THe biggest problem is the match review committee for starters. How many are on the committee and are they always the same people so at least it gets consistency.
As for the judiciary that is the same it is a rotating basis and similar incidents are being assessed by different people.
It needs to be the same people the system is badly flawed the way they operate it.
AS for the points & fines business get rid of that and treat each incident on it's merit or lack thereof.
He's not wrong, you'd probably have more consistency if the charged players just spun a "wheel of punishments" at the end of each game.
But then the former players that front these judiciaries and the lawyers involved wouldn't get their cut.
Noosa Duck
Roar Rookie
THe biggest problem is the match review committee for starters. How many are on the committee and are they always the same people so at least it gets consistency. As for the judiciary that is the same it is a rotating basis and similar incidents are being assessed by different people. It needs to be the same people the system is badly flawed the way they operate it. AS for the points & fines business get rid of that and treat each incident on it's merit or lack thereof.
John
Guest
He's not wrong, you'd probably have more consistency if the charged players just spun a "wheel of punishments" at the end of each game. But then the former players that front these judiciaries and the lawyers involved wouldn't get their cut.