It’s different when a microphone is shoved in one’s face after sporting triumph or despair.
The four words to follow are inevitable: “how do you feel?”
The sideline reporter knows a cliched answer is likely to such a cliched question, and in a way that’s what they’re hoping for. So when Sally McLellan strode through for Olympic Silver in the 100-metre hurdles at Beijing, we were all in shock.
Not just because she came second, but because her post-race interview was so refreshing and unique.
At one stage she turned the interview around on Pat Welsh with the now famous line “Did you see me?”
She might have won silver, but it was gold television.
It proved to me that the PR behind big sport should throw away the media training manual. Journalists are after unique angles and it’s difficult when sport stars are so guarded and machine-like in their answers.
Which brings me back to Twitter and the internet in general.
With the media looking for more and more stories on sport, it’s no wonder the internet has delivered: Phil Hughes announcing he was axed from the Test team via Twitter; Stephanie Rice’s Facebook profile status changing from “in a relationship” to “single”; and a few years ago, YouTube footage of Marcos Baghdatis at the Australian Open joining Cypriot fans in abusing Turkish supporters.
Of course, there are many more examples.
Just this week, Andy Roddick was critical of US Open organisers trying to prevent Twitter talk on matches.
Organisers fear corruption and betting scandals, but Roddick sees the move as a form of censorship.
I fear administrators are going to really crack down on internet use by athletes. The last thing we want is ghost writers dominating the blogosphere, advising sportspeople on what they should say.
One of my favourite blogs is Andrew Bogut’s.
It’s full of typos and it’s often just him talking about Seinfeld-esque nothing moments. But it shows him as a normal person.
If you stumbled across his writing, you certainly wouldn’t realise he was an NBA star. He tells it like it is.
At the start of the year, he had a go at a former Fairfax, now News Ltd journo for double-crossing him. He also gave a real insight into recovering from injury and how frustrating it was watching the Bucks from the sideline.
I foreshadow more and more controversies regarding the internet and sport stars.
Whether it’s a player criticising a team mate, the officials, or just letting out frustration, it’s bound to happen online as we go forward.
However, if sportspeople feel more comfortable expressing their thoughts on a laptop rather than to a journalist, I’m all for it.
Especially if we continue to see Darius Boyd and Tim Cahill-like interviews.
Gee
Guest
Tamsyn Lewis got in trouble for her Facebook rants but continued to whinge on Twitter about her non-selection for the World Champs. An insight into an athlete is good, but givng them a forum for blathering isn't always a good thing. Megatron is right - there's a fair bit of boring posted.
Brett McKay
Guest
Conks, I think I might have a similar opinion to you on this matter. Phillip Hughes (or his manager, as it turned out) would've been fine if he'd waited another couple of hours before revealing his disappointment of being dropped. But was the story there that he spoke early, or that the press corp didn't get the scoop?? I'm with Andy Roddick on the most part, athletes should be allowed to say what they want to say - and this goes for press conferences too - but at the same time being cognisant of what reaction their comments might generate. For e.g. did Karmichael Hunt and Mat Rogers seriously believe no-one would see their critical comments of the NRL judiciary in the wash up from William Zillman's biting suspension?!? They wouldn't made the comments they did in a press conference situation, so their comments on Twitter were either foolish or stupid, or both. Twitter isn't like a text message to a couple of mates, and so athletes just need to remember that when speaking (twittering) their minds..
megatron
Guest
Some of the Twitter stuff the athletes come up with is pretty banal and worse than PR.
DT
Guest
I love the way something like Twitter can allow the real personality of a sportsperson to shine. We have been bombarded with sterile, one-dimensional press conferences where there is lots of talk and nothing said. Like marketers in all industries, sports marketers need to learn that 'real' is compelling. And in any case, they have no control over it - it's going to happen more and more regardless because that's what the punters want.