Free agency brings out the paranoid and the feral

By Andrew Sutherland / Roar Guru

Paul Roos called it a “sad day”. A mourning journalist noted: “It was the day our culture, built on loyalty and hope, took a major shift”. For a moment I thought Lou Richards or democracy had died.

But no, nothing so dramatic – despite the angst. Just the beginning of free agency.

If anything the day was a positive one for democratic principles, giving players some freedom of choice in the despotic world of the AFL.

From day one, the draft camp grades potential recruits like chicks in a hatchery. If they survive that process, they enter the draft with a number hanging around their neck waiting for their name to be called.

Their club is decided for them and the better the player the worse the destination.

An argument often given against free agency is that having players shop themselves around like prostitutes destroys the family culture of football clubs. Football clubs as families – unconditionally loyal, loving, and protective – is a noble but false sentiment.

Nothing is said about loyalty when clubs publish the sad catalogue of delisted players at the season’s end.

If loyalty means sticking by someone at your cost, then football clubs are never loyal. They pick teams to win matches.

If they select a player who lacks talent but works harder than his more gifted teammates his inclusion is based on the contribution he can make to their success, not as a reward for his work ethic.

If the ageing body of a club champion shows signs of pulling the team down he is hurled out into the cold bleak wilderness like a hoary Eskimo elder (apparently the Eskimos don’t actually do this do but I’ll leave it in).

Free agency doesn’t only provide players with an opportunity to be disloyal.

When Collingwood signed free agent Quinten Lynch on Tuesday the football manager Geoff Walsh said: “Another strong-bodied marking target up forward will really suit the Collingwood game and Quinten can also play in the ruck. And we know very well how valuable a player is who can play those two roles”.

Yes, the importance of a strong bodied forward who can also ruck was the reason Chris Dawes still had two years on his contract but recently he hasn’t been able to mark, kick, or get a tap out to save himself from being replaced immediately.

As if trying to rub salt into Dawes’ wounds, Walsh concluded with: “We’re extremely happy to have Quinten with us”.

With all the moaning from commentators you’d think free agency was an NRL or EPL player agent – pimp fest rather than the small window of belated freedom that it really is.

You need to have spent an entire eight years at a club you may not have wanted to go to in the first place before you can entertain the possibility of getting the hell out. And if you’re in the top 25% of money earners you can only go if the club decides not to match rival offers.

As the NRL deals with the image of fans burning the flags of their Grand Final conquerors, the AFL is facing the feral response to free agency by some of its supporters. Departing players have been offered such sentiments as: “Hope you break both legs or at least an ACL”, or threatened with: “I will look for you, I will find you, and I will kill you.”

The latter – a quote from a CIA operative played by Liam Neeson in the film Taken – was aimed at Kurt Tippett (who is leaving Adelaide but not under free agency) and was apparently intended to be a joke. I must admit that imagining Neeson, who usually plays a lovelorn pain in the arse in a turtleneck jumper, talking like an assassin is funny.

The sender has stopped laughing though since the AFLPA referred it to the police.

Many fans of course have an emotional connection to their team and get upset when a player chooses to leave. They should realise that certain family members – black sheep if you like – just don’t fit in. It’s nothing personal and for the benefit of everyone they should be allowed to move on.

No one would accept such strict conditions of loyalty in their place of work. There is probably some resentment when an elite footballer has the temerity to show he’s not happy with his lot.

Some are paid highly and do receive the sort of acclaim and glory denied to the average working person but life for these modern-day gladiators is relatively short, and crippling: “That fat git over there with the limp…didn’t he play for Collingwood?”

The only reminders many of them will have of their playing days are a set of football cards and a listing in the Encyclopedia of AFL Footballers.

Everyone should settle down. Players can’t choose their first club. We can at least allow them to choose their last.

The Crowd Says:

2012-10-05T10:33:25+00:00

Lroy

Guest


I think its a great thing... take LYnch as an example... he wants to go the Pies, they want him, its win win... if there was no free agency he would have to go into the draft and maybe end up in Western Sydney... surely its a good thing that players have some say in where they end up? I recall several West Coast recruits bursting into tears upon hearing they had to leave their freinds family etc to get sent to Perth... as a supporter I dont want a guy like that at our club any more than he wants to come.. but its the Stalinist system we had. Im suprised the players association never challenged the AFL draft or salary cap in court... I bet you London to a mile they would win if they did. Why cant stronger clubs spend more money on players? It doesnt stop them spending more on coaches or facilities does it? Imagine Lionel Messi being told he could not play for Barcelona because they were too good, but rather he had to play for Fulham because they sucked.... thats pretty much what we have in the AFL... The sooner this stupid draft and salary cap are gone the better IMO.... and dont forget the Swans have a higher salary cap than everyone else (so Im told) does that not make a mokery of the system when the current premiers are allowed to spend more than any other club??? Has anyone visited Perth laterly?? $10 for a beer, $5 for a coffee... hotels $300 per night.. seriously, maybe its time West Coast and Fremantle recieved the same deal that the Swans are getting

2012-10-05T07:17:09+00:00

ToMC

Guest


I'll wait two or three years to make up my mind about free agency. I've been a bit surprised at how quickly clubs and players have embraced it, and I'm starting to wonder if the change it has on attitudes to club 'loyalty'might be greater than we realise right now.

2012-10-05T06:58:21+00:00

Siege of Perth

Guest


Fully agree, players dreaming of playing for say West Coast end up at the Demons and are punished with have a sucessless 10 years because they are a great player. You gotta feel for them and understand when players want to go home, I understood Judd leaving the Eagles, wasnt happy about it, but I could understand him. Despite this I am in favour of the Draft as a necessary evil. It keeps the richest, most successful clubs from getting all the top talent and helps provide (in conjunction with the salary cap) a fair and even comp. But in return the players deserve a chance to do what they want, what is best for them both professionally and personally. In fact I think the 8 year wait is too long, would be in favour of 6-7 years instead. After 8 is already too late for most players and are past their prime.

2012-10-05T03:16:41+00:00

William Goat

Guest


The AFL had to introduce free agency & it will only expand or it won't be long before a player or players are taking them to court for restraint of trade. The salary cap works because clubs agree to it, but telling a person who they can & cannot work for won't go on forever.

2012-10-05T01:13:19+00:00

Dr John

Guest


Great article. As a Tahs convert dabbing with the Swans, I marvel at the talent in the playing squads in different teams and the professional recruitment strategies. Swans have been brilliant in gathering thier list through resurrection and unearthing gems from elsewhere. There are some really good balanced points in the above article, and the last point that the player gets some choice in where they finish, is salient.

2012-10-05T01:07:18+00:00

AndyRoo

Roar Guru


Kudos tot he headline writer on this one.

2012-10-04T21:18:46+00:00

mwm

Roar Pro


Players will always have limited rights or freedom of movement as the AFL is the only first rate fully professional Australian Rules league in existence. Clubs will always have the upper hand as players can't threaten to go overseas like they can in RL, rugby and football to a rival league. They have one league to operate a professional career in and three lower leagues to offer a decent semi pro life style (VFL, SANFL,WAFL). I welcome any incremental step to give players more rights. Some people need to get over this strange concept of 'loyalty' they keep dishing out. Everyone knows this is a buisness. As a Swans fans personally I would love to keep our best players but I take the notion that whoever stay with the club, I'll support...whoever leaves the club..I won't. No malice, no disgusting twitter rants...just good luck (and I hope the Swannies beat your new team!)

Read more at The Roar