Clock ticking for the Raiders

By Curtis Woodward / Expert

When you think Canberra Raiders you think of the sheer brilliance of Josh Dugan. You think of their leader Terry Campese or maybe the natural abilities of Blake Ferguson and Reece Robinson.

But the main sticking point, the thing that would linger in the thoughts of opposing teams headed to Canberra, is just how big and tough their engine room really is.

Giant props like David Shillington, Brett White, Tom Learoyd-Lahrs and Dane Tilse.

Sledgehammers like Josh Papalii.

And perhaps the toughest of the bunch, Shaun Fensom.

Just like ‘The Hulk’, Hollywood’s version of the green machine, the National Rugby League would not like the Raiders when they’re angry. This is the job ahead of coach David Furner. To get these men absolutely focused and ready to punish the poor souls that head down the Hume Highway.

The Raiders won seven matches at home in 2012. A fair effort for most sides in the NRL.

But that isn’t good enough for Canberra. There was once a time where playing the Raiders in the nation’s capital probably meant you were coming back without the competition points and plenty of sore bodies.

Perhaps this version is still a little young. Perhaps this version still haven’t realised their potential. But the clock is ticking and Raiders fans are desperate to see their team back at the big dance in October.

Being dominant at home leads to a lot of good things. And that includes the confidence to start winning away from home too.

Alarmingly for fans, in five home losses in 2012, the Raiders conceded a whopping 194 points.

Where did the intimidation go in these matches?

These players are no longer kids.

Dugan is 22, Josh McCrone 25, Campese 28 and Learoyd-Lahrs is 27.

There are no more excuses for this squad and coach Furner. Canberra need to become premiership contenders sooner rather than later. The talent is there, the aggression is lurking, so why haven’t we seen a new dynasty at the Raiders?

“Come round one there will be a lot of options there for Dave and a lot of potential headaches but it’s my aim to make sure that I’m in the frame come round one,” new recruit Joel Edwards told raiders.com.au.

“I’m lucky that I don’t have to make those tough selection calls. I’ve just been worrying about what I can control and that’s how I play and how I turn up to train.

“As long as everyone does that and puts their best foot forward then that’s what’s best for the club.

“I feel that I’ve slotted in well down here. It’s become my home and I couldn’t ask for anything more.”

The Raiders have been impressive in the preseason, flogging the Melbourne Storm in Geelong and securing victory over NSW Cup side Mounties.

“I think that we can take a lot out of the trials,” Edwards continued.

“They’re just trials, but it’s about trying to find combinations and what works best for the team. It gives us an opportunity to try a few different things and we’ll try and get everything right for the season ahead.

“For me personally, I’ve been trying to improve each week. I’ve been trying to work on all areas of my game with the coaching staff here and not just concentrating on my defence.”

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-21T10:34:49+00:00

Eric M.

Guest


2005 (14th), 2006 (7th), 2007 (14th), 2008 (6th), 2009 (13th), 2010 (7th), 2011 (15th), 2012 (6th). Judging by the past, 14th for 2013. I hope the Raiders break this cycle.

2013-02-21T10:21:39+00:00

Eric M.

Guest


Agreed. Hinchcliffe was good in 2007-2008 and I was disappointed when he left for the Storm. And now he is a solid 1st Grader and fringe representative player. I don't know what they see in Buttriss. Is he playing for free?

AUTHOR

2013-02-21T09:25:10+00:00

Curtis Woodward

Expert


Ryan Hinchcliffe would have been a nice option @ nine.

AUTHOR

2013-02-21T09:23:55+00:00

Curtis Woodward

Expert


Surely they can do something about that. Maybe.

2013-02-21T06:11:10+00:00

Eric M.

Guest


The Raiders need a skillful, speedy Hooker. Top teams prove you need reliable performers at 1, 6, 7 and 9 to be serious contenders for the title. The Raiders have used Glenn Buttriss and Travis Waddell for the last 4 or 5 seasons and these two were never up to standard. Maybe playing McCrone at 9 and Williams partnering Campese in the halves would be good for the Raiders. If Berrigan and Buttriss wear the no. 9, we will finish the same as we did last year or maybe lower. We have depth, speed and skills in the Backline. Decent havles and big forwards. But, as for no.9...........................(shrugs).

2013-02-21T04:02:06+00:00

Edward Kelly

Guest


The Raiders have a two year cycle. In year 1 they are picked by everyone to be in the finals and they end up getting the wooden spoon. In year 2 no-one picks them and they make the finals. Last year was a year 2 so this year the Raiders are in year 1, so expect nothing.

2013-02-21T01:41:38+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


The last few years have all felt like this could be the big one for the Raiders. Their top strength team looks pretty impressive. Take Campo out for the past two seasons and they have plenty of excuses. Take the No 1 player out of any team and it's a bit much to expect them win the comp. Campo staying on the park will be crucial as will the decision as to who will partner him. McCrone stepped up last year but overall I think I prefer Sam WiIlliams. The Raiders don't want to be chopping and changing. If I was a rival coach and needed a fullback I'd be making a big play for Reece Robinson. He's a good winger but wasted out there. He's an outstanding No 1and from memory the Raiders were more successful when he played fullback than Dugan. I like the way they play and wouldn't mind seeing them have a big season.

Read more at The Roar