Osieck expects a lot more but not width

By Davidde Corran / Roar Guru

Wednesday’s announcement of the Australian squad that will take on Oman and Thailand in next week’s World Cup Qualifiers saw the continuation of Holger Osieck’s gradual evolution of the Socceroos.

While it’s been the inclusions that have garnered the most attention, in particular the return of high profile A-League marquees Harry Kewell and Brett Emerton as well as youngsters Chris Herd and Mitch Nicholls, the real interest for me is whom has missed out.

The most obvious player who wont be travelling to Oman and Thailand is Everton’s Tim Cahill, though his absence is to be accepted as a sign of Osieck’s man management – it’s a delicate balance maintaining the Socceroos’ gun goal scorer’s fitness as well as Football Federation Australia’s relationship with his English Premier League side.

Instead, I’m most curious about the reasoning behind Nikita Rukavytsya and Tommy Oar once again missing out on senior national team call-ups.

It seems unlikely that it would be because of playing time as, this weekend aside where he was left on the bench for FC Utrecht’s in their 3-1 loss to NEC Nijmegen, Oar has been starting regularly in the Dutch Erdivisie.

Furthermore fellow Utrecht Aussie Adam Sarota has been called up for latest round of World Cup Qualifiers despite having been left on the substitutes bench in eight of his side’s last 10 games. In other words his record is only marginally better than Rukavtysya’s at Hertha Berlin.

So the real issue must be elsewhere and I suspect it has to do with the positions both Oar and Rukavytsya have been playing in Europe – wide of midfield.

There’s a unique distinction with how the midfield in Osieck’s favoured 4-4-1-1 with the Socceroos operates compared to your standard flat midfield four. In particular it has to do with the more central role Brett Holman fills whether he’s playing on either the right or left-hand side.

Generally tucking into the space between central midfield and the front two – who despite being staggered tend to keep quite close to each other – Holman doesn’t play as a traditional winger. In fact whether it’s Matt McKay opposite him on the left or Emerton on the right, Holman takes up a much more narrow, but crucial, position (Osieck also tends to prefer his players in this position to tuck in from time to time and allow the full-backs to overlap and further stretch the play).

The fact is this not a role either Oar or Rukavytsya, two wide players with speed on the ball their greatest asset, can fulfill. Furthermore in Emerton, McKay and Kruse, Osieck obviously feels he has wide midfield alternatives he can already rely on.

So for the time being, Oar and Rukavytsya will need to provide consistent performances of a very high level if they’re going to break back into the Socceroos fold.

The Crowd Says:

2011-11-03T08:41:51+00:00

Titus

Guest


Kruse also seems to be a bit more of a creator and ball paying player where as Ruka would be a player that if you can create opportunities for him to run onto, he will finish them. So in the absense of a genuine creative attacking midfield I guess Kruse makes more sense.

2011-11-03T01:41:21+00:00

whiskeymac

Guest


ruka and oar will have their day - they are progressing better than a lot of the potential hopefuls playing in Europe. Campaigns for the roos are now long affairs, there are plenty of opportunities for them in the future even if they weren't named this time around, and especially as some players get old/ injured/ lose form etc.

2011-11-03T01:40:46+00:00

whiskeymac

Guest


ruka and oar will have their day - they are progressing better than a lot of the potential hopefuls playing in Europe. Campaigns for the roos are now long affairs, there are plenty of opportunities for them in the future even if they weren't named this time around, and especially

2011-11-03T00:55:54+00:00

Axelv

Guest


I think Oar will get selected for the next round of qualifiers. He is only just finding his feet in Utrecht, to take him out now would break his rhythm and all his hard work. Cahill has close to 10 years of experience at Everton and holds a lot more chips to his club than Oar does, and it's a battle to even get Cahill selected for us

2011-11-02T23:05:45+00:00

Fussball ist unser leben

Roar Guru


Very insightful piece Davidde. No longer is it simply a matter of choosing the 11 best Aussie footballers to represent the Australian National Team. Rather, we are maturing as a football nation, and the manager is choosing the best players to carry out his instructions and fit his structure, shape and plan. This, not only means, all existing squad members are kept on their toes to perform or be replaced; but it also gives incentive to lads outside the squad to work hard - like Mitch Nicholls has done - and aim to be on the pitch, not simply in the stands, in Brasil 2014.

2011-11-02T22:31:37+00:00

TomC

Guest


I think Davidde has hit the nail on the head here. Oar and Ruka just don't play in positions that fit Osieck's formation. National team selections are always a question of balance, however, and it may be that they get called up at times that are less disruptive to their club seasons.

2011-11-02T22:12:48+00:00

Rusty0256

Guest


Yeah, but also in Holger's eyes Kruse is the devil he knows. That seems to give him the edge over the relatively untried (under Osieck) Ruka.

2011-11-02T21:07:01+00:00

JAJI

Guest


Kruse is also an interestiung choice - he is in a division below Rukavystya and also starting mostly on the bench apart from last weekend....so the positional issues you touch on must be the reasons....

Read more at The Roar