Passion alone will never win you games

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

My attention was drawn to a comment on a website made by a rugby journalist representing a top private television station in South Africa, saying that the Springboks should admit now that passion alone won’t win them games.

It got me thinking a bit.

That’s what it’s all about for many South Africans, isn’t it? The Bok jersey always first and foremost, represented passion, blood and guts – and still does today.

In the early days though, for the majority of its citizens – the disenfranchised – that wasn’t the case; it has to be said that for many it was a label that was synonomous with the then-apartheid regime. I would say almost three generations of “players of colour” missed out on playing for their country, due to the divide and rule policies of the “old South Africa”.

The writer did not specify what else the Boks would require as well for them to come out on top. But I suggest he would have mentioned: “knowing how to win”.

By and large, Bok supporters should be proud that despite the fact that South Africa’s re-entry into the international fold is not even two decades old, their team’s doing pretty well indeed.

But again, for some South Africans like myself, despite their success, we believe the Bok brand will never be on equal terms with that of New Zealand.

There’s just something about the Kiwis’ pride, consistency (except Word Cup, of course!), knowledge and skill, developed over more than a century, when it comes to the great game, that makes every fan proud to be an All Blacks supporter. Passion the South Africans may have in abundance, but us Kiwi fans believe that they cannot match the All Blacks when it comes to skill, especially ball-handling and support play.

Many South Africans should know there are All Black fan clubs in South Africa that are passionate about their team. Fellow South Africans, some of whom are obviously angered by it, question the motives. But it would be safe to say that there is a history behind it. But it’s not so much about the history, as it is also about the way the Kiwis play the game.

They may be surprised to know, that despite South Africa’s love-hate relationship with the Aussies on the sporting front, many “people of colour” support the Wallabies in South Africa.

Many would reminisce about the days of the Ella greats. Even in the good old days, (before isolation) the passion ran deep in the Bok sides; wanting to prove that they could conquer the world, especially the old foe, New Zealand.

But this unbridled passion that continues until this day seems not always enough to provide the consistency against their foes in the Southern Hemisphere.

The writer probably implies that passion has to be translated into an on-the-field ability of knowing how to win. A loss for the Wallabies would have been a huge travesty indeed. A win for the Boks would have meant blood and guts triumphed again in the face of the improbable.

The Boks should be thankful – a win would probably have served to paper over the cracks.

Five tries to three was enough to satisfy even a neutral that the Wallabies had killed off the game early on with superlative running rugby. No one expected them to lose – in Bloem of all places. But passion for the Boks just wasn’t enough.

Their tactical nous was left wanting in the early stages of the game.

One headline in an Afrikaans newspaper read: “Enough to cry about”. About what? That the leaden footed, totally outwitted Boks had lost fairly and squarely – deservedly so?

I don’t think that the report even gave the Wallabies the credit they deserved. But could it be expected of the Afrikaans weekly to praise the foe? What can only be described as a boorish crowd elected to boo Bryan Habana. We know that he has had a poor run of late, but the heckling raises another question.

The fans have taken on the passion, without realising the team has to play well as a unit. Passion makes you patriotic or does patriotism make you passionate?

In fact the crowd’s behaviour at that stage when the Aussies were obliterating the Boks, was indicative of what their team sometimes represent. Passion and guts without the know-how.

So would they have booed if it was Hougaard, or Matfield or Bakkies having an off day? Probably no, especially in Bloemfontein. But no let’s target Habana, seemed to be the crowd’s approach on the day.

You wouldn’t get that in Australia or New Zealand, I hazard to guess.

You see Habana will always have to prove himself as a “player of colour”. Let us not mince our words here.

This is the man that has done so much for Bok rugby already, but he’s booed when he has an off game or two. Surely they should support him, not ridicule him, if they love him? But only in South Africa.

Jake White too was criticised by a passionate rugby public when he chose Habana for his first Test yonks ago; even White himself had to be persuaded about the precocious talent making his presence felt.

Then the singing of South Africa’s national anthem: the fans always make sure they belt out the Afrikaans version (as they did in Bloemfontein) and at every match when it is sung, the Afrikaans part of the song always moves up a massive crescendo. Passion or fervour, the majority of Bloemfontein fans laying claim to their birthright?

Do they still have to in a democratic South Africa?

Then you have Peter De Villiers.

Of course, 99 per cent of us don’t agree with his gaffes he is so infamous for. But this is a man who is always in the spotlight whether he is winning or he is losing.

No one should forget the revelations about an alleged videotaped session of him and a ‘third-party’ alleged to have cavorted in a car park. That was subsequently rubbished by the Saru authorities, and dismissed with the contempt it deserved. They were out to get him even before he had begun his stint.

It’s not that De Villiers is incompetent, he like many other sportsmen, women and coaches of colour would always have to prove themselves, not only when it comes to the Bok brand, but in all codes of sport.

Bobby Skindstadt’s been taking e-mail messages from the public and answering them, while acting as commentator.

One of the questions centred around another “person of colour,” back Gio Aplon.

Most of those who e-mailed into the programme reckoned Aplon was too small, suspect under the high ball and suspect when tackled. The former Sevens star proved that assertion wrong time and time again. How many times hasn’t he set up attacking options with his elusive running?

No, but the a certain section of the rugby-mad public would call for his head. You see it’s all about the passion, not being able to see what is positive in the guy and support him.

Then another “person of colour” Juan de Jongh had an outstanding game against the All Blacks lately. But while praising some of his play, the media sought to criticise him outright.

Will a section of the rugby-mad public call for Morne Steyn’s head. Will they call for Jacque Fourie’s head? For Rossouw’s head? For Francois Hougaard’s head – if they had poor games? Probably not. For example, Morne Steyn may be a match-winner, but he is merely a link – that’s all. Any rugby fan worth his salt would tell you that.

No flair, no tactical nous except when it comes to his kicking. But, of course, he’s one of Loftus’ “lieflings” (we adore you they sing out at Bulls’ games).

Then you have Saru head-honcho Regan Hoskin – a person of colour – who will always have to back De Villiers, who he surely helped elevate to the coaching position, so he can justify his appointment to the hallowed position.

It must be a tough job for all these “persons of colour” especially having to prove themselves, whether they are on top of things or not, to a class of people who believe the Bok brand is their birthright. The All Blacks and Australia know how to box clever.

The Aussies cut South Africa to shreds with a form of offence never seen in a long time in Test rugby. Their tactics were too attack and attack full out for the first half, and see if they could hold out in the second. Someone said on this forum that victory was bittersweet. No it was sweet – the young guns of the Wallabies proved again that size doesn’t always matter.

Both the All Blacks and Wallabies have played fire with fire and showed the Boks that they can match them in the physicality stakes.

That took a lot of tactical nous, and the knowledge of how to beat the bigger, hulking Boks. That proves that passion especially in this day and age, will never alone win you games.

The Crowd Says:

2010-09-10T10:42:05+00:00

Bazz

Guest


Yeah because the Afrikaners hated the little englishman...

2010-09-10T07:36:23+00:00

Shocks

Guest


A well written article but I think you'll find the average Bok fan will haply boo anyone they think is not up to standard as much as you want to make it about colour yes, there will always be that element in any society but if you go back to when Percy Montgomery was first picked for the Springboks there was a huge uproar because many fans and commentators believed that he wasn't up to the task and let there thoughts be known to the point that for his first dozen tests in SA the crowds at the stadiums would boo when his name was announced over the speakers and he was booed whenever he ran out onto the field.

2010-09-10T05:41:43+00:00

SteveDarke

Guest


"So would they have booed if it was Hougaard, or Matfield or Bakkies having an off day? Probably no, especially in Bloemfontein. But no let’s target Habana, seemed to be the crowd’s approach on the day. You wouldn’t get that in Australia or New Zealand, I hazard to guess. You see Habana will always have to prove himself as a “player of colour”. Let us not mince our words here." Utter complete rubbish. The crowd was booing because the Boks were rubbish, and so was Habana. It had nothing to do with the colour of Habana's skin. It had everything to do with the fact that the is massively out of form and playing in a team that defends like girls (no offence to the female roarers out there). I went to the same school as Habana and think he is a great great player, but I would have happily booed the Boks (and Habana, and Smit, and Matfield) too that day because they were playing like they wanted to be anywhere except on the field.

2010-09-10T04:40:30+00:00

Mick Gold Coast QLD

Roar Guru


I agree, Blinky Bill, especially with your "something very special" being possible. Before Saturday's Test I watched a Classic Wallabies match featuring 1999 against the Bok – our team of journeymen and recovering crocks, with Horan out of position, one in. They had speed and skill on the edges (Roff and Tune) and not much else, playing a brick, concrete and steel wall, with not much else, in the RSA manner of old. The Australians had a simple running backs game with experienced players passing and catching and backing up, and RSA had little to offer in attack. I've watched in delight the steady improvement of RSA since the mid '90s (in backline play, tactics, a hitherto absent ability to adapt withing the 80 minutes) culminating in Pretoria's ascendancy in the past couple of seasons, featuring clever, continuous forward surges on the edge and scintillating, penetrating running in mid field and out wide; also on show in the domestic internationals last season. The confidence in each other was palpable, their discipline and team spirit obvious. RSA rugby has not suffered the rock star / individual first mentality apparent in another team I watch. On Steyne - a good side, with a good half, good loosies and good outside men can afford a mere link man as first five. Especially when his boot has been microchip GPS-ed. I have also enjoyed watching some fabulous players - Pienaar, Gary Teichman, Corné Krige, Skinstad, Burger, just about every front rower (all built like expressway overpass pillars) some beautifully balanced runners in the centres, Paulse, Habana, Percy, now Gio Aplon and others. All the Super 14 and Springbok teams have had the most marvellous captaincy, for years. So - the performance is there, the players are there (bagging the splendid Habana for being off the boil is akin to calling for Carter to be dropped for dropping a few balls simply because he rarely does) and the steel is there in the captaincy. But someone has suddenly pulled on the hand brake over there - watching this Tri-Nations I wonder why that impressive evolution and progress has suddenly stopped. It truly is a mystery to me. No coach could make blokes as seasoned and confident as these cease playing well - de Villiers is not a dill. mactheblack's excellent piece offers some explanations, but the mystery remains for me. With NZ, Springbok rugby is to me the pinnacle of the game and I want them to be exceptional, for the good of the game.

2010-09-10T02:55:37+00:00

stripes

Guest


Yeh agree with the Ads, it sounds a bit arrogant to suggest only one team has or will ever challenge the all blacks mate. But thats not what this is about, good article, and surprising as i reckon you sell the boks a bit short.

2010-09-10T02:29:56+00:00

taylorbridge

Guest


Great read. Wish there was a bit more insight provided about the tactical component that is said to be missing. Where is the selection of a Pocock equivalent or for thoes with speed and ability to provide numbers in cover defence ?

2010-09-10T01:06:18+00:00

Blinky Bill of Bellingen

Guest


From my perspective as an Aussie who enjoys watching the Tri Nations and the Currie Cup, I am in awe of the high level of skill that is on show in Sth Africa at provincial level. Clearly something is standing in the way of this talent filtering through to the top level. Is it selection? Is it coaching? Is it politics? Obviously I have no idea. One thing for sure though is that if Sth Africa could get it's house in order with their National team then the Rugby world would be in for something very special indeed.

2010-09-10T00:25:58+00:00

Ads

Guest


I think the wobblies 99-01 and the poms of 02-03 might disagree with you on "The springbox are the only team that has, can and will again in the future truly challenge the all blacks for the no.1 spot in world rugby"

2010-09-10T00:12:53+00:00

Dexter William

Roar Guru


Good passionate read. But an article that is not correctly titled IMO. Passion is the foremost criteria you want from anyone who represents your country. You can not blame anyone if they are not blessed with creative talent.

2010-09-10T00:10:18+00:00

soapit

Guest


being an aussie i'm not qualified to comment on the content but sure was an interesting read. good to get some detailed assessment of areas outside the normal match review and from non aussies.

2010-09-09T22:02:12+00:00

djfrobinson

Guest


Mactheblack I'm a kiwi and I have the ut-most respect for the Bok. I grew up playing my rugby and listening to stories of how the All Blacks finally beat the Bok for the first time in 1956 not beat them in a single game but beat them in a test series. The history between our nations is unrivaled and even today there is pasion unequaled in the games. From a outside observer it looks more like pure politics is the issue within South African rugby the ANC wants to take away what is the last bastion of South African white community so instead of allowing things to change naturally over time they are trying to force the issue which has caused more resentment in the long run. I can tell you this. The springbox are the only team that has, can and will again in the future truly challenge the all blacks for the no.1 spot in world rugby. This year was a single bad year for the bok but history has shown us that a bad year for south africa is soemthing like a 50% success rate and most of their losses are to NZ and AU and thats a bad year its a record that most other rugby nations could only dream of. The pride the players have in their jersey can not be given up and if the team does not have the skills to match NZ or Aus at the moment that's purely a problem for the coaching staff and senior players to resolve

2010-09-09T21:05:46+00:00

LeftArmSpinner

Roar Guru


passion alone wont win the game but nor can you win the competitive tight games without it. its about wanting it more than the other team.

Read more at The Roar