The Wallabies can still win the World Cup but ...

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Wallabies player Will Genia makes a break (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

The magic and the agony of the Rugby World Cup tournament is that it can produce results that defy prediction.

The tournament is won on the field in 80-minute contests where underdogs can have their day in the sun.

Ireland’s well-deserved and splendidly thought-out victory over a (perhaps overly) confident Wallabies side was also a night in the rain, cold and unpleasant conditions for running rugby at Eden Park on Saturday night.

Your reporter (thanks to the argument between Fairfax and the IRB over the use of match videos) was seated virtually at ground level, about 10 rows from the front.

Notes I took during the game, for instance, were hard to decipher (even more so than usual) as the ink ran down the page in sporadic showers.

Even before the match you sensed that something special was about to take place. In one of the oldest sporting clichés, the atmosphere was electric.

The crowd roared when the names of the players were announced. You’d have sworn you were watching in Sydney or Dublin.

Huge clusters of yellow-clad Wallaby supporters spread around the vast towering stands of Eden Park.

In a poetic moment before I knew, of course, the devastating outcome of the match, I had the notion of the Wallaby supporter groups being like clumps of daffodils among the long green grass of the Ireland supporters.

In hindsight, there were some telling prompts (if we’d been able to read them accurately at the time) that gave clues to the way the match might go, and certainly to which team was the favourite of the large non-partisan contingent of the huge 58,000-plus crowd.

The names of the Irish players received by far the heaviest roaring from their Irish supporters. And when Quade Cooper’s name was called out, or indeed whenever Cooper touched the ball during the match, heavy roars of boos like a barrage of cannon shots blasted around the ground.

The animosity to Cooper, in fact, went much further than just booing him. At one point in the match Cooper took the ball to the line (which to his credit he did frequently) before being smashed in a tackle.

The fiery Irish pack collapsed on him and seemed rather unworried about where their elbows, shoulders and knees landed on his prone body.

A spectator a couple of rows behind me screamed out: ‘Smash him! Kill him! Kick him in the head!’ It was a man dressed in All Blacks supporter clothing.

All this goes back to Cooper’s stupidity in continually trying to bait Richie McCaw.

Courtenay Lawes, the young, talented but overly-pugnacious English second-rower got a two-match suspension for kneeing an Argentinian player for an action that looked much less deliberate than Cooper’s kneeing of McCaw in the last Bledisloe Cup match at Brisbane.

New Zealanders cultivate and like hard rugby. But, in the modern era, they intensely dislike the dirty, smart-arsed rugby in which Cooper has been indulging with McCaw.

The upshot of all this is that as Nick Farr-Jones predicted, Cooper’s behaviour has rebounded on the Wallabies.

Instead of being the second team in the affections of the New Zealand rugby public (with the Robbie Deans syndrome kicking in), the Wallabies have become the team New Zealanders least want to win the World Cup tournament.

So the Wallabies have lost the home ground advantage they would have had before the Cooper antics when they are playing sides that are not New Zealand.

When Ireland kicked for goal there was relative silence. When James O’Connor kicked for goal there was so much booing that around me there were ‘ssshh’ calls even from Irish supporters for some silence.

When Ireland made some surges, the roars of the Irish supporters were ballasted by the roars of the New Zealanders at the game, too.

There was one little incident that gave a clue to the advantage that this gave Ireland.

Around about the 30th minute mark, when the match was truly in the balance, the Wallabies kicked deep. Two Irish players exchanged passes around their own 22. The pass, although it was only a short one, was marginally but clearly forward.

In circumstances like this, with the referee and touch judges well behind in the play, an angry roar from the crowd identifying the error forces the referee to call a forward pass and set a scrum.

But there was no identifying roar. And so Ireland got away with the pass and the need to defend a tough situation.

When we go through this match, several factors stand out as elements that created the surprise result.

The first factor is that Ireland played very very very well. Their tactics of slowing down the Wallaby drives by keeping the tackled player off the ground thereby forcing a maul and a turnover were smart. What is more the players, forwards and backs, carried out the plan expertly.

Ireland presented one of the best scrums I have seen for a long time.

Whether the Irish scrum was really as good as it look, straight-backed, driving low with plenty of grunt, or whether the Wallabies without Stephen Moore had a bad night, will become clearer as the tournament progresses.

Their have been some suggestions by writers on The Roar that the Irish props bored in illegally.

But I must say that watching the game live (where admittedly you sometimes don’t see too much, although some scrums were quite close to me) and on a television replay that I could not see any boring in by Ireland.

I thought, in fact, that towards the end of the match referee Bryce Lawrence went out of his way to give the Wallabies the benefit of the doubt when scrums collapsed, even though it was pretty clear that the Wallaby props had slipped their binds and had gone down with their backs bent like a staple.

One scrum, in particular, which led to the last penalty saw the Wallaby front row go down two times before they were penalised on their third collapse. Either of the first two collapses warranted a penalty, in my view.

A second factor was the loss of David Pocock and Stephen Moore through injury and ill-health just before the match, and Digby Ioane out for a few more matches with a fractured thumb.

Pocock would have provided a contest with the excellent Irish number 7 Sean O’Brien for the ball on the ground (and in the slippery conditions there were plenty of such balls).

Ben McCalman, Pocock’s replacement is not a fetcher or scavenger. In hindsight, it might have been better to start with Scott Higginbotham.

Certainly, either McCalman or Rocky Elsom, who looked metres off the pace and out of puff for most of the match, should have been subbed earlier.

There was nothing that could be done about the Moore situation. Tatafu Polota-Nau is the second hooker. He looked over-weight (to put it kindly). He went down frequently, as he did for the Waratahs. His lineout throwing was poor. And, seemingly, his scrumming left a lot to be desired.

The Wallaby backline looked laboured too, with too much running across the field. Adam Ashley Cooper needs to come into the centres again.

Berrick Barnes should be given a crack at inside centre to provide two play-makers for the outside backs and Kurtley Beale to run off.

At the worst, provided the Wallabies win their next two matches against the USA, and Russia and Ireland defeat Italy in the last game of Pool C at Dunedin, the team will go into the quarter-finals and a match against a rampant (against Fiji, at least) Springboks outfit.

There is some comfort that England, of all sides, has twice lost pool round matches and gone on to play in the finals, in RWC 1991 and RWC 2007. Both times England came close to winning the final. So there is a precedent for the Wallabies to look too, although no one that has lost a pool round match has actually won the final.

The All Blacks could lose to France and go into the half of the finals draw away from the Wallabies.

Or Italy could defeat Ireland and the Wallabies could get to the number one position in their pool on bonus points.

Or, who knows what other upset results could be thrown up. Samoa might defeat South Africa, for instance, and take the Springboks out of the New Zealand half of the finals rounds.

And what if the rainy and windy conditions that have applied in the tournament so far give way to an October without rain but with sunshine and dry fields. These are the conditions that favour the Wallabies running game. All these missing stars will be back, too.

There is a saying in politics, particularly as it relates to by-elections which governments tend to lose: ‘While there’s death there is hope.’

The 2011 RWC tournament has plenty of deaths like the Wallaby loss to come, one would think. So hang on for the ride …

The Crowd Says:

2011-09-27T04:31:37+00:00

james linz

Guest


well, i agree with you on almost every point, except, bringing league players into union. but on the whole state of origin thing, you are absolutely right. even at club level,school level, i see players give it more. we used to say " play like your life depends on it, if you loose, you should at least be on all fours vomiting from exhaustion, cos anything else is disrespectful to the game. these players, the wallabies in general for the last 10 years, look like they are just turning up to get their pay check, they don't even notice that the jersey they are putting on, is green and gold. don't know what the answer is, perhaps they need somebody like Tomy Raudonikas screaming in their faces before every game. either way, these professionals need to remember what they are playing for, or they will always be losers, even when they win.

2011-09-27T04:04:25+00:00

james linz

Guest


rules to allow running in big rugby matches? its really simple, 3 points for penalty and drop goals is too much and just falls straight into the laps of boring NH teams. as long as this exists, big games involving NH team will be boring to watch and bad for the game from a global growth perspective. the Irish won fair and square, the wallabies failed to adapt, but i really hope that whatever SH team gets to the final, shows the NH what real entertaining, running, rugby is all about. and please, to all those NH supporters who are about to argue your style of rugby is as entertaining as ours, read this quote from ex english coach Clive Woodward. "They have to remember that they are not there to entertain - just to make sure they score more points than the opposition." i think it is fair to say there is something seriously wrong with a sport, when entertainment is not the focus of the rules.

2011-09-27T03:39:59+00:00

james linz

Guest


well said Riccardo, i hope you are right and its great to hear it from a Kiwi. go wallabies, and NZ second lol. but i also commiserate with CraigB. the wallabies have been soo painful to watch for the last 8 years, because they have lacked heart and passion. and now they are even more painful to watch, because we see glimmers of brilliance, glimmers of what could be the best team in the world, right before a ball is dropped, right before the forwards fail to show any god damn heart and passion and allow a turnover. i am becoming increasingly worried that this auto pilot wallaby culture is going to result in a ridicules amount of talent being squandered.

2011-09-27T03:15:33+00:00

james linz

Guest


Agreed, but it is rising to a crescendo, even when we are not playing each other. sledging is a big part of sport, and i have no problem with it, but sledging a whole team and its fans when your own team is not even on the field, is going a little too far. i know that Cooper has been an absolute idiot, but i think in some silly stupid manner, he was trying to signal to the ever intimidating ABs and Richie, that he would not be intimidated. it was very stupid, and i really really hope he grows up, but to attack the whole team for one players stupidity, and more importantly, the fans. seams a little unreasonable. and i know in a football crowed, reasonable plays second to passion, but i only read posts on this site now cos i see too much of that rubbish spilling over into the forums. i support Aus 1st and nz 2nd, and always SH over NH. has been good to read on this site some comments from more reasonable Kiwis. can actually have a discussion about it here lol.

2011-09-27T02:51:01+00:00

james linz

Guest


i like what you say about the wallabies being "incapable of liftng themselves out of auto-pilot" this above everything else has worried me about the wallabies. i stopped watching them for a while, claiming i would watch again when they grew some heart and passion. the game against the ABs was great, but if they don't show more passion when they put on the green and gold this RWC i give up, i dont care if they loose, as long as i see some heart, otherwise, there is something seriously wrong.

2011-09-27T02:41:47+00:00

james linz

Guest


agreed, don't care what people say, i would much prefer to watch the tri nations than RWC, NH rugby is intense, but chokes all the fun out of the game. is a real shame we are prob going to be on the same side of the draw. Even though Kiwis just want wallaby blood, i feel my loyalty, because of their style, will always be with the NH teams.

2011-09-24T05:44:30+00:00

kieran

Guest


I really do not think the Australians have what it takes to beat the All Blacks. *************************************GO THE ALL BLACKS!*******************************************

2011-09-21T05:27:37+00:00

peterlala

Guest


Green Lantern, the universe is perfectly balanced. Morne Steyne plays like a real flyhalf: he controls the game by passing and kicking, in the process hypnotising the defenders into thinking that's what he will always do. Then he runs, at his own pleasure. But you are right...it is scary.

2011-09-21T05:21:26+00:00

peterlala

Guest


Spiro, great story. But how is it that when the Irish are injured, it's a brilliant tactic but when Polata-Nau is injured, it's a flaw in his game?

2011-09-21T05:01:40+00:00

Bruno de la Dordogne

Guest


Spiro, I was at the Ireland v Wallabies game on Saturday night and was amazed how many times the Irish players stopped the game by going down especially when the Wallabies were inside the Irish 25. sometimes there were two or three players down at the same time. But the referee seemed to make no attempt to restart the game until the players were on their feet. It seemed that Horwill made no attempt to approach the ref.to do something about this strategic ploy, but maybe he cannot or maybe he did. But the performance continued throughout the second half as well. None of this type of information of course is reported in the statistics of the match. Did you notice this and what are the rules?

2011-09-20T16:16:34+00:00

Rugby realist

Guest


'' saturation journalism'' I love this term. Very apt.

2011-09-20T05:01:41+00:00

KingofDubai

Guest


There will be another major upset, my guess is Somoa will knock of SA because the Boks I dont think will keep up that sort of form up. Not sure what to make of France but the next round will be very very interesting. I think we will make the Semi's but lose.

2011-09-20T01:11:30+00:00

jaysper

Guest


Okay, so heres a question: "When Australia beats New Zealand, this is called a deserved victory (or whatever). But when Ireland beat Australia, this is called an Upset. Why?" Before the tirades start, Im not saying that everyone called it an upset. But it was indeed called an upset by many. When the ABs lose to the Wallabies, it is not generally called "an upset" despite the fact that many of us poor Kiwis are upset when it happens. So why do so many people call the victory by Ireland an upset? Lets look at the stats: * Australia beat New Zealand 28.9% of the time. * Ireland beat Australia 34.6% of the time. So therefore, it is reasonable to expect that Ireland have a better chance of beating Australia in any given game than it is to expect Australia to beat New Zealand. So, why the talk of upsets?

2011-09-20T00:13:21+00:00

soapit

Guest


well pots all i would say is that your backup option did a better job of adapting to openside than ours. maybe our pack is so used to having pocock doing that role that noone else has that string in their bow.

2011-09-19T21:00:44+00:00

Capital

Roar Guru


We just failed to be near the ball, I watched the first half again last night and the forwards just weren't at the breakdown.

2011-09-19T15:53:44+00:00

Gerhard van Lamp

Guest


There is absolutely no correlation between S15 and international rugby...especially when looking at knock-out internationals.Maybe that's Australia's problem?

2011-09-19T15:44:35+00:00

Gerhard van Lamp

Guest


Yeah,from the outside the Wallaby scrumming looked illegal...and therefore they were punished :)

2011-09-19T15:20:28+00:00

dc

Guest


Again, as a Kiwi fan, I won't rub in your loss to Ireland, as we know how the AB's perform at RWC knock-out time! But...I went to the Wallabies vs South Africa B game, Tri Nations, and it seemed to me the Wallabies were happy to play a backs-oriented sevens game....i was shocked by this and wondered if it would come back to bite them....very similar to the John Mitchell-Robbie Deans game plan of 2003 when the ABs racked up 50 points twice in the Tri-Nations, and had no B plan... ...Robbie's Crusaders won a ton of games on counter-attack......but RWC 2011 is a different kettle of fish...you gotta play hard up front.... ...and.Mortlock and George Smith would have been invaluable for Australia vs the Irish!

2011-09-19T15:06:53+00:00

Green Lantern

Guest


It was scary to see Morne Steyn run with the ball and breaking the line. Its like the Universe are unbalanced. Its like something something bad is gonna happen. Suzies muthi is working again wooooooo

2011-09-19T13:11:47+00:00

GPC

Guest


yep. we can look forward to a nh verse sh final, which will be boring, again. i was looking forward to a nz vs aus final because they are the only exciting (top) sides to watch.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar