Foley must go as Waratahs coach

By jeznez / Roar Guru

The Waratahs board is being reported as endorsing Michael Foley to remain as coach next year. However, the bulk of the Waratahs faithful have already voted with their feet and stopped attending games.

How else can a Waratahs fan let the board know they are not satisfied with what is happening?

Foley met the board last week to conduct the season review, despite having two matches left to play. I don’t mind the timing of the meeting, these last matches are irrelevant to the season since the Waratahs cannot make the Super Rugby finals.

I want the Waratahs to perform well in these two matches, facing the Brumbies in Sydney and the Reds in Brisbane. Good results in these two games should not save a coach who has shown himself to be hopelessly out of his depth.

Apparently the core message from Foley to the board was that if he did not return next year it would be a case of leaving business unfinished. The injuries that the Waratahs suffered were mentioned as was tough scheduling.

Let’s look at this for a minute. Foley has been part of the coaching team at the Waratahs since 2009, although he only became head coach this year. Throughout this period the Waratahs have based their game plan around kicking. This over use of kicking has turned the fans off in droves.

Further, the plan has been poorly executed: both the kicks themselves and the lack of chase. Foley announced pre-season that the kicking game would be tweaked this year to make the kicks more attacking and stressed they would be contestable. However, there has been nothing different from the way the team have kicked this year.

Perhaps the exception was the match against the Stormers where the South African commentators noted that Berrick Barnes seemed to be attempting set a world record for kicking the ball away.

Kicking will always be part of rugby but the Waratahs kick too much and too poorly.

During Foley’s tenure at the Waratahs we have seen a transformation of the forward pack, they are getting bigger and bigger. Their strength is undoubted and their scrum is the strongest in the competition this year. However the fitness of the team and the ability of the pack to get around the park for 80 minutes is not good enough.

The match against the Brumbies down at Bruce really showed the ineffectiveness of the Waratahs pack in the critical period before half time. The number of close losses that the Waratahs have suffered this year also points to an inability to close out matches late. The ability to play an up tempo game is beyond this pack with their current levels of conditioning.

I could almost forgive the lack of fitness in the forwards if they had an incredibly strong mauling game to match their scrum. Having an offensive mauling game would suck opposition forwards in and create space for the backs. Unfortunately the Waratahs are poor maulers – both with and without the ball. So beyond scrummaging, what are all the hours in the gym rather than on the track gaining the Waratahs?

I have neither seen nor heard anything from Foley to indicate that the poor kicking or lack of fitness in the forwards will be addressed, so I’m not sure what the unfinished business that Foley cites is.

Injuries have severely disrupted or ended the seasons of Dan Vickerman, Rocky Elsom, Drew Mitchell, Lachie Turner, Pat McCutcheon and Damian Fitzpatrick. There are four internationals in that lot. However the Waratahs had nine representatives in the recent Wallabies side that defeated Wales. Benn Robinson, Tatafu Polot-Nau, Sekope Kepu, Sitaleki Timani, Dave Dennis, Wycliff Palu, Berrick Barnes, Rob Horne and Adam Ashley-Cooper all made the Australian team.

Some of those players, most notably Barnes, showed a huge improvement in form when they stepped up to the international level. The question has to be asked of Foley as to why he hasn’t been able to coax similar performances out of these troops at Super level. I don’t think you get to complain about injuries cruelling your season when two thirds of your starting side are internationals.

Finally, Foley cites a tough schedule as a reason for poor performance? The Waratahs had a fantastic schedule this year. The byes came at excellent points of the season.

The first was in round six following a period where the Waratahs had got their New Zealand trips out of the way and had three home games and a walk up against the Rebels to get their season going.

The second bye is this weekend which gives the international players a break after three tough weeks.

The tough games that you look for at the start of every season fell relatively favourably. The Crusaders and Bulls who are always tough games were at home for the Waratahs with their toughest away match being the Stormers.

In hindsight, the Highlanders early in the season at Forsyth Barr and the Chiefs in Hamilton were tough games but I don’t think there is anything in the draw to suggest the Waratahs were comparatively hard done by.

Foley does have a point that the two teams NSW don’t play, the Lions and the Blues, have disappointed this year but before the season started avoiding the Blues seemed like a good thing.

If Foley had stepped up and admitted some failings such as the poor mauling, the lack of fitness and the poor kicking and chasing, and then indicated that he had a plan to fix them, I might not be as depressed as the recent announcement has made me.

Right this minute I am hoping that the board endorsement is the classic Machiavellian statement of support that comes before a sacking. Most reports seem to indicate that Michael Chieka has firmed as the favourite for the Force job, my preference for the Waratahs remains Scott Johnson but there are other coaches out there and available.

What is a fan to do? Do I just have to grit my teeth and bear it? The crowds have turned their backs and sponsorship will be the next thing to go. What will it take to ensure this board makes a positive change?

The Crowd Says:

2012-07-09T07:32:51+00:00

Matthew Skellett

Guest


I read a up-to-date article on the Herald site that the Reds need to bring a 'PERFECT' Game to beat the 'Horrortahs' and get da bonus point -well ummmmmm NAAAHHHHH lol they JUST HAVE TO TURN UP AND WAIT OUT THE FIRST 20 MINUTES TO DO THAT :-)

2012-07-04T21:58:35+00:00

schuey

Guest


some good points... but WHY are YOU typing like THAT?

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T16:09:42+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


well called mate. That Highlander game in particular I am not sure that even Pocock could have saved the Tahs in that match - have rarely seen a team belted at the breakdown more than during that one. The first Force game I missed as I was playing footy in the Manila 10s at the time. As I said earlier, I am very pleased that young Hooper is coming to the Tahs next year. Certainly in the Highlanders game a 7 like Pocock would have helped but I don't think could have rescued the match. Cannot comment on the Force game per above.

2012-07-04T15:17:00+00:00


JN i'm glad you asked. In not one game has a NSW waratah no7 either Alcock, Jenkins or Mccutcheon topped the work rate stats for the team but most crucially not in one match have they topped ruck involvement stats. I know because I check after every match and it has ped me off somewhat. In every match either the no 8 Palu or the 6 Dennis or Elsom have beaten them in topping ruck stats for example yet palu has been doing so much more carrying and defensive work. The tah no 7's need to pull a lot more of their weight or have their contracts torn up. I remember for example an early round where we played the force. Pocock and Hodgson arrived first to almost every ruck where as our no 7 was unseen and we lost. There are many more examples. I remember the Highlanders match and John Hardie monstered the breakdown while the tahs no 7 did nothing. I could go on and on and on. That is not good enough for no 7's. No they don't have to hit every ruck anymore, those days are over, but they need to be getting to a lot more breakdowns and either pilfering or slowing ball down at crucial times. They need to be influencing the flow of a game or they are not doing their job and in the age of phase play you can not afford not to have a quality no 7. SA if they persist with two running no 6's will be playing into ours and the NZ hands. If i was the AB's i'd persist with Cane and McCaw at 7 and 6. They'll be almost unbeatable if they do. That is unless we play Pocock and Gill in tandem. Game on.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T14:43:24+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


WW, I ask you - point to a game where the oppositions 7 was so much better it cost the Tahs the match this year. I completely buy that last year against the Cheetahs in Sydney that Heinrich made a massive difference. Point to a game this year where the lack of a Tah gun or an opposition gun at 7 determined the result.

2012-07-04T07:28:01+00:00


if you have not noticed that over the past 10 years gradually the no 7 has become the most important position on the field when historically it has not been as vital. Look at ow many skippers are all of a sudden no 7's. This is due to the increase in rucks which have doubled in the professional age. This in turn makes a no 9 also more important than 10 or 15 years ago because they need to distribute double the amount of phase ball than in the past, so their deeds are also now more important than ever. the no 8 and 10 used to be king, now not so much.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T06:23:57+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Greg, I love the optimism and I hope you are right. Per the article though I am much more pessimistic - I have seen exactly zero from Foley with regard to where he thinks he'll improve the side. Per what I said above and as reported in the smh, in his season review he pointed to three key issues - unfinished business, injuries and the draw. Two of those things he has no control over and the other equates to I just need more time. Well tell us some of the things that time is going to allow you to improve in the side. Why should he be in the seat rather than another coach? Johnson, Cheika, Mallet, Kidney, Louden and the list goes on - there are some very credible options out there to take on this team. Foley saying he hasn't had time when he has been part of the coaching set up for three years is just not good enough.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T06:18:57+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Grab me a Fosters. Mistah Elliott He ..................

2012-07-04T04:55:23+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


Great post Jeznez. Foley is an ass. ie an assistant only. The big question to ask is how come the Waratahs get it wrong so often? It seems that the board are incapable of picking a good coach then the coach asks for 'name' players as they are not good at picking talent and they think the big names will carry them to greatness. This is of course regardless of the stupid tactics and plans the head coach puts in place. Key ingredient is a good coach who can pick talent when they see it. The rest flows from there. Players fall in line when they believe what they are doing is successful about 1/3rd of the way through the season. Speed, strength, endurance and talent are the pointers to getting the right players.

2012-07-04T01:19:56+00:00

JC

Guest


All the Waratahs Board care about is covering their own ass, and managing public perception. The reality of this approach strangles the game of the Tahs and their creativity. From the outside looking in, it appears that the Powers in Tahland are heavy handed but not providing the support required. The pressure being applied starts at the top and filters to the coach and to the players.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T01:15:21+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


James, that is very possible. I'll be interested to see what happens with Douglas, he has shown in the past that he will take the coaches direction on board and deliver through the off-season. Two years ago he was told to get bigger and when he came back after the off-season he had bulked up enormously. I am hoping that when Deans sent him home from the Wallabies camp that he was told to lift his fitness levels with the aim to being considered for selection during the RC. A month isn't a huge amount of time to work with but still long enough to make gains and I'm hoping we see on Saturday that Douglas has been hitting the track and made some improvement in this area.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T01:12:40+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Absolutely Touko - the Brumbies are the best Aussie mauling side we have had in a long long time. I assume it is White's influence as I've not seen it as a hallmark of Fisher's teams in the past. Don't know for sure though.

AUTHOR

2012-07-04T01:07:43+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


WW, since the June internationals I've seen you on a few threads talking about 7 and 9 being the most important in the international game. They were certainly key players for the Aussies getting over the Welsh but I don't think that means these two positions are now the be all and end all. I'd point to South Africa being very comfortable while ignoring Brussow as a case in point and NZ moving McCaw to number 8 to cover for Read. The Waratahs haven't lost games this year because they've been slaughtered at the breakdown by superior 7s. Yes the recruitment of Hooper will make them stronger in this area next year which is a good thing (I think the Brumbies will be fine with Faingaa as well so not sure why they are putting so much effort into Pocock). 9 as I indicated above I'm prepared to concede is an issue, what I thought were issues with Barnes's passing game are quite possibly due to the poor service he has been receiving. Will be very interested to see how Hart goes this weekend.

2012-07-04T00:21:02+00:00

jameswm

Guest


It occurs to me that the Tahs' poorer fitness levels could be down to them simply not being prepared to put in the hard yards to get fit. There's no easy way - you have to put work in. Maybe there's a culture of doing some nice weight work in the gym and thinking you're fit.

2012-07-03T23:44:16+00:00

Touko

Guest


And while I'm thinking about it - on points related to your article - two of the things that have MOST stood out for me this year with the Brumbies have been their fitness and their attacking mauls. And in both cases I would put it down to excellent coaching. In the use of attacking mauls I'm not sure if we need to credit Laurie Fisher or Jake White more, though I did notice the Wallabies use the maul after White got involved with their training prior to the second test against Wales. Whoever should take credit it still smacks of good coaching. Ditto for the Brumbies' fitness levels and their newly recruited fitness coach.

2012-07-03T23:36:41+00:00

Touko

Guest


Great article, and spot on. Thanks for taking the time to write it. Let's hope it doesn't fall on deaf ears at Board level.

2012-07-03T22:05:08+00:00

greg

Guest


they got rid of mckenzie because he didnt bring home a title, they got rid of chris hickey for playing ugly footy

2012-07-03T21:40:04+00:00

mikeylives

Guest


Great points Jez. Not having 40 minutes in the tank (Tahs have physically dominated most teams in the first 20 minutes of each half.). Also, poor mauling/counter-rucking, poor handling, link-play and counter-attack. Most of these points are hallmarks of the top 6 teams

2012-07-03T12:04:25+00:00

greg

Guest


Yeah but I bet I am right though Its footy, teams go up and teams go down, its a very fine line between winning and losing in the super 15. Ewan came in second last when he was coaching the tahs and came back in later seasons quite consistently. there is a lot of quality players in the squad and some very good new ones coming through. i think Foley learned a lot this season and I just reckon next year will be different. there does not seem to be any players hoping (publicly I must say) he is going and players keep resigning with the squad which seems to say there is no disharmony. I don't have a crystal ball about next season just a gut feeling, a few years of football experience and maybe a bit of optimism but I think things will work out.

2012-07-03T10:23:30+00:00


Horne did not miss a tackle in the June tests.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar