The inside tip on sports gambling

By Michael Filosi / Roar Guru

I love sport, and most things associated with it. I love the pre-game banter. I love the atmosphere ahead of a big match. I love the debate that sport stirs up, and until recently I have been more than happy to tolerate the pastime of betting on sport.

However, over the past few years, sports gambling has insidiously worked ever deeper into sports coverage, to a point where it is very difficult for the governing bodies to repel the intrusions made.

Betting agencies have sport by the balls.

Gambling on sport used to be an adjunct to the spectacle of the match. Now, the odds of a match are continually updated and broadcast during matches. Gambling on sport is no longer just an optional extra, but a constituent part of sports coverage, apparently adding some value to the viewer’s experience.

Every preview of a match comes with the requisite odds for each result being displayed, as well as the details of the betting agency which supplies the odds. The Magpies or the Broncos are no longer mentioned as heavy favourite to beat their opposition, they are “$1.25 to win at SportsBettingMadeEasy.com.”

With live broadcasts of matches, viewers are encouraged to bet on the run, which will only increase the pervasiveness of sports betting.

It seems so abundantly clear, but I often wonder if those who bet regularly know what they are getting into?

I’m not a gambling man. I never have been. Call me a killjoy, but I just don’t get it. My decision not to gamble on sport is based on the financial reality that comes with it.

Betting agencies exist to make money. Punters wage their hard-earned cash on sports bets in an attempt to make money. These are mutually exclusive objectives, and the fact that the betting agencies continue to do business makes it very clear which way the flow of money goes over the course of all bets.

Sure, you might have the occasional lucky windfall, but over the course of time, you will lose more money than you win. It issimple mathematical probability.

Anyone who claims they can win over the course of a long-term series of bets is lying, deluded, or has a vested interest in promoting gambling. I say this not as an opinion, but as a statement of fact.

I’m tired of listening to paid segments on sports radio shows where the presenters tell me that if I listen to Jimmy Bob and his Dog from GamblingGenius.com I’ll come out ahead, when every law of business, mathematics and human behaviour says otherwise.

At what point will the gambling agencies be forced to get serious (because they would never do it of their own volition), and be made to warn the public about the realistic outcomes of betting on sport?

It is time that gambling, like smoking and excessive alcohol consumption, had its risks better publicised.

Just as cigarette packets are now adorned with a plethora of warnings, I’d like to see a glowing neon sign displaying the following message outside all betting agencies and on betting websites. I can see it now….

“WARNING: It is exceedingly unlikely that any attempt to win money by betting on sporting events will result in a net financial gain. The more bets you make, the higher the likelihood that you will lose. Gambling can lead to family and relationship breakdowns, bankruptcy, and social isolation.”

While the evils associated with smoking and alcohol are well known, there is not sufficient recognition of the fact that betting agencies will ultimately take more money from the general public than they give back.

If you have the occasional flutter, can afford to lose what you bet, and enter into any bet armed with the knowledge that the odds are stacked against you, by all means go ahead and place a bet.

But know that the only ‘sure thing’ with gambling is that the betting agencies will come out ahead in the long run. And that’s the safest bet of all.

Follow Michael on Twitter @michaelfilosi

The Crowd Says:

2011-04-18T18:32:23+00:00

Bondy

Guest


Just as i thought a topic on gambling by somebody who doesn't gamble, and responded to by most non gamblers. One great issue here is that these lets call them Betting Shops are driving even harder to keep their market share alive whilst driving out the competition which makes these companies even more aggressive to promote their company hence we see the wall to wall market advertising from all of them clamering for their market share. You can win by gambling on sport's if you know you're odds and more importantly are prepared to lose ,which most gamblers don't asses, you can't win if you don't acknowledge the ramifications from you're wager. But whats even more important and concerning is when your child say's daddy their decent odds when prices are shown on the screen when they are 12 -14 years of age ,thats when you should be flicking channels you generally know when the prices are coming in relation to the kiddies. Bookmaking firms nowadays aren't interested so much in our money their more interested in breeding our children to asses prices for sports and thats were i have a serious issue with these firms, our kids.

2011-04-18T17:01:53+00:00

Football United

Guest


i am not happy with all this betting advertising all over my sports broadcast, channel 9 are serial offenders with their coverage of the cricket and NRL (not that we see too much of that down in melbourne). i think the ease of betting on sport is getting out of hand. id like to see a rule where instead of being able to just plug your credit card into the sportsbettingistooeasy.com iphone app or website, you should actually have to get off your arse and go down to the TAB.

2011-04-18T12:58:37+00:00

amazonfan

Roar Guru


Indeed. Plus, isn't that part of the job? Just like insurance companies, gosh!, paying out insurance claims, isn't the job of the bookmaker to pay out winning bets from time to time? Anyway, I have no sympathy for bookmakers and their various complaints.

2011-04-18T12:24:40+00:00

Mark Young

Roar Guru


Great article Michael. The creeping encroachment of sporting betting is appalling. Especially when you consider the way exotic bets are not just corrupting players, but actually undermining our confidence in the players every time they do something stupid. 'Are they on the take???' What is it with sport? We just got rid of all the cigarette's and now have booze and gambling? Is it really that hard to stick to ethical companies?

2011-04-18T06:51:18+00:00

simonjzw

Roar Pro


I enjoy a punt on sport and I disagree with the idea that the odds are always stacked against you but I must say that's what the Bookies try to achieve. When an event is truly a 50-50 contest the Bookies set the prices at something like $1.95 v $1.95 so the pay out is marginally less than the true odds - hence their "advantage". If you want to take punting on sport more seriously and make money in the long haul you have to spend time assessing the odds accurately, track form and statistics that are true indicators of good form. Then you must make objective judgements about what the true odds for the event are. Once you've done this you can compare your odds with those set by the bookmaker and bet when you think the bookmaker has made an error in your favor (i.e your assessment of the true odds is $2.50 and the bookmaker is offering $3.00). I this situation an Irish statistician named Kelly has come up with a formula that tells you how much of your bank you should bet. Notice in this situation I only expect to win 40% of the time but if my assessment is right the Bookies odds more than pay for my losses. Of course the Bookies aren't often wrong and when they are it usually isn't by a big margin but this is the theory behind successful sports bettting (and I have the results over the last 3 seasons of the AFL and NFL to prove it does work if your discliplined). I do agree that betting on hunches is a long term, losing strategy (even though I still have the ocasional $10 bet when watching a game at the pub) Even if you don't want to go through the statistcal analysis you should always ask yourself "If these two teams play each other 10 times what would I expect the result to be?" and compare this percentage with the Bookie's percentage before you bet. Having said all of that even I agree that the promotion of odds for sports events is way over top. I don't mind the Sports Betting Companies sponsoring teams, events and venues but I think the commentators should just comment on the game. I actually think some legislation along the lines of banning the mention of odds on radio and television from 1/2 an hour before the game until the conclusion of the event is in order. And when a sports punter like me thinks this way we've definitely got a problem

AUTHOR

2011-04-18T04:12:39+00:00

Michael Filosi

Roar Guru


A lot of sports websites, news websites, newspapers and magazines and radio shows have paid segments or advertisements from gambling agencies. This makes it very difficult for any of these outlets to be impartial about the issue of sports gambling, or to write anything even remotely critical of sports gambling.

AUTHOR

2011-04-18T04:10:25+00:00

Michael Filosi

Roar Guru


I think kids growing up watching sport will just assume that sports gambling has always been so closely linked with the coverage of sport, which is sad. Gen Y or Z may be the generation of sports punters?

AUTHOR

2011-04-18T04:09:12+00:00

Michael Filosi

Roar Guru


Good point Hanzo. I find it irritating when the bookmakers cry poor when a favourite gets up and wins. Comments like "we got taken to the cleaners by punters" and the like.

2011-04-18T04:08:22+00:00

Gob Bluth

Guest


Nathan, Just because you are someone who watches sport and doesn't play the pokies don't think that sports betting comes anywhere near the amount of money gambled on the pokies. Also the amount which you can lose on pokies are far higher given they operate nearly 24/7 and your rates of success are much lower. I don;t disagree with your sentiments that the issue is a problem, but it is important to keep it in perspective.

2011-04-18T01:55:56+00:00

Nathan

Guest


the government's ignorance to this gambling promotion is farcical. they're up in arms about smoking and plain packaged ciggs, and even getting started on pokies now, but nothing about sports betting. I would ssy sports betting is potentially more dangerous than pokies, you can bet online with large amounts of cash and lose it all in one match or race. and the fact that the advertising is plastered everywhere, surely that's just encouraging problem gamblers to get on. It's a national disgrace and makes our sports image look tacky and cheap.

2011-04-17T23:49:56+00:00

Patrick Angel

Roar Guru


Individuals can win, but it is very rare. I've known a professional gambler in my time, and he would be ridiculously wealthy one week and poor as the next. That Centrebet ad just seems to look like a simulation of a gambling problem.

2011-04-17T23:21:06+00:00

TomC

Guest


I agree with the general sentiment of this piece, but I'm not sure it's true you're always destined to lose money. The public is as a whole, but there might well be some smart individual punters out there. My real issue is how difficult its become to protect kids from gambling. I think my mum wouldn't have let me watch footy on TV if there'd been as much gambling advertising in the 80s as there is now.

2011-04-17T22:53:32+00:00

Hanzo

Guest


Well said. I always read on Monday how an anonymous punter turned $10 into $30k but getting a series of "multiple-bets" correct. I think this is another ploy to encourage betting. The agency only has to add up some unlikely results that happened over that previous weekend and tell us a bet was placed on these results. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download The Roar's iPhone App in the App Store here.

Read more at The Roar