Advantage England in first hit out with Aussies

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

England’s Luke Wright hits a ball from Australia’s Nathan Hauritz during the first one day international at the Rose Bowl, Southampton, England, Tuesday June 22, 2010. (AP Photo/Tom Hevezi)

Gideon Haigh writing for Cricket Australia’s website says: “The Ashes is cricket’s Stonehenge. Its origins are obscure. It was standing when we got here, and will outlast us all.” This puts last night’s one-dayer at the Rose Bowl in its proper context.

Pre-match Ponting declared “we are going to impose ourselves.” He duly won the toss and the openers Watson and Paine had more intent than actual performance.

Watson perished trying to hook and Paine inside edged trying to force. Ponting pulled the pin early, on what was more an innocuous pie down legside than a grenade, and will have to holster the hubris early in his innings.

Cameron White tried to force off the backfoot when he should have been less forceful and inside edged. This was more England playing the woodpecker role than Australia imposing themselves. Clarke and Hussey played with a pragmatism lacking in the first 25 overs. Australia scrapped to a less than imposing 7 for 267 and Clarke showed why he is Australia’s best batsman at the moment with a controlled 87 not out.

England’s reply mirrored Australia and at 98 for four it was an even contest. Ryan Harris bowled with pace and reached 96.5 MPH. He was Australia’s best and Watson proved he is not the answer to Australia’s fifth bowler. Every time he took the pace off the ball Morgan picked it like a locksmith and put it away for four.

Eoin Morgan took the game away from Australia in an innings of poise and nerveless improvisation. England has to find a place for him in their Test side. He was the difference today and, like the rest of the England team, does not fear the Aussies. His hundred at better than a run a ball was punctuated with cuts, pulls and an audacious reverse sweep. He is quick on his feet and like the other famous pirate had a broadsword to match, In the end England won with a lot to spare.

This was but a prelude to the main fare starting in November. The next four months is about honing the skills and applying the coup de grace when the cicadas are in their death throes at the height of the Australian summer.
Australia has made a significant selection for their Test squad in Usman Khawaja.

In this time of recriminations it is pleasing to see a Pakistan- born cricketer given an opportunity to press for a baggy green. It says a lot for how far we have come as a Nation. Usman has made it because of his talent and not because of the colour of his skin.

But back to the Ashes. Has anything so trivial sounding and so fragile ever been given such importance in a country’s history? It is the reason why generations of Australians and English have played the game. This is the only true and abiding rivalry in cricket. Where cricket is paramount.

The rivalry between India and Pakistan is more recent and has been subjugated to the political whims of the two countries. On occasions it has been played as the game was meant to be played. After their first meeting in nearly a year last Saturday the Indian captain Dhoni downplayed the aspect of “revenge” Too often these rivals have played with acrimony and recrimination.

The rivalry between Australia and India had its genesis in Laxman’s 281 at the Garden of Eden in Kolkata in 2001. This is when Steve Waugh’s juggernaut was stopped. But increasingly this is a rivalry calculated to maximize revenue rather than emphasise the closeness of the protagonists.

Indian fans will not be overjoyed by this assessment but then there is ample time to give this rivalry the credibility it deserves in the years to come. The rivalry will need to be defined on the pitch rather than the 80% revenue that India generates. India has yet to win a series in Australia and till they do that it is empty rhetoric to talk of great rivalries.

Sadly, the Frank Worrell Trophy has not left Jollimont for more than a decade. Lillee versus Richards and Waugh v Ambrose. That was another time and another place. Lara versus Warne. Gayle has flattered to deceive and made a mockery of the traditions that so underpinned the rivalry of Australia and the Windies.

The Ashes has a cast of thousands. Heroes and villains for the ages. Douglas Jardine who so outraged Australia’s sensibilities with his merciless barrage of Bodyline. In retrospect I see him as a supreme strategist. He had a master in his craft in Harold Larwood. You needed a bowler with pace and accuracy and Larwood,”reluctant professional” that he was, obliged his “amateur” captain.

Len Hutton’s battles with Miller, O’Reilly and Fleetwood Smith evoked this offering from David Frith: “At times he seemed the head and the spine of England’s batting”

The mysterious “spirit of cricket” has been moulded to suit each succeeding generation’s value systems. Cursory and matter of fact congratulations now give way to exuberant and some say disrespectful celebration. Merv Hughes forever changed the joy experienced at the fall of a wicket. His tongue in the unsuspecting bowler’s ear is a thought Richie Benaud would have cringed at.

And what of Benaud? The Errol Flynn of Australian cricket. The shirt unbuttoned and the upturned collar. He reclaimed the Ashes in 1958-59 and then successfully defended them twice.

Most famously at Manchester in 1961 when England were set 256 to win in 230 minutes. Ted Dexter batting at 3 scored 76 at nearly a run a ball with 14 fours and a six and at 1 for 150 had the game won. Benaud went around the wicket and bowled into Trueman’s considerable footmarks. Benaud, in the space of 13 runs dismissed Dexter (caught behind) May (bowled around his legs) Close (caught O’Neill) and Subba Row (bowled). RB got 6 and England lost by 54 runs.

Ponting and Strauss will strategise endlessly till the hostilities resume at the ‘Gabba in November. Everything they do in the next four months, including walking the dog, will be geared to getting that little edge which will determine the next keepers of the Urn.

The centenary test in 1977 saw Australia win by 45 runs the same as a hundred years previous. This is the legend of the Ashes. The rivalry is permanent. The bragging rights are temporal.

The Crowd Says:

2010-06-28T22:31:01+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Tony and Verma, Guess which Test cricketer is a famous chicken farmer? Zimbabwe's 47 year-old Eddo Brandes (10 Tests and 59 ODIs in 1990s as a bowler). Troubles in Zimbabwe made him settle in Queensland. In 2006 he coached Sunshine Coast to a premiership win. So take chicken farmers, Eddo and Lu, lightly at your own risk!

AUTHOR

2010-06-28T21:39:11+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Hi Tony, Lu is adept at catching chickens and in Roddick's case skinning them slowly. He is a late bloomer and would make a good story. I struggled to get a response on Tiger Woods so I am not sure if Roarers want chicken in the morning. Thanks for the thought. If Hewitt had beaten Djokovic he had a good run to the semi.

2010-06-28T20:36:02+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


PS, worth a story I reckon..

2010-06-28T20:32:35+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Vinay, off topic, but wondering if you know much about this young Chinese Taipei boy LU who knocked off Roddick, sounds like a great story..

AUTHOR

2010-06-26T22:41:16+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Lolly, frightened? No. Struggling and rusty? Yes. England have looked decidedly better than Australia. And ,notwithstanding the speed gun, Broad bowled well and quick. His dismissal of Clarke was a sucker punch and made MC look as bad as Ganguly against the short pitched stuff. Watson is playing well but irresponsibly. Collingwood is justified in believing they can win the WC in 2011. But then this is like believing England can win the football world cup!

2010-06-26T11:51:47+00:00

Lolly

Guest


Did the Aussei batsmen look frightened to you? They did to me. Punter has to score something substantial or we are screwed.

AUTHOR

2010-06-24T22:24:48+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


England out-muscled Australia at Sophia Gardens overnight. Stuart Broad has obviously spent time in the gym and the result was a decisive points victory to him last night. He looked the best and quickest of both sides and if he maintains this development could be England's spearhead come November. Kevin Pietersen looked ominous without pushing on. He has an ungainly crouching stance but when he sets up and stands tall the shot off the back foot through extra cover is reminiscent of Lord Ted. England can wrap up this five set series at OLd Trafford with a straight sets victory.

2010-06-24T10:56:36+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


My debut for watching an Ashes Test on TV in Australia coincided with Greg Chappell's magnificent debut century in the 1970 Perth Test. Unfortunately, ABC interrupted the telecast for national news when Greg Chappell was in his nineties. By the time the TV coverage resumed, Greg had complted his century! What a batsman, Greg!

2010-06-23T13:03:47+00:00

mickh

Guest


Some of my more memorable times is listening to ABC 702 on a hot summers morning anticipating the first ball of the first Ashes test in the Australian summer. It is a special couple of hours for me and I love to be alone in front of the wireless listening to every word. Keep spreading the good word Vinay.

AUTHOR

2010-06-23T12:20:15+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Vim,when a batsman gets bowled by a yorker it means one of two things..the batsman was slow ..or the blower was quick. Ditto if you get hit on the pads in front and caught on the crease. Forgetting the speed guns and the jollity of the English commentators,Harris hurried the batsmen. Occassionally Anderson and Broad did ,too. I don't doubt that Anderson,when his rythm is good,can bowl at 90. In fact I am surprised he was not picked earlier against Bangladesh. He is a better bowler than Sidebottom.

2010-06-23T10:42:08+00:00

Vim

Guest


They were certainly laughing last year when Tim Bresnan was clocked at 90mph at Lords and Stuart Broad was at 93 point something. Almost every bowler on the pitch was hitting 90mph. It was pretty funny.

AUTHOR

2010-06-23T07:17:01+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


mickh, your salutation is humbling. I am trying to convey a sense of the "spirtual" that the Ashes engenders in me. The innocence of childhood when heroes were bigger than life. I believe we should nourish the traditions that matter otherwise we end up with a wasteland that has as its' edict "economic necessity" I still remember the joy of seeing the past greats assembled for the Centenary Test in Melbourne 33 years ago. The Bedsers, Larwood,Harvey et al. It was money well spent by the administrators and I am not usually enamoured of them.

2010-06-23T03:25:04+00:00

mickh

Guest


Vinay, whenever your smiling face pops up I always take the time to read and learn from you. You and people like you are rare birds in this crazy blogging world where insults take precedent over informed debate. Thank you for your ever appreciated knowledge and wisdom.

AUTHOR

2010-06-23T03:10:42+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kersi,,some people would say I am asleep all the time! OK Kieth M is EF and RB is Ernest Hemmingway. Brett: Growing up in India I would listen to John Arlott on the BBC and Johnny Moyes and alan McGilvray commentating on the Ashes and my early heroes were Ian Harvey, Richie Benaud,Ted Dexter,Trueman,Lindwall and Garth McKenzie. I was also fortunate I saw Lindwall in 1959 and he could also hit the ball a long way. Lovely rythmic bowling action and it has always stuck in my mind that Australians have always been the best fielders. FisherPrice..If Bell does play in the Ashes and does well I will gladly acknowledge him. Performances against quality opposition do matter and I try to be as dispassionate as possible in my assesment.

2010-06-23T00:55:53+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


He's by no means a superstar but in Tests Bell's averages 62 batting at number 5 and 52 and number 6. Morgan will do well to match that seeing as he struggles badly at first-class level. It's all subjective and speculative of course. Whether performances should be the benchmark is debatable. I think Johnson's too erratic to be considered indispensabIe. In Tests he was woeful at times last summer (coming off a horrendous Ashes) even up against Pakistan and the West Indies, whilst he regularly goes for 6 an over in ODIs. I recognise he gets wickets and he can hit but just think he's a tad overrated by some; much like Brett Lee.

2010-06-23T00:53:46+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


A question and a comment for your beautifully written post, Vinay. Question: Do you ever sleep or do you sleep with a laptop? Comment: I would call Keith Miller the Errol Flynn of cricket. Richie is the Winston Churchill. Anyway, nice to fly around the 133 years of Ashes in 233 words.

AUTHOR

2010-06-23T00:21:15+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Fisher Price,heres why australians don't rate Bell..57 tests for an average of 42..11 test centuries which include 3 against Bangladesh,4 against Pakistan,1 against West indies ,1 against NZ and 2 against SAF. In this he has four not outs and the only centuries worth talking about are his 199 against SAF at Lords and 140 in Durban. No centuries against India, Australia and Sri Lanka..a top score of 72 against Australia. If Morgan is given half as many opportunities he will do very well. I would like to think I have been impartial in my assesment of the relative merits of the protagonists in my article. For your edification Australians,myself included,do rate Swann,Collingwood and Anderson. The judgement on Broad is on hold. As far as Johnson is concerned he is a match-winner on his day and if fit is the first bowler picked.I will disregard your tenuous attempt at "Ponting's pin-up boy"

2010-06-22T23:58:11+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


Morgan may have more vitality that Trott and Bell put together but Bell scores more runs in the longer-form; his Test record at numbers 5 and 6 is very impressive. But, hey, Australians don't rate him so he must be rubbish (see also Collingwood, Broad, Anderson and Swann). Of the present first-choice batsmen Cook is struggling the most. On Bollinger: he's been Australia's best bowler in the past year but yet you pine for Ponting's ever-profligate pin-up Johnson. I'd have them both in the side with Johnson's batting making him hard to leave out. I love it when Watson's fit and tries to be a frontline bowler.

AUTHOR

2010-06-22T23:05:35+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Thanks,Viscount. I believe Morgan brings a vitality that Bell lacks. I also thought the Australian side looked underdone and dare I say, stale. Hazelwood needs a lot of work and Watson was profligate with his bowling. Australia needs the energy of Steven Smith and for all of Bollinger's whole-heartedness,I do not see him as a one day bowler. My first picks would be Harris,Johnson and Hastings(not in the squad). The Rose Bowl had some spin and was crying out for a leggie like Smith. Swann and Hauritz got bite with the odd one but it is not a finger spinner's wicket. Strauss was lose outside the offstump and could be a worry on the bouncier tracks in Australia. Does England have a backup opener? Cook can do the job and I hope he is more selective when set. A long way to go and it will be interesting to see how it pans out.

2010-06-22T22:59:38+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Lolly, Harris was consistently in the 145-150kph range in the last Australian summer, so even ignoring what we may think of the accuracy of speed guns, it's not out of the realms of possibility that he hit 96mph (~154kph) with an 'effort' ball. I don't think you can dismiss the notion quite so easily.. Vinay, lovely piece here, as usual. The esteem that the Ashes continue to be held in by the cricket world - even countries not involved - is just amazing, and seems to grow with every series. It's just more reason why I can't wait for November...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar