My 17-man Australian squad for Indian tour

By Brandon Marlow / Roar Pro

Over the past few weeks I have looked over the Australian squad for the upcoming series against India at least a dozen times and have found myself disagreeing with the selector’s decisions.

Now I realize the squad I’m about to name is controversial and most people would probably disagree with it, but I honestly believe these 17 men would give Australia the best chance at winning the upcoming series.

My Squad: Dave Warner, Ed Cowan, Phil Hughes, Michael Clarke, Usman Khawaja, Shane Watson, Matt Wade, Peter Siddle, James Pattinson, Nathan Lyon, George Bailey, Brad Haddin, Adam Voges, Nathan Hauritz, Moses Henriques, Mitchell Starc and Jackson Bird.

Now to explain my inclusions.

First off, I’ve included Nathan Hauritz over Xavier Doherty. I realise Hauritz is a right arm offie just like Lyon, but I rate Hauritz miles ahead of Doherty in the Test arena.

I wouldn’t want to play a second rate spinner just because he bowls with a different arm.

Bailey, Hadden and Voges have all been included into the squad because they are above average players of spin and have shown that they have the right temperament to succeed in India.

I wouldn’t include any of these three in the starting XI straight away. They’re are mainly in the squad in case Cowan fails in the first few Tests and we have to move Watson back into the opening position.

Now to explain why I’ve left out Glenn Maxwell, Mitch Johnson, Xavier Doherty and Steve Smith.

Glenn Maxwell and Steve Smith can both be put into the same category of not being good enough with the bat or the ball to really perform against India.

I personally don’t rate Maxwell as a batsman and his offspin is more likely to get smashed around the ground than take wickets.

Smith is handy with the bat, but isn’t quite there yet and the fact that he has pretty much shelved his legspin bowling goes against him.

I’ve already gone into some detail why I would leave Xavier Doherty at home but to reiterate, ‘X’ is not a good bowler in the longer form.

He’s fantastic in the short stuff, particularly ODIs but I just don’t believe he is cut out for the Test team when we could be playing Hauritz who has shown he is capable at Test level.

In Mitchell Johnson’s case, he’s just unlucky.

He would be in my Australian squad for every tour except this one due to the emphasis on spin and because Siddle and Pattinson seem like they will be the most likely Australian pace bowlers to take wickets.

Johnson can be hit and miss at the best of times and we don’t need him to be a passenger during a Test in India.

With the initial squad selected, I would go into the first Test on the 22nd of February in Chennai with a team like this: Warner, Cowan, Hughes, Clarke, Watson, Khawaja, Wade, Siddle, Pattinson, Hauritz and Lyon.

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-28T15:01:43+00:00

Mitcell

Guest


There should have to mitchell johnson in 2nd test

AUTHOR

2013-02-18T05:54:04+00:00

Brandon Marlow

Roar Pro


People get complacent when they become a "walk up starter". Look at the Hawthorn team in 2010. A whole bunch of players were getting complacent and they were dropped to show that they need to stay hungry. Not taking a second keeper on tour just shows that Wade will play all 4 tests, no questions asked.

2013-02-17T07:45:40+00:00

Daz

Guest


Good team Brandon, but I would go with 3 pace men as they are our strength at the moment. so for 1st test considering you don't have Johnson, top 7 + Siddle, Bird, Starc, Lyon and not Pattinson only because he is returning from injury but don't know who I would leave out for him at the moment. Wade is a determined and improving cricketer and should be given time.

2013-02-15T15:21:51+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


btw, would you have picked Voges if he hadnt just made 100 in the recent odi??? and i like Voges, but just find it funny how people jump onto the last innings and pick their teams as such.

2013-02-15T15:20:26+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


yes, because as a top line international sportsmen, he wouldnt know that he has to work hard to keep his spot.....

2013-02-15T15:19:10+00:00

AndyMack

Guest


only a couple of selectors are keen on maxwell (and the mumbai ipl team....)

AUTHOR

2013-02-15T08:25:11+00:00

Brandon Marlow

Roar Pro


I'd only bring Haddin as a back-up batsman and to remind Wade that he needs to keep working on his keeping and that if he neglects it and slacks off there are others waiting in the wings ready to pounce on his position.

2013-02-15T02:28:47+00:00

sittingbison

Guest


Good effort Brandon. I would leave Haddin behind, he is done and dusted. Given Wade is a batting keeper, select the best gloveman in case Wades keeping is the problem so its possibly Hartley (sic). Adam Voges is a mature experienced solid batsman, almost identical to Bailey. I don't have a problem with either, but would probably select one of the two and include a future prospect such as Burns.

2013-02-15T01:18:22+00:00

Dean Woodward

Guest


Yes agree 100%

2013-02-14T21:34:00+00:00

Varun

Guest


I like that khawaja is at 6, and also think hauritz is better then mr.x, also most folks will Agree that Maxwell shouldn't be there

AUTHOR

2013-02-14T20:26:30+00:00

Brandon Marlow

Roar Pro


I'm not looking to make a fantasy cricket team, though. I was picking what I believed was the best 17 man squad out of the available players and I have only made 4 changes because the selectors have got things mostly right. Sure, if Pat Cummins was fit I'd put him in the squad, but I'm going for a bit of realism.

AUTHOR

2013-02-14T20:24:25+00:00

Brandon Marlow

Roar Pro


Considering I've seen next to nobody mention Haddin, Voges or Hauritz should be included in the squad I'd say it's at least a bit controversial. Not to mention I left the flavor of the month, Glenn Maxwell, out of the side when everybody (Including the national selectors) seem to be high on him.

2013-02-14T19:21:59+00:00

The_Big_Big_Show

Roar Rookie


It's not very radical. Take a risk. Check my article out later today on selecting a cricket team. That's fantasy.

2013-02-14T16:07:27+00:00

Jake

Guest


"Now I realize the squad I’m about to name is controversial and most people would probably disagree with it". Hardly controversial selections.

Read more at The Roar