Supporting a 'druggy' club in the NRL

By Joe Frost / Editor

Since the Australian Crime Commission announced its report into doping, match-fixing and organised crime in sport, many rugby league supporters have had sleepless nights, unsure whether their club was involved.

As a supporter of the Newcastle Knights, I’ve slept the sound sleep of a man confident of the immediate outcome.

I have no inside knowledge of the team, nor any ‘friends of friends’ who do. But an investigation into drug use in Australian sport? Of course the Knights were going to be involved.

Supporting the Knights is a spoonful of sugar served with a handful of dirt.

Since their inception in 1988 they’ve delivered countless champion players to cheer for, two premierships to celebrate and the one reason I’ve had to visit the Newcastle suburb of New Lambton.

However, they have also had more drug problems than any club in rugby league history.

The 1997 grand final, in which Newcastle won their first premiership with Darren Albert scoring the winning try with seven seconds to play, was the game that saved rugby league and one of the happiest days of my childhood.

Yet season 1998 had barely kicked off when three members of the grand final winning team – Wayne Richards, Adam MacDougall and Robbie O’Davis (who won the Clive Churchill medal for best player in the ’97 decider) – tested positive for performance enhancing drugs.

The only other player busted for performance enhancers in 1998 was Melbourne Storm prop Rodney Howe and, though he’d long since departed, it wasn’t lost on many that Howe was a Newcastle junior.

Andrew Johns was the maestro behind 40 minutes of near-perfect football which saw the Knights win the 2001 premiership, just one of 249 games Johns played in his hometown’s colours before his retirement in 2007.

Later that year, Johns was searched by police in London, after attempting to ride the tube without a ticket, and was found to have ecstasy in his pocket.

This led to his admission of having taken party drugs throughout his playing career, “generally during the off season but there’s times when, during the season, I’ve run the gauntlet” with drug testers.

The 2009 season was not three months finished when Knights fan favourite Danny Wicks – he of the ample belly yet electric pace – was arrested as part of what police described as a “significant drug distribution network”. It was alleged wire taps on Wicks’ phone revealed teammates contacted him to purchase drugs.

Before the 2010 NRL season kicked off, his teammate and housemate Chris Houston was charged with dealing cocaine and ecstasy.

Houston was eventually cleared of charges, while Wicks was sentenced to three years in prison. No other Knights players were officially named in the year-long saga.

While the club has continued its bumpy off field existence since 2010, the dramas have been related to issues in the front office, rather than the gym or nightclub, as local billionaire Nathan Tinkler took over the club and delivered seven-time premiership winning mentor Wayne Bennett as head coach.

With Bennett having had a year to adjust to life in The Hunter and assembled a strong team to compete for the 2013 NRL title, things were going just a little too positively for the Knights.

They were due a little controversy.

Hours after the ACC announced their report last Thursday, the Knights’ offices were audited by the NRL. Knights CEO Matt Gidley said, “We’ve got absolutely nothing to hide and we’re doing all we can to co-operate with this process.”

It’s far too early to speculate on what the Knights may or may not have done.

Part of me asks the question, what if Dave Smith is right? The NRL’s new CEO said, “The information that has been passed on to the clubs is simply that they have been referred to within the report,” implying being mentioned doesn’t necessitate wrongdoing.

A far larger, more rational part of me asks how often is there smoke and no fire? And with the Knights’ track record, the smoke looks a whole lot thicker than any of the other five clubs said to be involved.

And a final part asks the scariest question of all, what if the Knights aren’t being investigated for doping? What if they are, instead, being investigated for match-fixing?

Because if it turns out the Knights have been doping, once again, I can weather the jokes of mates who support other clubs referring to my team as ‘druggies’ and ‘cheats’. I know it will all eventually blow over and I’ll be back to watching my team win and lose in relative peace – just like it did all the other times.

But if my team has been throwing games for their own personal profit – if they’ve cheated our town into paying to watch them lose on purpose – I’m not sure how I’ll sleep.

Joe is the editor of Disaffected Middle Class.

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-14T22:36:22+00:00

Knight life

Guest


Yep, Hunter Stadium is in New Lambton. The Knights have had a drug culture, yes. At least they aren't salary cap cheaters or rapists. Still a disappointing tag for the club.

2013-02-14T12:48:41+00:00

Bazzio

Roar Guru


How can they afford to pay the bills when the cheque's always "in the mail"? Income $upplement$

2013-02-14T07:31:09+00:00

Wrighty

Guest


Hunter Stadium is in New Lambton buddy!

2013-02-14T05:54:51+00:00

Wrighty

Guest


Great article Joe! As a fellow Novocastrian, there is no real surprise in Newcastle that we've been implicated in this scandal. Match fixing would be a major shock to everyone but a lot of people in Newcastle are very worried about the taking of illicit and performance enhancing drugs as we have the proven track record for that sort of thing.

2013-02-13T16:58:06+00:00

Knight Vision

Guest


now that's funny

2013-02-13T02:17:58+00:00

josh

Guest


To find out more just 'ring Gids'.

2013-02-13T00:37:32+00:00

planko

Guest


In theory match fixing and drugs should not have any link. Match fixing and doing ANYTHING that you dont want people to know about can always be linked. This could be your criminal history , this could be your sexual preference ,being financial trouble it could be anything from your past. It could be anything that people in general don't know about you that don't want people to know. Doing drugs is an obvious no no. To get a security clearance in a government department at any level you will be asked questions about these things. Your answers are not as important (within reason) as telling the truth. eg I answered all my questions honestly that raised eye brows but I got my clearance cause I dont care who knows about my mistakes. If a players takes regular drugs whether it be a couple of lines after a game or drugs that enhanced performance whether he gets caught or not by testers at least one person knows he did them. If that person is linked to organised crime then that is the sports biggest problem. Cause he can get easily blackmailed into throwing a game. If a player is gay no problem but if he is in the closet this is a problem. Cause he can get easily blackmailed into throwing a game. If a players has massive financial problems eitherway this is a problem. Cause he can get easily blackmailed/bought into throwing a game. In fact the gay thing is an example because I got asked as part of a standard form and was a little surprised that they were allowed to ask. The last question asked for standard security clearance was is there anything that could be used to blackmail you into providing information. This goes the same way for sport. Is there anything that the wrong people might be able to use to blackmail you into throwing a game.

2013-02-12T22:43:14+00:00

PGNEWC

Guest


Hunter Stadiums in Broadmeadow not New Lambton Joe the gully line is the border. In the Herald it says they've cleared the Knights management of involvement however that does not mean individual players are involved. I hear you about druggies though-- This is because the hunter has always had an illegal sly grog and drug thing -- its the nature of being an amalgam of a lot of mining towns and a lot of poor people.

2013-02-12T21:53:14+00:00

Anon

Guest


and then of course there was the speed with which Mitchell Sargent was recruited just a couple of weeks after the Cowboys showed him the door for cocaine use. The notion that the Knights (lack of) culture is acceptable and that it can be allowed to just 'blow over' is somewhat strange given the drawn out nature of this - if were a once off then fine - but the Knights seems systemic (if not the application of drugs then the acceptance of it). Ask any fringe player who gets cut from a squad in favour of someone they might suspect of doping and you'd find out how serious a thing it is to be a drug cheat.

2013-02-12T15:19:35+00:00

Madrid john

Guest


Sleep easy mate. I can´t imagine that match fixing could go on under the eagle eyes of W. Benett. But then, nor would you guess that Belamy, Hassler, etc would miss it either. I agree, match fixing is the real danger, if something like that were to come out, well, dead set, i reckon i´d be tuning in to watch mixed-doubles dwarf tossing instead. That said, the point has been made over on the rugby thread that rugby is too complicated a game to rig. League might be easier to fix, but would be just as obvious to the punter and fellow team-mates. Just don´t see that happening, mind you, it might explain some dodgy form we saw in 2012... And come to think of it, Phil Gould is a pretty canny fella... Just joking Parra fans, no team with Nathan Hindmarsh would ever pull a stunt like that.

Read more at The Roar