The Oranje finally take the initiative
By Tony Tannous, 7 Jul 2010 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, football, holland, netherlands, uruguay, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news

Netherlands' Arjen Robben, left, and Netherlands' Dirk Kuyt, right, celebrate following the World Cup semifinal soccer match between Uruguay and the Netherlands at the Green Point stadium in Cape Town, South Africa, Tuesday, July 6, 2010. Netherlands defeated Uruguay 3-2. (AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)
It might have taken three-quarters of the game here to finally wrestle the initiative, but Bert van Marwijk was ultimately able to win the tactical battle against Oscar Tabarez, while his men in Oranje were able to show just enough mental strength to get the job done.
It was far from convincing, in keeping with much of their work throughout the tournament, but the Netherlands are still alive, now have six straight wins and are into their third World Cup final, their first in 32 years.
After losing the first two, will it be third time lucky?
It mightn’t be total football, but for the Dutch it’s totally exhilarating.
It has proved very difficult to shake off this resolute and spirited Uruguay side throughout the tournament, and it was the case again here. South Korea and Ghana fell just short, but ultimately the increase in class of the opposition and their own preference to wait, rather than act, knocked them out.
With a bit more initiative, they might have had really had a crack at this Dutch side, who looked hesitant throughout.
The tactical and mental battle was fascinating both before and during the game, with both sides starting conservatively. It was only at the break that van Marwijk reacted, took the initiative, and for that Holland have their much desired spot in the final.
Before the game, van Marwijk had to make two changes due to suspension, but decided to make a third, bringing back Joris Mathijsen for Andre Ooijer in the centre of defence.
Elsewhere, Khalid Boulahrouz was in for Gregory van der Wiel at right back, and Demy de Zeeuw won the battle to replace Nigel de Jong in the holding role alongside Mark van Bommel.
Van Marwijk had the option of a slightly more offensive formation by bringing in Rafael van der Vaart instead of de Zeeuw, which would have provided a little more creative support for Wesley Sneijder and Arjen Robben.
Instead he went conservative and stuck with his preferred 4-2-3-1.
Tabarez, meanwhile, didn’t risk his skipper Diego Lugano, bringing Diego Godin back into central defence alongside Mauricio Victorino, while Martin Caceres came in for the outstanding left back Jorge Fucile, suspended for an accumulation of yellows.
Caceres’ would be one of the key roles, charged with the responsibility of controlling Robben. Michel Bastos wasn’t up for it a few days earlier.
The other big question was how Tabarez would handle (pardon the pun) the suspension of Luis Suarez, and that was answered by a conservative decision. Going from a front three to a two, Tabarez stiffened his midfield, going with a 4-4-2 instead of a 4-3-3.
Into the advance central midfield role came Walter Gargano, forcing Diego Perez out to the right and Egido Arevalo into the holding role, while left sided Alvaro Pereira came back into the starting side
Tabarez’s tactics were clear, absorb and counter through the twin strike force of Diego Forlan and Edinson Cavani. There was no Sebastian Abreu. It was a formation built for the long haul.
With van Marwijk also going conservative with two screeners, we looked to be in for a war of attrition.
For almost 20 minutes that’s exactly what we got, as both sides sussed each other out. It was cat and mouse, everything measured, with Holland the slightly more offensive of the two. Not that they were gun-ho, and nor were Uruguay completely retreating.
It would take something special from the Dutch to open this game up, perhaps a moment of fantasy from Robben, Robin van Persie or Sneijder, or a set piece, or something else.
Holland’s fullbacks haven’t exactly been offering the type of integration to suggest they would be a goal threat, so it’s probably fair to say that the source of Holland’s opener, a spectacular long distance bomb from skipper Giovanni van Bronkhorst, was a surprise to even the La Celeste.
The Netherlands were in the driver’s seat and could now invite Uruguay forward and play on the counter.
But they had to be careful at the back, ensuring there was enough cover to deal with the threat of Forlan and an under-rated Uruguay midfield that has shown, throughout the tournament, it can get forward and integrate with the front men.
But it is here that Holland made an error. It was one thing to have numbers back, but entirely another to drop off and allow space for Forlan to get in between the midfield and defence.
Instead of retreating, they should have been up, squeezing the space, looking to control the match.
How naïve. They allowed Forlan to turn, gave him space to shoot and watched as the Jabulani bent off Maarten Stekelenburg and in.
For a tournament that started with a drought of strikes from distance, we suddenly had two in half. Special strikers from the skippers, we were square at the break.
Hesitating to take the initiative before the game, van Marwijk reacted at the break, bringing in van der Vaart for de Zeeuw. The idea was that he would play advanced of van Bommel and closer to Sneijder.
Now that the Dutch had a more offensive formation, they should be able to control the match, the theory went. Now it was down to mentality. How would they deal with the expectation and weight of history?
Against a spirited Uruguay side that have proved they have an uncanny ability to stick around, this would be no easy feat, and so it proved in the opening half of the second half.
The longer Uruguay kept it at 1-1, the more chance they had of sneaking it. Hopefully the Dutch would melt, they gambled.
But shortly after a Forlan free-kick tested Stekelenburg and sent a warning, the Dutch got going.
In the 68th minute they finally got van der Vaart, van Persie, Sneijder and Robben all inside the box, but Fernando Muslera made a save to deny the substitute.
Two minutes later, after Robben went to work on the right, Holland were able to shift the ball through the midfield to Sneijder, who turned onto this right foot and snuck one in off the shin of Maximiliano Periera.
Would the Dutch now sit on their lead, as they had done in the first period, or stay on the front foot, in control?
With the formation set up as it was, there was only one answer, and Robben’s headed goal a few minutes later, from a Dirk Kuyt cross, looked to have provided the exclamation mark. 3-1 and, at last the Dutch were in total control.
It was only then that Tabarez brought on Abreu. Too late, it seemed. A late Maximiliano Pereira strike, early in stoppage time, made for a very nervous final minute or two, but the Dutch got through.
They will be mighty relieved, and can now start planning for the final.
Whoever they meet, Germany or Spain, is likely to be the favourite, so the Netherlands must up the ante, especially if it’s the Germans.
Privately, you sense, they will be hoping it’s Spain, another side looking for it’s first ever World Cup. That would indeed be another nervy night.
Tony Tannous has been keeping his usual close eye on all the goings-on in South Africa. Join him at 8.00pm tonight (EST) for a Live World Cup Q & A when he’ll address your thoughts, questions and comments on this morning’s semi final and look ahead to tomorrow morning’s much anticipated Germany vs Spain clash. Leave a comment or question now or at 8pm, when Tony joins us.
Recommend this story.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Would a video referee work in football? (103)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Manchester City, ‘Uniting’ the sporting world (60)
- Bling when you’re winning
- Dual signings give Mariners A-League boost (12)
- Would a video referee work in football? (104)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (18)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Bling when you’re winning (0)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, football, holland, netherlands, uruguay, World Cup


July 7th 2010 @ 8:21am
MVDave said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Couple of magnificent goals in the first half. The Dutch always seemed to have an extra gear up their sleeve but well done to Uruguay who will be welcomed home (after the 3rd place game) as heroes.
Would like to see Holland v Spain in the final as neither have won it.
July 7th 2010 @ 7:56pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 7:56pm | Report comment
Dave, agree about Uruguay, fantastic WC, and for a nation of 3.5mil they’ll be rejoicing the fact they’re back on the big stage. It’s been a long time.
As for the goals, quite incredible strikes, two left foot beauties. Forlan has been making the Jabulani talk all tournament, so that wasn’t a surprise, but the van Bronkhorst strike was out of the blue. And what about Robben’s headed goal, a rarity!!
That would be a great final btw, as would Holland-Germany. I think we’re spoilt either way.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:38am
zizou said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Two things you seemed to have missed Tony. How was van Bommel allowed to stay on the pitch after his studs knee high challenge in the lead up to Holland’s first goal? It beggers belief as to how van Bommel doesn’t pick up more yellow cards for some very ordinary challenges. And surely wasn’t van Persie interfering in the play in an offside position for their second goal.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:49am
MVDave said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:49am | Report comment
van Bommel should get a yellow when he comes out on the ground before each game to save time…van Persie was level with the last defender when the ball was shot by Sneijder.
July 7th 2010 @ 9:10am
st penguin said | July 7th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
I hadnt watched any dutch games until their Brazil game. How Van Bommel didnt pick up a card until the very end beggars belief.
I thought the second goal was fine, Van Persie was just in line with the last defender was the ball was struck.
Apart from that, I wasnt impressed by the uruguay player who to fell to ground in front of the ref after Sneijder had run up to confront him (hope that makes sense) – how was that not a yellow card for “simulation”?
July 7th 2010 @ 9:19am
AndyRoo said | July 7th 2010 @ 9:19am | Report comment
I know the incident you are talking about. It’s the player that did the overhead kick which hit the dutch player flush.
He was already getting a card for dangerous play so I think that’s why he got off with the simulation…though Sneijder got a card. Even though Sneijder didn’t really touch him i’m not losing sleep about him getting a card for it because he did run in so it played a part in nearly sparking a melee.
July 7th 2010 @ 10:25am
st penguin said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Thanks AR.
I still think he should get the second yellow – imagine the furore if he did!
While we’re at it, why were Uruguay so angry at the ref after the game?
July 7th 2010 @ 10:31am
AndyRoo said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:31am | Report comment
theories seem to be they were unhappy with Van Bommel getting away with frequent fouling and some offside calls. The Guardian also mentioned they were also angry at some Dutch players as well not just the ref.
More than likely it comes down to the fact they lost and their just bad sports.
July 7th 2010 @ 10:41am
Dejan Kalinic said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:41am | Report comment
AR, I thought there were many pointing to their arms complaining to the ref?
A volley in the final seconds was blocked (there was no replay) but it appeared they were suggesting it hit an arm.
July 7th 2010 @ 10:44am
AndyRoo said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Maybe Dejan, I will try and catch the replay.
Would be delicious irony if that’s true
July 7th 2010 @ 8:04pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
Good to hear from you zizou, you’ve been a bit quiet since France were knocked out. Had a bit to say back then
van Bommel is van Bommel, and really, for me, he sums up this Dutch side, a mixure of grit, in van Bommel and Nigel de Jong, Boulahrouz today, and quality in Sneijder, Robben, van Persie, van der Vaart, Nice blend.
It’s one thing to point the finger at van Bommel though and forget the role that Walter Gargano played in the game, there was alot of niggle between these two, throughout.
As for the van Persie moment, for me was line-ball, and it’s good to see the assistants giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacker. Wish that was the case in the A-League.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:53am
AndyRoo said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Either opponent (Spain or Germany) should make for a great game.
July 7th 2010 @ 9:01am
Towser said | July 7th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Agree should be a cracker.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:07pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:07pm | Report comment
Agree with that Andy
July 7th 2010 @ 10:35am
st penguin said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Ha ha, I wasn’t that surprised they found something to be angry about.
Although I have to admit van bommel was getting away with murder out there.
July 7th 2010 @ 10:43am
Dejan Kalinic said | July 7th 2010 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Not sure about you st penguin, but I’d be worried about van Bommel if it was van Marwijk.
He puts in some rash challenges and shows the potential to explode. You mentioned the high studs up tackle earlier, but he also kicked out at an opponent (and missed) late on.
July 7th 2010 @ 11:45am
Fisher Price said | July 7th 2010 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Van Bommel has made a decent career out of doing that.
July 7th 2010 @ 11:18am
mintox said | July 7th 2010 @ 11:18am | Report comment
I’m a bit confused as to why the Dutch style of play at this world cup is being compared with that of their Total Football counterparts from 30 years ago.
Total Football was a philosophy of every player on the pitch having the skills and tactical knowledge to be able to interchange positions at any point of the match. Certainly it was a success during the 70s when defending and defensive organisation wasn’t as sharp as it is now, but such carefree movements about the pitch would be punished by opponents in the modern game.
The Dutch haven’t played true total football for a long time, instead, they’ve taken on a more pragmatic style of football. Defending and being organised when they have to, holding the ball and probing for an opening if needed and attacking quickly when they do eventually find a weak point.
I’d love to see the Dutch play all out attacking football but I think that the Argentinians proved that all out attack can no longer be relied on to break down the best opposition teams.
July 7th 2010 @ 11:34am
Harvey the Scouser said | July 7th 2010 @ 11:34am | Report comment
agreed, it’s silly the way people throw around the term “total football” these days
on the other hand, certain characteristics of the original concept are now permanently engrained in the modern game, all the same, still silly to pretend that any one team can be defined as playing total football
July 7th 2010 @ 11:50am
Dejan Kalinic said | July 7th 2010 @ 11:50am | Report comment
mintox – nice take on Total Football
Here’s a clip from the 1974 World Cup – don’t have to watch all six minutes, but you get the idea. Would have a better idea if you knew the players and where they played.
I think the Dutch used to be more expansive, more attacking and more exciting – now it’s more results driven and it’s working – very compact team.
I was a big fan of the South American style during the tournament – exciting – but it won’t win this World Cup.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:13pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:13pm | Report comment
Mintox, the talk of total football is more about an ideal in my mind. We’re not going to see it in the modern game, but the point about it is that this Dutch side is so far from that ideal, and that’s the point.
I mentioned in my reply above to zizou that this side is a mixture of the toilers and the craftsmen. Ie, it’s modern football and there’s nothing wrong with it. But total football it aint.
July 7th 2010 @ 12:05pm
Towser said | July 7th 2010 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
As a former defender used to teach kids to tackle as a basic skill. All kids in the team. Some took to it with relish,others not so keen,preferring skills associated with attacking the goal. Total football seems to me an expression meaning everybody can attack,because not all players can defend or tackle correctly,even the Dutch under Total Football.
Attack, score, drop back, defend, move forward into midfield spraying creative passes regardless of personnel.
Nonsense.
July 7th 2010 @ 12:39pm
TailevuTorpedo said | July 7th 2010 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
I’m just glad the cheating Uruguay team has been well and truly booted out of the Cup!! Begone, I say!!
July 7th 2010 @ 1:39pm
Lazza said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
We should send our NRL players and sledging Cricketers to Uruguay to teach them proper moral behaviour and fair play.
July 7th 2010 @ 1:02pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
One cannot help but think that the best Dutch team in the competition at the moment is the German side.
July 7th 2010 @ 1:22pm
DaMan3000 said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
BAH HA HA HA – classic
July 7th 2010 @ 1:24pm
mintox said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
I’d have to disagree with you, to suggest that the Germans are playing Dutch football is to simplify football down to the end result. The Germans are playing attractive attacking football but it is decidedly un-Dutch in everything but the final product.
No doubt that the Dutch have reigned in their expansive attacking game but the players all round ability, tempo of play, the movement and the formation are very much Dutch.
The Germans on the other hand have admitted that they’ve created their style of play by borrowing from other styles. The English tempo of play (much faster than the dutch), Italian defensive qualities and the Spanish passing and movement.
The Dutch in the past had been criticised for putting style above substance, meaning they flattered in the lead up to the important games but eventually got knocked out before the final. Gladly this team is being a bit more pragmatic in it’s approach and as has been demonstrated can and will turn it on IF they have to.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:25pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:25pm | Report comment
Agree mintox, I think this more pragmatic Dutch approach is to be respected. Most impressive is seeing the Dutch learn the lessons of the past. If one approach isn’t working, fix it.
July 7th 2010 @ 1:30pm
ilikelollies said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
Another example of why we’re right to follow the Dutch system. A country of only 16 million who succeed because they get the fudamentals absolutely spot-on with their youth.
Hup, Holland, Hup !
July 7th 2010 @ 1:43pm
Lazza said | July 7th 2010 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
This just proves that small nations can win the World’s biggest sporting event unlike the Olympics for example. There’s no reason why we can’t do the same if we get those fundamentals right.
July 7th 2010 @ 8:39pm
Tony Tannous said | July 7th 2010 @ 8:39pm | Report comment
Good points Lollies and Lazza, for a small nation they have a proud history and the emphasis on technique and youth development stands up well on the international stage. They are getting the mentality and spirit right here to compliment the technique.