On the weekend, commentator Greg Clark made an obvious point during the Brumbies v Rebels game: Australian derbies are mistake-riddled.
This comment came after a period where both teams were struggling to hold on to the ball, and conceding repeated penalties.
This dour affair was even more disheartening where compared with the Crusaders demolition of the Highlanders a couple of hours before, which produced what will probably be the try of the tournament.
As the international season draws near, commentators and fans are becoming concerned about the contrast of skill level between local derbies here and abroad. There’s no doubt that all Australian teams have produced moments of brilliance, but that brilliance goes missing when they play each other.
If these performances are seen during the Rugby Championship it will be a long season for the Wallabies.
Lack of basic skills and junior development are mentioned when these games are discussed. It is true that in some cases these fundamentals may be lacking when compared to our South African and Kiwi rivals, but this alone doesn’t explain these lacklustre matches.
Rather, it is the conference system that plays a huge part. When a team defeats another in their conference, they get the four points and deny the other team four. With these games effectively worth eight points, the bonus point incentive (only one point) loses its appeal. What’s the point of risking eight points for a measly one?
In all likelihood there will be only one Australian team in the finals, so wildcard spots and the necessary bonus point to get into the top six is pointless for Aussie teams. The only option is to win the conference and deny other local teams that opportunity.
This means that every local derby is effectively a final.
A final means finals footy – invariably a dour grind where each side is simply intent on not making errors. The Brumbies and Reds are capable of brilliance but there’s no point playing entertaining rugby if you lose the conference.
In the coming weeks South African and New Zealand derbies will be more entertaining because their teams are fighting for three wildcard spots. These different styles of play don’t mean that Australian teams lack skills, it just means that they’re at a different stage of the competition.
Of course these games are tough to watch for all supporters, but that doesn’t mean they should be worried. The bright side is that these players are learning how to play in close contests where everything is on the line.
That could come in handy when they’re trying to regain the Bledisloe Cup later this year.
Dasher
Roar Guru
Crusaders and Highlanders hold the record for the lowest Super Rugby score. That was attractive and spectacular.
nomis
Guest
The main reason for the conference system IS that it is more marketable and attractive for Fox. But you are right about the difference between Aussie and NZ derbies. The local derbies will still bring the biggest financial benefits for a while yet, despite some of the dour affairs. Expect the conference system to continue.
Sam Taulelei
Guest
Will Which is the height of irony as the reason for the conference system in the first place, replacing the round robin format, was so that there were more local derbies to make it more marketable and attractive for Fox Sports in Australia. The main difference I've always noticed between Australian and NZ local derbies is that the NZ teams play to win, while the Aussie teams play not to lose, so their games are less attractive and spectacular to watch.
Will Sinclair
Guest
I don't think it has anything to do with the conference system... Local Aussie derbies have ALWAYS been tight, dour, stodgy affairs (with a couple of exceptions, of course). The conference system just means we have more of them.
mania
Guest
my bad mixing up the chiefsblues and hilanders saders game
mania
Guest
this articles a week old. weekend derby between blues and crusaders was epic. 41 to 36 won by the saders. poor blues, if they played like that against any other team they would've won