Daniel Kerr shouldn't be playing round one

By Ben Waterworth / Roar Guru

Things haven’t gone so smoothly for Daniel Kerr over the past few years. Since fellow star midfielders Chris Judd and Ben Cousins vacated West Coast at the end of 2007, his stardom status has suffered a major decrescendo.

Kerr’s had to cope with relentless taggers on a weekly basis, which has significantly reduced his impact on the field. He’s gone from averaging 27 disposals a game in 2007 to just 19 in 2010, and there’s little doubt his form has played a significant part in his team’s dramatic downfall over the past three seasons.

The onballer has also struggled to get himself on the park. He’s played just 26 of the past 66 games for the Eagles due to nagging injuries and questionable suspensions. In that sense, he’s perhaps been a tad unlucky.

Fortune finally favoured Kerr on the weekend. However, on this occasion, his run of bad luck should’ve continued.

Kerr lined up for East Fremantle in a WAFL practice game against Claremont on Saturday. It was his first competitive footy match since tearing his hamstring off the bone in round four of the AFL last season. His return was big news, drawing a couple of television cameras to the ground to capture his every movement throughout the match.

Did Kerr know about the cameras? If he didn’t, he made a massive mistake.

After being tackled to the ground, Kerr blatantly elbowed a vulnerable Luke Blackwell in the head. Looking at the footage, the former Carlton player is clearly stunned by the hit and flinches as Kerr’s elbow makes contact. His head snaps back due to the impact and forceful nature of the hit.

It was shameful – almost hard to look at. If the incident occurred in an official AFL match, the uproar would’ve been massive. Kerr would’ve definitely been suspended – some say for at least three weeks. You even heard a supporter scream out ‘you’re gone Kerr’ from the sidelines.

Amazingly though, he wasn’t even sited for the incident and is now eligible for AFL selection this weekend.

The WAFL umpires couldn’t do anything about it because they are not allowed to report or investigate off-the-ball incidents. Therefore, if Kerr was to be examined for his strike on Blackwell, the Claremont Football Club had to lodge a ‘notice of investigation’ themselves.

Blackwell was asked for his version of events and indicated to the club “there was contact (but) it wasn’t forceful.” He added that his surprised reaction was due to “either sweat or oil from Kerr’s arm” dropping into his eyes.

Please. We’re not dumb, Luke.

The contact was high, deliberate and vigorous. Cowardly too, considering Blackwell’s defenceless position on the turf.

Kerr’s brain fade was a disgraceful act, especially because he’s a player who’s under immense pressure to recapture his outstanding form of season’s past.

Blackwell clearly protected Kerr and the Eagles by taking no action on the incident. Claremont had every right to lodge a complaint with the league, but instead chose to let the incident slide in fear of the possible consequences.

The WAFL and its clubs deeply value AFL-listed players lining-up in the league when they haven’t been selected to play with West Coast or Fremantle in the same weekend. Their presence generates revenue and exposure for the league, plus it gives sides a greater chance of winning.

But imagine if Claremont had dobbed on Kerr – no doubt West Coast would’ve been furious. The trust between the Eagles – perhaps the Dockers too – and other WAFL clubs would’ve been tarnished and the possibility of AFL-listed players representing WAFL teams might’ve taken a serious blow.

The AFL must also take some responsibility for this farcical situation. This is the statement they gave TV show Footy Classified on Monday night:

“The AFL only has jurisdiction over AFL players in AFL matches. It’s up to the WAFL to deal with it. If it’s in a practice match between two AFL clubs then it is under our jurisdiction.”

That is an ordinary response.

Isn’t the AFL the governing body of footy in this country? Isn’t it their job to put an end to these types of incidents? Isn’t it their job to make sure the game stays clean? Isn’t it their job to encourage young kids to play?

The AFL had the authority to step in on this incident and take action if they wanted to. Adrian Anderson – general manager of football operations – should’ve come down hard on the Eagles and incurred some sort of penalty.

Instead, Kerr walked away from the game a free man and, barring any fitness concerns, will play for the Eagles against North Melbourne this Sunday.

The majority of the footy world wants Kerr to return to his best. His pace across the ground, composure in traffic and quick hands places him in the top 10 players in the country when in form.

But Kerr should not be playing footy this weekend. Nonsense incidents like these give the game a bad image and they simply can’t afford to be left alone.

Kerr was lucky he was wearing an East Fremantle jumper on Saturday, not a West Coast one.

The Crowd Says:

2011-03-24T05:59:11+00:00

gazz

Roar Pro


no he shouldnt be playing round one and he probably wont cos he aint fit

2011-03-23T08:45:47+00:00

can we get some accurate articles please

Guest


there’s little doubt his form has played a significant part in his team’s dramatic downfall over the past three seasons. What a stupid comment, really? Lets reverse that around to say theres little doubt the teams dramatic fall is due to a lack of quality mids!!! Beyond that saying that he'd be rubbed out for it if it was an AFL match is unprecedented as I remember judd getting nothing for giving pavlich some blood from an elbow (not a forearm) Maybe you could explain how if he was "dobbed in" as you say, that would lead to less afl players getting a run in the wafl when required? Where else are they going to play? Come down hard on the Eagles!!! I think we have had our share of having it tough considering the years of crap handed to us because of some bad behaviour from some players. How bout you take a look in the backyard of Victoria and how they produced a young caveman by the name of Fevola. The responsibility has an order and the order has been followed... dont get upset coz its not the result you wanted and dont put the blambe on WCE, the WAFL or Kerr for this result as its just the system thats got holes in it like our soft laws on criminals.

2011-03-23T07:52:02+00:00

Nathan

Guest


Can we lay off the Eagles? Honest to god people, stop putting the boot into the wooden spooners :P

2011-03-23T06:55:54+00:00

TW

Guest


D.K. should have been cleared to Carlton when he wanted to go a while back. He is past his prime now, but will be able to teach the youngsters around him. Also he gets a lot of physical stuff handed out to him and he aint no giant sizewise and it all takes a toll.

2011-03-23T06:19:49+00:00

the thug that is D Kerr

Guest


to suggest that Kerr has been unlucky up until now is just silly. He is a thug as is his whole family. Whether conatct was minimal or not is irrelevant. It was a cheap shot and it almost seemed an automatic reaction. He will be lucky to play 10 games this year as he will no doubt be either injured or get a silly suspension. He is easily wound up but unlike Barry Hall he can not back it up, he will one day get what is coming to him.

2011-03-23T06:10:01+00:00

Aussie

Guest


I do not condone what Kerr did,but there was more going on than meets the eye. An early incident had a player from Kerrs team ironed out ,and quite possibly there was a bit of heat and payback going on.

2011-03-23T00:43:39+00:00

Alissa

Guest


Good point, Pat. But Judd has always been able to get away with bloody murder and even has opposition players lying for him and receiving fines for such lies (i.e. Campbell Brown). The AFL are always throwing their weight around in matters that shouldn't concern them and I'm glad for once they've taken the right (diplomatic) approach.

2011-03-22T20:55:40+00:00

MyLeftFoot

Roar Guru


Not a great look for Kerr. Hopefully it's not an indication of where he's at this season, he's actuallly quite a good buy for supercoach.

2011-03-22T14:10:52+00:00

The_Wookie

Roar Guru


The AFL has absolutely ZERO authority over the WAFL and its matches. The same with the SANFL. In fact were the AFL to interfere with the WAFLs governing procedures, there'd be more than a little concern on the WAFLs part. The state leagues in SA and WA zealously guard their independence. The AFL Commission (as opposed to the League) authority extends to basic laws and development of the game. States are not required to enforce the changes to the rules. It maintains some authority over the NT, QLD, NSW/ACT and Tasmanian leagues because it more or less funds them. It of course maintains full authority over the AFL. The only way the AFL would be able to deal with this uis by claiming he brought the game into disrepute.

2011-03-22T13:42:58+00:00

Pat

Guest


The video is damning however only Kerr and Blackwell know exactly how much force was given. I suspect it was very, very minimal as Blackwell is suggesting. Elbows draw blood at the slightest touch i.e. Judd v Pavlich. On another tangent, Judd was not suspended for a blatant elbow which drew blood yet people want Kerr suspended???? Cameras present errors of perception and parallax. It was dumb by Kerr but i'm not convinced on the crime.

Read more at The Roar