Injuries on slow-mo have got to go

By Melanie Dinjaski / Roar Guru

I wasn’t even watching the match between Fremantle and Port Adelaide yesterday, when Michael Barlow suffered that cringe-worthy leg injury. But Channel Ten made sure I saw it ten times during the Adelaide vs Essendon match later that night. So, slow motion injuries – should they stay or should they go?

Fremantle midfielder Michael Barlow and his bowed leg is burnt into my brain.

It’s horrific. It’s disgusting. It would make anyone cringe.

It was replayed numerous times from different angles during Channel Ten’s coverage of the Essendon vs Adelaide clash. Each time more sickening than the last.

But why? Why do broadcasters feel the need to etch into our minds the exact moment a bone breaks, a shoulder dislocates, or a player gets concussed? What is there to gain from replaying this footage so many times?

They’re commentators, not team doctors. There’s just no need.

Maybe it’s a girl thing. Maybe it’s not. But what can we possibly gain from letting out a collective “Ouch!” the exact millisecond we see an injury occur?

I don’t know about you, but when my dinner goes down, I want it to stay down.

It’s been happening for decades since the beginning of sports coverage. But now with super slow motion, high definition televisions and instant replays, the pain (for the player and the viewer) lasts long after the initial live broadcast.

Naturally then, the slow motion treatment given to Michael Barlow’s injury is not an isolated case.

In April Andrew Bogut got his name back in the sports headlines in Australia with his slow motion injury going viral across the web.

Then just last week, there was the gutsy, body-on-the-line effort by New Zealand Warriors winger Kevin Locke, which saw him almost cut in half by the goal post.

Surprisingly he escaped with just a few bruises and a medial ligament strain. Diving on the ball with tacklers chasing, his try won them the game, and earned Locke the admiration of both Warriors and Roosters fans alike. But please don’t play that footage more than once.

But probably the most horrifying slow motion injury I’ve ever had the displeasure to witness, was way back in July 2001, when Scott Prince was a young Brisbane Bronco.

After a routine kick, an attempted smother saw his leg snap in two places. Imagine if you will, a leg as rigid as a gummi worm. That was what was replayed on television. Again, and again, and again. I was 11 at the time, and I still remember it today.

I’m all for playing tough. And in all cases, the injured player should be commended for their effort. But we don’t need sickening images like these replayed again and again in slow motion.

They’ve got to go.

The Crowd Says:

2010-07-06T00:05:53+00:00

Erasmus

Guest


Viewers, especially young people become desensitised by the images shown on TV. It is the same with the injuries sustained while playing sport and uncensored for general public viewing. It has become generally acceptable that a young player can sustain horendous injuries, bravely get up as if nothing has happened and continue playing. No one, especially TV has shown the long term effects of these injuries and that as a result the players experience chronic health related problems caused by these injuries. Promoting the injuries on slo-mo is unacceptable. It should come with a warning - NOT SUITABLE FOR YOUNG VIEWERS

2010-07-05T09:27:46+00:00

Kingaz

Guest


I AGREE DoughhBoy! I find it interesting that there has been a ban on public swearing under our public nuisance laws but what about sporting fields. There has been no discussion of charging brodcasters or sportsmen and women for swearing in public that by definition reaches far more public members then anyone sitting on a street corner whilst being offensive. Also... why don't we fine people for saying 'faggot' or anything along those lines. I think the media has a whole lot to answer for in perpetuating this terrible behaviour! That is all!

2010-07-05T09:22:07+00:00

Kal

Guest


I think it can be quite hilarious sometimes, as long as its not serious. But also, I guess the commentators look at them carefully because injuries could make or break future match/career performance .

AUTHOR

2010-07-05T09:21:11+00:00

Melanie Dinjaski

Roar Guru


How exactly do they 'put kids into soccer' ?? Just curious..

AUTHOR

2010-07-05T09:20:17+00:00

Melanie Dinjaski

Roar Guru


Hmm. Maybe. I never thought about it that way...

AUTHOR

2010-07-05T09:18:13+00:00

Melanie Dinjaski

Roar Guru


Haha thanks Brett! We'll see how long I get to stay here! (Hopefully I never leave!) And you make a good point. At least then I know I should look away. Though I'd rather be watching the game than five different angles of the injury!

2010-07-05T06:37:25+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


they could certainly give the standard "and we warn the following replay may disturb some viewers" disclaimer if they MUST show it. In Barlow's case, it wasn't so much the impact that got me, but when he stood up, and ... well, we all know what happened then.. Oh, and Melanie, congrats on the sideways move to the red column, a meteoric rise if ever there was!!

2010-07-05T01:47:30+00:00

DoughhBoy

Guest


Ban them! Along with spitting, and lip reading swearing. Think of the children!

2010-07-05T01:30:59+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


Pretty amazing, Melanie. This is the same society where graphic war footage is censored by the mass media. Yet, when it comes to horrific injuries on the playing field, its a slow mo extravaganza. In the end this makes it easier for consumer society to consume war as even a game of football looks tougher.

2010-07-05T01:20:33+00:00

Lazza

Guest


I like them - they do more to put kids into Soccer than anything else.

2010-07-05T00:56:31+00:00

Pete

Guest


Yeah they're pretty gross. THEY'VE GOTTA GO!

2010-07-05T00:56:18+00:00

Erasmus

Guest


It is worth considering that slow motion injuries should be viewer restricted and censored. Not suitable for young viewers considering there is a large number of young fans and is usually brodcast in prime time

Read more at The Roar