Khawaja and Beer, two debutants at the ball game

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

For six weeks the two debutants, Usman Khawaja and Michael Beer, have been all dressed up with nowhere to go. First Khawaja was added as cover for in an initial squad of 17 and then as cover for Ponting in Melbourne. Beer was playing a domestic game for the Warriors in Brisbane when he was flown across the continent to the WACA.

They have sat like wall-flowers hoping someone will ask them to dance.

On a dark and dank day in Sydney both were granted a waltz on the SCG. Michael Clarke won the toss and both Hughes and Watson tried to leave as many balls as they could. There was a refreshing desire to play themselves in. It was slow going but then there is a time to waltz and a time to hip hop.

Tremlett and Anderson were tight and brisk but not threatening. Watson and Hughes were not prepared to take any liberties and the longer they survived the easier it would get for Khawaja and Clarke.

The irony was that this was the end of the series and it showed how difficult it is to get rid of bad habits. The disrespect shown by Cricket Australia to the traditions of Test cricket had been both careless and unthinking.

The litany of inadequate preparation and muddled selections has been well documented. When CA trumpets the gate takings and healthy revenue in March please remember that our cricket this summer has resembled a patient with chronic afflictions.

At no wicket for 55 and one over to go for lunch, the crowd groaned as Hughes played at a wide one and was snapped at third slip by Collingwood. The hard work had been done and a rich harvest waited after lunch. Unfortunately he lost patience and bit the apple.

An innings half-finished like the trail-end of a twitter message.

Khawaja would not be eating any lunch and would fidget for forty minutes while all of Australia waited for him to take to the dance floor.

The ovation Usman got would have flattered the Belle of the Ball. Tremlett had an unfinished over and, perhaps, unfinished business, as he had, once again, been the pick of England’s bowlers.

The ball was short and on Usman’s hips. He was untroubled in putting it away for two. The next ball was short. He pirouetted, a la Ponting, and pulled it emphatically, for four. The shot was forward of square and showed the quickness of his feet and the agility of his mind. The young man was away and these were the two most assured shots of Australia’s innings up to this point.

Usman must have invigorated Watson because he greeted Anderson with a well drilled boundary past wide mid-on. A single brought Khawaja to face Anderson and the first ball was placed wide of mid-wicket for a single. Watson hesitated but there was no disaster this time.

Every debutant needs luck and Khawaja edged Tremlett short of second slip. But any nerves were dispelled with the next ball that was wristed beyond square for another boundary. Then he slashed over third slip for an injudicious two. He saw the over out with two studied forward defences.

Suddenly there was vitality about Australia’s cricket. UK (my nickname for Khawaja) may just have taken the momentum away from England!

24 runs had been added in three overs and UK had 15 of them from just 10 balls.

Both Watson and UK showed a learned disposition to leaving the good balls. And the conditions were, indeed, helpful for bowling. Why had Australia been ignorant for four of the previous Tests? Or were they just slow learners?

More luck came Khawaja’s way in the 38th over as UK flashed Tremlett between third slip and gully. In the air but fortuitously between the fielders.

This is the luck that deserts ageing captains.

Watson had been diligent for 44 overs but once again squandered a good start. The delivery from Bresnan had no threat, real or imaginary, yet Watson poked at it as he would a daddy long legs spider. Strauss took it low to his right. Nothing escapes this spider!

Clarke made his way on to the arena to a mixture of cheers and boos. His first ball was crisply driven through cover point for two. His first stint as top dog on the watch would be revealing of his worthiness or otherwise.

Unfortunately, Clarke did not further his cause, cutting at one which was too close to his body. There had been an extended rain break and this was only the second over after resumption. To say the shot was careless would be an understatement. UK, at the other end must have wondered at the frivolousness of his Captain.

3 for 114 represented a spendthrift’s disregard for his ancestor’s hard earned wealth.

Khawaja and Hussy would have to resurrect Australia’s innings under skies that remained more threatening than the bowling.

UK unfurled another sumptuous pull off Bresnan to again state his intent. He was not going to go into tortoise mode. The bad offerings would be summarily dismissed. Good batsmen make the bowlers bowl to them. Khawaja continued to be discrete outside his off-stump. Not willing to get too close to his dancing partner!

Khawaja fell as soon as Swann was introduced. This was astute captaincy by Strauss. He moved midwicket to silly point leaving just mid-on and square leg by the umpire. Khawaja like a moth to the light committed cricketing suicide.

Good bowlers make batsmen play shots they normally would not.

Khawaja showed enough to suggest he will get better but the questions will persist about Australia’s overall levels of concentration and application.

Khawaja perished because he was emboldened and took liberties with his dancing partner. The longer the courtship the more productive the liason.You cannot rush the batting Gods on your first date!

The Crowd Says:

2011-01-04T22:09:00+00:00

sledgeross

Guest


I dont agree re mediocre attacks, I just think it makes them more hit and miss. Hughes hit plenty of runs against probably the best bowling attack in the world at the time (Steyn, Ntini, Morkel). I think its about patience. As Steve Waugh said, these blokes dont know how to bat for 4 sessions anymore. I thought Hughes and Smith, despite their deficiences, showed plenty of gumption in reining in their attacking outlook, and occupied the crease. It was just lapses in concentration that (ie poor shots) that got them out. England have far and away bowled much better than us, but it hasnt been the good balls getting teh Aussies out, its been poor application and shot selection.

2011-01-04T21:45:04+00:00

Whiteline

Guest


Sledger It's not about being pretty or otherwise. It's about having the basic tools to succeed more often than not AND on a pitch that might seam or spin or against a ball that might swing. I think everyone knows that Hughes, Smith et al will score heavily against medicore attacks and in favourable batting conditions - they've already proven that!!

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T21:32:59+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Ian,it certainly is. This is a heavy weight clash. Real cricket.

2011-01-04T21:01:14+00:00

sledgeross

Guest


Can anyone name me an Aussie player with good technique? Its the nature of the way we have come to play the game that our players rely of keeness of eye and strength of bravado to score runs. We are not raised on turf pitches on picturesque grounds with bowling green outfields. We are taught to play on footy fields, with astroturf pitches and kikuyu outfields. Most of out best batsmen from the last 15 years havent been too pretty to look at, but have had that confidence (arrogance) to know they can score runs.

2011-01-04T20:48:55+00:00

jamesb

Guest


So hughes and smith are getting batting coaching and advice from langer, a bloke who got hit on the head many times during in his career. Whilst Langer had a successful career, and a gutsy opener, at times even when he batted, he had a bit of luck, where he scored a lot of runs through the slips cordon, via edges.

2011-01-04T20:22:23+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Vinya, The South Africa-India match is turning out to be one of the great Test Matches :)

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T20:18:49+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Fisher,more is the pity. Greg Chappell fixed Ganguly's problems a week before the Brisbane Test almost a decade ago and Ganguly scored a hundred. Langer was a gutsy opener but as a batting coach his results have been underwhelming.

2011-01-04T20:13:53+00:00

Fisher Price

Guest


But they won't watch those things. They'll listen to the know-it-all batting heroes Ponting and Langer.

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T19:57:30+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kersi,I wish they were ambi-dextrous in their brain!

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T19:22:38+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


jamesb,all these young guys have to do is to watch videos of Greg Chappell playing holding Roberts and GarnetrSometimes Chappell "had to wait half an hour to get one loose ball" Or they should watch a replay of Steyn to Tendulkar yesterday. Tendulkar faced 48 of the 66 balls that Steyn bowled in two spells either side of lunch. Firstly,Tendulkar shielded his playing partner and secondly he scored 10 of the 15 runs that Steyn conceded. All these are significant numbers in the context of the 2 run lead India finaly eked out. This is waht Test cricket is about. A searching examination of technique and temperament.

2011-01-04T12:43:01+00:00

jamesb

Guest


I think whoever is coaching smith, hughes and afew of the others needs to be accountable.. The beauty about Smith and Hughes is they are young and talented, but don't have the "concrete technique". If both of them get the right coaches, then hey they will succeed. Don't write them off yet.

2011-01-04T12:35:51+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Kersi, No it isnt. England are winning at a canter - day 3 will be the best for batting, and Australia's batting and bowling is simply less disciplined than England's

2011-01-04T10:47:45+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Did you notice that the two debutant players and the the debutant captain in the Sydney Test are ambidextrous? Usman bats left-hand and bowls right-arm. Beer and Clarke bat right-handed but bowl left-arm. The Test is delicately poised.

2011-01-04T07:27:40+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


Smith, Beer and Doherty are the three big reasons Australia or Australia A should tour Bangladesh, based out of Bogra, during and after the World Cup. The ground is free during the WC, and a tour after the World Cup will hit the wet season (April is vaguely doable, May will be a wet joke, and any time after that will be washed out). Beer, Smith, Hughes and so on *have to* get more four day cricket in varied conditions - Khawaja will get a solid working over against SLAs in Bangladesh as well. Australia cant afford to finish taking their beating in Sydney then have a six month break. They have to get the kids playing real cricket in tough conditions.

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T05:44:24+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Whiteline,point taken about Smith and I agree we cannot afford to play important matches against quality opposition with an "intern" who is learning on the job. Yes,agreed,he needs to go back and learn the correct technique. I am not a cheer squad for anyone but he has been given enough of an opportunity and he should play against the minnows till he tightens up. He needs to work his backside off if he is to cut it at the highest level. With Clarke it is not so much the unothodoxy as the desire he has to plahy too many shots and too early in the innings.

2011-01-04T05:37:10+00:00

Whiteline

Guest


Vinay Your points about Clarke and Hughes are valid I suppose but I can't recall Clarke being too unorthodox (besides his terrible stance - if you can call it that). Steve Smith on the other hand has a lot of technical problems. I know you are a massive fan of his but I urge you to take this as constructive criticism rather than leap to his defence. Smith's game needs a lot of work. He will 'suceed' at number 7 or 8 against New Zealand, the West Indies etc where you only play 2 tests and the pressure and skill isn't as high as England, India or South Africa. But if he wishes to succeed in the top 6 like he has said he wants to then his game needs modification and LOTS of it!! - Especially if pitches continue to provide a bit of encouragement for bowlers. Smiths technique is tailor made for flat decks that offer nothing to only the higherst quality bowlers. He obviously has some exceptional hand eye coordination to have progressed this far so early but somewhere along the line he'll need to have a good look in the mirror if he wishes to achieve what he and his supporters want.

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T03:06:47+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Ian,greetings,I think a lot of the problems can be linked to the coaches of guys like Hughes and Clarke..Clarke,originally,was a player schooled in the good points till D'costa started to "manufacture" shots for the shorter versions.

2011-01-04T00:16:05+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


As a Bangladesh Tigers supporter, I've seen this movie before - good batting interspersed with bad shot selection. Its a team full of Aftab Ahmeds and Mohammed Ashrafuls.

AUTHOR

2011-01-04T00:08:51+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


England is chipping away and playing with Aussie minds and patience. hussey goes after being frustrated by collingwood. Australia will struggle to get 200 here and may be handing the match to england...they have been the more composed throughout the series.

AUTHOR

2011-01-03T23:39:32+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Desert war. It seems prohibition is back and the SCG is a "dry" place. Swann is not giving anything away. anderson has been frugal and england are not going to give australia any sighting of an oasis. 20 runs in the first hour for the loss of haddin. Hussey and smith are battling and smith isshowing admirable restraint. Something will give soon.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar