BROWNIE: How coaching differs in England and Australia

By Nathan Brown / Expert

Having been the head coach at the Huddersfield Giants in the UK Super League since 2009, and previously the coach of St George Illawarra in the NRL, I’ve had a first hand view of the differences – and similarities – between the two competitions.

The first thing I should note is that the training and preparation of teams in England have really developed over the years, primarily because there have been a lot of Australian coaches over here who have brought their NRL experience to the Super League and have groomed some of the local coaches to combine NRL ideas with English Super League ideas.

Many current English Super League coaches have worked under Brian and Tony Smith, for instance.

Brian Noble is a good example. Early on in his career, he worked with Brian Smith and Matty Elliot, and would have learned a lot from the experience.

My assistant coach, Paul Anderson at the Giants, has just spent three weeks in Australia with the Dragons, Tigers, Roosters and Bulldogs, as he will be taking over the Giants next year and this experience will be very valuable for him in his future as a head coach.

The biggest difference between the two countries is the way the pre-season works.

In the NRL, the pre-season is a long one. Players have a break after the season ends, do some pre-Christmas training, then break again for Christmas, before resuming with more intensity in the lead up to the first trial matches.

You can plan for two distinct phases of pre-season training: one could be conditioning and defense, for instance, and then the next could be speed and attack.

This approach allows coaches to work directly with players on improving specific areas of their game, while also enabling them to get over any niggling injuries they may be carrying before the next season kicks off.

This contrasts with how it works in the UK.

Here, the pre-season is only 6 weeks long (compared to around 12 weeks in Australia) before the teams get stuck into the friendlies.

As a result, international players, like Jamie Peacock, mightn’t have had a proper pre-season for years. Between England camp, and his club duties, he basically starts playing again as soon as the annual three-way tournament against Australia and New Zealand concludes.

So the biggest downside to the game in the UK is that top-line players can go for years without a real pre-season, whereas players in the NRL can generally get something new to work on in between seasons to add to their game.

The style of play itself is also vastly different.

A lot of teams will chance their hands in England. This goes against the grain of the NRL, where it is more about reducing errors. So the rugby league in the UK tends to be more attacking, and often very attractive to watch.

It’s not unheard of for a team to amass 1,000 points in a season.

The reason for the shortened pre-season is, of course, the Challenge Cup, which is a knockout competition and has been a wonderful success for league in this country.

It’s a real shame that in Australia we haven’t taken to a knockout competition. It would be sensational if there were two Cups to be won.

This would mean that teams like Parramatta in this years’s NRL competition, who are struggling, would still have the possibility of winning a Challenge Cup.

In fact, it’s often the case that teams not loaded with the best players win the Challenge Cup.

What’s more, it gives smaller regions a chance to compete on a larger stage. The Super League teams don’t enter the competition until the fourth round, by which time the smaller sides have had the opportunity to earn the right to take them on.

It would be fair to say that the intensity in the Super League can vary a fair bit, mainly due the the fact that the number of peoplee playing the game in England is much smalle than that in Australia, which leads to less depth.

In the NRL, most games are of high intensity and most weekends, any team can beat the other, where in England, if some of the lower team suffer 3 or 4 injuries due to a lack of depth the intensity can be lost.

But, when you come over here and watch the game on a regular basis, you’ll see that there are a lot of very good players running around.

When I first came over, there were perhaps one or two teams with a genuine chances to win the title each year. Now there are five or six sides all competing for the top four.

Sides at the top of the competition are playing more consistent football, which is leading to the number of good young players impoving quicker and more consistently due to the increase in consistent intensity/more frequent, harder games.

The success of guys like Sam Burgess and Gareth Ellis in Australia has opened the door to more English players starring in the NRL.

There is a huge number of Super League players who would be a hit in the NRL, if watched more closely and given the opportunity.

Throw in the passionate supporter base in the UK, with the fans singing throughout the matches, and it’s easy to see why my time at the Huddersfield Giants has been so enjoyable

The Giants fans and players have been a great bunch of people to work alongside.

Former Dragons coach and player Nathan Brown writes an exclusive weekly column for The Roar. Brown, who played 172 games for the Dragons and coached them for a further 142 games, is currently the head coach at the Huddersfield Giants in the UK Super League.

The Crowd Says:

2012-06-19T03:30:10+00:00

Chris Atkinson

Guest


Nathan Brown actually played 171 games for the Dragons not 172

2012-06-11T10:54:05+00:00

Droppa

Guest


what a moronic comment.

2012-06-04T13:25:49+00:00

Droppa

Guest


C'mon Nathan,no offence but your a terrible coach.,..the Brown Polish.

2012-06-03T05:24:19+00:00

Gongsong

Guest


Never new Brownie coached St George, thought he only coached St George Illawarra.

2012-06-02T14:55:53+00:00

danny griffin

Guest


@league freak the super league is not as bad as you make it out to be, there are plenty of players that would easily do well in the nrl as seen with burgess,ellis and graham and teams like wigan would do well over in australia

2012-05-31T17:26:10+00:00

peeeko

Roar Guru


i would love to see a cup competition reinstated in Australia

2012-05-31T11:19:17+00:00

Galaxy Hop

Guest


The camera angles are a bit foreign--I'm sure you could get used to it.

2012-05-31T11:16:24+00:00

Anakin

Guest


I like the British broadcasting style .. not as much as I used to love the ABC's coverage here in Oz back in the day, but it's not too bad at all IMO.

2012-05-31T04:48:35+00:00

Tommygun

Guest


Pull your head in mate. Do you show that much disrespect to Campo or Rathbone? Would Roar mods allow it? Eadc.

2012-05-31T04:42:53+00:00

Pot Stirrer

Guest


I havent watched much SL but i have to agree, everytime i catch a game on tv someone is winning by 20 points. Also i have often wondered if its becuase of the broadcasting style but it just doesnt seem to be as good to watch, not becuase of the standard but the way its televised. Whilst i wouldnt know it seems to me they way the televise it is like a soocer veiw, good for soccer but not league

2012-05-31T03:59:08+00:00

League Freak

Roar Guru


Nathan is leaving out the dire playing ability of most teams in Super League. I have watched Super League for many years and this season in particular has been appalling. The standard is football is a disgrace. Nathan Brown can talk about how many contenders there are all he likes, but the fact is only 4 clubs have won the title in the Super League era and that doesn't look like changing any time soon (Warrington are chokers). The Challenge Cup? A dead competition. They only get a crowd for the final because it feeds into the English need for everyone to win a trophy. Last season of the 14 Super League teams, two went bust. This season, one of the bigger clubs, the Bradford Bulls, revealed they were also about to go bust unless they received an immediate cash injection. I can understand why someone would fail in the NRL, head to the UK and start to convince themselves that Super League isn't a dying competition of terrible standard. It probably makes things feel a heck of a lot better about themselves. But please, don't try and tell everyone else how great Super League is when you just have to watch a few games to realize what a terrible competition it is.

2012-05-31T00:27:23+00:00

AGO74

Guest


Interesting article Nathan. Seems to me that for the sake of international football, then the Super League should adhere to less is more. Realistically if you had 10 teams rather than 14, you would have a much higher quality comp. Easier said than done though as we've seen ourselves here with the rationalisation/disaster that was Super League. Having more English players in the NRL can only be good for the English national team. If possible, I'd like to see an article from you on Catalans Dragons - and any thoughts you have in general on French rugby league. Seems like things whilst still a long way to go are on the up. I saw a game a few weeks back on Eurosport with Catalans at home to Warrington and the atmosphere was pretty raucous so there is obviously some passion for the game down there.

2012-05-30T21:28:29+00:00

DumpStar

Roar Rookie


I used to love the Pansonic Cup, and when Illawarra, then bottom of the table made the final, they were a team that everybody got behind (except for Brisbane supporters of course!). I would love to see this return. Drop Monday night footy, have Wednesday night knockout footy instead.

2012-05-30T19:44:06+00:00

Ben S

Roar Guru


Nice article. Cheers (from London).

Read more at The Roar