Geelong and Hawthorn notch up eight classics and counting

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

Over Australian football’s storied history, which two sides have had a rivalry as good as this? Not clubs, but teams of a particular era, when the competition gets personal.

There have been some beauties. The Essendon and Hawthorn sides that battled through the 1980s. Richmond and Collingwood playing five grand finals in ten years from 1919. Carlton and Collingwood in the 1970s. Essendon and North Melbourne around the turn of this century.

But the last few years between Hawthorn and Geelong would have to rate highly among them.

We all know the back story. The taste of the 1989 grand final epic was still in our mouths when these two sides met in the 2008 rematch. The Cats dominated play but couldn’t finish off in front of goal. A third-quarter burst from Hawthorn rattled the favourites, and their composure was lost.

That Geelong side famously swore they would never lose to Hawthorn again. In eight matches across four seasons since, they’ve been true to their word.

But Hawthorn have not taken a backward step either. They feel the heat of the Cats’ intensity and respond. Every contest since that day in 2008 has been played with a physicality above anything in the surrounding season.

And oh, how close those matches have been. Any and all of them could be included on a highlight reel.

In 2009, Geelong triumphed by eight points in the opening round, and a solitary point kicked after the siren in round 17.

In 2010, the margins were nine points and two. In 2011’s regular season, 19 points and five. Even the 19-point match involved a big Geelong comeback, and was in the balance until the dying minutes.

Then yesterday’s match, again decided by two points. The only larger margin was in 2011’s qualifying final, as Geelong sealed it the top-four contest by 31.

More remarkably, five of the eight matches have involved Geelong coming back from deficits at three-quarter time.

By 2012 you could be forgiven for imagining that the fire might have dimmed. Not so. Don’t think that the dropped chance in 2008 doesn’t still sting the Cats. With three premierships in five years, they are talked about as potentially one of the great sides. Had they taken four, that status would be beyond debate.

For Hawthorn, the standouts in these contests have been Jordan Lewis and Brad Sewell. These are matches that suit their relentless physical style of play.

Mitchell especially relished the first half yesterday, with retired Geelong tagger Cameron Ling doing sideline interviews for television rather than standing in the Hawk’s hip pocket.

On paper, Hawthorn’s devastating forward has looked like it should be too much for the Cats. But while Lance Franklin, Jarryd Roughead and Cyril Rioli have all threatened to explode at various stages over these matches, the threat has always ended up suffocated by Geelong’s defence.

Even without fullback Matthew Scarlett yesterday, Geelong were well served by the old firm of Corey Enright, Tom Lonergan, Harry Taylor and Andrew Mackie. Mackie’s chase to smother Michael Osborne’s final-quarter shot from the goalsquare was the stuff of legend.

Hawthorn’s defence was equally determined, with Lance Gibson coming back strongly after an accidental kick to the face, and the chronically underrated Brent Guerra calmly defusing half a dozen dangerous situations.

But even in the wet conditions, they were unable to neutralise the threat of Geelong’s talls. James Podsiadly is becoming a Hawthorn specialist, his five matches against the Hawks yielding returns of 2, 2, 6, 3, and 5 goals.

Tom Hawkins, meanwhile, played by far his best game for the Cats, and gave them inspiration when they looked to be flagging. The big man has suddenly grown into his game.

He flew high for two of the most athletically brutal pack marks you could hope to see, smashing opponents out of the way and plucking the wet football like low-hanging fruit. The confidence was palpable. His set shots can still be awkward, but he managed three crucial goals.

But the real telling point for Hawkins was the development of other parts of his game. In the tense last quarter, he contested a ball outside fifty, won it at ground level, spun off an opponent, waited a split second, then dinked a pass to a teammate within goalscoring range. Later that quarter, he put in a gut-busting run to the halfback flank to provide an option for Geelong out of defence, and remained on the wing to give support in the movement forward.

These were complexities to his game that would not have been there a season back. If Hawkins can just get his set shots from 50 metres going, he will be a scary proposition.

But the central player, both to yesterday’s match and to the last four seasons of rivalry, was Jimmy Bartel. Bartel is the man synonymous with Geelong’s last quarter charge-downs. It is he who is most able to commit to the contest late when legs are weary and skills fade.

His possession count since 2009 goes 28, 23, 29, 26, 28, 20, 19, 20, these in some of the most fiercely contested matches of his career, when silky stat counts are brutalised out of the game. He has kicked five goals into the bargain.

His ten behinds might ordinarily seem below par, but in contests this tight, even those have at times proved crucial. It was he who kicked the late behind to level the scores in 2009, then another after the siren to win it.

Yesterday, with Geelong 18 points adrift early in the final term, Bartel marked outside 50. All day players had struggled even with short passes in the high winds and slippery conditions.

He calmly went back, weighed up the breeze, and kicked a swirling 55-metre bomb straight through the middle. The Cats believed they could get back. They did.

One day, Geelong’s streak of wins will break. One day, the streak of classics will break too. I have to admit, yesterday I was tipping the Hawks to get up. But I see now that only a fool would do that while Bartel is around.

As for the run of classics, that probably won’t end with the Geelong streak. The fire between these sides burns yet. What makes the Geelong run all the more remarkable is how well their opponents have played. To be none from eight just defies probability.

Yesterday, Hawthorn were the dominant side most of the day. They had their opportunities late, too, squandering several decent chances to run in and goal. But as the Geelong side of 2008 can remind them, if you don’t kick ‘em, the rest of it doesn’t mean anything at all.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2012-04-12T13:54:57+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Reckon I'd agree. Despite his Brownlow, Bartel still seems to fly a little under the radar. Such a big contributor, but just not flashy enough to get all the attention.

AUTHOR

2012-04-12T13:54:07+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Yep - even if the winning streak lasted ten years, if it ended in another grand final loss it would be very hollow. Much like winning 23 of 24 before the GF in 2008 makes the hurt worse, not better.

AUTHOR

2012-04-12T13:50:37+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


I'd say they still have the ability, it's just a matter of how much their confidence took a battering after last year's fade, or whether they can channel that disappointment into exceeding previous efforts.

AUTHOR

2012-04-12T13:49:09+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Not sure that headbutting someone's shoulder is really an offence in the run of play...

2012-04-12T12:40:54+00:00

Archie

Guest


Bartel and Selwood would have to be the toughest and classiest big-game combo in the league, and the first two you'd pick for a grand final. And if I had to choose someone to slot a 50m goal post-siren to win a flag it would be Bartel.

2012-04-12T11:01:28+00:00

Yosh

Guest


As a Cats fan, my greatest fear is that our hoodoo over Hawthorn, which has given me so much pleasure, will snap on the day that matters most – another grand final. Until we can beat them in a grand final, we won't truly have atoned for 2008. But if we get the opportunity, and they beat us again – god, it doesn't even bear thinking about!

2012-04-12T10:55:13+00:00

jabba

Guest


I got no beef with you, or your argument, BIG BEN. But please - can that be the last use of the term 'naughties'?

2012-04-12T10:51:20+00:00

Po

Guest


The Pies are firmly back in the pack. Even with a full strength list, I have doubts that Buckley can run as tight a ship as Malthouse. They really need both Dawes up one end and Tarrant down the other to string a solid season together.

2012-04-12T10:51:01+00:00

Luke

Guest


LOUD NOISES

2012-04-12T10:48:09+00:00

D

Guest


Raaaaahhhhhh Footy

2012-04-12T10:47:32+00:00

Po

Guest


If the Blues can't roll the Filth on Friday, they have no claims to a Top 4 spot. They're absolutely flying in terms of injuries and structure (although it would be nice to have Walker and Warnock on the park).

2012-04-12T10:44:12+00:00

Sally Grant

Guest


I think you may have just proved my dad has not left the 70's behind.

AUTHOR

2012-04-12T09:13:06+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Yes, a relief there Redb. Also good that Selwood rang Whitecross during the week to back him up and thank him. A bit of class from both sides there.

2012-04-11T11:09:48+00:00

Redb

Roar Guru


Good to see the MRP come to their senses & agree with the rest of the footy world that the Whitecross-Selwood collision was accidental.

2012-04-11T10:33:40+00:00

Archie

Guest


Carlton and West Coast should be stronger this year. If there's vulnerability at the top, I think it will be Collingwood. Buddy suffers from left footers' malady when running into the right hand pocket. He can't/won't use his right foot. As an ex-player and long-time spectator, I observe that right-footers are generally better on the wrong foot than left footers. 'Twas ever thus. And LF are far more prone to avoiding their RF. It was common knowledge when I played and nothing's changed.There are some exceptions - Pendlebury for example - but there are few LF who can slot a goal from 50m with their wrong foot. Check it out before commenting. Enjoying reading intelligent sports discussion as opposed to the bigoted bombast of NRL prevalent up here in Qld. And Geoffery, excellent article now hindsight has kicked in.

2012-04-11T10:04:26+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


Geoff might be, but players with penetrating kicks don't have to worry about the wind, keep it low, one bounce before the goal line, much better chances than what he tried to do. It grates on me because it's just not Buddy the other day, stacks of youngish players these days try this dribbling caper from all sorts of positions when the first option should be to just drill it, plain and simple

2012-04-11T10:01:46+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


No, in the case of Selwood they are called 'headbutts', and he should get rubbed out from them until he fixes his technique.

AUTHOR

2012-04-11T08:55:44+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Wouldn't be getting any stick at GWS, would he?

AUTHOR

2012-04-11T08:54:36+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Yes. They've been good to watch, after everyone was writing the obituaries for attacking football five years ago.

AUTHOR

2012-04-11T08:53:39+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Seconded.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar