What are Australia's chances in India?

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

Australian Test series wins on Indian soil are about as rare as the Swedish sash at the Miss Universe contest being worn by a brunette.

Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting both played 168 Tests and yet throughout that time neither played an active role in an Australian series victory in India.

Ponting got closest in 2004, but he missed the first three Tests due to injury and by the time he returned for the fourth and final encounter in Mumbai, Adam Gilchrist had skippered the side to a series winning 2-0 lead.

Victory in that series was Australia’s first in India since the Bill Lawry led side of 1969-70.

Five subsequent tours prior to 2004 resulted in four Indian series wins and one draw. The last two tours – in 2008-09 and 2010-11 – both resulted in victories to the host.

So what chance of an Australian win when Michael Clarke leads his team on a four-Test tour starting late next month?

It would appear there are only three players certain of selection who have played at Test level in India before – Clarke, Mitchell Johnson and Peter Siddle.

That may swell to five if Shane Watson is risked and Brad Haddin gets the nod as the back-up keeper to Matthew Wade.

History has shown some of the country’s finest batsmen have been undone in India – Ponting (average of 26.5 from 14 Tests), Gilchrist (28.5 from 7), Justin Langer (30.0 from 7).

The selectors were dealt a cruel blow when Mike Hussey stunned the cricket world by announcing his retirement prior to this month’s SCG Test against Sri Lanka.

In the 11 Tests Hussey played on the sub-continent he averaged 63.0 and his ability to counter class spin bowling in the middle order will be sorely missed, not to mention his experience and cool head.

Clarke’s Test debut in Bangalore in 2004 was nothing short of stunning as he literally danced his way to 151 against Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh.

The way he took up the challenge with positive footwork and a desire to leave his crease was reminiscent of Kim Hughes at his best.

He will be very keen however to atone for a very poor series in India in 2009-10, when he could only manage scores of 14, 4, 14 and 3.

The weight on his shoulders will be Atlas-like, as he will be surrounded by a relatively inexperienced top seven at Test level.

The exception will be 38-Test veteran Watson, if he makes the cut, which he should.

He was the leading run-scorer on the last Indian tour with scores of 126, 56, 57 and 32 for a series average of 67.8 as an opener.

I would return him to that position in place of Ed Cowan, who has hardly set the world on fire in his 13 Tests to date – 722 runs at 32.8.

I can’t see Cowan being the answer in England at the top of the order and while it may be harsh, I would be leaving him at home.

If Watson, as he has stated, opts to cut right back on his bowling, the opening position seems to be his best, especially on this tour given his recent success in India.

Given his hard hands, similar to Gilchrist, he is better suited at the top of the order rather than facing spin as soon as comes to the crease.

Interestingly the selectors have removed Phil Hughes from the last three one day internationals against the West Indies in order for him to head to India early to acclimatise to the conditions.

David Warner and Hughes in particular, should they get through the new ball, would be well advised to adopt the sweep shot as a weapon that can help blunt the Indian spinners.

It is a shot that Watson plays well. Matt Hayden used the sweep to amazing effect in 2000-01 when he made 549 runs at 109.8.

Regardless of what shot selection they choose, one of the keys will be to rotate the strike. And that goes for the entire batting order, especially against the Indian spinners.

Allowing them to operate exclusively to the one batsman for a full over may prove fatal.

Once again, the home side will construct its attack around spin – the grounds chosen will largely to see that with Chennai, Hyderabad, Mohali and Delhi the venues

In August last year when India beat New Zealand in Hyderabad by an innings and 115 runs, spinners Ravi Ashwin (12 wickets) and Pragyan Ojha (6) captured all bar two Black Caps’ wickets.

It was a similar affair in Delhi in November 2011 when Delhi last hosted a Test – this time it was the West Indies on the receiving end when Ashwin (9) and Ojha (6) again cleaned up.

Chennai is less of a spin paradise but nonetheless will prove bountiful for the slow men. Strangely the last Test encounter was in December 2008 when India downed England by six wickets.

The spinners claimed 17 of the 35 wickets to fall.

The ground that will perhaps best suit the Australian attack is Mohali where the last Test, in October 2010, saw India beat the Aussies by one wicket.

In that match it was the pacemen who did the bulk of the damage, with Zaheer Khan (8), Mitchell Johnson and Doug Bollinger (5 apiece), Ben Hilfenhaus (4) and Ishant Sharma (3) doing the bulk of the damage.

Despite the fact several of the venues will be heavily biased towards spin, the fact Australia currently lacks quality slow bowlers will result in pace oriented attack by the tourists.

There will be a lot of interest in the regard to the spin options when the selectors announce their squad.

Nathan Lyon is a definite starter, despite the fact that he is yet to show he can be a determining factor late in matches. Aside from Lyon the cupboard is fairly bare.

Jon Holland’s shoulder injury has not allowed him to put his wares on display to the level the selectors would want.

Michael Beer, who had an outstanding Big Bash, is also currently sidelined with a shoulder injury, although his Sheffield Shield form this summer has been poor – eight wickets at 46.4.

The one spinner who has stood up is Steven O’Keefe. He has claimed 17 wickets at Shield level at 24.3 and has a tidy first-class career average of 27.3.

Being left-arm orthodox complements Lyon and his batting would also add depth to the line-up as he boasts a career average of 31.8.

One gets the feeling Glenn Maxwell will also be on the plane, although I do not necessarily believe two off-spinners in the one line-up would prove effective. I would not include him in the squad but the selectors seem enamoured by him.

Xavier Doherty is perhaps the only other spinner the selectors would have faith in but his first-class form has been lamentable this summer, with just two wickets at 80 from four Shield matches for Tasmania.

Clarke and Warner will be required to send down some overs during the series.

If the selectors do opt for three spinners in the tour party there will most likely be only four specialist quicks chosen.

James Pattinson may be in contention but given his injury run and the fact he will be a key in the Ashes I would be leaving at home and rather than Maxwell, I would be taking Ben Cutting.

He has had a fine Shield season for Queensland with 22 wickets at 18.8.

He is also more than capable with the bat with 348 runs at 38.7 this season at the staggering strike rate of 96, along with a century against South Australia.

I would have Haddin in the tour party as a back-up to Matthew Wade, while he also has the capability of playing as a specialist batsman – in fact he is probably the best option in that department from outside the current side.

Moises Henriques has had a breakout season for New South Wales with both bat and ball and deserves selection. I would also reward Alex Doolan for a fine season – 570 first-class runs at 81.4 including an unbeaten 161 against South Africa in the Australia A match earlier in the summer.

Australia’s fortunes will be boosted should Sachin Tendulkar’s form continue to waiver. His last eight Tests have produced a meagre 236 runs at 18.2 with just one half-century.

It would be a brave selection panel that jettisoned him midway through a series but if his run of failures continues it will have an effect on the rest of the team, given his status as a living god in India.

It will be fascinating also to follow the form of India’s new number three, Cheteshwar Pujara. The Australians got a sight of him on the last tour when he debuted in the opening Test in Bangalore.

Since then he has played seven Tests at home and scored a healthy 730 runs at 73.0, with his highest score an unbeaten 206 against England.

He has filled the void left by Rahul Dravid at first drop and is certainly in good form of late, having recently peeled off an innings of 352 in the Ranji Trophy.

I cannot see the current Australian side coming away with a series victory and feel the final score line will be 2-1 to India.

This is the squad I would choose for the tour:

Michael Clarke, Shane Watson, David Warner, Phil Hughes, Alex Doolan, Usman Khawaja, Moises Henriques, Matthew Wade, Brad Haddin, Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc, Mitchell Johnson, Jackson Bird, Ben Cutting, Nathan Lyon, Steve O’Keefe.

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-06T23:28:04+00:00

Brian

Guest


I think a lot hinges on what sort of Indian side Australia actually end up facing. They've been on a downward spiral for the last 18 months and many of their key players that got them to No. 1 in the test rankings and won the World cup in 2011 have since retired/are injured/over the hill. There are some signs though that the new Indian selectors are looking to bring through newer, younger players. I wouldn't write India off totally based on their series loss to England. They will still be a tough proposition on their home turf. The younger guys coming through will revitalise them I feel and there is a lot more pressure on some of the older guys (e.ge Sehwag, Gambhir) to perform. Unlike ENgland, Australia haven't played as much recent cricket on the subcontinent. 7 of England's starting eleven had played in India previously. Australia at best will only have three. It will be a competitive series - for me it will probably be decided by how ell the Indian batsmen handle Johnson, Siddle and Pattinson.

2013-01-31T05:32:47+00:00

sittingbison

Guest


Glenns selection: Clarke Watson Warner Hughes Doolan Khawaja Henriques Wade Haddin Siddle Starc Johnson Bird Cutting Lyon O’Keefe Invers selection: Clarke Watson Bird Cowan Doherty Henriques Hughes Johnson Khawaja Lyon Maxwell Pattinson Siddle Smith Starc Wade Warner Invers cheated with a 17 man squad, and didnt fit in the reserve keeper. Doherty, Maxwell, Pattinson, Smith, Cowan included, Doolan, Haddin, Cutting, O'Keefe excluded. Once again we are a middle order batsman short. I am disappointed with selections of Doherty, Maxwell, Smith and Henriques.

2013-01-31T05:23:01+00:00

sittingbison

Guest


no Glenn, on his performance a year or two ago on the sub continent (Sri Lanka). Its as good an argument as many of the others put forward for Watto et al.

2013-01-31T02:24:00+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


Having seen the tour squad I would answer "What are Australia's chances in India?" with "bad, very very bad".

AUTHOR

2013-01-31T02:18:03+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


Gavin, I would say one series win in India in four decades is rare. I can't think of another place where AUS has struggled so greatly in the past 40-years. I wouldn't place a lot of store in the early series results given they only won 6 of their first 75 Tests. They were a particularly weak side for a very long time.

2013-01-31T00:50:02+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


From twit: Squad: Clarke Watson Bird Cowan Doherty Henriques Hughes Johnson Khawaja Lyon Maxwell Pattinson Siddle Smith Starc Wade Warner Quietly seething.

2013-01-30T14:39:56+00:00

Gavin Maslen

Guest


"Australian Test series wins on Indian soil are about as rare as the Swedish sash at the Miss Universe contest being worn by a brunette" says Glenn, but are they really? Let's have a look back in time at the consecutively played series: Australia in India 56/57: Australia wins 2 tests to India's 0. Series WIN Australia. Australia in India 59/60: Australia wins 2 tests to India's 1. Series WIN Australia. Australia in India 64/65: Australia wins 1 to India's 1. Series Drawn. Australia in India 69/70: Australia wins 3 to India's 1. Series WIN Australia. Australia in India 79/80: India wins 2 to Australia wins 0 (4 draws). INDIA WIN A SERIES for the first time EVER against Australia! The only dampener on that is Australia were missing their best players to World Series Cricket. This was barely their second XI. We'll let them have it though, they need it. Australia in India 86/87: Australia (missing most of their best players available to the rebel tour to South Africa) wins 0 India wins 0 (1 tie).series Drawn. Aside from a one off test in 1996 (that's not a series) that India won, India beat Australia in India in 97/98 and again in 00/01 until Australia again broke through under Adam Gilchrist in 04/05 and won the series again in India. Finally India have won the last 2 series in India in 08/09 and again in 2010/2011, 2 nill (one by just one wicket). In history, Australia have won on Indian soil fairly regularly; too regularly to label it "rare". In recent times they've been light on for series wins, but historically, despite TEN year gaps between some tours there, they've done better than a lot of people think. India are beatable in India; England just proved that. Australia, despite their fragile batting, can win that series. India cricket are a basket case and definitely should not be feared, even in their own conditions.

2013-01-30T11:57:03+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


I don't think there's any hatred for Henriques, just an acknowledgement that he isn't ready yet. This season is his breakout season. It is the first time he has scored a century in any form of senior domestic cricket and he has only just managed to get his first-class batting average above 30. He is not a test-ready allrounder. If Arthur and Inverarity are that desperate for a poor-man's Kallis then develop Henriques in the limited overs games, but keep him the hell away from test matches.

AUTHOR

2013-01-30T10:56:09+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


I am not too sure why there appears to be such a hatred for Henriques. This season he has averaged 77 with the bat and 18 with the ball. Last season he averaged 41 with the bat and 31 with the ball. I think for a developing all-rounder they are very good stats! I wouldn't have him in the Test side straight up in India but I believe he would provide excellent back-up should there be injuries.

AUTHOR

2013-01-30T10:49:57+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


I take it Sittingbison that you are selecting Shaun Marsh to play Test cricket on the back of his Big Bash form because in the Sheffield Shield this season he is averaging a whopping 10.2

2013-01-30T10:19:07+00:00

DCO

Guest


Sound reasoning sittingbison. Good post. You've almost convinced me. Definitely replace Haddin and Burns for Henriques is a great if obvious call. Just not sure about Marsh.

2013-01-30T10:16:12+00:00

DCO

Guest


Brian, not a bad squad, though I will like to note that though I agree Faulkner is a modest all rounder who's batting is nowhere near International level, he is a first rate bowler who deserves without a shadow of a doubt to be rewarded for three exceptional first class seasons as a front line bowler; 107 wickets from 30 matches at 22.82. But being stuck in Tassie and bowling only 135mph has him nowhere near the spotlight of the national media to champion his cause.

2013-01-30T08:48:01+00:00

Jack

Guest


In a word as to Australia's chances, GOOD.

2013-01-30T07:09:13+00:00

dcnz

Guest


Keith Miller also loved his wine, women and song...the good old days..

2013-01-30T06:51:34+00:00

dcnz

Guest


Hodge, Katich, Tomic, Wade, Warner, Pattinson, Mitch Johnson, take all the mavericks, pricks, loud mouths, and hard arses, leave the powder puffs at home and stop picking people that Pup likes. That also means Ussie must play every match in India. yes, Tomic was a joke ho ho...oh and Jackson Bird must tour ....

2013-01-30T06:22:32+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Or pick only 2 pace bowlers

2013-01-30T05:32:50+00:00

Rob Barrow

Guest


Jamessw no one is putting SOW down, he would be much better then Maxwell but for the number 6 spot it has to be Khawaja and you can play SOW ahead of Lyon. Khawaja averages 43 over a longer period of course and actually has a decent technique when he is not expected to bash every ball

2013-01-30T05:30:54+00:00

Rob Barrow

Guest


Pies and Beer lets hope you are wrong and Maxwell does not get the 6 spot ahead of Khawaja, our issue with our batting and none better then Khawaja to bring in for that. Faulkn is a better allrounder and so are about 5 other allrounders. The number 6 spot should go to Khawaja, another 70 yesterday in the PM's game and his fielding looks brilliant. He is averaging above 40 in all 3 formats and was stand in batsman for the last 2 tests so lets get him in. And SOK or Doherty should be our backup spinners.

2013-01-30T05:24:28+00:00

sittingbison

Guest


agree with general sentiments - stop this ludicrous obsession with club level all rounders. I cannot understand the other ludicrous obsession - with Brad Haddin. Brad is 35yo. His past couple of years were woeful, dropping clangers and batting poorly, with numerous brain explosions. He was a liability, it was a blessing when Wade played all the West Indies Tour and cemented his place after Haddins most unfortunate circumstances. Time to select another keeper, Paine or Hartley. Neville MUST keep for NSW from now on. Glenn, you have fallen into the trap of looking at Watsons historical figures. The 2008 series delivered only 170 runs from 7 innings at 24 (highest score 78), the 2010 series delivered 271 runs in 4 innings at 68 (highest score 126 his 2nd and last century). This last result ended at the beginning of October 2010, two and a half years ago! He started the 2010 Ashes in form but started to peter out after Perth, the next 12 or so tests from Boxing Day 2010 he has averaged 24 or so with no test hundreds. Shane Watson must return to shield and put in a solid season. He has neither the runs on the board over more than 2 years, nor any form on display, nor fitness levels to warrant selection. BTW his bowling the past two years has been equally ineffective, 20 wickets in 21 innings including the 5 at Cape Town in the Debacle Test I would select Paine for Haddin, Marsh for Watson, Burns for Henriques. Going on all the arguments on display, Marsh scored a ton in Sri Lanka, 240 runs at 80 top score 141 plus an 80. And it looks like he has turned the corner with his scone. Just the ticket for India ;-)

AUTHOR

2013-01-30T04:54:14+00:00

Glenn Mitchell

Expert


I think at times Nathan Coulter-Nile's limited-over & T20 performances mask his four-day form. This season he has taken 15 at 34.2 in Shield ranks.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar