Federer to Winbledon again? I would Roger that

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

The Wimbledon Championship is the oldest and arguably the most prestigious tennis tournament in the world. I must confess to being a selective republican. Wimbledon and Lords make me give thanks to the traditions of English culture.

There are no advertising hoardings at Wimbledon. The lack of overt advertising is Wimbledon’s strategy in superior marketing. Other sports would do well to study this.

For the first time since the Championships started in 1877, there will be no Englishman in the main draw of the men’s singles.

The Queen will visit for the first time in 33 years on the 24th of June and will have to console herself by cheering for the Scotsmen Jamie Baker, ranked 259 and Andy Murray, ranked 4.

The torture of trying to find an English tennis champion even extended to a Canadian, Greg Rusedski, swearing allegiance to the Queen. Sadly, that was not enough. Allegiance and talent can be like oil and water.

The winners of the singles receive one million pounds and a lifetime of fame.

For multiple winners like Roger Federer, it is not about the money. He would play for free to equal the seven titles won by Pete Sampras.

King Federer has been in every Wimbledon final since 2003. Like the tax collector, he is there every June. He has won them all except the one in 2008, which many consider the greatest tennis match ever played. Nadal won 9-7 in failing light but the glow from that match still illuminates the world of tennis.

Nadal has the credentials to win but Federer is not about to abdicate. Like Prince Charles, Nadal may have to wait a little longer… The battle lines are drawn and Nadal is single-minded in his stalking of the Swiss master.

He has mapped his course with a diligence not seen since Copernicus.

Federer, on the other hand, has not won a tournament since his Australian Open triumph in January. He is distracted and impatient.

He appears serene on the outside but is churning inside. History is beckoning and the pressure is more of his own expectations than Nadal with his explosive two-handed backhand.

The inscription on the men’s trophy reads: “The All England Lawn Tennis Club Single Handed Champion of the World.”

This then is Federer’s trophy to lose.

The early rounds will resemble a reconnoitering mission down the dusty mine strewn dirt roads in Afghanistan. Upsets lurk for the top seeds with every step and some may implode. The serve and the return of serve become the defining moments. Grass is not as forgiving as the red clay. The ball keeps low and the reaction time is fleeting. The fittest and the most adroit will survive.

The draw has been kind to the Aussies. Hewitt, who has played the Last Post so often, should make the third round meeting with Monfils. Andy Murray is in Nadal’s half of the draw. Potential men’s quarters could have Federer playing Davydenko and Djokovic against Roddick. Murray could play Verdasco and Nadal against Soderling.

Sam Stosur plays a qualifier in Kanepi and this is always difficult. The qualifier has nothing to lose and every match is a bonus. If Sam survives this she will go deep in the tournament. This time around she will not have to contend with former number ones.

Henin and Clistjers have a potential fourth round meet, and Jankovic may not make it past Wickmayer in the fourth. Serena has a date with Maria “Miss Piggy” Sharapova in the fourth. This will be the battle of the grunt and the squeal.

Stosur will possibly play Penetta in the fourth. Once we get to the quarters it will come down to the Grass Gods on the day, the lucky net cord, the variable bounce, and the knot in the stomach.

Stosur can win this if she learns to put away the wounded.

At the French against Schiavone she squandered a lead in the second set. In the Eastbourne semi she was up 3-0 in the second and lost her way. She cannot afford to be intoxicated by the grass.

Wimbledon also binds the Aussies and the English together. This is the tournament that Aussies queue for overnight. Just like the campers for the New Year’s fireworks.

Tomic will do well to survive his first round against Mardy Fish. Peter Luczak and Carsten Ball are queuing up in hope more than anything else.

They may have to console themselves with the 11,250 pounds first round losers’ prize money.

Jarmila Groth plays Voracova from Checkoslovakia, and Alicia Molik plays Kucova from Slovakia. I see them both progressing to the second round but that is when they will have to lift.

Casey Dellacqua should win her first round but will come up against Azarenka in the second and will need her leftie serve to be working. Rodionova, the Aussie, plays Keothavong the Pommie.

In this global village, nationalities are blurred and tennis becomes an individual pursuit. Countries and administrators will be quick to claim the victor as their own.

Remember “Aussie Kim” and “Jilted Jelena”?

Wimbledon and Lords. Australia and England. Monarchist and republican. Siblings estranged but eternally tied at the navel.

The Crowd Says:

2010-06-22T01:21:45+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Plasmodium, You have caught me out! I am not an astronomer so can't name the four dwarf planets. I had just googled for 'Sportsmen named after asteroids' and was amazed at the weird and illogical selections. We should have a "Height Contest" between tennis players and cricketers. Pakistan's Mohammad Irfan measured at 6'10" (give and take a few Pakistani inches!) would give Kevin Anderson (6'8") value for money.

AUTHOR

2010-06-22T01:05:15+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Plasmodium, Yes, I wondered if you were away at Wimbledon. Falla certainly had the outswinger going away to fourth slip and Roger wished he had teloscopic arms. Hewitt surprisingly served 16 aces against Maximo but these were also well placed. Line and length. Though he did reach 195KPH. Still he can serve better and needs to be at 70% or better on his first serves to trouble the top 5. I did not reply regarding the Indian squash players but have noted Ghosal and Chinappa moving up the rankings even as the pakistanis are disapperaing. Jahinghir Khan seems so long ago.

2010-06-22T00:40:29+00:00

Plasmodium

Guest


Kersi - is that why Nadal constantly pulls at the back of his shorts, because he has asteroids? Okay, without checking, name earth's four dwarf planets. Vinay - we were talking about lefties giving righties trouble last week, and the Colombian certainly showed why when he had Roger on the ropes. As predicted, there were some surprising matches. I watched Kevin Anderson, previously known only to fans of SA and US college tennis, give Davydenko a torrid time. He's 6' 8" and his serve comes out of the treetops. World ranking, 95. And the feared Cilic, seeded 11, went out to Mayer, ranked 59. Andreev lost to Brands. Brands just makes it inside the top 100, but he's 6' 5" and can also pound a serve. Ljubicic lost to Przysiezny who's ranked just 5 spots above Brands. All these wins and losses are surprises on paper but not when you consider the surface now that just about everybody has a big serve on grass and they all seem to have learned, at last, to come in on the turf and volley when necessary. Even Maximo Gonzalez, who'd never ever won a match on grass, took a set from Hewitt who has the best grass record of anybody now playing. BTW, I was away for a few days so if you replied to my comments re subcontinental squash the thread disappeared before I could check.

AUTHOR

2010-06-21T21:49:06+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


OJ,It had me on the edge,too. Federer had trouble with Falla's leftie serve,especially swinging away from his forehand side. He also seemed distracted,as if he was thinking about his parents in the Royal Box and their likely introduction to the Queen on Thursday. Falla hit some great returns and also showed a willingness to serve and volley. Federer had to save some breakpoints in the fourth set at 4-5 down and survived..champions usually find a way. The fifth set was normal service restored and I am glad I did not reach for the double scotch otherwise I would not have slept at all. Alicia Molik served well and can go further. She is a confidence player and has the ability. Tomic was beaten by a stronger man and will improve as he fills out. Still a boy playing against men.

2010-06-21T21:06:34+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


A major scare for Federer in his opening match. Thrilling match. Alas, I was unable to sleep properly after that.

2010-06-21T09:35:51+00:00

sheek

Guest


But Kersi, You answered before I had an opportunity to respond. Not that I knew.... Vinay, Beautifully written article..... again. Raising the literary bar at The Roar. I must confess I don't follow the tennis as closely these days.

2010-06-21T04:23:00+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Brett, just using my telescope to get away from the wuwuwu cacophony at late nights or early mornings during FIFA's TV coverage!! To be serious, it took me three days of serious to list all the sportsmen-inspired asteroids. Among Australian sportspeople who have asteroids named after them are Shane Gould and Greg Norman. No Bradman so far! Vinay, my prediction for Wimbledon 2010: Federer and S. William. My personal favourites: Novak Djokovic and Sam Stosur.

AUTHOR

2010-06-21T04:16:51+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Ravi,I believe Nadal is close to Federer's equal on grass and hardcourt and has time on his side. But a fit and motivated Federer should just edge Nadal for another two years. Federer's reign will come to an end as all sporting reigns do but not quite yet. And the gulf after these two is vast. Ferderer and Laver have to be the two greatest of all time.

2010-06-21T03:57:47+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Kersi, baffling "the best brains on Planet Roar" isn't exactly setting the bar very high though!! And I dare not ask what you were looking into to come across this skerrick of supreme obscurity!!

AUTHOR

2010-06-21T03:52:48+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kersi,my world has just gone up in smoke. And you haven't even given me your prediction as to the likely winner in men's and women's.

2010-06-21T03:48:05+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Let me gloat, I have baffled the best brains on Planet Roar! Asteroids have been named after Nadal (128036 Rafaelnadal, designation 2003 KM18, discovered on 28 May 2003), Henin (11948 Justinehenin QQ4) and Clijsters (11947 Kimclijsters PK7). This is taken from Wikipedia, "Meanings of Asteroid names". As asteroid discoveries are confirmed, they are given a permanent number by the IAU's Minor Planet Centre. Federer is still waiting saying, "Roger, Roger!" I had listed these three Asteroid-bestowed tennis stars in my Roar article "Ten Tantalising bits of tennis trivia" on 18th June 2009. 368 days ago.

2010-06-21T03:16:58+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Kersi, firstly I was going to say 'ill-fitting shorts' but your second hint has thrown me...

2010-06-21T02:44:46+00:00

ravi midha

Guest


Nice article , but knowing what happened in French open , i have my doubts about Federers invincibility, either he is trying too hard or others are catching up. Article is very informative and i will keep a track about your predictions. Ravi

2010-06-21T01:45:23+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


OK, no takers? Hint: Justin Henin and Kim Clijsters have also got one, like Nadal. Nothing anatomical. More astronomical.

2010-06-20T23:04:39+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


A trivia challenge for Vinay and other tennis experts from Roar: What Nadal has which Federer lacks?

Read more at The Roar