Attoub banned for 70 weeks for gouging

By Julian Guyer / Roar Guru

Stade Francais prop David Attoub has been hit with a mammoth 70 week-ban from rugby union for eye gouging.

The ban, which has been backdated to start on December 18, means the Frenchman cannot play rugby again until April 22, 2011 ruling him out of the remainder of the current European season and most of next term’s campaign.

It is the second-most severe suspension to have been handed out for a gouging offence in the professional era, exceeded only by the two-year ban handed to Richard Nones, a prop with French club Colomiers, in 1999.

Attoub, 28, was cited for gouging Ulster lock Stephen Ferris during a stormy European Cup clash on December 12 in Belfast that the Irish province won 23-13.

Eye gouging is regarded as one of the worst acts of foul play in the 15-man game and the International Rugby Board (IRB), the sport’s global governing body, have instructed disciplinary authorities to come down hard on those found guilty of the offence.

Judge Jeff Blackett, the disciplinary supremo at England’s Rugby Football Union (RFU), who heard Attoub’s case said it was the IRB directive and the player’s previous history of gouging that saw him impose a penalty which could end the forward’s career.

Blackett, who found Attoub guilty of the offence on Friday but only passed sentence when the disciplinary hearing reconvened on Monday, determined his action was “in the top-end in the level of seriousness for an offence of contact with the eye/eye area”.

Attoub had previously been suspended for contact with the eye/eye area in a European match in the 2004/05 season,

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Blackett said: “This is the worst act of contact with the eyes that I have had to deal with: it is a case of deliberate eye gouging.”

The initial hearing on December 18 was adjourned until January 15 to allow for more evidence to be gathered after doubts were cast on the veracity of photographs which showed the incident.

But Blackett’s ruling made clear he accepted the images were genuine and he delivered a damning indictment of Attoub’s conduct.

“When he was shown the incriminating photographs and asked to explain what he saw or what was happening he replied that he did not know,” Blackett said. “He refused to accept the possibility that his finger was in the eye.

“It was this evasiveness which satisfied me that his account was less than truthful and that he knew that he had deliberately attacked the eyes of an opponent but was trying to evade responsibility.”

The ban follows a 24-week ban given to Attoub’s team-mate and scrum-half Julien Dupuy who also gouged Ferris in the same match.

Dupuy, who began the year as a starter in the French international lineup, appealed but his ban was only cut by a week.

The severity of the punishments handed out to the Stade duo follows a crackdown in part caused by the furore over the mere eight-week ban on South Africa flanker Schalk Burger for gouging British and Irish Lions wing Luke Fitzgerald during last year’s second Test in Pretoria.

Max Guazzini, the club president of Paris-based Stade Francais, said Attoub would appeal against his ban.

The Crowd Says:

2010-01-20T16:28:00+00:00

Roger Rational

Guest


Jeff Blackett is probably the best Judge in rugby. I wish all the other ones, especially the Saffers, were similarly strict.

2010-01-20T11:15:15+00:00

mattamkII

Guest


Biting is another I hate. Two forwrds wrestle for the ball after a double knock on, the ref blows his wistle to bring play back: Matta "f##k me ref this c##t just bit me" Ref "I didnt see it happen" Matta "well I didn't bite my f###ing self" while showing the perfect teeth print of broken skin on my forearm.

2010-01-20T09:25:41+00:00

Colin N

Guest


It was the ERC who made the decision, but they were employing an IRB directive.

2010-01-20T03:34:29+00:00

ballboy

Guest


yep, the squirrel grip is nasty - especially when playing in the cold. Ah...the memories...

2010-01-20T03:00:04+00:00

stuff happens

Guest


We often criticise the IRB on the roar but full marks to them for this.Someone will lose an eye one day unless lunatics like Attoub are stopped.Burger was unfortunately very lucky.

2010-01-20T01:59:26+00:00

Bay35Pablo

Roar Guru


Ballboy - Um, the squirrel grip. But given a choice between the 2 youd be hard pressed to decide the lesser of those 2 evils ... 70 weks sounds about right.

2010-01-20T01:57:29+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Indeed. 70 weeks is a pretty big statement...

2010-01-20T01:48:50+00:00

Campbell Watts

Guest


Hmmm.... Bet Schalk is pretty happy he wasn't playing in the northern hemisphere when he pulled his eye-gouging stunt last year!!! Eye gouging really is the lowest of low acts. Good on the IRB for clamping down on it - imagine the tarnish on the world cup if one of these idiots tried it in a tight final?

2010-01-20T01:47:14+00:00

ballboy

Guest


A brave and just decision. You'd be hard pressed to find a more cowardly act than gouging on any sporting arena. Hopefully this harsh penalty will go some way to stamping it out of the game.

Read more at The Roar