Australia beat Black Caps in a one-sided encounter

By Vinay Verma / Roar Guru

Nagpur, in the exact geographical centre of India, is a long way from Christchurch and the respective teams stood in a moment’s silence reflecting on the tragedy still so fresh.

Republican, a respected Roarer, was of the opinion New Zealand would lift for this encounter and Australia’s “weeping willows” middle order would crumble.

John Wright, their coach, comes from Christchurch, as do Hamish Bennett and Brendon McCullum. It was understandable that their minds would have been on anything but cricket.

Chris, another sensitive Roarer, had commented, entirely reasonably, that he doubted that a game could be as important as life and death. On reflection he is right. But if the game in any way lifted the spirits, or even distracted for a moment from the suffering, it would have served a small purpose.

Ponting must have sensed something because he won the toss and sent New Zealand in. Ponting usually likes to bat first. The three Australian pace bowlers showed that when in concert they could be fiery.

It was three different fires.

Lee, searching and precise. Tait, a crackling and out of control bush fire. Johnson, a fits and starts fire.

New Zealand was tentative and the batsmen held back in their crease. McCullum struck two uppercuts against the Tait thunder but perished going for a third. In many ways, the batsmen only heard the thunder and never saw the lightning.

Guptill took 18 balls to get off the mark. In the end he was a victim of nature as the ball kept low. But his fate had been sealed because he was tentative. Jesse Ryder tried to stem the tide and reached 25 with six well struck fours before he wafted without conviction.

Ross Taylor played across the line to a full pitched ball from Tait and looked ruefully at the scattered timber.

Franklin was batting too high at number five and went without scoring soon after the drinks break in the 14th over. Three balls later Scott Styris played a shot as if he was sleepwalking and edged behind.

At 73 for 6, New Zealand were looking for Edmund Hilary!

Jamie How and Nathan McCullum showed admirable resolve and took the score to 121 before How missed a straight one from Smith to be plumb in front. I would not call this a flipper because Smith is not yet that proficient.

Captain Vettori then combined with Nathan McCullum to put on a valuable 54 before Ponting reintroduced Johnson. Nathan missed a fast straight one and was LBW for a gritty 52. At 8 wickets down for 175 Vettori’s mind would have been on batting out the last 8 overs and scrambling to 200. Vettori went down swinging, finally caught behind attempting to pull Lee.

Southee went next ball in Johnson’s over skying one straight up in a last show of spunk.

206 all out was never going to threaten Australia.

Ponting was relentless in his captaincy, and every time a partnership looked like developing, he introduced one of his three strikers. He was also flawless in his fielding and is looking the part.

Watson and Haddin started in a blaze with Haddin being particularly severe on Southee. Southee’s first and third balls were wides and this set the tone. Vettori bowled the second over of the innings and was handled easily Southee was taken to the cleaners in his next over and Vettori could not stem the tide.

Haddin lofted Vettori back over his head and after four overs Australia had raced to 27.

The hundred came up in the 14th over and the two openers combined for 133 in 18 overs before both were out in quick succession. Haddin was out to a slow looping bouncer from Bennett that took so long to arrive that Haddin almost had enough time to make himself a cup of tea.

Watson was out swiping and it seemed he was bored that batting was so easy.

Ponting and Clarke were untroubled till Ponting was stumped off Southee. A good piece of work by Brendon McCullum standing up as Ponting overbalanced. Clarke and White sailed home and Australia won with 16 overs to spare.

By the 16th over of Australia’s innings I was screaming silently to the referee to stop the fight. New Zealand were outbowled and out batted. Their minds may have been in Christchurch but their form on the subcontinent has not been good. They had lost 4-0 to Bangladesh and 3-0 to India not very long ago.

So maybe this is their real subcontinental form.

Johnson bowled well except in his 7th over when Vettori launched a counter attack;he did look like Little Boy Blue in that instant. But he has improved and is not trying to bowl too fast.

He is bowling in the high 130’s and low 140’s and is more accurate as a result. Tait remains a loose cannon and did his job by picking up 3 wickets. Two of them were gifts and batsmen from India and South Africa will not be so generous. Lee was the best and, of the spinners, Smith shaded Krezja.

The crazy one is floating the ball rather than spinning it and needs to put more revolutions on the orb.

It was also ironical that Vettori and Nathan McCullum, both spinners, were New Zealand’s best batsmen. Vettori must have wished he could have bowled at both ends so ineffective was the rest of the bowling. Bennett has potential but here was as wayward as a blind-folded drunk.

Australia proved their pace attack is capable of taking wickets and Watson and Haddin proved they can be match winners at the top of the order.

Australia could have chased 300 against this attack and won easing down to the line. I don’t believe New Zealand expected any charity and they certainly did not receive any.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2011-02-26T08:38:39+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Russ,In the last 12 months I have spoken with Sehwag,Pietersen and Dravid and they ALL are challenged by Test cricket. Yes they play the short forms and one of them said it is fun and the money is easy. In the end if we do not produce technically proficient cricketers all forms will be devalued and the money every one is chasing will not be there. Forget the quality of the product and you are consigned to a no name brand with dubious appeal and benefits. To be fair,Ponting sees some of this and has said he wants to see Associates encouraged but is not sure how it should work.

2011-02-26T08:01:37+00:00

Russ

Guest


Vinay, well put. The sad thing is even his basic premises are wrong. Reducing the number of teams doesn't reduce the number of minnow vs full member games (unless you remove the associates completely), only the number of minnow vs minnow games - and given Ireland vs Bangladesh has been by far the highlight to date, that is hardly a good idea. And secondly, revenue is much higher without the small nations; the idea that the ICC is chasing revenue by including associates is laughable. And thirdly, meaning is derived from context, not competition. Ireland vs Bangladesh had meaning, Australia vs New Zealand didn't. In the former a win was vital. But that's all by the by, I have a more straight-forward, selfish, perspective: if the next Tendulkar, or Warne, or whomever emerged out of an associate nation (and there is no reason why they might not), then I want to see them to play test cricket, in World Cups, and in general on the greatest stage, for their homeland. It ought to be quite obvious to the nay-sayers (Clark, Martyn, Ponting) that if they'd been born in one of those countries that they'd have wanted the same.

AUTHOR

2011-02-26T06:54:20+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Republican,I still believe Australia has a side that on their day will beat any other side. In practical terms they need to win one more game to be assured of the knockout stage. if they win them all (Kenya,Canada,SL and Pak) they will finish top of their group. Even if they lose one they may still finish top of the group. Once you get to the quarterfinal stage then you need to play three consistent high quality games where there cannot be any passengers. I see Krezja as the weak link. Also interesting who they get as a replacement for Bollinger. This is an ideal case for Michael hussey to be the replacement. They need his experience because White and Ferguson may freeze in the big games.Cam White is an enigma. He can be destructive but i think he is caught between being himself and trying to nurdle. he is also not rotating the strike enough. It is mental and I hope he can come good because we need his hands in the slips to catch the Lee and Johnson snicks.

2011-02-26T06:45:21+00:00

Republican

Guest


I agree with you Vinay, in respect of the bling factor compromising so much about the quality of not just Cricket but many aspects of our culture. Personally I Have no time for the ludicrously truncated version i.e. T20 but tolerate the ODI format. CCh factor - I don't no it's hard to say. If they'd had won, the earthquake would have been seen as the motivator now they lose, well it can be mis used as an excuse perhaps? Anyway, my view is NZ are a very good exponents of truncated cricket formats, so i was surprised in all honesty that they were unable to take advantage of what is an Australian line up struggling for form and rebuilding after a dynasty of world domination in all forms of the game. Cheers

AUTHOR

2011-02-26T05:34:51+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Republican,NZ have done well in previous WC's. It is just that their record in India is not exemplary. Like in australia,and I dare say many other countries, NZ players are also seduced by the riches on offer in India. They have also agreed to play Twenty20 games in the USA and are being paid decent money. I think cricket basics are being ignored and in the long run this will impact on the quality of the cricketer we see. Unfortunately administrators are unable to see beyond the glitter. I also believe the Christchurch factor was at play here early on in the NZ batting...by the time the natural contest kicked in it was too little too late.

2011-02-26T03:28:59+00:00

Republican

Guest


Vinay. I was way off the mark, wasn't I! Sheek, I don't think NZ are hopeless at Cricket myself. They are ordinary at the Test version of the game to be sure, but have always been able to produce a good calibre of agricultural hitters that are required for the truncated versions, especially T20. They have the brawn but perhaps lack the brains? Cheers

AUTHOR

2011-02-26T01:09:46+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Sheek,I see a piece by Stuart Clark in this morning's SMH which shows how out of touch some elite cricketers are. Also how narrow minded and uncaring about anything but themselves. Cricket needs its fans in Bangladesh and ireland and Zimbabwe and Holland. What may be meaningless to Clark is a whole lot of meaning to Bangladesh. He may have been to Uni and is bookwise but his life knowledge and worldview is as narrow as the darkest one-way alley.

2011-02-25T23:41:55+00:00

sheek

Guest


Vinay, It could have been much worse. The other McCullum & Vettori took the score over 200, which only helped to make the game slightly more interesting. Funny/sad about the Kiwis, apart from throwing up the odd gem here or there, they are generally hopeless at cricket. Which is a pity, because the world game can do with a consistently strong NZ. I agree the India-England game will give us an idea of the ambitions of these two favourites. But do the Saffies have them both covered? And I take back my doubts about Sri Lanka, they might cause some headaches.....

AUTHOR

2011-02-25T22:22:13+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Kersi,Tomorrow's match aginst England will show how strong India is. Will be interesting to see KPat the top for his second match. He was overly cautious in his first avatar as an opener .He needed more dutch Courage!

2011-02-25T21:45:22+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Nice one Vinay. Australia has not lost a single World Cup match under Ricky Ponting. Australia has won all their 24 matches under Ponting from 11 February 2003 to 25 February 2011, spanning 8 years! Going further back, Australia has remained unbeaten in 25 WC matches in a row (under Steve Waugh and Ponting) between 20 June 1999 and 25 February 2011. Spanning two millennia!! Also Ponting has played most number of WC matches, 41 and counting. BTW, did any one see the presentation of the Chappell-Hadlee Trophy? I did not.

AUTHOR

2011-02-25T21:16:06+00:00

Vinay Verma

Roar Guru


Jason,the India-England game at Bangalore is a sell-out. England have a lot of goodwill in India from the time Kevin Pietersen led the team back for 2 Tests soon after the Mumbai terror attack. I spoke with KevinP in the New Year and he was excited about the WC. He "absolutely" loves India. He said" We stay in the best hotels,the food is great and the fans are passionate" If anything this WC will demonstrate the passion the Indians have for cricket. Not every ground will be full but all the talk will be of the WC. There was a riot for tickets as only a few thousand were released to the public. Often in India it is the privileged that have access. Administrators should be made to sit in the public stands. They should also be asked to queue up once in a while. Sri Lanka-Australia will be a test and Clarke and Ponting will be the batting keys. Footwork and patience against the spinners and score quickly off the seamers. Once again Lee and Johnson will need to get rid of Dilshan,Sanga and Jayawardne early. Bollinger is being shipped home with an ankle injury and perhaps Siddle will be the replacement

2011-02-25T20:51:15+00:00

Jason Cave

Guest


The game against Sri Lanka will give us an indication of where Australia are heading in this World Cup. The games between India and England on Sunday and the Sri Lanka-Australia encounter could be the highlights of the whole tournament, outside the World Cup Final itself.

Read more at The Roar