Going out on top, but Hussey leaves a big void

By Brett McKay / Expert

The old adage that it’s much better to be asked ‘why are you retiring?’ rather than ‘why don’t you retire?’ has never had a better modern-day example than that of Michael Hussey.

Shocking Australian cricket with his announcement via a Nine News interview on Saturday night, Hussey has declared that the New Year’s Test starting tomorrow in Sydney will be his final outing in the baggy green.

He’ll embark on something of a national farewell tour during the remaining limited over internationals against Sri Lanka and the West Indies, with his final appearance in Australian colours likely to be the one-off Twenty20 against the Windies at the ‘Gabba – the same ground on which he made his Test Debut – on February 13.

Now, with humble apologies to the editors for what they’re about to let slide, Hussey’s surprise announcement was one of those genuine ‘holy shit!’ moments for me.

While the tragic passing of Tony Greig was not altogether surprising, given his battle with lung cancer, news of Hussey’s impending retirement really gave my cricket emotions a jolt.

Simply put, Michael Hussey had long been a favourite player of mine, going back to the days when he was carving up the domestic scene for Western Australia.

That he was only six weeks younger than me, similarly batted left-handed for a somewhat obscure reason, and was also meticulous in his training and preparation, meant that I always felt a kindred sense. Obvious gap in playing level, talent, and ability notwithstanding.

Like Stephen Larkham in the Wallaby no.10, I could watch Mike Hussey bat for Australia all day. The Larkham cut-out pass and the Hussey pull shot share the peak of my sporting beauty scale, and I’m so thankful I saw both as close and as often as I did.

As much as I wanted Hussey to play on forever (just so that there remained someone of my generation in the Australian team), there was little doubt his retirement would come sooner rather than later.

I just didn’t expect it to be this soon.

His form this summer had been outstanding; indeed, his form over the last 18 months or more had been from the top shelf in all forms of the game.

He seemed one of the few batting locks for the Ashes Tour in the middle of this year, and unlike his recently retired contemporary, Ricky Ponting, there appeared to be no evidence that his days were numbered.

The questions regarding the batting order’s evident fragility have hovered ominously in recent months, but along with Michael Clarke, Hussey has been a proper batting rock, a literal foundation stone with which the Australian batting could be built around.

Suddenly, things are looking decidedly shaky.

It’s a sobering but not impossible scenario that Australia could go into the Ashes series in the Old Dart with Phillip Hughes and David Warner the most experienced batsmen after Clarke. Neither will have played more than 25 Tests.

Actually, if I’m honest, perhaps his retirement announcement is one of the very few things Hussey hasn’t timed well. His replacement – whoever that might be – has the unenviable task of cementing his Ashes tour berth via four historically uncomfortable Tests in India.

And the replacement options are abundant, even if the supporting numbers aren’t overly convincing. It’s a big six or seven weeks coming up for the Khawajas, Baileys, Doolans, Forrests, Fergusons, Marshes, and Burnses of the cricket world either way.

Regardless, none of that will be of concern for Michael Hussey over that same period, as he winds down his international career in the coloured gear with anywhere up to twelve appearances in seven cities through until mid-February.

His reasons for calling time on his career well before most saw it coming can only be commended, and just reinforce that family will always come first.

When you recall that Hussey didn’t go on Australia’s one-day tour of the UK in mid-2012, and left the Champions League tournament early, both for family reasons, it’s hardly surprising at all that this decision has been playing on his mind all summer.

Not everyone gets to go out on their own terms – much as plenty have tried to – and the recent overlooking and retirement of Brad Haddin and Ponting, respectively, provide all the recent proof of that you need.

It will be an absolute privilege and an honour for me to watch Hussey in the flesh one more time in Sydney tomorrow, and I genuinely look forward to seeing that exquisitely timed pull shot (and the cover drive, and square cut, and all the others) one last time.

(Memo to the captain, if he’s reading, you have to bat first tomorrow; my Sydney schedule doesn’t extend into the weekend!)

Hussey will finish his stellar Test career 12th on the Australian Test runs table (I can’t quite see him bridging the 727-run gap to Clarke), with somewhere in the vicinity of 6200 runs.

His current average (51.52) will remain above the ‘greatness’ mark of fifty even if he goes out with a pair in his last Test.

Whatever should happen over the next five days in Sydney, the Australian cricket team is about to enter a whole new era. Australia has found replacing the Warnes, Haydens, McGraths, Gilchrists and co to be difficult in recent years, and replacing Ponting and now Michael Hussey will be no less so.

Happily, for the next five days, we can revel in the brilliance of the man reluctantly known as ‘Mr Cricket’ for one last time. A remarkable career is about to come to an end.

Well played Huss, and enjoy retirement.

The Crowd Says:

2013-01-03T07:58:53+00:00

Jocelyn McLennan

Roar Guru


He is the Pat Rafter of cricket and the perfect role model for all Australian sports people not just cricket. Humble, grateful for his career and opportunities, first to blame himself for faillures not others, not loud or drunk on his celebratory status, rediculous love of the game and genuine interest in others cricket, a technical gutsy war horse. Should have been the captain long ago and is going to be sadly missed by me as a shining light in the game and an act that must be followed if Australian cricket is to gain back a decent reputation internationally from being a bunch of ego driven, arrogant, prima donna's.

2013-01-02T12:35:45+00:00

Phil Watson

Guest


Hussey has been excellent bat for Australia and is one among highly popular cricketers world over. it is sad that cricket is losing another classic batsman. If Khawaja comes in to replace Hussey then he should bat at 4 as this will allow Watson to bat at 6 and bowl more overs, we need Watson both batting and bowling. I would have considered D Hussey but at 35, the younger Hussey brother would only be a short-term solution nor has it been a happy Shield season for him this summer with 120 runs at 17.

2013-01-02T12:34:17+00:00

Yusuf

Guest


Well done Mr.Cricket, I think most are asking, "Why did you?" rather than saying you should have done it earlier so hats off to an excellent player, who always played in the spirit of the game and loved the game, instead of caring about the money. The enthusiasm you showed on a cricket field earns a lot of respect, not to mention your skill. I think the English are sighing in relief now, and that's not an insult to Usman Khawaja who i think is a deserving replacement, but just because they don't have to face a cricketer as skilful as Michael Hussey

2013-01-02T09:48:37+00:00

doozel

Guest


Hussey was in worse form than Punter a couple of years ago, managed to turn it around though starting with his knock art the Gabba.

2013-01-02T09:25:45+00:00

doozel

Guest


So true, using a little foresight they would have selected Khawaja so he could get some form against the Sri Lankan medium pacers instead of the Indian spinners on raging turners. Because they disappointed Stark by unjustifiably testing him they have to select 4 quicks because they can't drop one. Another bad reason for a rotation policy.

2013-01-02T07:51:21+00:00

Rodney

Guest


I think they realized maxwell would not do well with his offies and Khawja deserves to replace hussey in india

2013-01-02T06:51:56+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


Eranga limped off training today didn't look good. My SL friends at work might be a chance for a call up.

2013-01-02T05:28:18+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


One match (v WA at the Gabba) before the tour and I think the squad is actually announced before that match.

2013-01-02T05:21:17+00:00

Andy_Roo

Roar Guru


Nice one Brett

2013-01-02T05:11:07+00:00

Rhys

Guest


It's a real vote of no confidence in Khawaja. It would have been a good chance to give him some game time. Now he'll go back to the BBL, and possibly play a Shield game or two before the squad to India departs in February.

2013-01-02T04:37:48+00:00

Rodney

Guest


Hussey was a left hander do having khawaja there is not a issue and he has improved his batting against the spinners under boof and is among the better batters against spin

2013-01-02T04:35:47+00:00

Rodney

Guest


Yes I think this is a temporary move as well, khawaja has to be the number 6 for India and j am sure that's what Clarke will decide too

2013-01-02T04:35:09+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Isn't BBL the yardstick for run-scoring.....? ;-)

2013-01-02T04:33:43+00:00

Rodney

Guest


Agreed khawaja should be the next guy in, standby for 2 matches and should be out number 6 in India

2013-01-02T04:28:27+00:00

Atawhai Drive

Roar Guru


One for true cricket tragics: when was the last time Australia went into an SCG Test with four quicks? I confess to not having a clue.

2013-01-02T04:01:19+00:00

Chop

Guest


Beer ? Seriously, I couldn't believe AB was talking him up in the big bash commentary last night as a contender to go to India and the ashes. I don't think I've ever seen him turn a ball, even Doherty offers more as a left armer and that's saying something. D Hussey's time has gone, we need to pick players for the next 5 years not 5 tests. I do agree with your point about a 2nd XI tour JM, it would be interesting to see who can take the step up to the next level.

2013-01-02T03:58:32+00:00

Chop

Guest


Maxwell's stats really surprised me. He's batting Ave in shield is 42 and bowling is 31. That's respectable, not outstanding but respectable. I may have been to harsh on his selection. The recent selection decisions give me a flashback to the late 80's early 90's where they picked people on instinct rather than stats and they built a team on attitude. Wade @ 6 makes me feel uncomfortable, I'd like to see Khawaja in there somewhere.

2013-01-02T03:57:33+00:00

Jm

Guest


What I'd really like to see - as a trial for India and the Ashes - is a genuine "second XI"/"Australia A" match versus the touring XI...in the background of the Tests. This could have been against South Africa. So - with Ponting and Mike Hussey out of the equation - and with star or injured players out of the picture (eg, Clarke Watson Cummins Pattinson Siddle Wade Warner, etc.), you could be looking at an XI like the following. This way we could work out who's really in contention for India and the Ashes! Hughes Cowan Quiney Khawaja David Hussey Paine Johnson Starc Hilfenhaus Bird Beer

2013-01-02T03:53:13+00:00

Jm

Guest


It is an interesting XI. Personally, I'd rather they have played Khawaja as one of six proper batsmen. The most interesting things out of this Test will be: 1. Hussey's swansong 2. How Clarke goes at four - that's where he belongs! 3. Can Johnson make some more runs?

2013-01-02T03:34:59+00:00

Matt F

Roar Guru


I agree with you. I wouldn't have played 5 bowlers. I think it's pointless as we'll never do it in a match that actually means something. However the fact that I think they're trying something stupid doesn't mean that they aren't trying something

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar