The Oranje finally take the initiative

By Tony Tannous / Expert

Netherlands’ Arjen Robben, left, and Netherlands’ Dirk Kuyt, right, celebrate following the World Cup semifinal soccer match between Uruguay and the Netherlands at the Green Point stadium in Cape Town, South Africa, Tuesday, July 6, 2010. Netherlands defeated Uruguay 3-2. (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)

It might have taken three-quarters of the game here to finally wrestle the initiative, but Bert van Marwijk was ultimately able to win the tactical battle against Oscar Tabarez, while his men in Oranje were able to show just enough mental strength to get the job done.

It was far from convincing, in keeping with much of their work throughout the tournament, but the Netherlands are still alive, now have six straight wins and are into their third World Cup final, their first in 32 years.

After losing the first two, will it be third time lucky?

It mightn’t be total football, but for the Dutch it’s totally exhilarating.

It has proved very difficult to shake off this resolute and spirited Uruguay side throughout the tournament, and it was the case again here. South Korea and Ghana fell just short, but ultimately the increase in class of the opposition and their own preference to wait, rather than act, knocked them out.

With a bit more initiative, they might have had really had a crack at this Dutch side, who looked hesitant throughout.

The tactical and mental battle was fascinating both before and during the game, with both sides starting conservatively. It was only at the break that van Marwijk reacted, took the initiative, and for that Holland have their much desired spot in the final.

Before the game, van Marwijk had to make two changes due to suspension, but decided to make a third, bringing back Joris Mathijsen for Andre Ooijer in the centre of defence.

Elsewhere, Khalid Boulahrouz was in for Gregory van der Wiel at right back, and Demy de Zeeuw won the battle to replace Nigel de Jong in the holding role alongside Mark van Bommel.

Van Marwijk had the option of a slightly more offensive formation by bringing in Rafael van der Vaart instead of de Zeeuw, which would have provided a little more creative support for Wesley Sneijder and Arjen Robben.

Instead he went conservative and stuck with his preferred 4-2-3-1.

Tabarez, meanwhile, didn’t risk his skipper Diego Lugano, bringing Diego Godin back into central defence alongside Mauricio Victorino, while Martin Caceres came in for the outstanding left back Jorge Fucile, suspended for an accumulation of yellows.

Caceres’ would be one of the key roles, charged with the responsibility of controlling Robben. Michel Bastos wasn’t up for it a few days earlier.

The other big question was how Tabarez would handle (pardon the pun) the suspension of Luis Suarez, and that was answered by a conservative decision. Going from a front three to a two, Tabarez stiffened his midfield, going with a 4-4-2 instead of a 4-3-3.

Into the advance central midfield role came Walter Gargano, forcing Diego Perez out to the right and Egido Arevalo into the holding role, while left sided Alvaro Pereira came back into the starting side

Tabarez’s tactics were clear, absorb and counter through the twin strike force of Diego Forlan and Edinson Cavani. There was no Sebastian Abreu. It was a formation built for the long haul.

With van Marwijk also going conservative with two screeners, we looked to be in for a war of attrition.

For almost 20 minutes that’s exactly what we got, as both sides sussed each other out. It was cat and mouse, everything measured, with Holland the slightly more offensive of the two. Not that they were gun-ho, and nor were Uruguay completely retreating.

It would take something special from the Dutch to open this game up, perhaps a moment of fantasy from Robben, Robin van Persie or Sneijder, or a set piece, or something else.

Holland’s fullbacks haven’t exactly been offering the type of integration to suggest they would be a goal threat, so it’s probably fair to say that the source of Holland’s opener, a spectacular long distance bomb from skipper Giovanni van Bronkhorst, was a surprise to even the La Celeste.

The Netherlands were in the driver’s seat and could now invite Uruguay forward and play on the counter.

But they had to be careful at the back, ensuring there was enough cover to deal with the threat of Forlan and an under-rated Uruguay midfield that has shown, throughout the tournament, it can get forward and integrate with the front men.

But it is here that Holland made an error. It was one thing to have numbers back, but entirely another to drop off and allow space for Forlan to get in between the midfield and defence.

Instead of retreating, they should have been up, squeezing the space, looking to control the match.

How naïve. They allowed Forlan to turn, gave him space to shoot and watched as the Jabulani bent off Maarten Stekelenburg and in.

For a tournament that started with a drought of strikes from distance, we suddenly had two in half. Special strikers from the skippers, we were square at the break.

Hesitating to take the initiative before the game, van Marwijk reacted at the break, bringing in van der Vaart for de Zeeuw. The idea was that he would play advanced of van Bommel and closer to Sneijder.

Now that the Dutch had a more offensive formation, they should be able to control the match, the theory went. Now it was down to mentality. How would they deal with the expectation and weight of history?

Against a spirited Uruguay side that have proved they have an uncanny ability to stick around, this would be no easy feat, and so it proved in the opening half of the second half.

The longer Uruguay kept it at 1-1, the more chance they had of sneaking it. Hopefully the Dutch would melt, they gambled.

But shortly after a Forlan free-kick tested Stekelenburg and sent a warning, the Dutch got going.

In the 68th minute they finally got van der Vaart, van Persie, Sneijder and Robben all inside the box, but Fernando Muslera made a save to deny the substitute.

Two minutes later, after Robben went to work on the right, Holland were able to shift the ball through the midfield to Sneijder, who turned onto this right foot and snuck one in off the shin of Maximiliano Periera.

Would the Dutch now sit on their lead, as they had done in the first period, or stay on the front foot, in control?

With the formation set up as it was, there was only one answer, and Robben’s headed goal a few minutes later, from a Dirk Kuyt cross, looked to have provided the exclamation mark. 3-1 and, at last the Dutch were in total control.

It was only then that Tabarez brought on Abreu. Too late, it seemed. A late Maximiliano Pereira strike, early in stoppage time, made for a very nervous final minute or two, but the Dutch got through.

They will be mighty relieved, and can now start planning for the final.

Whoever they meet, Germany or Spain, is likely to be the favourite, so the Netherlands must up the ante, especially if it’s the Germans.

Privately, you sense, they will be hoping it’s Spain, another side looking for it’s first ever World Cup. That would indeed be another nervy night.

Tony Tannous has been keeping his usual close eye on all the goings-on in South Africa. Join him at 8.00pm tonight (EST) for a Live World Cup Q & A when he’ll address your thoughts, questions and comments on this morning’s semi final and look ahead to tomorrow morning’s much anticipated Germany vs Spain clash. Leave a comment or question now or at 8pm, when Tony joins us.

The Crowd Says:

2010-07-08T12:09:00+00:00

Dublin Dave

Guest


I think Uruguay were ultimately rendered toothless by the suspensions that were forced on them. Forlan was never as threatening up front, despite his wonderful goal, without the support of Suarez. And their defence was shakier too. But fair play to two small countries, whose combined populations are less than that of Australia. Both have wonderful soccer pedigrees, albeit in the case of Uruguay you have to go back 60 years to its true glory years. They won the first World Cup in 1930 and remained unbeaten in World Cup competition until the semi final of 1954 when, in what was reportedly one of the classic matches, they lost to the red hot favourites and acknowledged greatest team in the world, Hungary. True, this record was helped by the fact that they had not competed in the competitions of 1934 and 1938, sulking at the fact that so few European countries had bothered to attend the first tournament which they had hosted. Yet their achievement in winning that first World Cup was remarkable and even more so was their feat in 1950 when they had to defeat Brazil at its home shrine of the Maracana stadium in Rio de Janeiro. Given the tournament organisation of the time, it was a match which Brazil had only to draw but Uruguay had to win. Small wonder then that soccer has such a strong hold on the affections of the Uruguayan people. As a later manager of the national side once famously put it: "Other countries have their histories; we have our football"

2010-07-08T03:32:28+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


We will have a new World Champion on Monday morning and hoping it's the Dutch !. How ironic is it to see Spain with there masterful passing game winning on a header from a defender !. I too thought the Germans would prevail but I admire the way Spain play so really looking forward to the Final. Tony as you mentioned earlier, the calmest minds will prevail and I agree with you. Spain have experienced winning a big tournament ( monkey off there back ) and the Dutch are hoping it's 3rd time lucky in a Final. Bring it on !.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:45:43+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Jose, are Holland the new Germany? Short answer, no. They are far more pragmatic, play the percentages, but I don't think they quite have Germany's famed mentality yet. That will take years to build, but a good start.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:42:54+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


World's Biggest, if it is Spain we're going to see two pretty nervous sides desperate for their first title. The calmest minds might prevail.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:39:53+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Good points Lollies and Lazza, for a small nation they have a proud history and the emphasis on technique and youth development stands up well on the international stage. They are getting the mentality and spirit right here to compliment the technique.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:34:53+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


I'm with you Dave, I think Germany will be too strong, physically and mentally. The will look to over-power Spain with their physicality and run, and I think the Spanish defence are in for their biggest test yet. They survived against Paraguay and Portugal, but to me those teams didn't have a real go. Germany will. The same probably goes the other way, and I said in my piece earlier in the week that Mertesacker and Freidrich really haven't been tested a great deal, which is why you might send Vila there. But that's because Schweinsteiger and Khedira haven't let teams near them, they've been terrific. Again they will make it real difficult for Spain to get into their final third, so watching them try to find solutions will be intriguing. Spain would need to regain their mojo, or Germany would need to have an off night for a Spain/Holland final.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:25:30+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Agree mintox, I think this more pragmatic Dutch approach is to be respected. Most impressive is seeing the Dutch learn the lessons of the past. If one approach isn't working, fix it.

2010-07-07T10:25:25+00:00

MVDave

Guest


Tony l can see the Germans scoring at least once, even with Mueller out. Therefore the Spanish will need to score at least twice and possibly 3 times...something they havent done yet. They seem too reliant on Villa to score for my liking. Nevertheless for the romantic aspect of having 2 teams in the final that have never won l hope it is Spain v Holland.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:13:57+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Mintox, the talk of total football is more about an ideal in my mind. We're not going to see it in the modern game, but the point about it is that this Dutch side is so far from that ideal, and that's the point. I mentioned in my reply above to zizou that this side is a mixture of the toilers and the craftsmen. Ie, it's modern football and there's nothing wrong with it. But total football it aint.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:07:05+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Agree with that Andy

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T10:04:03+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Good to hear from you zizou, you've been a bit quiet since France were knocked out. Had a bit to say back then :-) van Bommel is van Bommel, and really, for me, he sums up this Dutch side, a mixure of grit, in van Bommel and Nigel de Jong, Boulahrouz today, and quality in Sneijder, Robben, van Persie, van der Vaart, Nice blend. It's one thing to point the finger at van Bommel though and forget the role that Walter Gargano played in the game, there was alot of niggle between these two, throughout. As for the van Persie moment, for me was line-ball, and it's good to see the assistants giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacker. Wish that was the case in the A-League.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T09:56:55+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Dave, agree about Uruguay, fantastic WC, and for a nation of 3.5mil they'll be rejoicing the fact they're back on the big stage. It's been a long time. As for the goals, quite incredible strikes, two left foot beauties. Forlan has been making the Jabulani talk all tournament, so that wasn't a surprise, but the van Bronkhorst strike was out of the blue. And what about Robben's headed goal, a rarity!! That would be a great final btw, as would Holland-Germany. I think we're spoilt either way.

AUTHOR

2010-07-07T09:48:52+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Good evening and welcome to this Live Q & A, and thanks to those of you who have left a comment here and on previous forums. I'll be address these and the questions in my previous piece on the German tactics against Argentina and what they might produce in the blockbuster tomorrow morning. Apologies first to the likes of Australian Football, Greg Russell, Art, Whiskey for not addressing these earlier, but I'll endeavour to get to these tonight, as well as the comments above For those joining, if you have any queries or thoughts on anything you've see at the World Cup, fire away. What were your thoughts on Holland and Uruguay, Ravshan Irmatov, what are your thoughts ahead of tomorrow, who deserves to be in the final?? Fire away

2010-07-07T07:21:11+00:00

The Special One

Guest


Are Holland the new Germany? http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/football/world-cup/armchair-pundit/article/5393/ The dutch have reminded me of Italy 2006. 25 games unbeaten, nothing fancy but effective and will hopefully lift the cup.

2010-07-07T03:58:13+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Great to see the Dutch back in the Final after so many great teams before them falling short. Having watched the game they really should have scored another goal or two. They will need to be more clinical in the Final. I would like to see them play Spain as there would be a first time champion however I think Germany will win and set up a rematch of 1974 Final. Wont the media love dredging up that one again. Looking forward to the Final and Go the Orange Army !!.

2010-07-07T03:43:05+00:00

Lazza

Guest


This just proves that small nations can win the World's biggest sporting event unlike the Olympics for example. There's no reason why we can't do the same if we get those fundamentals right.

2010-07-07T03:39:37+00:00

Lazza

Guest


We should send our NRL players and sledging Cricketers to Uruguay to teach them proper moral behaviour and fair play.

2010-07-07T03:30:40+00:00

ilikelollies

Guest


Another example of why we're right to follow the Dutch system. A country of only 16 million who succeed because they get the fudamentals absolutely spot-on with their youth. Hup, Holland, Hup !

2010-07-07T03:24:11+00:00

mintox

Guest


I'd have to disagree with you, to suggest that the Germans are playing Dutch football is to simplify football down to the end result. The Germans are playing attractive attacking football but it is decidedly un-Dutch in everything but the final product. No doubt that the Dutch have reigned in their expansive attacking game but the players all round ability, tempo of play, the movement and the formation are very much Dutch. The Germans on the other hand have admitted that they've created their style of play by borrowing from other styles. The English tempo of play (much faster than the dutch), Italian defensive qualities and the Spanish passing and movement. The Dutch in the past had been criticised for putting style above substance, meaning they flattered in the lead up to the important games but eventually got knocked out before the final. Gladly this team is being a bit more pragmatic in it's approach and as has been demonstrated can and will turn it on IF they have to.

2010-07-07T03:22:20+00:00

DaMan3000

Guest


BAH HA HA HA - classic

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar