Dire bowling bodes poorly for Poms

By Geoff Lawson / Expert

Does the performance of the Australian team in the First Test reflect the strength of the starting XI or did the woeful display by England just serve to wallpaper the imperfections of the visitors?

For months we have heard about the relative evenness of the two teams and how the 2009 Ashes may rival the 2005 series, in terms of close finishes though not necessarily drama, mainly due to the well matched nature of the two antagonists.

A spinning pitch was expected at Cardiff and although the occasional ball deviated, especially late in the match, I wouldn’t call the pitch a “bunsen burner” by any stretch of the imagination.

Nathan Hauritz outbowled his counterpart Graeme Swan easily.

Having watched Swan in action during the Caribbean tour and then again at home against the West Indies, I was waiting to see him cause plenty of problems for the Australian top order. It didn’t happen.

Swan looked out of his depth when Katich, Clark, Ponting et al used their feet and came running at him. Swan’s confidence evaporated like a beer within an arms length of Dougie Walters.

Monty Panesar bowled without serious thought. He hasn’t made progress since his first Test match, the same old tricks and strategies are repeated and the batsmen know full well what he will try.

England played two spinners and both were impotent. But if the spinners were not up to it then the seam bowlers were totally flaccid.

I will give the Australian batting order huge plaudits for the patient and disciplined way they went about chasing 447 and then building that substantial lead.

Unlike England who built their total around a top score of 67, thus finishing with a modest total score on a slow but undaunting surface, the Australians turned half centuries into the full Monty.

If Kevin Pietersen’s response to questions about the shot he played against Hauritz in the 1st innings, which more resembled a 25 handicapper raking a bunker rather than one of the world’s best batsmen giving a delivery the respect it deserved, is to be taken seriously then England’s captain, coaching staff and supporters are in for many more innings of heartache.

Pietersen allowed his ego to bat for him, and it cost his team significantly.

Skipper Strauss looked clueless as his bowlers delivered pies rather than hand grenades. They rarely looked like taking a wicket.

For the first time in many a Test Ricky Ponty won the captaincy duel. The Durham Country attack of Steve Harmison and Graeme Onions should start doing their stretching routine now, they will be playing at Lords on Thursday.

A flat deck, winning the toss and being completely outplayed in all aspects of the game. That’s England’s lot at the moment.

I guess you only have to beat the opponent that turns up on the day, and Australia did not quite achieve that.

One Test in and this series has 1989 written all over it. The drama was there, but with no result for Australia unfortunately.

They were the better team but still let the last pair survive 69 deliveries without Hilfenhaus bowling at all.

Troy Cooley, the almost invisible bowling coach has a lot of work to do with Mitchell Johnson in the next 72 hours if Australia want to continue their winning form at their favourite away venue.

The Crowd Says:

2009-07-13T03:13:33+00:00

Benny

Guest


If they keep serving up the same pitch we saw in the 1st test it is going to ruin what should be a classic series. Mitchell Johnson still has a lot of work to do to prove he is our strike bowler IMO...seems to have gotten more sidearm and he tends to want to go back to bowling 2 feet outside off rather than stump to stump

2009-07-12T23:44:37+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Henry - good points however we still didn't close out the game we should have won. Swan and Monty didn't getting it done with the ball but proved stoic with the bat to help England get out of jail. Our batting was obviously very impressive however it's the bowling which is still a bit of a concern. Mitchell Johnson didn't do a good impersonation as our strike bowler in this match. We still lack punch in the Bowling ranks. Will Binga be available for Lords ?. AND the question everyone wants answered is why is Stuey Clark on the outer, is he not fit enough, who has he p&ssed off in the Australian heirarchy ?. The English bowling did look pedestrian for the most part and changes will be made for the 2nd Test. Bring on Lords !.

Read more at The Roar