AFL's best home away from home stories

By Damo / Roar Guru

According to a recent article by Roar Guru Curtis Woodward, hell is freezing over at the prospect of the New Zealand Warriors playing home games across the ditch.

Woodward’s views got me thinking about this phenomenon in the AFL, and made me investigate the benefits associated with clubs playing at home while away from home.

So here is a list of some of my favourite (read that as ‘memorable’) foreign home games deals in the AFL from recent years. Some are belters, benefiting everyone, others were complete duds, and some left us wondering whether the club was just better off pulling a South Melbourne.

Richmond in Cairns
Hoooo boy, this is a good one. Not for Tigers fans, obviously. It’s rubbish for Tigers fans. But in a discussion on ‘just how bad can a deal get’, this one is comparable to bringing a knife to a gun fight.

Like so many bad ideas, it started out as a good one. But the cost of the deal could very well have outweighed any potential gains, and not only did the main proponents of the idea lose out, but the other side benefited.

Playing home at Cazaly Stadium netted Richmond a massive financial windfall. It also engaged a large population of footy-starved Victorian expats, and tapped into a new and growing market in the AFL – the ‘Footy game tropical holiday’ concept, championed by the ultimate winner from Richmond’s deal, the Suns. Good idea!

But, despite copping roughly $500,000 a game, the Tigers in 2012 possibly lost a finals berth after losing to the Suns, who not only won on the scoreboard but in the marketing world, furthering their exposure across Queensland.

I would not be surprised if the Suns announce a deal to play in Cairns from 2013 onwards and tap into a large, untapped market.

Kangaroos on Gold Coast
This arrangement lead to a crap-fight which was about as popular as dropping the North Melbourne bit from North Melbourne.

The name change, much like the switch from Footscray to the Western Bulldogs, was aimed at widening the team’s potential supporter base and opening new markets. Couple that with a two year deal to play games in another state, and you should have opened a pretty good window for cash and fans to flow through, yeah?

Well, maybe, but in this particular case the league tried to push a team through that metaphoric window.

The 2007 announcement that the AFL wanted a presence on the Gold Coast from 2010 was quickly followed by a massive novelty sized check arriving at Arden Street with a string attached.

Basically,the Kangaroos, who now had no North Melbourne affiliation by name and a board divided into factions, were offered a multi-million dollar cash carrot to increase their home games at the Gold Coast from a couple a year to 11 of them.

North’s presence on the Gold Coast was rejected, and so far so good for all concerned with the Suns doing well in this new market and the Kangas looking at some light at the end of a long and dark financial tunnel.

But this was a home away from home deal akin to your parents offering you cash to get a house thousands of miles away because you’ve become a drain on their pension funds.

Hawthorn in Launceston
This is undoubtedly the most positive move of recent years… for some. The Hawks have a shiny sponsor’s logo on their chest, a growing fan-base in a massively lucrative and passionate market, the support of the league and great record at their adopted home.

But for those who want to see a Tassie team in the comp any time soon (and that would include myself if I’m honest), this deal sucks.

North Melbourne’s move to Hobart, which at first resembled something of a relocation with four games a year being offered, has now further cemented the fate of any possible bid, unless North do eventually relocate to the Apple Isle.

Giants in Canberra
A brilliant move. An area with rich football heritage, Canberra has been home to a few teams over the years but never for a long period of time.

The Giants move into the Capital allows for an expanded fan-base for the emerging club, as well as giving the many expats and footy loving Canberrans (if that’s the right term, I’ve always just called them ‘politicians’) a new team to adopt. Or, at the very least, a regular roster of games played locally.

The deal for me is sealed by the Giants use of an alternate strip for use in the capital. This is brilliant marketing and further cements the Giants’ ownership over the region, as well as making another great collectable the footy tragics love to bid excessively over on EBay.

Port in the North
This is another mixed feelings one. For me, Port Adelaide Power playing games at TIO stadium is a brilliant move. I’ve written in the past on how this arrangement should be nurtured and indeed promoted further.

Port Adelaide moved from the SANFL to the AFL feeling they were a big fish in a small pond. Since this move, they’ve become a small fish in the same small pond, desperate for greater notoriety and cash inflow. A second home could be the answer.

The danger in a small fish playing in multiple ponds is that the aquarium master might just decide that the fish should stick to the unused pond to increase the viewing capacity for his customers. This incredibly convoluted metaphor comes with precedent – just take a look at the North Melbourne/Gold Coast affair.

These are my five favourite home away from home stories. Doubtless there are more, and I’d love to hear them.

This can be a prickly topic, and the whole concept is despised by many, so let’s here the opinions of Roarers on this while I warm my feet on the impending flame war.

The Crowd Says:

2012-11-02T11:58:47+00:00

yewonk

Guest


yes it definately should be

2012-11-01T01:40:03+00:00

Will

Guest


The North melbourne home games at the SCG in the late 90s or early 2000s - complete with the swans "come and boo a roo" campaign... the SCG must have felt really homely

2012-10-31T07:57:43+00:00

joe b

Guest


west coast played one (maybe more) of their home finals in melbourne, and lost to essendon as a result (1996)...this was forced on them though by the AFL's poor contract with the MCG. I do feel for the financially poorer sides, they will most likely always have to sell some of their regular season games interstate or non-traditional regions as they will never get prime time TV slots to help boost their supporter base. Unfortunately for non victorian teams this generally means they will be the teams that have to take that extra plane leg to Tassie. North Melbourne will eventually fold, and a Tassie team will be born. hopefully not a silly hybrid name though, it is an aussie rules state so it should have it's own fresh clean start. And perhaps the Sydney Swans token reference to SMFC on their jersey should be laid to rest now that they have won 2 premierships and have been in existence for 30yrs.

AUTHOR

2012-10-31T02:40:06+00:00

Damo

Roar Guru


HA! Can't beleive i left out the Bombers in Wangaratta. Well, i guess it doesn't really count anyway being a preseasons match and the fact that it never actually happened. I actually really like the idea of teams playing for points in regoinal centres- i doubt it'll ever happen, but seeing more games like North Melbourne in Ballarat for example

2012-10-31T02:24:11+00:00

Jsteel

Roar Pro


These aren't in particular 'favourites', just a few other ones Western Bulldogs annual home game in Sydney Western Bulldogs in Darwin Western Bulldogs in Canberra (seeing a trend here?) Richmond in Darwin North Melbourne in Canberra My favourite, even though it wasnt a home and away match, would have to be Essendon in Wangaratta

2012-10-30T22:38:56+00:00

Brewski

Guest


GC Suns pre-season match in Townsville against Nth Melbourne ...... first AFL game in Townsville i believe. March 2013

2012-10-30T22:38:48+00:00

Australian Rules

Guest


Good work Damo. I think there's two, perhaps conflicting, themes here. 1. It's good for clubs to play games away from home to engage supporters in new markets and as well as increase the brand exposure of the club. 2. People in local communities aren't mugs. If you rock up and take the cash and then piss off, don't expect to be loved (see Noth Melb). The Hawks have shown how it's done...actually enter a relationship with an area, commit to it and properly engage with the fans. The Launceston relationship has had an enduring affect on the club and has enriched the area.

2012-10-30T22:30:48+00:00

damo

Guest


Never said port played home games at TIO but i did say i think they SHOULD keep playing up there. I agree to the NZ game is brilliant!

2012-10-30T18:54:48+00:00

The_Wookie

Roar Guru


Playing games away from home is a time honored VFL tradition that goes back to Victorian teams playing in Brisbane and Sydney in the mid 20th century. Fitzroy is one of the ones you've failed to note here, they were the pioneers of the Tassie approach, and st Kilda werent far behind. The Port games played in Darwin are Port Away games, the home games belong to Melbourne and the Western Bulldogs, who formerly played in the ACT before the Giants made it theirs. Speaking of the ACT, North were also in there for a time as they were in Sydney and the Gold Coast too. Carlton sold a one off game to Carrarra when the North contract was cancelled. And the most interesting one is yet to come - St Kilda home to Sydney in Wellington for Anzac Day starting next year.

Read more at The Roar