult as he started writing about his almost clubbing experience with MLB star Manny Ramirez, playing video games with Tiger Woods, as well as getting great seats to any sporting event that interested him. Ultimately though, Grantland wasn’t sustainable. While redefining the genre, it was hemorrhaging money.

Personally, the most remarkable element of Simmons’ style, whether he is writing or
podcasting, is the vast length of his work. His columns generally run from 4-7000 words and take up to 45 minutes to read through. His book, The Book of Basketball, released in 09, is 736 pages long and contains at least 400 footnotes. On the ESPN show SportsNation, the book was shot from a distance of 25 feet with a 9mm pistol. The bullet was stopped by page 642. Simmons’ large fan following is especially remarkable, then, in view of the time commitment necessary to participate fully in his universe.

Like everything with Simmons, the book had a few controversial one liners like when detailing how “…Phoenix swapped Kidd to New Jersey for Stephon Marbury a few months after Kidd was charged with domestic assault. (36) Later claiming,
(36) Anytime “he smacked his wife, let’s get him the hell out of here” is the only reason for dealing one of the best top-ten point guards ever, I’m sorry, that’s a (expletive) reason. By the way, this footnote was written by Ike Turner.” (page 236). Ike Turner being a famous muscian revealed wife basher. But I argue if you look deep into Bill’s work and not just the pull quotes, you would know he tries to make humour out of everything.

Bill commented on this in another Q n A claiming, “Satire is getting tougher and tougher cus part of being funny is, getting as close to the line as possible, and when you get as close to the line as possible sometimes you’re going to go over the line, and if you go over the line in 2018 everyone freaks out”.

Simmons’ fans not only imagine him as a buddy; they recognize their own identities in the one he projects, and can assimilate themselves into the framework that he provides.

While he has stopped writing now, and is leading CEO of the Ringer, a growing media outlet that holds multiple podcasts and writers, no one can undervalue the imprint Bill Simmons, the writer, left behind.

This part of the season comes every year. The only reason this one was 72 was because of covid. In fact it made it more boring because our break from ball has not been that long.

The following years will be 82!

They were commenators for playoff games or did the sideline interviews. I was using them as an example of the media landscape in general not just Simmons time.

Magic was a commentator after his playing career.

Read the Book of Basketball my friend, The guy is more than his popculture references

IMO: It should be measuring a players peak by the length and height of that particular amount of time. In other words thier dominance. As well as mentioning past feats and fall before and after this valued time. Brons peak is longer but not as great. Jordans was still very long and GREAT.

Whenever people mention LBJs ‘off the court’ stuff. Whether listing it or claiming to favour it when discussing GOAT. NO MATTER WHAT. I think that person’s opinion might be invalidiated because they are thinking off the wrong criteria for GOAT

The Hawks rank in the bottom 8 in Team Defensive Efficency with 111 points allowed per 100 possesions.

I don’t think the team will ever be able to compete because of the defensive liability Trae Young poses. Trae Young is similar to Isiah Thomas (Celtics version) in that he will always be targeted because of his defensive liability. I don’t even think Trae could pack on the pounds IT has. Same goes for Kemba in that there both bad defenders because of their height but at least Kemba is strong and stocky. Young is a KD except with no athleticism or height.

I don’t think the time Frame matters. The comparison can swap both ways.

im optimistic on wiseman

agreed but when Klay comes back! who knows

Never say never

We agree Boston was a failure. Id also argue that the mess he cause last season with the media was funny because he was barely playing but still making head lines. Ill agree I may have come across to strong in this one.

AHHAHA I think you have a career in television producing.

No one can dispute that Kyrie is a baller tho!

Hey, Kyrie clearly has been the one to sacrifice the most this season. Now, I do believe Kyrie will be ‘normal’ for the rest of the season and not cause any more mess – But, next season, remember I said this, he will fizzle out into his old narcissistic dramatic ways!

Clyde was insanely underrated and dragged that Blazers team to a finals spot, but damn.. he shot the ball a hella lot. I was under the impression that Drexler changed his game around when joining Hakeem but his assists remained roughly the same. It still speaks to an athletic guard not being the best player on a championship team and having to bring his talents as a second option!

its sad

Id still watch it!