Australian Test selectors have got it wrong

By The Governor / Roar Rookie

Ever since the retirements of our key batsmen, Matthew Hayden, Justin Langer and Damien Martyn since 2007, the Australian test selectors have promoted Simon Katich and Marcus North whilst continuing to persist with Michael Hussey, and not taking into account the long term future of Australian test cricket.

Our Test match winning era from 1995 to 2007 was created by the previous selection panels that identified the best young batting and bowling talent in Shield cricket and picked them to wear the Baggy Green Cap.

Australian cricket from the days of Sir Donald Bradman had a rich history of identifying the best young talent at Shield level and giving them a chance to play test match cricket.

Previous champions like Neil Harvey, the Chappell brothers, DK Lillee, RW Marsh, Richie Benaud, Bob Simpson, Bill Lawry, Keith Miller and Shane Warne to name just a few were picked at a young age and gave Australia at least 10 years of test match service.

Our current test selectors Hilditch, Cox, Hughes and Boon have taken their eyes off the ball by believing our test XI is the best nation in the world whilst forgetting that a successful test match winning dynasty is created by selecting a number of young batsmen and giving them as much test match exposure to allow them to blossom as test match hardened batsmen.

Lets look at the age of the Australian Test XI, which reminds me of the England Test XI from 1980 to 2002.

The England selectors, Ted Dexter, Ray Illingworth and Peter May picked seasoned county veterans who had the county runs on the board to play test cricket for England: Chris Broad, Bill Athey, Alec Stewart, Chris Tavare, Tim Robinson, Graeme Fowler and Graeme Hick.

Back in the mid 1980 to 1996, the Australian test selection panel (Greg Chappell, Lawrie Sawle, Bob Simpson, Dick Guy, Jim Higgs, John Benaud and Trevor Hohns) picked a bunch of young players to play test cricket.

Mark Taylor, David Boon, Dean Jones, Michael Slater, Warne, Glen McGrath, Matthew Hayden, Ricky Ponting, the Waugh twins and Ian Healy made their Test debuts when they were below the age of 25 years of age.

They were dropped from the side and when they were reinstated, they made the most of their chances again.

These players were brilliant servants of the Baggy Green Cap and they gave us at least 8 to 16 years of test match service. Their reflexes were fast and they had the positive energy to play attacking positive cricket.

When they failed, the selectors dropped them to Shield Cricket and when they regained their form and confidence, they were reinstated, and became permanent fixtures.

For example, Ricky Ponting made his test debut at the age of 21 in 1995 and he is our best number 3 batsman since Sir Donald Bradman and Ian Chappell.

Since Steve Waugh was appointed captain in 1999, the Australian test selectors changed direction in the selection of test batsmen.

Due to the on-field success, there was a cue of batsmen around the country putting their hands up for test match honours. Steve Waugh decided to influence the selectors by asking them to pick seasoned players who had a stint at test level for a period of time, got dropped, and had regained their form at test level.

Matthew Hayden, Damien Martyn and Justin Langer are examples of players who had a brief taste of test match cricket and were dropped due to poor form. When they regained their form, they got their chance and became permanent fixtures of the Test XI.

As a result of this policy, we continued to win games because McGrath and Warne were able to bowl Australia to victory from any position.

Since our World Cup victory in 2007, the Australian side has lost Warne, McGrath, Langer, Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds, Martyn and MacGill to retirement and a loss in form.

The selectors decided to go with Marcus North, Brad Haddin and Simon Katich as replacements for Hayden, Gilly and Symonds.

With Ricky Ponting and Michael Clarke being the senior experienced members of the Test XI, the selectors should really start to re-shape the batting order with the long term future of creating a winning dynasty.

The promotion of Shane Watson to the opening position is a master stroke. He is an excellent player of fast bowling and he reminds me of David Boon.

He needs to get into the action when the score is 0 for 0 to build an innings. If you look at his 20-20 performance for the Royals in the IPL, his game began to flourish when Darren Berry and Shane Warne decided to partner Graeme Smith with Shane Watson. From that day in 2008, his game began to develop on a positive path.

Watson is the type of player who can set an innings up for Australia and if you google Barry Richards’ name, have a look at Barry Richards’ batting technique – Watson’s batting technique reminds me of him.

Have a good look at his straight defensive shot. When I watch Shane Watson open the batting, I see a bit of Barry Richards and Gordon Greenidge in the way he bats.

There is a need for the selectors to undergo a succession plan for the future. Past selectors picked young talented batsmen who scored runs at Shield level to wear the Baggy Green Cap. They knew that young batsmen had to become mentally hardened test match cricketers by playing test cricket all the time.

Once they hit the 20 test match mark, most Test batsmen will begin to show their true abilities against the best nations.

With the Australia playing England on a 4 year cycle (every four years in the UK: 2005, 2009 and 2013; Australia: 2006-07, 2010-2011 and 2014-15) and India and South Africa every 2 to 3 years, there is a great opportunity for the selectors to play the young batsmen against Sri Lanka, New Zealand, Bangladesh and the West Indies to allow them to gain the confidence in their batting technique and mental approach to build an innings at test match level.

Test match cricket is a hard game where the gap between shield cricket and test match cricket is huge. If the selectors give the young batsmen a chance, they will rise to the challenge.

They will learn about shot selection on different wickets and their decision making skills will be put to the test.

Look at Tim Paine’s innings of 92 against India. Did he not rise to the challenge? His batting technique was tested and he chose the right shots to execute during his 92. This innings would give him the confidence and belief that he belongs at test match level and at the age of 25, we have a 10 year test match player for Australia.

Keith Stackpole and Ian Chappell held the strong view that a batsmen’s best years are from the age of 27 to 33. Hence, it is important for a young test match batsmen to make their test debuts before they turn 27 to allow them to gain as much test match exposure.

After a batsman hits 33, their game starts to wane and a batsman has to re-develop their game by playing within their limitations. A seasoned veteran like Tendulkar and Steve Waugh had to build an innings by working the ball for 2s and 3s instead of flaying the bowling to all parts of the ground.

Who remembers 1992? John Benaud and the Australian selectors dropped Dean Jones from the 1st test match against the West Indies. They promoted Damien Martyn into the test match line up. If you recall, they did not pick Geoff Marsh back in November 1992 because he was pass his prime.

If you go by these past selection decisions, it is about time for the selectors to drop Simon Katich for Phil Hughes. Would not it better for a player who has done so well over the past 2 years to bow out from test match cricket when he is on top of his game? Matthew Hayden bowed out of test cricket when his form was on the down.

Simon Katich has a perfect chance to bow out from test cricket when he knows he is not out of form.

In reference to Marcus North, I find his continued selection is the biggest joke in test selection history. He claimed the wicket of Tendulkar but his job is to score runs.

He can score runs against the lower struggling nations, but he does struggle against good quality bowling. He did well against the Poms last year, but I would not be picking him in my side.

Here is my Test Match XI for the 1st Test Match against England:

Shane Watson
Phil Hughes
Ricky Ponting (C)
Michael Clarke
Usman Khawja
Stephen Smith
Tim Paine
Mitchell Johnson
Peter Siddle
Ben Hilfenhaus
Doug Bollinger

Stephen Smith is our leg spin bowler and if you look at past successful Australian sides, a leg spin bowler is the key component in a winning side: Richie Benaud, Terry Jenner, Kerry O’Keefe, Shane Warne and SCG MacGill.

I would play Stephen Smith and bat him at 6. His batting technique is good enough for test match level and he reminds me of KD Walters.

He has a bit of an attacking flare in his batting and he is not afraid to play his shots.

He has the X-factor, and the past successful Australian sides always had an x-factor at number 6 or 7: Keith Miller, KD Walters, Adam Gilchrist, David Hookes, Gary Gilmour and Andrew Symonds.

This balanced Test XI will allow us to play four fast bowlers. The benefit of this line up is Ricky can use Mitchell as a strike bowler in 5 to 7 over bursts whilst using Hilfenhaus, Siddle and Doug ‘the Rug’ as shock and stock bowlers. These three bowlers can dry up the runs at one end or perform a shock bowling role.

Bollinger and Siddle can perform the shock and stock bowling role whilst Mitchell can just attack the batsmen from the other end.

You have to remember that we do not have Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist and Hayden to win the game off their own game. They had the X-factor and the selectors have to rebuild the side with young players who have the X-factor at this point in time.

If you look at other elite sports, a successful winning dynasty is not created by picking players to fill a role in the side for 3 to 5 years.

As I have mentioned earlier, a winning test match dynasty can only be created by picking a core group of young players and surrounding them with 2 to 3 experienced campaigners.

And, when 2 to 3 players retire from the game, the selectors bring in a young player who will fill the retired players’ shoes. The past West Indian sides under Clive Lloyd and our successful test era from 1989 to 2007 were created under this principle.

The Crowd Says:

2011-03-12T06:03:11+00:00

BackToBasics

Guest


The author is totally correct about our policies, however I disagree with the team selection. I was calling for this team BEFORE the 1st test by the way. Watson (NSW) (c) Rogers (VIC) Khawaja (NSW) Ponting (TAS) D.Hussey (VIC) M.Hussey (WA) Haddin (NSW) O'Keefe (NSW) Johnson (WA) Harris (QLD) Copeland (NSW) Most Batsmen average over 50, all bowlers average under 30 and have a strike rate under 55.

2010-10-14T08:28:03+00:00

Damien

Guest


Really like the 2014/15 line-up - don't count out Siddle and Peter George as genuine possibilities though. I think fast bowlers are increasingly finding it difficult to last into their 30s, so perhaps Hilfy and Johnson might have been worn out. Sad thought really.

2010-10-14T08:24:45+00:00

Damien

Guest


I'll also suggest that Steve Smith might be a very significant consideration as (eventually) a replacement for Watson. I actually think his spin bowling would benefit from some time in Shield cricket though.

2010-10-14T08:19:52+00:00

Damien

Guest


My biggest concern is Marcus North. North is clearly a talented batsmen, but his inconsistency is problematic for the role that he has been selected for. My perception is that the selectors have chosen him (being 30/31 years of age) to provide some continuity for the period in which Katich, Hussey and Ponting all leave the test team. Moreover, his experience would assist Clarke as he takes over the captaincy. However, his inconsistency is the problem, since as an experienced player he should be providing stability and leadership to the team. I think Katich's consistency over the last few years warrant his continued selection for the Ashes and beyond, subject to any and lengthy lapses of form. Hussey has been consistently bad for the last two years and is surely on his last legs. And Ponting cannot be dropped, the effect would be too damaging on the culture of the Australian Cricket team. My proposal would be to replace Marcus North with similarly aged (and talented) player. Names like Michael Klinger come to mind - he scored 886 runs at 63.28 in last year's Sheffield Shield season, the most runs the year before (1203 @ 70.76) and has just come off a hugely successful CLT20 tournament where he has shown attacking flair. His consistency would be vital during the upcoming transition period. In place of Mike Hussey, it's time to bring in some young talent for the future - Khawaja, Ferguson or Hughes (I see no reason why he couldn't bat down the order). As Katich and Ponting retire I would then suggest the other players are phased in. I think we lack spin bowling flair, but I'm not addressing this in this comment: Katich Watson Ponting Klinger Clarke Hughes/Khwaja/Ferguson Paine Johnson Hauritz Hilfenhaus Bollinger

2010-10-14T01:37:17+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Cameron White in the test team? On what basis? I was assistant coach of our Region's U11 rugby team at the State carnival - and out-of-form players were dumped from the starting line-up from game to game. If the U11s are supposed to handle it, why can't pros? Worried they won't be able to make their next payment on their porsche?

2010-10-13T23:51:05+00:00

David

Guest


Hodge and D Hussey should have had a shot in the test side by now. Smith at 6 worries me and for now i'd bat him lower down the order until he shows he can take wickets and bat confidently (alot of work for a youngster). Too many changes are recommended over night but i agree with your eventual line up. For the first test i'd go with Watson Katich Ponting Clarke D Hussey \ White Khawaja Paine Smith Johnson Siddle Bollinger number 5 stumps me, m hussey is in poor form and we need to unearth someone to fill his place but I'm stumped as to whos ready for it. Hughes, Watson and Katich shouldn't bat down the order, leaves maybe ferguson (too long out of international cricket), D Hussey (getting on in age ), I'd consider giving White another chance as a batsman aswell, he has improved and if treated correctly (not as a bowler) he could be useful and also has potential to be a leadership role. My view we need to shake it up abit and give some fresh players a shot to revitalise the time. It only take a couple of new faces and some pressure on players positions to give the team a boost. We are handling the players like a 10yr team where everyone can't be offended. In the past if you sucked you got dropped for afew games then in the future you could get another chance to see if you learnt from it. Ideally we should have been trying out alternative players earlier in the year and not leaving it to an ashes test. As it stands no changes will be made by the selector and by the 3rd test we will be in trouble and bringing in new players to try and save our ass.

2010-10-13T21:30:07+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Hodge? Puhleeeease.

2010-10-13T20:56:32+00:00

Lolly

Guest


It's the pressure. I think the Aussies can be beaten by any good team now as they don't believe that they can win under pressure. Which is a fair enough belief as they have so much proof now that they can't win close matches under pressure. I'm not sure what Nielsen is doing with them, but whatever it is, it isn't working. I don't blame him particularly though, the Aussies just don't have the cattle.

2010-10-13T19:39:47+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Lolly,the fielding was shoddy yesterday. Hussey dropped a difficult one of Sehwag and thankfully it was not critical. However simple things like not backing up,allowing singles and generally slow were glaring indictments that the players either were not focussed or the pressure got to them.

2010-10-13T19:28:32+00:00

Lolly

Guest


What makes anyone think that Hussey is still worth a gamble when a younger player isn't? Go and look at his stats for the past 2 years, specifically an innings by innings list if you want to be appalled by the lack of foresight from our selectors. The most telling sign is that Hussey was once our most reliable fielder. He is now shelling catches regularly. In fact the fielding in the past 3 test matches has been dismal by the Aussies. If even this is going down the toilet, there really is something wrong somewhere.

2010-10-13T08:28:04+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


Hodge should have been regular since 2005, but clearly he didn't fit into Punter's In-Club, which is apparently what counts.

2010-10-13T06:25:06+00:00

Georgie McHugh

Guest


Ponting was ready for test cricket when he was selected.

2010-10-13T04:36:41+00:00

daver

Guest


You're not from nsw are you? You'd bring in hughes and khawja and smith right now? If you wanted to win the ashes, then surely you MUST pick Hodge. And Smith for a spinner - how many wickets has he taken exactly in shield games?? Pick the players whose form deserves it, not because they MIGHT be good one day. And Khawja, you're kidding? I do agree with your comments on North. They problem with the selections is that sooner or later, batsmen like North who must have some talent to get into the team in the first place, will EVENTUALLY score runs. Classic example this test, then followed up with a single digit score. One score every 5 goes really isn't good enough, but the selectors will still be saying we told you so with North's innings...

2010-10-12T03:05:42+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


No Katich? But Hussey and North remain. wtf?

2010-10-12T01:11:25+00:00

jameswm

Guest


You'd drop Katich for Hughes right now, Sam? That beggars belief.

2010-10-12T01:10:12+00:00

jameswm

Guest


How much have you seen of him FOS?

2010-10-12T00:33:40+00:00

Sam

Guest


Agree with a fair portion of your side but still think that Hussey deserves a run against the English, as much as Khawaja is a future star (direct replacement for Ponting when he retires in my mind) he is untested at international level and would almost be unfair to throw him in the deep end that soon. Hauritz is too ineffective and has no future in the test side so agree that Smith should be given a shot (remember the last time a stocky blonde bowled his first ball against the poms lol) and also think that North is in serious trouble of losing his spot to Ferguson. WIth that in mind my side would be First Test 2010/11 Ashes - Watson Hughes Ponting Clarke Hussey North/ Ferguson Paine Smith Johnson Hilfenhaus Siddle/ Bollinger First Test 2014/15 (Just food for thought) - Watson Hughes Khawaja Clarke Ferguson Keath/ M. Marsh Paine Smith Johnson Hilfenhaus Hazelwood

2010-10-11T21:39:19+00:00

formeropenside

Guest


I really don't get all this man-love for S. Smith.

2010-10-11T11:30:01+00:00

Hilditch out!

Guest


While you have Hilditch running the show we will always be rubbish.

2010-10-11T09:54:33+00:00

james

Guest


You certainly know your cricket governor. This Australian side does lack players with an x-factor (Sorry Fisher Price) England would be looking at the current Australian side and i tell you what, their not shaking in their boots. As i am typing right now Australia have failed to take a wicket on day 3 and where over an hour away from stumps. Unfortunately Marcus North getting a ton does complicate things. Bare in mind he scored that ton on a flat wicket. How will North go when the ball is swinging? I would have put smith in at No. 6. He has the X-Factor. He is the sort of player that has that unpredictable nature. I have only seen him play a few times but you sense that hes the sort of player that would score runs in a hurry in a tight situation, or take a few quick wickets at vital occasions. But on the other hand he could come up with duck egg. Then again he is only 20 or 21. Thats the sort of player that England would be fearful of. Sure Smith may not be ready for test cricket right now, but then again other great players like healy, s.waugh, warne, mcgrath, ponting weren't ready when they started. Look at them now. Legends!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar