Learning from our selections of past

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

With all the brouhaha surrounding the omission of in-form but aging Test opener Simon Katich from the list of 25 contracted players, I thought I would share with fellow Roarers an interesting selection intrigue that occurred many years ago indirectly involving current fulltime selector, Greg Chappell.

It basically demonstrates how clever and insightful selections can greatly benefit the national team.

In 1969/70 the Australian Cricket Board decided to undertake an ambitious three countries tour of Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), India and South Africa. To today’s sports fans that might not sound overly ambitious, but for 1969/70 it certainly was.

You could still get seriously ill back then if you didn’t closely monitor your dietary habits on the sub-continent.

Just a simple act of drinking a glass of water could land you with an upset tummy. A very upset tummy.

The tour was fraught with all sorts of dangers, not only to do with diet and hygiene. There was the political powder keg of South Africa’s white-dominated apartheid system.

India was also a nation at unrest, with border skirmishes against Pakistan leading eventually to a brief, violent war in 1971.

Apart from the massive cultural changes to be found travelling from India to South Africa, there were the vastly different playing conditions.

The Australians would have to adjust from the humid, dry, slow, turning, dust bowl wickets of the Indian sub-continent, to the seaming, moving, fast wickets of South Africa. Somewhat surprisingly, the selectors chose just 15 players for this Odyssey across 3 vastly different countries.

They would play three matches in Ceylon, including a 3-day unofficial test. In India they would play 10 matches – 5 x tests and 5 x 3-day zone matches.

In South Africa, they would play 12 matches – four tests and 8 x 3-day provincial matches. This was long before the concept of playing one day internationals as part of the tour schedule.

The 15 tourists would miss the entire 1969/70 domestic season while on tour. A precursor to today’s 365 day traveling cricket teams!

In 1969, Sir Donald Bradman, as chairman of selectors, still ran Australian cricket with a firm hand. At the selection table, he was assisted by fellow ex-players andamp; ex-captains Jack Ryder and Neil Harvey.

Part of their deliberations concerned Greg Chappell, who the end of the 1968/69 season at age 20, was a rising star of the future. The question for the selectors was this – should they blood him on the 1969/70 tour, or hold him back another season?

In the back of their mind was a B team tour of New Zealand at the end of the 1969/70 season. Might it be better to select him for that tour instead?

12 of the players to tour were a ‘given’. They were the 12 from the Fifth test against West Indies in Sydney.

The team was – Bill Lawry(c), Keith Stackpole, Ian Chappell(vc), Doug Walters, Ian Redpath, Paul Sheahan, Brian Taber, Eric Freeman, Graham McKenzie, Johnny Gleeson, Alan Connolly and Ashley Mallett (12th man).

The Aussies had crushed West Indies 3-1 in a 5 test series. The portents of what was basically still a young team were good. To this team would be added another thrre players – a batsman, a fast bowler and a reserve keeper.

The following is how the revered Richie Benaud opened with his thoughts on the team selected, writing in the March 1969 edition of a new cricket magazine in its first season – Australian Cricket.

“The Australian cricket selectors, bless them, always seem to produce surprises in their choosing of touring teams; this year was no exception in their announcing of the team to tour India and South Africa. Sir Donald Bradman and Messrs. Harvey and Ryder all possess a good sense of humour, and they must be chuckling a little at the fact they were the only people in Australia to choose the final fifteen players announced after the South Australia-N.S.W. match at the S.C.G.

“There was no problem encountered in the choosing of 12 of the players, for those who represented Australia in the fifth test against the West Indies were automatic selections. The final three places – reserves if you like – were the ones that mattered, and anyone else who chose Irvine, Mayne and Jordan, should give away cricket-team selecting and make straight for the racecourse ….. there’s a fortune to be made there!”

Benaud goes on to describe how the final three players earnt their selection, and the thinking behind each selection is quite intriguing, and clever.

Jock Irvine was a 25 year old middle order batsman for WA. Irvine had been one of the leading non-test batsmen during the 1968/69 Australian season, averaging 56.5.

He won the final batting spot over Chappell because the selectors felt Chappell would not gain much by playing effectively every second week on tour. Irvine wasn’t considered a serious test selection, but was there to provide backup in midweek games.

Fast bowler Laurie Mayne, at 27, was not much more than a workmanlike Sheffield Shield player for WA. He had toured the West Indies in 1965, and played 3 tests for reasonable but not spectacular returns.

He had won selection over another ex-test bowler Dave Renneberg from NSW, who was the same age but faster. The selectors felt Renneberg would be wasted in midweek matches, and wanted him to spearhead the pace attack for the B team in New Zealand in early 1970.

For the backup keeper’s role, the selectors sprung another surprise by selecting veteran Victorian keeper Ray Jordan, who at 34 would be in his second last season of first-class cricket.

Again, the selectors’ thinking was that there would be little to gain by selecting the Queensland young gun John Maclean, who they felt would also be wasted in midweek matches. And of course, there was that B team tour in 1970.

As it was, Chappell, Renneberg and Maclean all won selection for the B team tour of New Zealand. The team was led by veteran Queensland opener Sam Trimble, who had toured West Indies in 1965 but never played in a test.

Apart from Trimble and Chappell, the other batsmen were Chadwick, Turner, Steele, Inverarity, Watson and Davies. Inverarity and Watson had played tests while Turner was a future test batsman.

Davies was 12th man once against the West Indies. Maclean was the keeper, ousting Rod Marsh from WA. Jenner and O’Keeffe were the spinners, while 3 pacemen were chose – Renneberg, Alan ‘Froggy’ Thomson from Victoria, and a young tyro from WA named Dennis Lillee, who had brilliantly made his 1st class debut in the 1969/70 season.

In 1970/71, Chappell and Lillee spectacularly made their test debuts against England, having toured with the B team. Others from the B team to win selection in 1970/71 were fast bowler Thomson and leg-spinners Jenner and O’Keeffe.

Unhappy with Maclean, the selectors leap-frogged Marsh into the test team, with Taber ill after the arduous tour of india and South Africa. It’s interesting to note that many of the team that toured India and South Africa were never quite the same again, especially the bowlers. That twin tour took a great deal out of them physically and mentally.

With some clever selections and indeed, non-selections, the selectors had set up some great players for the future. The rest, as they say, is history.

Touring team to India and South Africa, ages at end of 1969: Bill Lawry(VIC-c) – 32, Ian Chappell(SA-vc) – 26, Keith Stackpole(VIC) – 29, Doug Walters(NSW) – 24, Ian Redpath(VIC) – 28, Paul Sheahan(VIC) – 23, Jock Irvine(WA) – 25, Brian Taber(NSW-k) – 29, Ray Jordan(VIC-2k) – 34, Graham McKenzie(WA) -28, Eric Freeman(SA) – 25, Alan Connolly(VIC) – 30, Laurie Mayne(WA) – 27, Johnny Gleeson(NSW) – 31, Ashley Mallett(SA) – 24.

Touring B team to New Zealand in 1970 (ages at end of 1969): Sam Trimble(Queensland-c) – 35, Tony Steele(NSW-vc) – 27, Derek Chadwick(WA) – 28, Alan Turner(NSW) – 19, Greg Chappell(SA) – 21, Geoff Davies(NSW) – 23, John Inverarity(WA) – 25, Graeme Watson(VIC) – 24, John Maclean(Queensland-k) – 23, Dave Renneberg(NSW) – 27, Alan Thomson(VIC) – 24, Dennis Lillee(WA) – 20, Terry Jenner(SA)- 25, Kerry O’Keeffe(NSW) – 20.

The Crowd Says:

2011-06-17T07:01:20+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Sheek, taking a young player as the spare batsman on tour thing, I have a perception that a number of times in recent years that's what's been done, but the player concerned hasn't come on and that's virtually been the last heard of them (at the top level anyway). As I say, it's a perception and It could be one of those things where it's happened once or twice only but since that has stood out it's enough to (probably totally erroneously) create the impression that that is what frequently happens. Given most tours don't involve many non-test games, taking an older hand to slot in if there's a last minute injury doesn't sound such a bad approach. And doesn't that B tour to NZ highlight how shabbily they got treated! Great for blooding our promising talent, not good enough to play tests against. I wonder how long before the 73/74 series against them it was agreed to play that series - and whether SA being out in the cold had anything to do with it?

2011-06-17T03:52:53+00:00

sheek

Guest


JohnB, It must be frustrating for the selectors when they DO give a young player an opportunity, but the player fails to grasp that opportunity. In 1966/67, young paceman Jim Hubble & batting all-rounder Graeme Watson were chosen for South Africa both at 21 years of age. Watson was a straight swap for Doug Walters who was doing national service (this was the Vietnam war era). Although Hubble appeared again in Sheffield Shield again, his tour was a flop. Watson played 3 unimpressive tests, & although he toured NZ in 1970 & England in 1972, he failed to fully fulfill his early promise. In 1968, young batsman Les Joslin toured England at age 21. He had made his debut against the Indians in 1967/68. He was a flop, & quickly faded from 1st class cricket by 1970. John Inverarity at 24, was also selected for this tour, & although he played few tests, he had a long & distinguished Shield career. It's often a fine balancing act. Some players will always complain about lack of opportunity, while other players, given plenty of opportunity, will fail to deliver. The art of selection is truly an inexact science.....

2011-06-17T03:42:43+00:00

sheek

Guest


JohnB, One thing we can't argue here is the quality of the South African team at the time - they were awesome! They would have beaten us anyhows. Also, they could sense the noose of isolation tightening around their neck. Perhaps not to the extent it happened, but they could certainly sense it. So there was this added element to their play to make every post a winner, before it was all cut off from them. Even allowing for the B tour in NZ in 1970, which would overlap the tour to India & South Africa by about a month, why not take 17 players? As they would to England. Or start the tour in South Africa, where the lifestyle was similar to Australia & then tackle India afterwards. Anyway, none of the fast bowlers - McKenzie, Connolly, Freeman, Mayne - were ever the same again. The twin tours totally knackered them. Also, keeper Taber was a sick man for quite some time after the twin tours. I think it was an interesting time, entirely different to today. Tours & tests were just starting to mushroom with extra TV exposure & coming sponsorship. The late 60s & early 70s were a bridge between the easy paced days of the 60s & previously, & the fast paced days of the 70s & future.

2011-06-17T02:17:52+00:00

JohnB

Guest


With the benefit of hindsight, you wonder if really smart selection wouldn't have been to pick different squads for the 2 sections of the tour - in particular, holding back McKenzie for the SA part of the tour and adding one more quick bowler (Renneberg?) for there. It's not as if they didn't have experience both of how debilitating Indian tours could be, and how strong a side SA were, particularly at home, and how important pace bowling was there. Having said that, only fair to say that that SA team would probably have been far too hot for them even if they went there fresh and with a team specifically chosen for the conditions. A point you make is interesting though - it often seems that the spare batsmen taken on tours is a youngster "for the experience", but nowadays they play very few games outside of the tests (and when they do they're often against weakened sides and not actually first class because they're played as select 12, bat and field 11). Is that the best way to bring on younger players?

2011-06-17T02:12:02+00:00

boes

Roar Pro


".......deemed vulnerable outside off stump early in his innings……(cos, seriously, who isn’t!!!)." Simon Katich perhaps?

2011-06-17T00:40:18+00:00

sheek

Guest


Eric, The selections are still interesting irrespective of the fact there was a B tour in the offing. It simply provided the selectors with more options. Perhaps without the B tour in 1970, the only change might have been to select Maclean as backup tour keeper to India & South Africa. Good selectors can have a huge effect on the success of a tea. Unfortunately, it's bit like coaches & refs/umpires - good work/selections is unseen/unappreciated. But howling mistakes are highlighted for all to see! In relative recent times, Lawrie Sawle was probably the master of selectors, while Trevor Hohns was also highly regarded (although Ian Healy wouldn't agree!).

2011-06-17T00:34:04+00:00

Onlooker

Guest


let's just hope that Kawaja, who seems to have technique and attitude, can win the day, because Hughes seriously is an embarrasment, well, he was when promoted to the test team in the middle of last seasons Ashes series. If that technique is deemed worthy of a test opener, then, you've really gotta wonder that for years a guy like Brad Hodge was missing out because he was deemed vulnerable outside off stump early in his innings......(cos, seriously, who isn't!!!).

2011-06-17T00:22:36+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Sheek, there's a nice link here with the Australia A tours to Zimbabwe and South Africa next month. All eyes will be on two intra-team battles: Phillip Hughes v Usman Khawaja (who after Katich's omission said he'd be more than happy to open if necessary), and the three-way spin-off (pun intneded) between Xavier Doherty, Jason Krejza, and Michael Beer. The actual tour results will almost certainly be secondary, with Sri Lankan tour spots up for grabs...

2011-06-17T00:07:31+00:00

Eric

Guest


Interesting history Sheek, which would be relevant if Australia were picking an A and a B team to tour somewhere today. Re Hilditch, I can't believe an intelligent bloke could be so inconsistent, so who else is influencing the selections. I am sure Ponting always put his 2 bobs worth in, and if he didn't like a selection, eg Hauritz, he just wouldn't use him. So Clarke? Nielson?

Read more at The Roar