David Silva revolutionises the role of wide players in England

By James Gray-Foster / Roar Pro

When Manchester City purchased David Silva for £24 million pounds in July of 2010, it looked like another illogical spray of exuberance from Manchester City’s owners.

Frankly, there were plenty of better value agile wingers in the world, and understandably, many questioned how long it would take for the little Spaniard to adjust to the style change and rigours of the Premier League.

The move looked like another tactical stab in the dark by City manager Roberto Mancini, who was searching for a team of players that would gel in a revolutionary new system, unlike the one that had lacked edge the following two seasons.

Just 20 months on and to the surprise of many, Manchester City sit top of the English Premier League. Silva has provided 18 assists and scored seven goals for City this campaign, and is undoubtedly the most important player in their revolutionary 4-4-1-1 system.

Rather than performing the archetypal and stagnant left-wing role that the Premier League has seen since its formation in 1992, where a player will provide breakaway speed, attempt to cross the ball at the byline and directly run at the opposition right-back, Silva’s has utilised his technical qualities and completely revamped, what were the narrow roles a wide player could assume with two out-and-out strikers.

Silva has become a number 10, a trequartista of sorts. Rather than running like a bull at opposition defenders in the Antonio Valencia style, Silva is now a virtually untouchable, versatile player, who pirouettes away from opposition defenders into central areas and has the rare ability of being to dribble and pass into pockets of space.

In City’s current system Sergio Aguero is often situated just behind Edin Dzeko or slightly wide of him. City’s tall target often presents and provides decoy runs, or Aguero will dribble at or past defenders, consequently sucking them in or leaving the opposition out of position, allowing Silva to exploit open spaces and feed unmarked or dangerous runs.

This tactic has reaped rewards, as City have scored 69 goals this season, six more than their neighbors Manchester United in second.

But crucially, this role is not all about its aesthetic and mutually offensive qualities.

The fact that Silva is often less direct than usual wide players, and often cuts in and out of central positions, means that he can also drop back and assert himself defensively as a third midfielder or defensive cover.

Silva’s ability to sit back more and pick passes as opposed to making lung busting runs towards the byline strongly reduces City’s chances of susceptibility on the counter-attack.

And, like their attacking record, City’s defensive record appears to give weight to the practicality of the formation, having also conceded seven fewer goals than their second-placed rivals.

David Silva’s success at Manchester City has set a new template for the function of wide players in two-striker formations, and unsurprisingly a few Premier League clubs have already begun to follow Manchester City’s blueprint, with Juan Mata and Hatem Ben Arfa recreating similar roles for their respective clubs.

The Spaniard has become a poster boy for intuition and tactical endeavour among Premier League managers, and such is his influence, the old mould of wingers we were so used to seeing will likely never be the same.

The Crowd Says:

2012-06-02T05:18:09+00:00

Emmanuel

Guest


I do agree with u the role of silva,bt the most successive system is 4 2 3 1:with yaya and barry hholding,silva and nasri am-l and AM -l .then aguero second striker and either MB or CT being strikers.

AUTHOR

2012-03-12T12:48:15+00:00

James Gray-Foster

Roar Pro


Hey, thanks for the support. It's an interesting one really, it could be classed as a 4-4-1-1 or a 4-2-3-1 because in a 4-4-1-1 you have two wide-men who sit next to the CF who is situated just behind the striker. In a 4-4-1-1 you also have two central midfield players who are considered box-to-box. In a 4-2-3-1 it's largely the same, except, your two central midfielders are deemed as defensive midfielders, while your front 3 are considered AM-L, CF/AM and AM-R. Assuming David Silva is considered an AM-L, it misrepresents Toure and Barry, who yes, are defensively very reliable, but do get forward and don't simply anchor. So it's almost like a cross between the two formations. I agree with your point about the interchangeability of the formation, it's very rigid and fluid and that's where the confusion about what it's technically classified is, comes to fruition. What I'm suggesting in this article is that in a 4-4-1-1 Silva is basically an interchangeable AM-L, which would be considered different because wide players in the 4-4-1-1 are more often than not simply wide players. Dempsey for Fulham is maybe an older example. He's not quite as good, but they play a 4-4-1-1 and he's on the left, but he's more of an AM-L because he doesn't simply run at defenders, he cuts into central areas and links mid with attack. In addition, City have also used an interchangeable 4-3-3 this season where they play De Jong, Barry and Toure in the mid, while Silva plays Wide-left and does his fluid creative role, and Nasri sticks more to the flanks on the other side, with Balotelli or Dzeko as the striker. That's how they played last night against Swansea and they've played like that a few times this season.

2012-03-10T07:41:05+00:00

bloodybutsa

Guest


Hey great article, David silva is a true gem You're spot on that he used to play on the wings for Valencia and Spain, but since moving to England he has blossomed in this new #10 role in which he plays between the lines of the midfielder & forwards. Due to this he gets the opportunity to play in the free role more often + express his vision, sublime ball control and defense splitting passes -- even though he drifts from the flanks into central positions i would still class him as a Central Attacking Midfielder (trequartista). However this 4-4-1-1 system u r talking about I would have to disagree with, Mancini has only used this system 3 or 4 times, the most successful + common formation city have used is the 4-2-3-1 system (where david played in the middle or interchanged with aguero). the 4 upfront interchange would interchange bamboozling their markers, whilst the 2 holding midfielders (yaya toure has to be there) tried to keep possession (this is where david used to drop down and assist them in creativiy but iltimately holding the ball, this is also where i like seeing nasri come to aid the defensive midfielder h/w this is a different topic) Nonetheless David Silva is one of my favourite players in the world, and for me the best attacking midfielder currently, then closely followed by ozil

AUTHOR

2012-03-05T06:46:13+00:00

James Gray-Foster

Roar Pro


Thanks Calippo. Yeah, one of the points I was trying to make in the article is that he's not a generic wide-player because he cuts into central areas and has created a completely new function for the wide player, an almost winger/am prototype. However, I would still technically consider him a wide-left because Aguero operates the central position behind the striker, and is almost like a play-maker/second-striker, while Silva regularly cuts in and out that wide position.

2012-03-05T06:35:44+00:00

calippo

Roar Rookie


great article. when city signed him he was only on the fringe of the national team! however, I don't think you can call him a winger or wide-player for city. he plays too central. i wonder if mancini signed him for this, more central, playmaking role, or whether he just impressed at training and early on which forced the change.

2012-03-05T05:57:46+00:00

Steve

Guest


I agree Silva is a gun, but Messi is still better. Better shot, passer, vision, faster and stronger on the ball. He would dominate at City just as Silva and Aguero do.

2012-03-05T05:08:44+00:00

maric

Guest


Not sure that the gap between Messi and Silva would be as significant if Silva played for Barca and Messi at MC.

2012-03-05T04:48:52+00:00

Steve

Guest


David Silva is an absolute gun, always has been, always will be and is only getting better. While Silva is damn good and still improving, the gap between Messi and him is still significant. I dare say Messi has improved in the past few years as well, consistently increasing his goalscoring and assist returns.

2012-03-05T03:17:25+00:00

Punter

Guest


Best player is the EPL without a doubt, though RVP not far behind.

2012-03-04T23:09:07+00:00

maric

Guest


Hooray finally a positive story on MC! Silva is a genius and is fast clsing the gap on Messi.

2012-03-04T21:26:56+00:00

Tristan Rayner

Editor


Fixed, thanks.

AUTHOR

2012-03-04T21:20:38+00:00

James Gray-Foster

Roar Pro


Haha, beats me.

2012-03-04T20:29:46+00:00

Football United

Guest


good analysis of the role but why is this in the afl tab and not football?

Read more at The Roar