Mixed report-card for Sydney's football fiesta

By Tony Tannous / Expert

Sydney’s inaugural Festival of Football was certainly a worthwhile exercise from a footballing perspective, giving Vitezslav Lavicka, Dusan Bajevac, Sam Allardyce and Walter Smith some invaluable insight into how their respective squads are tracking ahead of the season proper.

But from a marketing and promotional perspective, it could have been much, much better.

From early in the piece, the organisers of the festival were out spruiking up the affordability of their ‘$29 for two games’ tickets.

On the surface it looked like a fair deal for a double-header, admittedly involving the middle tier of European football, teams more likely to be Europa Cup also-rans than champions of Europe.

But scratch beneath the surface and a more realistic picture emerges of the ticket price structure for this four-team pre-season tournament.

The reality is that the cheapest children tickets were also the same $29 tickets that adults were paying, for category D tickets in the respective corners of the Sydney Football Stadium, or behind the goals.

In this cheapest category, there was no discount for children, pensioners or concessions; just one price, regardless of age or circumstance.

For many, the incentive to sit at home and tune on Fox, or choose another option, was simply too great.

What’s worse is that there was no category D family tickets, perhaps an admission that the seats behind the goals are best kept for the supporters group, rather than younger children.

But it meant that those after a family ticket had to upgrade to category C, those bays in line with the bylines, where the individual tickets were $45 for adults and $29 for children. A family ticket there would set you back $120, hardly what you would call affordable family entertainment.

And that, of course, is before you factor in the add-ons, such as public transport or parking, a programme, and of course food and drink, the demand for which tends to multiply across two games.

It’s conceivable that a day out at the football could end up costing the family upwards of $250. Spare change for some, but very few.

Is it any wonder then that thousands of Sydney families choose the Aroma coffee festival at The Rocks on the first day of the four-team tournament?

Compare the Festival of Football prices, say, with the NRL in Sydney, where much advertising mileage is made out of the fact you can get a family ticket for $48.

Is it little wonder then, on Saturday evening, that Parramatta Stadium was a sell-out for the Eels’ clash with the Sydney Roosters, which attracted just short of 20,000.

Equally, there were 15,000 fans at Leichhardt Oval for the Tigers’ clash with the lowly Sharks, meaning at least a percentage of these 35,000 fans were out of the equation as potential Festival of Football customers.

While 15,000 were simultaneously at the SFS, you just wonder what a little more foresight might have achieved had the final matchday fixtures been scheduled for yesterday, where there was not a single League game in Sydney.

Again, with better prices, this might have been an opportunity to market to families via the notion of affordable entertainment.

Elsewhere, and especially given the torrential rain, there was a decent roll-up of 9,000 for Wednesday night’s mid-week double header. Given the success of the mid-week fixtures in the most recent A-League season, the attempt to attract the after-work market was a good one.

Here the promotional push should be less about the family and more about the after-work crowd, distinguishing between events within the event.

While ticket prices, seating arrangements and scheduling are obviously key factors in the success or otherwise of such a tournament, there were other elements that impacted it.

The choice of teams is one.

This obsession with all things English Premier League and all things British has become rather boring. It’s one thing to land a Manchester United, Liverpool or Arsenal, but how many people really want to go out and watch Fulham, or Blackburn, or Wolverhampton Wanders, or Glasgow Rangers?

To borrow a line from A-League season one, “not many, if any”.

With the greatest of respect to the wonderful Rangers supporters club, who at least showed up in force, Celtic’s 3-0 hiding at the hands of Braga of Portugal in the Champions League qualifiers last week showed where Scottish club football really is.

Meanwhile, Blackburn and the predictable aerial and muscle-up game of Allardyce isn’t exactly the type of the football that sells seats, Brett Emerton and all.

The thought of seeing Jason Roberts, Phil Jones and Steven N’Zonzi isn’t exactly going to get the turnstiles ticking.

How refreshing it was to see the least heralded of the visitors, AEK, dish up the best football, illuminating the tournament through entertainers like Nikos Liberopoulos, Iganccio Scocco and Pantelis Kafes.

If the obsession has to remain EPL, let’s hope that this next year the festival will feature one of the bigger clubs. If there’s no chance of a big-gun like Arsenal or Real Madrid coming out, focus on some of the better footballing sides from other leagues, like FC Twente, Ajax, Benfica, Atletico Madrid, Roma, Fiorentina, Marseille, Lyon or Bayern Munich.

Or how about a Galatasary or Panathinaikos, teams likely to appeal to larger audiences, generating some great atmospheres.

And when they’re here, promote them to death. Very few of the sports fans I spoke to in the lead-up to this tournament, or throughout the week, even knew it was on, let alone who was playing.

Keeping the official website up to date would have been a good starting point.

Another area that needs attention is the live broadcast in the host city. For decades cricket did a great job of building up its crowds by ensuring that the host city was blacked-out from live coverage.

These are all little things, but ultimately add up to much.

While crowds to the Everton, Boca Juniors and Festival of Football tours have been decent, what the real message out of this pre-season is that Australia’s football fans are weary, sick of having to pay exorbitant prices, well over the odds, for what are essentially training hit-outs.

It’s time for organisers and administers to listen to the fans, re-engage with them, and start offering affordable entertainment.

Twelve months from now the hope is we are talking exclusively about the football on display rather than the things that might have been done better.

One day we will learn.

The Crowd Says:

2010-08-03T01:22:45+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


Depends on the market Tony - EPL teams with waiting lists like Liverpool Man Utd and Arsenal can charge an arm and a leg for season tickets 680 pound cheapest season ticket for for Liverpool this season for 19 home games. 513 pounds for Man Utd (19 games). 900 pounds!! for Arsenal but thats for 26 games. On the other end of the spectrum - team like Wigan and Blackburn have had to drastically reduce season tickets. Its 224 pound and 250 pounds to watch them play this season. Better to fill the ground than charge silly prices for half full stadiums.

2010-08-03T01:06:51+00:00

Chris

Guest


It was on the same channel as the Rugby - except hiding behind the Red Button.

AUTHOR

2010-08-03T01:00:13+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


You're right Art, the EPL is a downright rort, but as a one off I was happy to part wih 35 pounds, and it was a great game/atmosphere. Naturally would have paid much more for a ticket at Anfield. On weekly basis though, it's a joke. But the demand for the EPL is there, here it's not, we need to build the demand again. What I've seen is that they built the demand in the early days, then went beserk with pricing, and are now paying for it. You're spot on about the $20 flat fee.

2010-08-03T00:51:03+00:00

Art Sapphire

Guest


Tony - 35 pounds is exorbitant pricing that the English are too silly to pay. EPL clubs are just exploiting the devotion their fans have for their clubs. The cheapest ticket to see a West Ham is 35 pounds ($65) That's an enormous sacrifice for what is supposedly a team supported by the working class. I'd rather pay 13 Euro to stand in the Kop and watch Dortmund play in front of 70k. In regards to pricing at these pre-season friendlies. They should just make it a flat $20. Even for the Cat A seats.

AUTHOR

2010-08-03T00:44:55+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Mick, it appeared the football was crowded out on Sat... Cricket, League and Bledisloe Cup all on live, so no live festival, certainly not the first game, not sure about Syd/Blackburn..I know it was replayed the next morning.

AUTHOR

2010-08-03T00:34:38+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


good one choclate... Last year I paid 10 pounds for a reserves game between Arsenal and Chelsea where I got to see Miroslav Stoch (get sent off), Florent Malouda amd Mikel Silvestre, which I thought was very reasonable. Even an EPL ticket to Fratton Park only cost 35 pounds, and that was a crucial game, at the time, for Pompey...

AUTHOR

2010-08-03T00:21:02+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Yep, $20 is about the reasonable price I reckon Realfootball, and $29 is ok for double header provided it's not in the corners somewhere. From there though you need to offer discounts for kids etc, maybe $10 for a one pre-season game, $15 for double header. $90 for top price is just ridiculous.

2010-08-02T22:28:50+00:00

AndyRoo

Roar Guru


Perhaps a differnet chanel (Fox sports 3 maybe) because it was definitely on.... watched it :)

2010-08-02T20:23:15+00:00

Mick

Guest


What happened to fox sports broadcast, I saw some of matchday 1 & 2 but they did not televise matchday 3 of the festival. Interesting to note that Japan does not host any European teams preseason.

2010-08-02T14:27:52+00:00

chocolatecoatedballs

Guest


on the Leeds website, they had a preseason game against premiership side Wolves, tickets were either 6 or 12 pounds! the pricing was way out of perspective. Even normal match pricing is a bit pricey, a match ticket for a bundesliga game can start as low as 6 euro and the average seems to be 13-15 euro. They are guaranteed big crowds and still the price is not exorbitant. Surely if lower prices were offered more people would be buying a hotdog and coke and go because they would feel they would be getting value for money, it all seems a bit strange.

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T06:21:18+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Spot on stip, you need an incentive to take the family and should be provided one for supporting the game. Likewise, Uni students need affordability. Instead it's the football family propping up the FFA with ridiculous rego fees, and then being forced to fork out at the gate.. Whatever happened to the A-League's first season efforts to attract the aspirational audience? "How many dudes do you know roll like this?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8hKlU7bYEc

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T04:28:56+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Cheers Con, so you're telling me the seats behind the goals were $45, while the ones in the corners were $29? Daylight robbery, and even more reason to have children's Cat D tickets. And it must be the first time I think I've seen such a price structure at the SFS, and I've been going there for 20 plus years.

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T04:24:10+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Jaji, out of interest, given the same need for a 'detox', would any club have swayed you to venture to the SFS, any club other than Blackburn? What factors would have enticed you?

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T04:02:47+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


It's a fair point about the media side of the EPL Andy, but I've gotta be honest and say I didn't see Allardyce or Smith feature on free to air, but I watch very little of it anyway. And anyway, in the modern world of football, you generally have three or four players at each club who can speak solid English. Your point about the over-kill of two British teams is a good one. One is enough, and your choices of Utrecht and AZ are good ones.

2010-08-02T04:01:03+00:00

Realfootball

Guest


I think part of the low crowds equation is that local supporters are wise to these kind of hit outs now. They don't provide genuine intensity, nor rivalry. I am sure I am not alone in being much, much more interested in the A League season to come. It is a sign of the maturing of football in this country that people don't just flock to meaningless exhibition games simply because an overseas club is involved. I went to see Everton play Brisbane, and was glad I went, but I in fact had decided after last season not to bother with any pre season games this season. I only went because I could get a ticket for $20 and it seemed ridiculous not to go at that price. But even with 20,000 inside Suncorp there was a real lack of atmosphere. The game just didn't matter, and you can't get around that fact. Next pre season, I'll go for $20, but much more than that and I simply am not interested enough to buy a ticket.

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T03:57:06+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Thanks for sharing your personal anecdote mds1970...if it's the Roosters you support, save your biccies for grand final and get down to the A-League in the meantime :-)

AUTHOR

2010-08-02T03:48:40+00:00

Tony Tannous

Expert


Yes Breen, not quite sure how many thousand A-League fans would be tuning in on Fox, but I dare say a good percentage of them, if denied the option of live telecast, might be convinced to attend live, provided the price was right, of course. Nothing wrong with a delayed telecast in the host city.

2010-08-02T03:45:43+00:00

Pinuts Pethia

Guest


I think the organisers were tailoring prices towards the game they play in heaven (the leather patch brigade who reside on the North Shore, work in the finance industry as have access to company cab charge vouchers). Marketing/Promotion? Spandau Ballet employed better promoters. TT i agree with you in that I don't see what the interest is in British football teams other than the top 3 or 4 EPL teams. Bring out decent sides from Croatia, Greece, Turkey, Serbia, Portugal, France, Holland, Germany etc instead. Also, I am yet to meet a person who rates the quality and pricing of food and beverages at the SFS. Many league supporters don't play league but attend games because of the product on offer. Many football supporters play the game at various levels themselves but do not attend any matches, let alone matches involving Rangers Blackburn FC. You have mentioned some of the reasons why.

2010-08-02T02:58:41+00:00

Con Stamocostas

Roar Pro


Hey Tony, Great article mate. I was in the Cove for the first game and that tix cost me $45 Also who plays a game at 12:45 like they did with the fist game? What about the state of the pitch as well. One day; my Greek hairy arse! .

2010-08-02T02:00:30+00:00

rovers2011

Guest


Crowd wise not sure what people were expecting. Maybe people are picking and choosing, and it's probably better people will fork out for league games. I thought the crowds were decent all things considered. The key thing is these tournaments are training hit-outs. On football terms it was great for Sydney as u mention. On the 'TV blackout' idea... i'd agree if we had free television coverage but not with pay TV. I doubt the numbers on Fox will have kept that many away. I watched some of it, but if it hadn't had been on i doubt it would have added that many to the crowd.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar