Australian cricket's Unlucky XI: Part two

By Stoffy18 / Roar Guru

Stuart Law (VC): Vice-captaining the side is former Queensland captain, banana bender Stuart Law. Law is famously recognised for leading his Queensland side to their first Sheffield Shield title in 1994/1995 (after a 68 year wait).

However, it wasn’t just his performance as captain that won him the accolades of many.

Law was a prolific run scorer who remarkably maintained a first-class average above 50 by the time he retired, after 367 matches.

Like the others, Law was bound by the performances of other Australia batsmen during his time, leading to a solitary Test cap.

He played his only match during the 1995/1996 series against Sri Lanka, replacing the injured Steve Waugh. Law notched up an unbeaten half century but with was inevitably replaced by Waugh the following test. Law is one of the few cricketers to bat for their nation and finish without an average.

For Queensland, his stats were distinguished. 27,080 first-class runs (9034 in SS), at an average of 50.52 (43.85 in SS), 128 (47 In SS) half-centuries, 79 (24 in SS) centuries with a highest score of 263 (216 in Sheffield Shield).

Shaun Young:
The all-rounder position is filled by yet another Tasmanian, Shaun Young. His stats speak for themselves:

Batting: 7212 first-class runs at an average of 37.95, 44 half-centuries, 14 centuries with a highest score of 237. Bowling: 274 first-class wickets at an average of 35.82, with eight five-wicket hauls and one ten-wicket haul.

For over a decade he was a great servant of the domestic game. As a batsman, his defiance was a testament to the middle order and his strength produced an array of hard-hitting shots that awaited a bowler if he would stray just marginally off line.

His bowling was more than handy; he offered his side tireless spells of sustained bowling and prided himself on constantly hitting the right line and length.

Throw in the ability to swing the ball and you can see why he was utilised to the full extent.

In 1997, played his one and only Test, at The Oval in London. He was called into the side as a replacement when selectors were notified that he was conveniently in London for personal reasons. You can say that Young never actually represented his country solely on the performances he produced at a domestic level, but thanks purely to coincidence.

Young deserved more than just being at the right place at the right time.

Roger Woolley:
The wicketkeeper position is filled by yet another Taswegian, Roger Woolley. If not for the Indispensable Rodney Marsh, the man with the iron gloves, Roger Woolley would have certainly enjoyed an extensive test career.

Woolley was a member of the 1978 Tasmanian side that won its first one day domestic title in the history of the competition. Woolley played in just two Test matches while Marsh was injured, however unfortunately he failed to replicate his domestic success. Given more opportunity, Woolley was destined to play cricket for Australia on a more regular basis.

For Tasmania, his stats with the bat were amazing for a period where keeper-batsmen would often average below 35. He scored 4,781 first-class runs at an average of 40.17, 30 half-centuries, seven centuries and with a highest score of 144.

With the gloves he collected 145 catches and 16 stumpings.

Andy Bichel:
Andy Bichel kicks things off for the bowlers in the Unlucky XI. The sharp paceman with a brisk action will be recognised for his contribution to Australia in the one day format; however his Test career could easily have lasted longer.

Labelled the “smiling assassin”, Bichel terrorised batsmen in the Sheffield Shield contest, collecting 430 wickets and the tag of being the third most successful bowler in the competition’s history. He played 19 tests for Australia claiming 58 wickets at a average of 32.24 at the same time displaying his talent with the bat down the order.

By 2004, Bichel was dumped from the national squad and never returned in either format. Upon leaving, his stats only improved and on retirement in 2007, he was regarded as one of Australia’s premier domestic all-rounders. Bichel’s stats:

Bowling: 769 First-class wickets (430 in SS) at an average of 25.98 (23.24 in SS), 36 (22 SS) five-wicket hauls, seven (4 SS) ten-wicket hauls with best figures of 9/93 (7/54 SS). Batting: 5,860 First-class runs at an average of 26.51, 23 half-centuries, 9 centuries with a highest score of 148.

Adam Dale:
The second seamer in this line-up is Adam Dale. “He’s a Victorian,” Bill Lawry will say, however Dale made his claim as a great cricketer after heading north to Queensland. Unlike Bichel, who relied on his pace, Dale was a genuine medium-pace bowler who relied heavily on his nagging accuracy for wickets. This relentless style of bowling ensured that frustration led to many batsmen virtually throwing their wicket away.

Dale played two Tests in the late 90s, against India in 1998 and the West Indies in 1999. He claimed 6 wickets at an average of 31.16, by no means a poor performance, especially very early on in a career. However, Dale was not given another shot by the selectors, instead playing onto until 2003 for Queensland.

He took 245 first-class wickets at an average of 20.75, 13 five-wicket hauls, and 1 ten-wicket haul with best figures of 7/24.

Stuart MacGill:
Rounding off the XI is “that other great spinner”: Stuart MacGill.

Unlike the others, Stuart MacGill managed to clock up 44 Test matches for his country, not a bad achievement. However, for anyone who has witnessed MacGill, you can agree this old school spinner with a ripping leg break was entitled to a lot more.

Only one obstacle stood in the way of MacGill, fellow leg-spin bowler Shane Warne. The master of spin is regarded as not only the greatest spin bowler of all time, but one of the greatest cricketers – MacGill was doomed from the start.

In an era where a two-pronged spin attack was disfavoured, MacGill found himself jostling with Warne for the position.

His stats at a national level were slight justification of the effort committed by MacGill. He claimed 208 wickets at an average 29.02, including best figures of 8/108.

For NSW, his performances maintained he was always in the hunt for a test recall. He took 774 First-class wickets (328 in SS) at an average of 30.49 (34.54 SS), 43 (17 SS) five-wicket hauls, 6 ten-wicket hauls with best figures of 6/64.

So there we have it, the Unlucky XI.

1. Jamie Cox
2. Martin Love
3. Michael Di Venuto
4. Brad Hodge
5. Jamie Siddons
6. Stuart Law
7. Shaun Young
8. Roger Woolley
9. Andy Bichel
10. Adam Dale
11. Stuart MacGill

In conclusion it is obvious that all 11 have fallen victim to the era. The late 80’s/90’s profiled Australia’s dominance in both forms of the game. Four Tasmanians in this list all but reaffirms the general consensus that Tasmanians are hard done by!

These players biggest enemy was, ironically, Australia’s depth. It happens in all sports around the world, in various divisions and in various leagues. Not only must you have enough skill, but you must be in the right place, at the right time.

I’ll throw honourable mentions to Jimmy Maher and David Hussey as well.

What do you think, Roarers, who you think deserves to be on this list?

The Crowd Says:

2017-10-15T03:00:15+00:00

Big Ramifications

Guest


Wayne Andrews was a BEAST. In 91 first class matches in the 1980s and 1990s his BEASTLY batting strike rate struck fear in opposition bowlers for his entire career. He was also a BEAST slow left-arm orthodox bowler, capturing a metric shiat-ton of wickets at a sub 40.00 average.

2016-01-02T11:34:57+00:00

Nathan

Guest


I agree with MacGill being unlucky. I gotta say you are wrong on this one. Yes and played 44 tests and got 200 test wickets. If Warne never existed you could argue that MacGill would've played 120+ test matches and at the rate he was going he could've got to 600 test wickets making him the most successful bowler in Australian history. If he had changed nationality he would've played for any other test playing nation at the same time. If he had played for Sri Lanka playing against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh every couple of months like Murali did he probably would've clocked up 1000 test wickets. The fact is if Warne never existed Macgill would be Warne and would be held in the same esteem all Australians hold Warne in today.

2013-06-09T16:45:15+00:00

dan

Guest


Nice site, and good article. As a Pom, I have slightly more respect for County Cricket runs - there haven't been too many cricketers who have scored hatfuls in England without having a good career. Graeme Hick is obviously one exception...as may be Philip Hughes ! = ) Anyway, a few thoughts from performances on this side of the pond off the top of my head and including some of yours ; Agree with Stuart Law, was brilliant with Essex Dean Jones (dumped shamefully early), was awesome with Durham Tom Moody Michael Bevan Darren Lehmann Phil Jaques Matthew Elliott Damien Martyn We should have had a reverse Five Pound Pom drive to give us some batting in the 80s and 90s, all we got was Martin McCague !

2012-03-02T12:39:43+00:00

Johnno

Guest


I think Bryce mcgain had the most unhappy of test debuts ever, and scott muller another unlucky cricketer had the most forgettable and miserable time in the aussie team Anyone remember a name by the name of simon cook , he was another one who slipped though very unlucky was injured but was promising.

2012-03-02T10:00:01+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


Couple of 1-test wonders there. C Rogers def should be in the test team still.

2012-03-01T22:56:18+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Did anyone mention Chris Rogers? And Wayne Phillips the lesser?

2012-03-01T11:37:31+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Wayde Sedcombe, Tim Zoherer, Mark Atkinson, Phil Emery, Teflon Tim, Ryan Campbell and Rod Tucker, and Joe Sceduri.

2012-03-01T11:17:54+00:00

Oracle

Guest


Darren Berry

2012-03-01T10:09:25+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


I'm loving the rotation policy now!!!

2012-03-01T05:46:58+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


I know. To be fair to Stuey it was no Langer or Symonds but it looked out. Check out Stuey's stats for the innings. Amazing.

2012-03-01T05:22:59+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


Oh for Tony Greig's beloved hot spot back in teh summer of 1994/95!

2012-03-01T05:03:40+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


A faint edge. He didn't bat an eyelid.

2012-03-01T05:02:07+00:00

JohnB

Guest


You may be right re his credit standing. On the other hand I think there may be a view that arguably justified though it may have been to go with Marsh, they did pull the wrong rein there and acknowleding that Khawaja warrants further opportunity. Plus there remains a lack of strong alternatives.

2012-03-01T04:54:01+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Dead easy from where I'm sitting Pope! And good to see your previous post brought us back to normal service, after my bizarro day fears.

2012-03-01T04:53:40+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


Huh? Caught behind for 5? Not according to the scoresheet, is this some controversy from the game that I don't remember (because that would be awesome).

2012-03-01T04:52:23+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


Khawaja's "credit in the bank" is kind of irrelevant seeing as he was told what he had to do when he was dropped - score runs and improve his fielding. I don't think he should have been dropped in the first place, but he was, there's no use crying about it, he needs to perform again. If he's as good as we think he is he will, I just don't see him getting a look in before the Ashes in Australia in 2 summers time (I agree with Pope Paul VII below in that Ponting and Hussey are clogging up the works somewhat).

2012-03-01T03:56:53+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Stuart Law was caught behind for 5 JohnB is a brilliantly fearless selector and by the way, Mike Haysman.

2012-03-01T03:36:43+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Oh he's gone to pot alright but he shouldn't have been dropped in the first place after what was a very good win by New Zealand. Now hapless Marsh has been told not to even dream of the West Indies. So that's two careers stalled. I think the real issue is that Ponting and Hussey are clogging up the works. Their plan is Ashes 2013. If Watto slots in top 3 ( ave 29 last 10 innings ) there are no vacancies for younger eyes and sharper reflexs when things go bung against speed merchants and swingers that South Africa and England possess. Ian bloody Bell endured all sorts of humiliation, including batting behind dodgy collingwood, because they stuck with him. Australia has to do the same with new middleorder batsmen. I wouldn't rule out big Ravi, Fidel and Kemar causing a bit of havoc if they are fit either.

2012-03-01T03:25:23+00:00

JohnB

Guest


It must be some sort of bizarro day RK - you cooling on Khawaja and me leaping to his defence! I'd have thought despite a couple of poor games Khawaja should still have enough credit in the bank to be on the plane, especially as he covers the top 3 better than Forrest who looks the most likely alternative choice.

2012-03-01T03:14:29+00:00

JohnB

Guest


David Hussey's FC average for Victoria (86 games) is 47, and his FC average for Nottinghamshire (72 games) is 64.82. Given the quite large difference between those 2 figures, an overall average roughly in the middle (boosted marginally by a couple of good Australia A appearances) is perhaps as misleading as it is enlightening. If selectors put more weight on runs made in Australia, the 47 (still very good of course) may be more relevant than the overall 54.84. Stoffy, you mention Roger Woolley as being unlucky because of the presence of Rod Marsh - John Maclean could say exactly the same thing (and add that he had been preferred to Marsh in the Australian 2nd XI team touring NZ in 1970, a bare few months before Marsh was picked to replace Brian Taber as Australian keeper, possibly giving him a better argument!).

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar