Ponting: A trust repaid or a trust betrayed?

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

The Australian cricket team would have flown out to India as you read this. Josh Hazelwood has been replaced by Mitchell Starc and the Victorian, James Pattinson, is on standby. Astute readers will remember these two players mentioned as possibilities a month ago.

Bollinger and Michael Hussey are in South Africa playing the Champions League and will join the team next week.

The team plays its only warm-up match at Chandigarh between September 25 and 27. The Test will be played at Mohali, on the outskirts of Chandigarh on October 1.

I was born in Patiala which is just 100 kilometers from Chandigarh and the weather in October ranges from a low of 19 to a maximum of 28. It is autumn and the weather will be ‘heavy’ most mornings. There will be a little swing but almost no seam.

Ricky Ponting is excited about looking horns with the number one ranked Test team. Ponting is a scrapper and has many points to prove and all these centre around his captaincy and batting form.

Ricky Ponting is coming to terms with an administration seemingly more intent on appearances and ‘marketability factors’ than ground reality. There is a working relationship based on convenience. There is neither trust nor mistrust. Just a wary acceptance of the need to work together.

To dismiss Ponting’s captaincy as lacking tactical sensitivity is to ignore the logic of collective leadership. Great teams have multiple leaders and Ponting’s young charges are still defining the boundaries of their talents.

These young men will develop just as McGrath and Gilchrist did. Then Ponting will be able to throw the ball to Johnson or Siddle and trust them to deliver.

Ponting’s batting and fielding sets him apart as a great player and history may well judge him as a great captain. He is, after all, statistically the most “winning” captain in the history of Test cricket.

No Australian captain has been subject to more scrutiny than Ponting. He has been pilloried for his two Ashes losses in 2005 and 2009. He has been criticised for his failure in India in 2008.

He has been slated for, what many see, as institutionalising a “boy’s club” mentality within the Australian team. The past eighteen months have been disappointing for Ponting in terms of runs scored and he is the first to admit that. Typically, he has made no excuses.

Ponting has had 35 Test innings since January 2009 and only once has he stamped his authority in the opening match of a series.

The 150 he scored in the first innings at Cardiff remains, apart from the 209 against Pakistan in Hobart, his only score of importance. I am discounting Hobart because Aamir may have dropped Ponting deliberately before he had scored.

He has spent the last month honing his body for the grueling road ahead. A road that stretches to 2013, all the way from Cronulla to Cardiff.

Ponting will arrive in India the fittest he has been in his career. It is the only way he can keep up with an accelerating father-time.

Will Ponting rediscover his form? Can he be the batsman that dominated in 2006 when he scored seven tons, including twice in both innings of a Test (in Sydney and Durban)?

Ponting, in many ways, has not been ‘selfish’ enough. He has many distractions and all of them worthwhile. He has his charitable foundation. He is mentor to an evolving team. He is a husband and young father. Most importantly he is the captain of the Australian cricket team.

Before flying out he hoped aloud that his team could play positive and attacking cricket. He is conscious of the damage to cricket’s psyche. The daily revelations of match-fixing annoy and disappoint him in equal measures. “I think if we all do the right things on the field, hopefully there will be something positive coming back on the newspaper pages about the game of cricket, which is what we will try and achieve.”

I have been saying for a very long time it is only the players that can restore cricket’s credibility. Most administrators are slow to react and overly conservative. More often than not they are in denial.

Cricketers in the great teams are in a defacto relationship. This relationship is one based on implicit trust. It works outside conventional rules and regulations. It is personal and constantly reaffirmed in principle and practice.

The not so great sides work more like a marriage. Their trust is explicit and codified by vows taken in reverential tones and often, sadly, broken with routine impunity.

The success of Ponting’s team will revolve around the measure of trust in the team. This is Ponting’s biggest challenge. He has shown enough trust in North and Johnson. It is time for these two to repay that trust.

Starc, George and Pattinson are there to ensure Johnson is aware of this. Smith and Hughes will increase the pressure on North to deliver. Ponting will want to know who he can trust BEFORE the Ashes.

There will not be any more ‘freebies’ under Greg Chappell’s watch. Ponting will respect GC’s decisions and in a way will be relieved there is a man of stature pulling the selectorial strings.

It is time for Ricky Ponting to be more selfish and concentrate on scoring runs and catching at slips and running out batsmen from short-midwicket.

It is time for the M & M’s – Clarke, Hussey and Johnson – to repay the trust.

Otherwise, as I wrote in July, there is a massacre waiting to happen.

Likely Australian team for First Test against India: Watson, Katich, Ponting, Clarke, Hussey, North, Paine, Hauritz, Johnson, Hilfenhaus, Bollinger, 12th man P.George.

Likely Indian team: Sehwag, Gambhir, Dravid, Tendulkar, Laxman, Raina, Dhoni, Harbhajan, Zaheer Khan, Ishant Sharma, Abhi Mithun, 12th man Amit Mishra

The Crowd Says:

2010-09-26T08:59:13+00:00

Lolly

Guest


Yes, they should just play newbies and take a bullet if necessary. But what do you think the chances are of that? Considering how much warm-up they consider necessary on tour these days, they probably think none at all is necessary at home. Gah!

AUTHOR

2010-09-25T19:55:18+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Lolly,the players involved in the Ashes Tests should not even be considered for the one day series against Sri Lanka. The last of these finishes on the 7th of November and that is just about two eeks out from the first test. Johnson needs to be bowling 25 overs in a day leading up to the Test and you are right, Shield would be ideal. However,being a drawcard, CA will want to play him for the TV ratings. Actually the series against Sri Lanka would be an ideal opportunity to play David Hussey as captain and include the likes of Warner,Henriques and all the other young pups not involved in the Ashes.

2010-09-25T14:50:02+00:00

Lolly

Guest


Yes, that's just bad organization on behalf of CA. They agree to schedules that are too tight. One three day tour match before a test series? Even sillier, from what I see of the future schedule, unless they drop Mitchell Johnson from the ODI series v Sri Lanka and let him play in the touring match of Warriors v England in early Nov, he's only going to get one Shield match under his belt before the Ashes start. Poor organization again. Huss will have the same problem. It's crackers that a touring team to Aus is going to have a better warm-up to play tests downunder than the local players.

AUTHOR

2010-09-25T11:42:46+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Lolly,with Australia 1 down for 319 the batting is settled and George will get his opportunity tomorrow. If he performs well there is every chance he will play. Bollinger is still on duty with Chennai in South Africa and is in Twenty20 mode. He doesn't join the team till two or three days before the Test.

2010-09-25T10:24:11+00:00

Lolly

Guest


I don't think so Vinay. It would be a real surprise if Bolly isn't pretty much set in the team. He's been excellent in India in short formats so they are bound to give him the nod.

AUTHOR

2010-09-24T20:37:39+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Lolly,the 3 day game starting today at Chandigarh is an opportunity for someone like Peter George or Mitchell Starc to force their way into the Test side. Johnson and Hilfenhaus will play the first Test but the third fast bowling spot is up for grabs,with Bollinger,George and Starc in the mix.

2010-09-24T20:33:05+00:00

Lolly

Guest


There isn't anyone. All our bowlers are about the same level at present. The fact that he is probably the most talented is quite depressing.

2010-09-23T06:59:41+00:00

Will

Guest


For those people that don't rate Johnson, it would be great if you guys can find someone else who has taken 150+ wickets @ 28 who can replace him?

2010-09-23T06:57:57+00:00

Will

Guest


I rate Ponting highly, as a batsmen, his IMO in the top 3 we have ever produced. As a fieldsmen - I have never seen a better allrounds fieldsmen. As a captain - he is solid without being in the class of, say, Mark Taylor. He is a street fighter and a scrapper. Just the captain we need for this team. Ponting has been betrayed by CA. Half his bowlers are in SA, the team has one warm up game, and then they are into the cauldron. The toss will be vital, lose it, and lose any chance of winning the match. If Ponting steals a series win against India then I am prepared to grant him godlike status. I give us a chance of winning, but the toss is vital.

AUTHOR

2010-09-21T11:39:47+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Jason, I am greedy I want both..Smith and Hughes. My starting X1 for Mohali would be : Katich, Hughes,Ponting,Clarke,Hussey,Watson,Paine,Smith,Johnson, Hilfenhaus,George. Hauritz in India does not appeal (to me). I would play two spinners in Sydney only. Michael Clarke can bowl some orthodox stuff. But if only had one choice it would be Smith for North.

2010-09-21T08:58:24+00:00

Jason

Guest


Just having a dig! Who would your first choice be though? North for Hughes or Smith?

AUTHOR

2010-09-21T06:27:42+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Fisher Price,lets revisit Johnson and Ponting after the series in India. The string is stretched and how far can one stretch it?

2010-09-21T04:12:43+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


Johnson remains overrated. He isn't especially good.

2010-09-21T04:11:55+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


And Khawaja.

2010-09-21T04:09:06+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


Katich (c)

AUTHOR

2010-09-21T03:19:22+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Jason,you should know me better than to take me literally. I meant he is keeping Hughes OR Smith out. I t was a hurried reply to betty b. Johnson will certainly get a workout in India but I feel it will be the batsmen working him over. Unless he is on song like in his very first International in Malaysia and ironically against India. Bayman, I agree averages in the modern game are inflated. How good does that make AB and GSC?

2010-09-21T03:02:56+00:00

Jason

Guest


I'll stand up a bit of Johnson here - he is obviously a bowler who needs miles under his belt. Almost everytime he has come back from a "rest" or at the start of a series he has struggled. Cardiff was a classic case of mishandling him as he barely bowled a ball in the lead up. That said, I am hopeful that the Indian tour serves to give him some bowling miles prior to the Ashes. A first up match in Brisbane will also be good. Vinay - how can North be keeping two players out? I agree - it is one of Smith and Hughes but it can't be both! Personally, I would bat Watson at 3 and Ponting at 5 with Hughes to open.

2010-09-21T00:53:28+00:00

Bayman

Guest


Like some others, perhaps, I feel the key to this coming Ashes series is Johnson - and that makes me very nervous indeed. Johnson certainly owes Ponting and the team - remember Cardiff? In the end the captain took the ball off him and gave it to North!!!! I knew then we were in trouble. I think Lolly's point is valid. Johnson doesn't have the brains, apparently, nor the desire to improve. Siddle has the aggro and work ethic but not the talent that Johnson posesses. Pity! As for Marcus North, he's a lovely guy. He's not, unfortunately, good enough to be in the Australian team. That's not a criticism of North, by the way. I'm not good enough either! The truth is, though, that it's time the selectors moved on from the policy of "Ricky likes him" to "He hasn't done enough, get rid of him". The future is the youth, not the old men still hanging around because no-one else will pay that well. Let's not forget, also, that Hughes lost his spot in England not necessarily because of issues with the short ball but because Johnson was so horrendously pathetic and Watson was brought in as bowling cover. Unfortunately, the skipper forgot and only gave him about nine overs in the next three Tests. So much for the best laid plans. Hughes should open, North should go and Watson bat six. It's not a radical suggestion - people have been saying it for a year - but it is probably what should happen. Hopefully, GSC (and friends), and not the captain, will now be picking the team. As for Johnno, well, it's time to step up, or leave, or be sent. In Australia these days we seem to be fascinated with guys who can hurl it down at 150kph regardless of what happens next. We have forgotten, and quickly, that G. McGrath was about high 130s tops (mind you, I'd still like to have seen Ooh Aah against Richards, Lloyd and Greenidge at their best - or Sobers - I'm not sure 138 in the same spot every time would have been quite good enough). Personally, I'm glad we're taking some young, untried quicks to India and I would have no problem if they play at home against England in place of Johnson. While Johnson's total lack of radar may be a weapon of sorts (a la Thommo) I suspect his wicket tally is also a reflection on the fact that the overall standard of Test cricket has fallen. The modern players may dislike Neil Harvey for saying it but flat, covered pitches, ropes and the railway sleeper bats have inflated batting averages and deflated those of the bowling fraternity. There's hardly an Australian Test batsman of the last decade who hasn't averaged fifty at some stage of his career - and for a fair period of his career. And trust me, they're not that good compared to Ian Chapple, Walters, Burge, Harvey, O'Neill, etc. to name a few. So when Marcus North is only travelling at about 37 he should be attracting some attention. Somebody get that man a bigger bat. Still, like I said, Marcus is a lovely bloke - no, seriously, he is - but I'm a good bloke and I'm a mile and then some away from the Test team. As I should be. Another major concern is that the 35yo Katich is probably now our best and most consistent batsman. Bill Lawry was considered too old at 33. The skipper is but a shadow of the batsman he was, the Kat and Huss must be getting worse rather than better, Clarkey hasn't yet fully taken over and said, "Follow me!", Watto's still just a 29yo kid and Marcus, well, we've covered Marcus. Perhaps if the selectors continue to show faith in Johnson he might consider making a few runs to make up for his bowling deficiencies. By the end of summer, we may need those runs from the bowlers. All the bowlers. I sincerely hope George and Starc can bat. Still, I reckon we can probably count on one thing. The team that plays the first Test against India may be quite different from the team which plays the last against England. There will be a changing of the guard this summer it's just a matter of when.

2010-09-20T21:20:27+00:00

Lolly

Guest


Apparently it was the same pitch that was used for the CB 40 final on Saturday. Most of the Pakistan team really just don't move their feet out to the pitch of the ball at all with Swann. Apart from Yousuf and Afridi, but Yousuf got suckered in by a slider today. Afridi is a funny one isn't he? He has actually got a lot of shots and can play them properly if he even displays a modicum of patience but he'd rather hit and hope. He must have no attention span at all.

AUTHOR

2010-09-20T15:30:41+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Thanks for that Lolly,the commentators don't really tellyou it is a worn pitch. But it is end of season. I was a spinner and the best way to play a spinner is to attack him. Not kamikaze like the Pakistanis but controlled and with the use of feet. Australians generally play spin well and in Australia it is the pace at which you bowl. In Sydney you can toss it up and bowl slower. In Adelaide you have to bowl a little quicker. It is a question of adapting. I will look forward to seeing Swann bowl. I have no doubt that under the Grep Chappell watch inconsistency will not be tolerated. I think for this Indian tour he has basically gone along with with what the others had put in place. But come the Ashes expect to see more of his authority.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar